Session 6 December 2025

[RedFox]

I personally think none of the rules people think of apply to me really. I was still a virgin at 35 after my wedding night because we couldn't figure out how to work it. Eventually it became apparent she had to work on it and get it in before I lost it hardness-wise
and I had to even then rely on her to tell me if I lost it. To orgasm I had to play a fantasy in my mind essentially like I was still going solo like I had to until 35. Just looking at girls was better really.

If things are not working as they should, I suggest seeing a doctor who specialises in these issues.
Maybe get your testosterone and circulation checked? Poor circulation (I.e. heart disease) can first appear as an inability to get or maintain an erection.
Excess masturbation can desensitise the nerves in that region, and I believe certain other medical conditions can damage the nerves (viral infections, diabetes etc).
Then you have trauma and programming that could mean „you’re not in the mood“.

Lastly - did you ever feel any spark of sexual attraction? If so, there are things you can work on together here.
For example knowing each others love languages. If you are visual, then perhaps she can wear something you both agree upon?
Maybe she is doing something you do not like?

The point is, it may be „normal“ for you - but it’s not normal, and suggests their is something wrong.
Have you read the romance novels? As an archetype they are good for working out what is actually normal.

 

[Julius]

Yeah, you’re correct. it’s just conditioning to think that a man will only receive pleasure and fulfilment from sexual engagement if ‘the job is completed’.
I understand a man can climax without ejaculating, wouldn’t that be a worthwhile avenue to explore?

My attitude and opinion has changed since I gleaned a little insight on this topic, I no longer feel pity, I see the awakened and awakening men who come across this information invigorated by this awareness to take back their masculinity.

This graph illustrates what I personally feel to be true. Remind you that science acknowledges that after 7 days without releasing a man testosterone peaks. I never found longterm (>6 months) studies on the effects of retention but only anecdotal evidence of the benefits.

One very subjective effect being the luck-effect, to the point of this effect seemingly overspilling to near relatives. Is it real or just a shift in perspective?

There is something reported by many called the whole-body orgasm by man (without releasing). I have not ever experienced this. And I am fine and ok with it and very happy. It is true as you say that this is a way of bringing back masculinity especially in this hyper-sexualized and full of lies society that encorages men to be weak.

 

[John G]

If things are not working as they should, I suggest seeing a doctor who specialises in these issues.
Maybe get your testosterone and circulation checked? Poor circulation (I.e. heart disease) can first appear as an inability to get or maintain an erection.
Excess masturbation can desensitise the nerves in that region, and I believe certain other medical conditions can damage the nerves (viral infections, diabetes etc).
Then you have trauma and programming that could mean „you’re not in the mood“.

Lastly - did you ever feel any spark of sexual attraction? If so, there are things you can work on together here.
For example knowing each others love languages. If you are visual, then perhaps she can wear something you both agree upon?
Maybe she is doing something you do not like?

The point is, it may be „normal“ for you - but it’s not normal, and suggests their is something wrong.
Have you read the romance novels? As an archetype they are good for working out what is actually normal.

Being very introverted is probably the root cause. I couldn't even talk to girls in my teens and 20s so looking was the only attraction. When online showed up in my early 30s (pre-internet) I did great with attraction talking dirty online but things fell apart immediately when it became in-person. I was able to kiss all three (the third being my wife) but I had to stop the first two when we started to go all the way (it simply didn't feel right). My wife is conservative Catholic so I didn't have to worry until the wedding night. My wife has also been at least 80 pounds heavier than me so that might not have helped things geometry-wise (no one else to compare that to though).

 

[Cleo]

Thank you for the new session!

(Nienna) In previous posts, the C's have said that the Apollo mission did take men to the moon and Neil Armstrong did walk on the moon although the dates stated in the session were not quite accurate. Do the C's still say that this is true?

A: Yes

Q: (Nienna) Did the Apollo missions land on the moon with the help of secret or advanced technology?

A: No

Q: (Joe) Did the Apollo astronauts see or experience anything on their trip to and on the moon that shocked them and that they could not speak about?

A: Yes. That is the reason so much confusion has been shrouded about the topic.

Q: (L) Okay.

(Joe) What did the Apollo astronauts see?

A: Aliens and altered reality.

Q: (L) Are there things on the moon that are part of another reality that we cannot consistently see?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) So what they saw was something that is normal on the moon - that wasn't put on for their benefit?

A: Yes

Q: (L) And those people that are always seeing flashes of light on the moon, I've heard about people that train their telescope on it and they just watch it all the time. Are those flashes of light related to this altered or other reality?

A: Yes

Q: (L) All right.

I’m reminded of the X-files episode “Space.” I saw the episode over ten years ago I believe so there’s only so much I remember of it, but it has been interesting to review, in light of the above info about the Apollo missions.

From: Space (The X-Files)

Originally premiered on the Fox network on November 12, 1993, the episode centers on a series of sabotage incidents plaguing NASA's space shuttle program during a mission, prompting Mulder to theorize that an alien spirit possessing a former Gemini astronaut is responsible for the disruptions.[1] Written by series creator Chris Carter and directed by William Graham, it explores themes of extraterrestrial influence and the psychological toll of space exploration on human participants.[2]

I tried to locate more info about what inspired Chris Carter to write the episode. So far though I could only find the following two pieces of info (from the same site linked to above):

Developed early in the series' first season, the episode drew inspiration from NASA-related events, including the "Face on Mars" image captured by the Viking 1 orbiter in 1976 and the unexplained loss of the Mars Observer spacecraft in August 1993.[6]

 

[Possibility of Being]

Thank you @panoptix for your elaboration, it was helpful. There are details that I failed to find any confirmation of, but it doesn't matter. I think, I understand now where you are coming from much better than before.

 

[Juba]

Thank you, Laura, for a great session with a lot of interesting info to think about.

 

[Chacara]

Thank you for this interesting session!

 

[1peacelover]

Thank You All for your "energy" put forward for the session!!! Gave me a lot to think about!!!

 

[Thebull]

Thank you for another fantastic session. I want to thank you all again for all you do to shed light on so many different topics.
Personally I'd be completely in the dark without the information you've shared over the years.
Trying to remember to sit back and enjoy the show which is difficult. I feel we're going to be in for a rollercoaster of events now and throughout 2026.
Wishing everyone the very best for Christmas and the new year.

 

[T.C.]

Sex without love and deep psychic connection drains energy to 4 level STS.

It’s actually quite amazing that there’s a difference in what happens with energy if the two people having sex are in love and psychically connected.

I mean, so many dynamics and interactions in our reality are meant to drain our energy to 4D STS.

And here you have a biological practice between the sexes that can actually go either way. And the thing that determines which way it goes, is love.

It’s quite mind blowing. I think it’s easy to feel powerless and at the mercy of the lizzies. You know, they feed off us, we’re their food source and energy source. And yet, when two people are in love, then the lizzies can’t have the energy from their sex.

I guess the reason is because they cannot experience love of another, and so the energy that’s generated between the lovers is of a frequency that the lizzies are just not compatible with.

Fascinating.

 

[LVX in Tenebris]

WOW — very good and detailed response.
Thank you very much for that mate .

I read your message again and again and really liked it. I’m familiar with what the Cs say about the Illuminati and Freemasonry, but they also (in a way) talk about quorum and “Masonic rites guiding one’s life journey,” or something along those lines.

So maybe you are right. Actually, you are right. Even within Freemasonry, and even in my own lodge, there are authors who claim very similar things and present strong evidence for them.

In reality, I am more careful about Freemasonry than I may sound, and I wasn’t truly overarching it either — though perhaps I was a bit more enthusiastic than I should have been.

By the way, thank you for the knowledge you shared, especially regarding King James and the 1723 Constitutions. I had read that the Geneva Bible was removed and replaced by the King James Version, but I didn’t know that level of detail.

Lastly, thank you for the book recommendations. I will definitely read them as soon as possible (I feel like I have to).

Hey @MJF,

After reading your first document, “The Widow’s Son,” I am a bit confused about the “Lost Word” part. There were certain sections in the document—such as the idea that Hiram being killed by the assailants, not having been resurrected, and remaining dead—which are presented as a paradox or an issue within the ritual.

However, in all ritual workings of the Third Degree in the Craft, the Third Degree is about death: “observing the darkness visible” and what we refer to as the “Tomb of Transgression.” There is a reason why there is no resurrection of Hiram Abiff in the Third Degree ceremony, and also why the “Lost Word” is substituted with the Five Points of Fellowship and is not related to M…B… either.

Also, the connection of the Lost Word to Egyptian monoatomic gold (which you describe as a trap for total control, and therefore interpret the Freemasonic Lost Word as an STS trap) feels a bit like a stretch in terms of the deeper meaning of the ceremony.

Of course, I don’t think it is my place to judge or even comment critically on your valuable work, but in my humble opinion, if one reads books written by Freemasons about the meaning of the Third Degree from their own perspective—and, most importantly, researches the Holy Royal Arch Degree and how it completes the story of the Craft—I believe a different view may emerge. In particular, this may shed light on why the “Lost Word” is not related to M…B… or monoatomic gold at all, and also why Hiram had to remain dead in the tomb.

This degree also explains the meaning of the Triple Tau in Freemasonry, the theme of resurrection, the true meaning of the Lost Word, and—although it may seem trivial—the meaning of the colours you mentioned in your document (purple, crimson, and blue dyes).

Anyway, thank you again for taking the time to read my message, and I look forward to reading your next document tomorrow as well.

Regards,
LVX in Tenebris

 

[Liliea]

Thanks to Laura and Andrómeda for their energy on the board, to those who participate with questions, and to the entire forum here that publishes their interesting and enlightening responses.

I think I'll go with the phrase ‘Love gives everything’, in the sense of life force and love. If one person holds back, the other gives. They are not opposites, but complementary through empathy, physical love and unconditional love. I also see it as the truest, most natural and effective prophylactic for feeling constantly in love or for conceiving, as you can give everything consciously and physically. This requires training, a lot of willpower and discipline, as mentioned.
On the contrary, it is understandable that sexuality has been and continues to be demonised, because it is plagued by feelings of guilt and subject to social taboos based on people's prejudices. Sexuality is a great source of nourishment.
Laura is doing a great service by taking this approach because, in my opinion, there is more distortion and confusion in this area than in any other area of humanity. There is much to heal

 

[panoptix]

if one reads books written by Freemasons about the meaning of the Third Degree from their own perspective—and, most importantly, researches the Holy Royal Arch Degree and how it completes the story of the Craft—I believe a different view may emerge.

I have little questions about bibliography.

Does Albert Pike's “Morals and Dogma” give a deep, valid and complete introduction to Freemasonry? Why does it contradict Yarker's “The Arcane Schools?”

Arthur Edward Waite (1857–1942) has written “A New Encyclopedia of Freemasonry,” a big one should I say, and another book: “The Brotherhood of the Rosy Cross.” Do you know if he was in both Orders?

@Possibility of Being: In the former book, on p. xxxv of the introduction it says:

The greatest liberator of South America, leading several nations —Colombia, Venezuela, and Ecuador— was the Freemason and military genius, Simón Bolívar.

We thus enter into a curious contradiction with what I.F.H. claims about the membership of the Liberators, unless we make the bold assumption that José de San Martín was the only Rosicrucian and Bolívar the Latomi.

@LVX in Tenebris: in the latter book, with vast chapters dedicated to Alchemy, it does not name Fulcanelli, Pierre Dujols and ignores the guiding Adept behind the plural author. Could it have something to do with Canseliet's suggestion that Fulcanelli was a Knight Templar?

BTW, is it known the authorship of “A Proposal for Humbling Spain?” It was a British pamphlet wrote by a “Person of Distinction,” outlining a strategic plan for Great Britain to seize control of Buenos Aires and the Río de la Plata region to cripple Spanish power, dominate South American trade, and control the routes from Potosí, significantly weakening Spain's economic and colonial dominance.

 

[Piotrek]

Q: (L) So, I'll put it all together and make it available. But there are, like I said, there are a couple of books you can buy that have this material. They don't put so much focus on the love part, which the Cs apparently consider to be very important. They're mostly into practical aspects, or whatever. But there are a couple of books that I think are reliable. So, I'll make that available very shortly. But in the meantime, I guess from what the C's have said, people can, if they know the principle, you know, retention for the man, but not for the woman... or not normally for the woman. Under some circumstances, apparently it might be advisable, but not usually. And prolonged encounters, and prolific encounters. Because that makes it even harder. I mean, because if you have a period of time, obviously if you don't do anything for that period of time, you're not really challenging yourself. Because I think that... I don't know if you guys realize how hard it is to retain for any great period of time, and I'm really thankful that the burden is put upon the men. [laughter]

...

Q: (L) All right. I'm done. That's enough. I'll be getting the rest of the... I'm not going to put the really personal material online, but as soon as I get the general stuff online, then I'm going to put the personal stuff together, in a PDF or something, and I'll upload it in the private forum. Because Grok really collected a lot of information from different sources, and put it together. So I thought it would be useful. And of course, I've been cross-checking it. I've been reading the actual books, just to make sure Grok didn't lead us astray.

Thank you for another fantastic session!
I look forward to reading the substack and further discussions, along with finding the books.
All the best!

 

[Bernardo GA]

Funny that the film was from 1973, same year that a coup d'état on September 11, 1973, led to the death of Salvador Allende.

Thank you, Gaby, for making those connections.
Yes, coincidences are certainly almost impossible in this matter.

And I just want to add another interesting fact.
On December 10, 1948, the International Declaration of Human Rights took place.
And the evil Augusto Pinochet died on December 10, 2006.

In other words, on the same day that people were honoring and commemorating the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Pinochet died.

The universe knows how to speak to the people!

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)