Prison wardens and prison officials take a dim view these days of the rehabilitation potential of major criminals. We who are involved in neurofeedback, however, know that diminished emotional capacities such as the lack of empathy or the capacity for remorse, are software issues in the brain that are perfectly susceptible to remediation at any age. This may not be sufficient to allow the release of a leader of the Arian Brotherhood back into the wild, but it might very well be sufficient to give Michael Vick a genuine sense of remorse about what he was involved in. Most criminals are released back into society sooner or later. Better that they be reinforced in their emotional capacities before that happens, for whatever that may be worth.
[...]
It had always mystified me why the utilization of neurofeedback wasn’t extended to the entire patient population at CRI-Help after that successful study. It turns out that the study never succeeded in altering the belief system of those who work there, despite the solid evidence. Addiction continues to be seen as primarily a moral and character issue. If patients come in with ADHD or panic or other conditions, then they are referred for neurofeedback. For plain old addiction, they get the standard CRI-Help treatment. So, technology transfer is tough, and old belief systems are tenacious.
The California Prison Crisis
The financial crisis in California is a manufactured one, but by now it is real enough. Finally, a Federal judge ordered the State to relieve prison over-crowding, so wholesale early release of inmates is being planned in response. If that occurs, non-violent offenders will be favored, and these tend to be either drug users or those involved in the drug trade. Would it not be nice if all of those could get the benefit of neurofeedback before they were released? The recidivism rate in California is running at 70% here these days, so early release will mostly result in cost-shifting to other parts of the criminal justice system that have to deal with the fallout—re-apprehension, retrial, and recommitment—with a predictable net increase in cost to the society overall. The solution to all of this is standing by.
Siegfried Othmer, Ph.D.