Haiku
Jedi Master
Hello everybody, good wishes upon everyone … I wanted to do a session on words, on what they mean to us, the other-serving part of society, and how that differs for the self-serving. Today we examine the word ‘Allies’.
A plump man enters the stage from the side and makes his way over to the podium. At the podium was Bob, he was messing with some wires on the microphone. He lifted his head and stated to me, “The microphone’s dead, wire or something.” I told him I could live without it for this session, I will just speak louder so everyone can hear. Bob turned and left the stage, “I’ll have this fixed for next time,” he said as he disappeared behind a curtain.
CAN YOU HEAR ME UP THERE IN THE BACK! YES, good, I’ll get started …
I was watching the news the other day and I saw an important figurehead of a country who was discussing their partnership with another country and used the word Allies to define this other country. It was used many times in the news clip like someone was using it to make a point to someone out there. One item, I have followed both of these countries for some time now and they are anything but friends to each other. So, what is the beef here, or am I misunderstanding the usage of the term.
Now the figurehead talking was from what I would call a larger country in worldwide standing. And the other country was a lower defined one. The way the figurehead was using the term, the emotion used with it, made it seem like this term was being used in a threatening manor, at times.
In my young life I read encyclopedias and dictionaries. It was a deprived life but educational. I thought I knew material from the dictionary. The word Allies to me meant a friend, a partner, a co-worker or helper. Someone who was willing to work with you when you needed help in a situation. Even down to the guy that will drive out to help you when you are broke down on the side of the road. I thought that this meant that you are one of the good guys.
Today I am seeing this figurehead using it and I do not believe that it means the same thing, as they are using it. I rewound the news and had to watch it again.
There it was they used the term in a most unfriendly manor, right there. I paused the news.
They were using this word in an unfamiliar way almost like this other was an accessory or an accomplice in some unknown action. Maybe something to be held over the lesser that might not be acceptable behavior. I would almost say that this figurehead was kind of using it like someone who was applying force upon another. There was a pressure here and it insinuated that it would increase if the predefined course was not traveled. I kept rewinding the news story, watching it completely, must have been a dozen times.
I was not seeing things here, this figurehead was subtly presenting this force but not enough to draw in issues with others above their stature, I figured. There were allowable limits to what could be stated openly.
A week passes and another figurehead used the same term in a similar manor to someone that I would have thought would not like the statement. They didn’t and denied their alliance.
Now, when I hear Allies being stated in the news I stop and see how they are using it. I have seen this over ten times since I first saw it. I am drawn to it now, watching the news (sic) just to hear someone referencing it.
I sit back in my chair and contemplate this. Right about now I am longing for my old books of my youth. The encyclopedias were a Collier’s hard cover set that we got from the good will, hand-me-downs or discarded, I would speculate that they were published in the 1960’s. My dictionary was split into two sections, about five inches total in thickness, very warn from use. The dictionary was probably older, something from the fifties. I would love to have them still just to review past knowledge to current knowledge from internet sources. You know changes have been made, the hidden rewriting of knowledge to suit a different need.
I have to wonder if I was cherry picking the knowledge that I found in my youth, taking in only the good side of the knowledge.
I continued my research on-line. My destination was dictionary.com, I found this …
You can clearly see the events of WWI and WWII were peaks in its usage, almost defining its increased usage to these war events. But what about the early peaks in the 1800’s, what was the cause of them.
Changing world financial order is currently under American control since 1944, before that it was the English UK around 1850, before that it was the Dutch. These show in the chart but not as the major events. WWI is well defined and in the early 1800’s it is the French invasion of Russia in 1812, the war of sixth coalition ending in 1814 and the 100-day war of 1815. The major peaks were wars that look like they were control efforts, taking care of someone who was not following the order. The lesser peaks in the chart are the times of the change in the world financial order and the reserve currency. I expect that the current peak is following this same level. Kind of what I am seeing right now.
(You have to wonder just how they got the information for this chart, what defined a mention, not to mention, how did they do this two hundred years ago. I will continue, just wanted to note that to everyone.)
But clearly from this chart is that fact that usage of this word, or certain other words, really are a commitment to war, the more that they are used increases the risk of it actually happening.
So, my definition of Allies is softly accurate, but only to those that rarely use it, like us.
For those that use it, the self-serving society and those in-charge, it starts out meaning a special engagement has been made within a control structure. This then turns to force or pressure to maintain a specific direction. As pressures increase it turns to aggression and disruption which eventually leads to war for control needs or a change in the world order.
It looks like their definition has been around for more years than we can identify. The PTB or those in charge have passed this definition down throughout the centuries. Yea, they allow a cleaned-up definition, but that looks to only be so they can continue to use it for their needs. They know that we will think of it the nice way, they will continue to use it to pressure others.
Now, when I watch the news and that dignitary, politician or figurehead states this, I have to only wonder at what level are they using it as and how close to a physical altercation that they are at.
When I started this session, I had no understanding of ‘Allies’ but a simple definition, I could not have been more wrong. Other words are in-process, to be released later.
I look down and see Bob sitting in the first row, he gives a nod of approval. I pick up my things and depart the stage.
(I see Meta elbowing in on using this hall for their purpose. The Impact Will Be Real - YouTube) Haiku …
A plump man enters the stage from the side and makes his way over to the podium. At the podium was Bob, he was messing with some wires on the microphone. He lifted his head and stated to me, “The microphone’s dead, wire or something.” I told him I could live without it for this session, I will just speak louder so everyone can hear. Bob turned and left the stage, “I’ll have this fixed for next time,” he said as he disappeared behind a curtain.
CAN YOU HEAR ME UP THERE IN THE BACK! YES, good, I’ll get started …
I was watching the news the other day and I saw an important figurehead of a country who was discussing their partnership with another country and used the word Allies to define this other country. It was used many times in the news clip like someone was using it to make a point to someone out there. One item, I have followed both of these countries for some time now and they are anything but friends to each other. So, what is the beef here, or am I misunderstanding the usage of the term.
Now the figurehead talking was from what I would call a larger country in worldwide standing. And the other country was a lower defined one. The way the figurehead was using the term, the emotion used with it, made it seem like this term was being used in a threatening manor, at times.
In my young life I read encyclopedias and dictionaries. It was a deprived life but educational. I thought I knew material from the dictionary. The word Allies to me meant a friend, a partner, a co-worker or helper. Someone who was willing to work with you when you needed help in a situation. Even down to the guy that will drive out to help you when you are broke down on the side of the road. I thought that this meant that you are one of the good guys.
Today I am seeing this figurehead using it and I do not believe that it means the same thing, as they are using it. I rewound the news and had to watch it again.
There it was they used the term in a most unfriendly manor, right there. I paused the news.
They were using this word in an unfamiliar way almost like this other was an accessory or an accomplice in some unknown action. Maybe something to be held over the lesser that might not be acceptable behavior. I would almost say that this figurehead was kind of using it like someone who was applying force upon another. There was a pressure here and it insinuated that it would increase if the predefined course was not traveled. I kept rewinding the news story, watching it completely, must have been a dozen times.
I was not seeing things here, this figurehead was subtly presenting this force but not enough to draw in issues with others above their stature, I figured. There were allowable limits to what could be stated openly.
A week passes and another figurehead used the same term in a similar manor to someone that I would have thought would not like the statement. They didn’t and denied their alliance.
Now, when I hear Allies being stated in the news I stop and see how they are using it. I have seen this over ten times since I first saw it. I am drawn to it now, watching the news (sic) just to hear someone referencing it.
I sit back in my chair and contemplate this. Right about now I am longing for my old books of my youth. The encyclopedias were a Collier’s hard cover set that we got from the good will, hand-me-downs or discarded, I would speculate that they were published in the 1960’s. My dictionary was split into two sections, about five inches total in thickness, very warn from use. The dictionary was probably older, something from the fifties. I would love to have them still just to review past knowledge to current knowledge from internet sources. You know changes have been made, the hidden rewriting of knowledge to suit a different need.
I have to wonder if I was cherry picking the knowledge that I found in my youth, taking in only the good side of the knowledge.
I continued my research on-line. My destination was dictionary.com, I found this …
Allies: plural noun
- (in World War I) the powers of the Triple Entente (Great Britain, France, Russia), with the nations allied with them (Belgium, Serbia, Japan, Italy, etc., not including the United States), or, loosely, with all the nations (including the United States) allied or associated with them as opposed to the Central Powers.
- the 26 nations that fought against the Axis in World War II and, with subsequent additions, signed the charter of the United Nations in San Francisco in 1945.
- the member nations of NATO.
You can clearly see the events of WWI and WWII were peaks in its usage, almost defining its increased usage to these war events. But what about the early peaks in the 1800’s, what was the cause of them.
Changing world financial order is currently under American control since 1944, before that it was the English UK around 1850, before that it was the Dutch. These show in the chart but not as the major events. WWI is well defined and in the early 1800’s it is the French invasion of Russia in 1812, the war of sixth coalition ending in 1814 and the 100-day war of 1815. The major peaks were wars that look like they were control efforts, taking care of someone who was not following the order. The lesser peaks in the chart are the times of the change in the world financial order and the reserve currency. I expect that the current peak is following this same level. Kind of what I am seeing right now.
(You have to wonder just how they got the information for this chart, what defined a mention, not to mention, how did they do this two hundred years ago. I will continue, just wanted to note that to everyone.)
But clearly from this chart is that fact that usage of this word, or certain other words, really are a commitment to war, the more that they are used increases the risk of it actually happening.
So, my definition of Allies is softly accurate, but only to those that rarely use it, like us.
For those that use it, the self-serving society and those in-charge, it starts out meaning a special engagement has been made within a control structure. This then turns to force or pressure to maintain a specific direction. As pressures increase it turns to aggression and disruption which eventually leads to war for control needs or a change in the world order.
It looks like their definition has been around for more years than we can identify. The PTB or those in charge have passed this definition down throughout the centuries. Yea, they allow a cleaned-up definition, but that looks to only be so they can continue to use it for their needs. They know that we will think of it the nice way, they will continue to use it to pressure others.
Now, when I watch the news and that dignitary, politician or figurehead states this, I have to only wonder at what level are they using it as and how close to a physical altercation that they are at.
When I started this session, I had no understanding of ‘Allies’ but a simple definition, I could not have been more wrong. Other words are in-process, to be released later.
I look down and see Bob sitting in the first row, he gives a nod of approval. I pick up my things and depart the stage.
(I see Meta elbowing in on using this hall for their purpose. The Impact Will Be Real - YouTube) Haiku …
