Show #15: No Ordinary Inside Job: The 9/11 Psy-Ops
- Thread starter Niall
- Start date
You're welcome. :)
I had a quick go through his 71 pp. long application for UK Phonon Maser patent, but I'm definitely not advanced in physics enough to find flaws and possible errors. Anyway and FWIW, what seemed to me while checking his references was that he took others' hypotheses (or theories, at best) as a basis for his machine for facts and proofs that his machine has a solid scientific basis and all reasons to work. Also, his claims (29!) are much broader and vaguer than I came across in other similar applications. I mean, he doesn't specify 'crystals', 'superconductors' and so on, so basically he provides a framework (whatever it is worth) and claims patent rights for anything anyone can ever actually invent as a working thing. Nothing like the very specific and actually existing first room-temperature maser constructed last year, which uses a pink crystal made of pentacene cooked with p-terphenyl.
But I may be very, very off on that.
I had a quick go through his 71 pp. long application for UK Phonon Maser patent, but I'm definitely not advanced in physics enough to find flaws and possible errors. Anyway and FWIW, what seemed to me while checking his references was that he took others' hypotheses (or theories, at best) as a basis for his machine for facts and proofs that his machine has a solid scientific basis and all reasons to work. Also, his claims (29!) are much broader and vaguer than I came across in other similar applications. I mean, he doesn't specify 'crystals', 'superconductors' and so on, so basically he provides a framework (whatever it is worth) and claims patent rights for anything anyone can ever actually invent as a working thing. Nothing like the very specific and actually existing first room-temperature maser constructed last year, which uses a pink crystal made of pentacene cooked with p-terphenyl.
But I may be very, very off on that.
I have started reading Judy Wood’s book. The book looks like it want to be a textbook – heavy, glossy pages, hard cover, - about the only thing missing is problems/exercises at the end of each chapter.
In the Foreword, Eric Larsen quotes Wood:
She is implying that she is better qualified than most to interpret the 9/11 photos for what happened to the buildings based on experience with image-based lab interferometry measurements. I think this borders on the absurd.
That is like me saying that my deep involvement with antenna array interferometry based on study of antenna pattern imagery, uniquely qualifies me for study of the 9/11 WTC photos.
Towards the end of the Foreword Larsen says:
Looks like some pretty major image-building going on here.
On page 7 she says
I think most would agree with this.
On the jumpers, I think many were probably pushed out by others behind them trying to get to fresh air. Some may have had to take a running leap to avoid fire. I don’t think some “mystery force” needs to be invoked.
Part 2 of the Jenkins paper (quoted/linked above) looks to me like a “hit” piece – an authoritarian stance consisting of “breaking the laws of physics”, “can’t do”, and “we all know that …”
That’s as far as I’ve got so far – fwiw. I’ll add more as I get through Wood’s book.
In the Foreword, Eric Larsen quotes Wood:
She is implying that she is better qualified than most to interpret the 9/11 photos for what happened to the buildings based on experience with image-based lab interferometry measurements. I think this borders on the absurd.
That is like me saying that my deep involvement with antenna array interferometry based on study of antenna pattern imagery, uniquely qualifies me for study of the 9/11 WTC photos.
Towards the end of the Foreword Larsen says:
Looks like some pretty major image-building going on here.
On page 7 she says
I think most would agree with this.
On the jumpers, I think many were probably pushed out by others behind them trying to get to fresh air. Some may have had to take a running leap to avoid fire. I don’t think some “mystery force” needs to be invoked.
Part 2 of the Jenkins paper (quoted/linked above) looks to me like a “hit” piece – an authoritarian stance consisting of “breaking the laws of physics”, “can’t do”, and “we all know that …”
That’s as far as I’ve got so far – fwiw. I’ll add more as I get through Wood’s book.
Palinurus
The Living Force
Hi LQB,
While you're at it, could you please also have an eye on the Hutchison influence on Judy Wood?
I've found a quote from Ark about Hutchison in this topic: Cold-fusion demonstration a "success", over here: http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,9155.0.html
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic said:
Much obliged. :)
EDIT: spelling.
Thanks seek10 for bringing these Cs excerpts on 9/11 together. The very first one in 2001 pretty much sketches it all out:
There are other versions out there but I think this is the film being referred to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqZThMtAcVY
Regarding 'turning on the programs', the janitor who became a 'poster-boy' for the 9/11 Truth Movement and toured the world giving talks comes to mind.
Regarding missing gold, apparently around a billion dollars worth of gold went missing in and around 9/11:
Dr. Wood includes many eyewitness testimonies describing the moment they were engulfed by the 'dust cloud', which several described as like being inside a tornado or hurricane:
Paramedic Michael Delgado
Firefighter Dan Walker
Firefighter John Moribito
Back into the lobby?!
EMT Renae O'Carroll
Firefighter Michael Macko
Firefighter Todd Heaney
Photographer David Handschuh
There are several other descriptions of being 'picked up and thrown' by the 'pyroclastic cloud'. However, as Wood explains, this fast-moving dust cloud was not pyroclastic because it was not hot like a cloud of volcanic ash, otherwise people would have been incinerated. Some actually reported it to be cooler than the ambient air temperature. These people were all either at or close to the base of the Twin Towers when they came down.
What stands out for me is that, once 'picked up' by this cloud, they were braced for impact - either with the pavement or street - but it never came.
Wood's background in materials science and engineering, and access to on-site studies done in the aftermath of the event - particularly by the DELTA Group (Detection and Evaluation of Long-range Transport of Aerosols) at the University of California at Davis, which analysed particles of concrete, steel and glass that were barely the size of DNA (!) - lead her to conclude on p.335 that:
I agree with her up to that point. But then she mentions cold fusion and directed energy in the same breadth, moving from fact to speculation. Which is fine, as long as you acknowledge that this is what you are doing!
Hurricane Erin is an astonishing 'find' by Wood (chapter 18). Here was a powerful hurricane that was making a beeline for NYC, reaching maximum power and proximity around the time the Towers come down, before abruptly reversing direction and dissipating out to sea. We all remember the clear blue sky of 9/11, but Erin actually came so close that thunder was reported at all three major NYC airports and rain at two of them (JFK and La Guardia).
And it barely received mention in the media.
Then there were the recorded fluctuations in the Earth's magnetic field, with the most pronounced change taking place when the North Tower (WTC1) crumbled. This is all detailed in Chapter 19.
Evidence of 'EMP-effects' is included in Wood's book, such as eyewitness testimony that radio communications were knocked out and multiple reports of objects (particularly vehicles) spontaneously bursting into flames far away from the site. These 'flames' did not always give off heat and may more closely approximate St. Elmo's Fire plasma effects, something Wood describes in chapters 11, 13 and 20.
Wood has done excellent work bringing together studies that would otherwise have languished unnoticed. Her own analysis based on what she knows that she knows is also invaluable.
But as a hardcore scientific materialist, Wood's work was always going to be limited by her own assumptions. Her uncompromising approach to studying the WTC event on 9/11 is hampered by the fact that the ultimate truth about 9/11 - if it were known - would clearly shake up science as it's taught today - and forevermore.
I'll close this post with a passage from Molecules of Emotion by Dr. Candace Pert, the American neuroscientist and pharmacologist who discovered the opiate receptor, the cellular binding site for endorphins in the brain.
There are other versions out there but I think this is the film being referred to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqZThMtAcVY
Regarding 'turning on the programs', the janitor who became a 'poster-boy' for the 9/11 Truth Movement and toured the world giving talks comes to mind.
Regarding missing gold, apparently around a billion dollars worth of gold went missing in and around 9/11:
Dr. Wood includes many eyewitness testimonies describing the moment they were engulfed by the 'dust cloud', which several described as like being inside a tornado or hurricane:
Paramedic Michael Delgado
Firefighter Dan Walker
Firefighter John Moribito
Back into the lobby?!
EMT Renae O'Carroll
Firefighter Michael Macko
Firefighter Todd Heaney
Photographer David Handschuh
There are several other descriptions of being 'picked up and thrown' by the 'pyroclastic cloud'. However, as Wood explains, this fast-moving dust cloud was not pyroclastic because it was not hot like a cloud of volcanic ash, otherwise people would have been incinerated. Some actually reported it to be cooler than the ambient air temperature. These people were all either at or close to the base of the Twin Towers when they came down.
What stands out for me is that, once 'picked up' by this cloud, they were braced for impact - either with the pavement or street - but it never came.
Cs said:
Wood's background in materials science and engineering, and access to on-site studies done in the aftermath of the event - particularly by the DELTA Group (Detection and Evaluation of Long-range Transport of Aerosols) at the University of California at Davis, which analysed particles of concrete, steel and glass that were barely the size of DNA (!) - lead her to conclude on p.335 that:
I agree with her up to that point. But then she mentions cold fusion and directed energy in the same breadth, moving from fact to speculation. Which is fine, as long as you acknowledge that this is what you are doing!
Hurricane Erin is an astonishing 'find' by Wood (chapter 18). Here was a powerful hurricane that was making a beeline for NYC, reaching maximum power and proximity around the time the Towers come down, before abruptly reversing direction and dissipating out to sea. We all remember the clear blue sky of 9/11, but Erin actually came so close that thunder was reported at all three major NYC airports and rain at two of them (JFK and La Guardia).
And it barely received mention in the media.
Then there were the recorded fluctuations in the Earth's magnetic field, with the most pronounced change taking place when the North Tower (WTC1) crumbled. This is all detailed in Chapter 19.
Evidence of 'EMP-effects' is included in Wood's book, such as eyewitness testimony that radio communications were knocked out and multiple reports of objects (particularly vehicles) spontaneously bursting into flames far away from the site. These 'flames' did not always give off heat and may more closely approximate St. Elmo's Fire plasma effects, something Wood describes in chapters 11, 13 and 20.
Wood has done excellent work bringing together studies that would otherwise have languished unnoticed. Her own analysis based on what she knows that she knows is also invaluable.
But as a hardcore scientific materialist, Wood's work was always going to be limited by her own assumptions. Her uncompromising approach to studying the WTC event on 9/11 is hampered by the fact that the ultimate truth about 9/11 - if it were known - would clearly shake up science as it's taught today - and forevermore.
I'll close this post with a passage from Molecules of Emotion by Dr. Candace Pert, the American neuroscientist and pharmacologist who discovered the opiate receptor, the cellular binding site for endorphins in the brain.
Kniall said:
And this is where the Tesla tech comes in. I have thought of Tesla as pioneering the use/collection of energy a la the electric universe variety (as opposed to the zero point "free energy"), and its wireless, lossless transmission. This might bring in the role of the hurricane as an energy sink and help explain some of the bizarre effects observed.
An engineer I used to work with has recently demonstrated in the lab, lossless EM power transmission at about 2MHz. He is using "Tesla coils".
Kniall said:
The above comment from Kniall re Rodriguez, and indeed the whole High Strangeness brought out in this thread, brought to mind one of the many reported instances surrounding 9-11 'hero of the hour', namely that:
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/931/331/Exclusive:_Last_Man_Out_Makes_Shocking_9_11_Disclosure.html
One particularly bizarre incident snapped into focus, one that was so frightening he recalls it made his “hair stand up.”
A few weeks prior to the attacks, he was working in a stairwell on the 34th floor, which he knew to be completely vacant. Suddenly, he heard the strangest sound—one he’d never heard inside the tower in his nearly twenty years there.
It was a powerful, ominous, “rumbling” sound of something extremely heavy being rolled about. It sounded like a “huge metal dumpster on steel wheels, containing something extremely heavy—tons—being rolled around” a floor that he knew to have been totally empty—devoid even of furniture.
Yet, Rodriguez categorically maintains there was “someone” on that floor moving some monstrous contraption about.
Oddly, he admits to having been gripped by intense fear at the time, but he was having difficulty verbalizing to me the exact nature of his apprehension. While this didn’t strike me as having been a particularly inauspicious occurrence, it was clear he had been deeply affected by it. He immediately reported the incident to the main office, but was reassured it was a vacant floor.
Rodriguez was emphatic that he felt so frightened by this incident he didn’t dare open the door to look inside because he literally feared for his life.
He intuitively sensed grave danger behind that door, and did his best to avoid the 34th floor thereafter.
[NB: It is worth considering that long-term occupancy (and thus control) of a whole floor would have granted occupants virtually unlimited and unobstructed access from all sides to the entire 47-column central core of the tower via the elevator shafts. By sequentially disabling individual elevators for ‘servicing,’ the occupants would have had clear access to the entire 1,350-ft central load-bearing core—from the topmost floor right down the 6th level basement sitting on bedrock.]
Willy does not strike me as a man who can be frightened very easily, and this one anecdote has always intrigued me. The emotions I saw in his eyes, and his body language as he was describing the event were real. I was left with no doubt that what he experienced that day was extremely frightening and deeply impressionable’.
If any of the above is true, it does hint at the possibility of something going on in the building prior to 9-11 and perhaps with some suggestion of possible 4th Density STS involvement (although reading the C’s comments above, one might interpret them as suggesting that 4th Density STS joined in during the event ‘for the ride’, even if being the unseen instigators from the get go). Ever since reading the noted article the section above has stuck in my mind as having the hint of truth about it (perhaps for being so outlandish, and hence something not worth!)
More on Wood's book:
Fig 41 on pg 48 shows how tension rods to bedrock were used to support the Bathtub until the subfloors were poured against the walls of the Bathtub (in some areas). Permanent support was provided by the subfloors (see Fig 43). Wood points out that these subfloors, undamaged for the most part, continued to support the Bathtub against caving in to the Hudson. Had they caved, water would have flooded the NJ tunnels and the subway tunnels (on the east side) - creating major problems.
What comes to mind is that the planners of 9/11 also planned eventual rebuilding and continued use of the site - so they would have had much interest in demolishing the WTCs in such a way that kept the Bathtub intact. It would appear that they succeeded if this was the plan. IMO, Wood goes to lengths to avoid this observation (maybe it comes later?)
On the seismology, Fig 60 on pg 67 shows the responses from the Palisades sensor for the impacts and collapses - measured data taken at 40Hz and bandpass filtered to .5-6Hz. They are referred to as "displacement amplitude spectra". I don't know if this is seismology lingo, but a time waveform is not a spectrum. The frequency spectrum is obtained by the Fourier transform of the time samples.
Wood then tries to compare one of the collapse waveforms to a comparable (M2.4) earthquake measurement from the same facility (see Fig 64(a) on pg 67). No mention is made of the relative sample rates and filtering. It looks like the filtering applied is different between these waveforms - and if it is, then the comparison is not valid. If you really wanted to compare these two seismic measurements, a good approach would be to start with the unfiltered waveforms and transform to frequency via Fourier transform. Comparing the resulting spectra might be much more revealing - apples are compared with apples.
At best, this seismology analysis is just plain shoddy, and at worst, completely wrong.
Fig 41 on pg 48 shows how tension rods to bedrock were used to support the Bathtub until the subfloors were poured against the walls of the Bathtub (in some areas). Permanent support was provided by the subfloors (see Fig 43). Wood points out that these subfloors, undamaged for the most part, continued to support the Bathtub against caving in to the Hudson. Had they caved, water would have flooded the NJ tunnels and the subway tunnels (on the east side) - creating major problems.
What comes to mind is that the planners of 9/11 also planned eventual rebuilding and continued use of the site - so they would have had much interest in demolishing the WTCs in such a way that kept the Bathtub intact. It would appear that they succeeded if this was the plan. IMO, Wood goes to lengths to avoid this observation (maybe it comes later?)
On the seismology, Fig 60 on pg 67 shows the responses from the Palisades sensor for the impacts and collapses - measured data taken at 40Hz and bandpass filtered to .5-6Hz. They are referred to as "displacement amplitude spectra". I don't know if this is seismology lingo, but a time waveform is not a spectrum. The frequency spectrum is obtained by the Fourier transform of the time samples.
Wood then tries to compare one of the collapse waveforms to a comparable (M2.4) earthquake measurement from the same facility (see Fig 64(a) on pg 67). No mention is made of the relative sample rates and filtering. It looks like the filtering applied is different between these waveforms - and if it is, then the comparison is not valid. If you really wanted to compare these two seismic measurements, a good approach would be to start with the unfiltered waveforms and transform to frequency via Fourier transform. Comparing the resulting spectra might be much more revealing - apples are compared with apples.
At best, this seismology analysis is just plain shoddy, and at worst, completely wrong.
LQB said:
Maybe they didn't want Manhattan to flood because it would be harder to manage the crime scene?
I don't think Wood was trying to avoid anything here. My impression was that she made a detailed case about the intact bathtub to contrast it with the 'dustified' Towers. What I took from it was that if the Towers collapsed as we're told they did, the in-pouring Hudson River should have devastated most of Lower Manhattan.
LQB said:
Very interesting. I wonder what, if anything, was being fudged here? Wood implies at the beginning of the book that she doesn't believe two Boeings crashed into the Towers. Perhaps the seismology data was contaminated or shoddily handled somewhere on its way to or through Wood to give fuel to the No Planes theory?
Kniall said:
Yes, her point comes through very clear and repeated often. I just thought it strange that she did not strengthen it by noting that the controlled "whatever" left much undamaged - possibly intentionally.
Kniall said:
Not sure about that because the waveform comparisons are for the collapse - but yes, games could certainly have been played with the raw data. My first impression from the comparison was that she was trying to show that a falling heavy dust cloud would result in a "softer" seismic response. But in a scientific paper or book, you simply do not present a comparison like that without stating exactly where those plots came from (like sensor, sample rates, filters, windows, filter shape, etc).
LQB said:
Seismic comparisons for the Jan 17 2001 earthquake and WTC 1/2 collapse are presented in Figs 65-66 for 3min and 50 sec time spans. In Fig 65, compare the quiescent levels prior to the events. This noise level prior to the earthquake is twice the level prior to the WTC events. Why is that? The same thing is evident in Fig 66.
On pg 70, Wood provides a description of the data as a cut/paste from a columbia.edu readme file. This gives the impression that she merely "ordered" the data from Columbia and re-plotted it for the book. In this cut/paste it says the data sample rate is 80 Hz. But the caption in Fig 60 states that the sample rate is 40Hz with bandpass filter applied.
If you are serious about doing this kind of analysis, you first acquire the RAW data from the sensors with no post-processing. You then proceed with your own post-processing (resampling, filtering, etc) in such a way that you can describe exactly what you did so others can reproduce your results. (I've been down this road many times with sensors of many kinds).
Wood's data may be correct in the end - it does make intuitive sense. But her description of the data inspires very little confidence that it indeed valid and correct.
