Session 6 December 2025

[RedFox]

I personally think none of the rules people think of apply to me really. I was still a virgin at 35 after my wedding night because we couldn't figure out how to work it. Eventually it became apparent she had to work on it and get it in before I lost it hardness-wise
and I had to even then rely on her to tell me if I lost it. To orgasm I had to play a fantasy in my mind essentially like I was still going solo like I had to until 35. Just looking at girls was better really.

If things are not working as they should, I suggest seeing a doctor who specialises in these issues.
Maybe get your testosterone and circulation checked? Poor circulation (I.e. heart disease) can first appear as an inability to get or maintain an erection.
Excess masturbation can desensitise the nerves in that region, and I believe certain other medical conditions can damage the nerves (viral infections, diabetes etc).
Then you have trauma and programming that could mean „you’re not in the mood“.

Lastly - did you ever feel any spark of sexual attraction? If so, there are things you can work on together here.
For example knowing each others love languages. If you are visual, then perhaps she can wear something you both agree upon?
Maybe she is doing something you do not like?

The point is, it may be „normal“ for you - but it’s not normal, and suggests their is something wrong.
Have you read the romance novels? As an archetype they are good for working out what is actually normal.

 

[Julius]

Yeah, you’re correct. it’s just conditioning to think that a man will only receive pleasure and fulfilment from sexual engagement if ‘the job is completed’.
I understand a man can climax without ejaculating, wouldn’t that be a worthwhile avenue to explore?

My attitude and opinion has changed since I gleaned a little insight on this topic, I no longer feel pity, I see the awakened and awakening men who come across this information invigorated by this awareness to take back their masculinity.

This graph illustrates what I personally feel to be true. Remind you that science acknowledges that after 7 days without releasing a man testosterone peaks. I never found longterm (>6 months) studies on the effects of retention but only anecdotal evidence of the benefits.

One very subjective effect being the luck-effect, to the point of this effect seemingly overspilling to near relatives. Is it real or just a shift in perspective?

There is something reported by many called the whole-body orgasm by man (without releasing). I have not ever experienced this. And I am fine and ok with it and very happy. It is true as you say that this is a way of bringing back masculinity especially in this hyper-sexualized and full of lies society that encorages men to be weak.

 

[John G]

If things are not working as they should, I suggest seeing a doctor who specialises in these issues.
Maybe get your testosterone and circulation checked? Poor circulation (I.e. heart disease) can first appear as an inability to get or maintain an erection.
Excess masturbation can desensitise the nerves in that region, and I believe certain other medical conditions can damage the nerves (viral infections, diabetes etc).
Then you have trauma and programming that could mean „you’re not in the mood“.

Lastly - did you ever feel any spark of sexual attraction? If so, there are things you can work on together here.
For example knowing each others love languages. If you are visual, then perhaps she can wear something you both agree upon?
Maybe she is doing something you do not like?

The point is, it may be „normal“ for you - but it’s not normal, and suggests their is something wrong.
Have you read the romance novels? As an archetype they are good for working out what is actually normal.

Being very introverted is probably the root cause. I couldn't even talk to girls in my teens and 20s so looking was the only attraction. When online showed up in my early 30s (pre-internet) I did great with attraction talking dirty online but things fell apart immediately when it became in-person. I was able to kiss all three (the third being my wife) but I had to stop the first two when we started to go all the way (it simply didn't feel right). My wife is conservative Catholic so I didn't have to worry until the wedding night. My wife has also been at least 80 pounds heavier than me so that might not have helped things geometry-wise (no one else to compare that to though).

 

[Cleo]

Thank you for the new session!

(Nienna) In previous posts, the C's have said that the Apollo mission did take men to the moon and Neil Armstrong did walk on the moon although the dates stated in the session were not quite accurate. Do the C's still say that this is true?

A: Yes

Q: (Nienna) Did the Apollo missions land on the moon with the help of secret or advanced technology?

A: No

Q: (Joe) Did the Apollo astronauts see or experience anything on their trip to and on the moon that shocked them and that they could not speak about?

A: Yes. That is the reason so much confusion has been shrouded about the topic.

Q: (L) Okay.

(Joe) What did the Apollo astronauts see?

A: Aliens and altered reality.

Q: (L) Are there things on the moon that are part of another reality that we cannot consistently see?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) So what they saw was something that is normal on the moon - that wasn't put on for their benefit?

A: Yes

Q: (L) And those people that are always seeing flashes of light on the moon, I've heard about people that train their telescope on it and they just watch it all the time. Are those flashes of light related to this altered or other reality?

A: Yes

Q: (L) All right.

I’m reminded of the X-files episode “Space.” I saw the episode over ten years ago I believe so there’s only so much I remember of it, but it has been interesting to review, in light of the above info about the Apollo missions.

From: Space (The X-Files)

Originally premiered on the Fox network on November 12, 1993, the episode centers on a series of sabotage incidents plaguing NASA's space shuttle program during a mission, prompting Mulder to theorize that an alien spirit possessing a former Gemini astronaut is responsible for the disruptions.[1] Written by series creator Chris Carter and directed by William Graham, it explores themes of extraterrestrial influence and the psychological toll of space exploration on human participants.[2]

I tried to locate more info about what inspired Chris Carter to write the episode. So far though I could only find the following two pieces of info (from the same site linked to above):

Developed early in the series' first season, the episode drew inspiration from NASA-related events, including the "Face on Mars" image captured by the Viking 1 orbiter in 1976 and the unexplained loss of the Mars Observer spacecraft in August 1993.[6]

 

[Possibility of Being]

Thank you @panoptix for your elaboration, it was helpful. There are details that I failed to find any confirmation of, but it doesn't matter. I think, I understand now where you are coming from much better than before.

 

[Juba]

Thank you, Laura, for a great session with a lot of interesting info to think about.