Session 6 December 2025

This may be so. That is one way to look at it. But my question is; do they believe in reincarnation? I can't help but wonder if these materialists, and they do seem to be materialists, are so gung-ho on transhumanism is because they are afraid of dying because, then, they would no longer be alive to continue to reap the benefits of being in control of all of those below them. They would just be gone. And being able to continue to "live" (if that's what one wants to call it) by transferring oneself into a robotic body, or whatever they plan to do, is one way they see fit to outsmart death.
I don't know if they believe in reincarnation, but in terms of knowledge about consciousness, how they perceive it, and the technology to manipulate or understand it, they are light years ahead of us...
That's my point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MJF
I don't know if they believe in reincarnation, but in terms of knowledge about consciousness, how they perceive it, and the technology to manipulate or understand it, they are light years ahead of us...
That's my point.
I believe that you and Nienna will find many answers in the link I've provided below.

It appears that there are several Freemasons on the forum, so they will be able to assess the accuracy of that exchange.

There's also a thread about that on the forum.

 
Yes, I agree, but I also assume that the powerful residents of such international networks in the country in question must look like the majority of people there. A Caucasian or Jewish 'string-puller' in China is going to stand out as a 'foreign devil'. His 'official role' must be convincing so that he can efficiently exercise his secret role.

I completely agree.
And because of this need to go unnoticed, to have a suitable appearance so as not to attract attention and thus be able to infiltrate the very heart of a secret society, which in this case would be a Chinese secret society (possibly the Chinese Communist Party itself), and considering that the Illuminati

A: They keep their genes strictly to themselves. As a result, inbreeding has led to a decline in their numbers.

I wonder if the Illuminati need to infiltrate directly, which would be a problem for the reasons mentioned above, or if they actually use other resources, use beings raised underground for various missions on the surface, extreme mind control over members in key positions within the secret society, or anything else that solves the problem of physical appearance.
That is, domination, control, and direction of that secret society, without the need to be physically present in it.
For a reason, the Illuminati are represented by the character of the “Wizard behind the curtain.”
Perhaps we will manage to draw back that curtain at some point. It seems that our freedom is closely linked to that achievement.
 
I believe that you and Nienna will find many answers in the link I've provided below.

It appears that there are several Freemasons on the forum, so they will be able to assess the accuracy of that exchange.

There's also a thread about that on the forum.


Wasn't there a "non-recommendation" in another thread?

Not willing to discredit the content, but seems to me that there were strong opposition to the objectivity of the text.
 
@MJF I don't know - $30 billion seems not much for the worth of a family (Lee family). Am I wrong?
I think most people would consider $30 billion to be a vast sum of money but then this would not put them in the same ball park as fortunes go in comparison to say Jeff Bezos or Elon Musk. But you do have a point.

I remember reading some years ago that a group of Swiss based researchers undertook a project to determine just who controlled all the most powerful listed companies in the world. This involved trying to unravel a huge network of cross-holdings by which front companies would own shares in other large corporations. Working from memory here, I believe in the end they found that most of these large share holdings in major corporations were ultimately concentrated in the hands of a just a few individuals and families that made them fabulously wealthy in the order of trillions, not billions. If there is anything in this, it would suggest that these individuals and families were the Illuminati and it would bear out what you were saying. Incidentally, I don't think they were able to work out who these individuals and families were, unless, of course they had deemed it prudent not to say on the basis that they wanted to keep living.​
 
My own take on all this secret society stuff is that if we accept the ideas around higher densities/dimensions, advanced ancient civilisations, underground beings who can live for thousands of years, and so on, then the “game” is being played on a scale that very few people could comprehend. Largely because our lifespans are so short, we tend to hyper-focus far too much on our own time and location.

My view is that people with true power wouldn’t feel the need to wield it openly or signal that they have it, unless it was strictly necessary. What greater pleasure is there than having power while living like a common person? Isn't this the thing most superheroes follow: Superman/Clark Kent, Spider-Man/Peter Parker, and so on. Not that I'm saying such people are superheroes!

Thinking hypothetically, and assuming the above conditions are true, real power would likely be hidden in obscurity to some extent, think of the gods, or Zeus living as a beggar, that kind of thing. In the modern world, we often assume “true” power lies with families holding trillions of dollars in hidden wealth, but do the truly powerful even need that level of wealth?

I’d argue that what they really need is deep knowledge of the system’s pressure points, knowing where to apply minimal effort to achieve maximum effect. They’d need the ability to raise funds quickly if required, but otherwise, why hold vast wealth if it isn’t serving a purpose? Ultimately, true power means not being constrained by the forces that dictate how the vast majority of people live or behave.

In my mind, I don't picture such types as being the most vain, egotistical, secretly insecure, psychopathic or whatever. I picture such people as being in full control over themselves, having hidden knowledge of how things actually work at the esoteric level, knowing how to exercise such knowledge and ultimately having transcended mortality to some extent. I'd imagine they'd be master manipulaters and would know how to exercise power through others, be it individuals or whole nations. Look at Trump for example and tell me that guy can't be played like a fiddle by a group of people who know exactly what to do, look at Israel, look at things like Darwin's theory of evolution - to me all these stuff has the hallmarks of something that is exerting influence from way beyond where you'd even consider the shadows to be. Naturally, the question becomes - if it's not really about money, power, wealth or some other ego driven things, then what is it really about for such a thing, should it exist?
 
For many years now, I have had this “theory” going round and round in my head.
I don't know if this idea has been proposed here before. I don't remember reading it before.
For example, if I were an underground-Illuminati SAS, what would be the thing I would fear most?
From my point of view, it could be death. And why death?
Because that implies reincarnation, and the crux of the matter would be “where would you end up incarnated?”
My theory would be that this obsession with “lineages” is so that they can be reincarnated into the same group or family group of Illuminati.
Well, that's my idea, I don't know if it could be even remotely possible.

@MJF


This idea reminds me of this scene from the movie "Jupiter Ascending" 2015:

And here I left a message related to this "idea" I've put forward...:evil::evil:
I really enjoyed that movie. It seemed to be one of those fantasy films that was hinting at a disguised truth. BTW: I love that British actress's name "Tuppence" Middleton since her forename was once common parlance for two old pennies. Quite rare and unusual :-D.

It strikes me that the problem with reincarnation is the veil of forgetfulness. So, even if you manage to reincarnate into the same bloodline (assuming here you get the choice), you will not simply be able to pick up where you left off in your previous life, as you have to relearn things just to get to the approximate position you enjoyed in your previous life. However, the C's have suggested that for an elect few, there are persons who are able to retain their memory from one life to another, which would certainly give them a huge advantage in continuing past life projects and designs:
Q: (Barry) Who is the Consortium?

A: Term refers to idea of large body of individuals.

Q: (L) Who specifically? (Frank) Human beings?

A: Yes, and others.

Q: (Barry) Are these people who have reincarnated for lifetime after lifetime and have kept the same memory to continue the same plan?

A: Only a select few.​

Do these "select few" include high ranking members of the Illuminati I wonder?

Talking about movies and reincarnation, I see that Barnardo GA referred to The Wizard of Oz in his last post and the fact that the C's told us that in the movie the Wizard behind the curtain represented the Illuminati. Well the movie got a reference in another session, this time in connection with reincarnation matters:
Session 22 July 2000:
Q: (IT) I think that when we die and go to 5th density, that we make pacts with people in each incarnation, so when you come back, it is coming back to fulfill that pact. (LC) Yes, that is the way my line of thinking is going. But, when they asked that question, I was thinking that you have people you come back with because of closeness. Somebody may be your mother in one life, and there is a love bond, and then there are other people that you come back with because you have to resolve something to let go of that person rather than to get closer.

A: This is partially correct. But, there is more to it than this. For example, one can incarnate on various planes of existence, not just the one you perceive currently. And, one may actually reincarnate on more than one plane concurrently, if one is advanced enough to do this.

Q: (IT) You know, a psychic told me that I had two lives going on at once... (L) Are you suggesting that ...

A: Yes, we are!

Q: (L) I was thinking it, but they didn't let me finish. For the record, I was thinking that we are all part of the same soul unit here.

A: To an extent, but you may not yet understand what exactly a "soul unit" is in that sense. And of course, there is more than one sense for this as well. The "trick" that 3rd density STS life forms will learn, either prior to transition to 4th density, or at the exact juncture, is to think in absolutely limitless terms. The first and most solid step in this process is to not anticipate at all. This is most difficult for you. We understand this, but this is also why we keep reiterating this point. For example, imagine if one of your past lives is also a future life?

Q: (IT) There we have quantum tunnelling!

A: Yes.

Q: (IT) This has to do with past lives and future lives.

A: Yes.

Q: (IT) But somehow I can't put it together yet. I can't connect it.

A: You will. "All in due time, my pretty, all in due time."

Q: (L) That was a line from the Wizard of Oz! When Dorothy wanted to know where Toto was. (PC) Now, I just want to say that I think that we have all of us here travelled back in time to change the way things are now. We inserted ourselves into this time period to wake up and see what is really happening. This is 3rd density thinking, I know, but it is the only way I can describe it. We looked back on the way things happened, the way the world is now, and we have come back to change things. We have come from the future, to wake up now, because we didn't wake up before. (C) Maybe that's our "past life/future life" connection here? (PC) Right, we all agreed to insert ourselves in this time line.... (L) So, we ARE from the future... (PC) Because the world is going in this direction, and SOMETHING had to be done. That's what I see. (IT) Yes. We all decided to come back, but there was a strong possibility that we would not be able to wake up and link up. And that's why so many things happened to attempt to keep us from getting together. (PC) Not just that, things happen to keep us from waking up period! We've all been bombarded with stuff all our lives. (IT) Yes, and when we started waking up, and realized that we HAD to come together to "link" to DO whatever it is we are going to do, there has to be all kinds of things to prevent it - like Caroline's cats, even! [Laughter] (S) I would like to ask a question about synchronicity...

A: Wait a minute... someone said something a short while ago that is surprisingly close to the truth. Now just a moment... reflect please.

Q: (L) PC was saying that we have come back from the future and inserted ourselves into this timeline...

A: Yes. That is close to being totally correct!

Q: (L) In terms of reincarnation, that we were talking about a few minutes before that, we are possibly incarnations of ourselves incarnated at different levels. This just happens to be one of the levels of reality that we are occupying, but there are other selves at other levels thinking and doing other level stuff, and these other levels are perceived by us as the future...

A: Maybe for some of you, but let us not get ahead of ourselves.

If this is true for Laura and co, it may be just as true for our heavily STS orientated Illuminati friends as well and, if some of them have the benefit of remembering their past/future lives, this again would give them a huge advantage in fulfilling their current life mission.​
 
Wasn't there a "non-recommendation" in another thread?

Not willing to discredit the content, but seems to me that there were strong opposition to the objectivity of the text.

I think this is the thread they're referring to:

Session 17 August 2024

Q: (L) Oh, that's much better. Okay. I wanna talk about this alleged Illuminati insider. His name is S_ S__, but he introduced himself as “The Ruiner” by writing a blog. And, according to our AI synopsis:

He presents a narrative on the secretive operations of the so-called Illuminati, a group he claims to have been raised within. He describes his various roles from training others in telekinetic attack to teaching the operation of cloned bodies, and ultimately, disinforming a government agency about paranormal activities. His transition through these roles reflects his struggle with the moral implications of his actions and his “abundant” conscience.

(L) Okay, well, we're not going to go through that document completely, but he says, first of all, that ascending to a higher density isn't what the human experience is about. So he negates the C's on that point. And I'm not going to be asking argumentative questions like this, so don't get in an uproar here. And here he says, “I don't think that anyone doesn't have a soul, but there are certainly people who are very disconnected and running on autopilot.” But it just reflects two types of people: the transhumanist versus the organic or the natural ones. The NPCs, he says, (or what we would call OPs), are on a different frequency. They choose not to see things. He says, "I don't think it's the case of them not having a soul in the body. I think it's just that they weren't resonating. I think it's temporary." Is there any comment about that?

A: Soul smashing anyone?

Q: (L) Hmm? What does that mean?

A: Those with souls can be "smashed". Those without simply merge back in the pool.
 
Back
Top Bottom