Show #55: Is World War 3 Imminent? Russia Vs USA, Sinkholes and Weird Weather

Joe

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
Sunday March 2nd, 2014

Show #55: Is World War 3 Imminent? Russia Vs USA, Sinkholes and Weird Weather

This week we'll be, once again, discussing the situation in Ukraine but this time in the context of international politics and if the pathocrats really are insane enough to push the world to the brink of all-out war.

Ukraine's population is split, roughly 50/50, between those who are "pro EU/US" and those who are "pro Russia". The recent "revolution" and change of government in Ukraine has exacerbated political, ethnic and religious divisions (as all US-inspired provocations do, and are designed to do) among the Ukrainian people. At present, the US-backed government in Kiev and its supporters in Western Ukraine are lobbying the UN security council and NATO (the US military mainly) to "look at all ways to protect its territorial integrity." At the same time, the newly declared 'independent' parliament in the Crimean peninsula has called on Russia to protect its 'integrity'. All of which appears to shape up as the opening gambit in a possible soon to come military confrontation between the USA and Russia. So, is the real war that never came during the 'cold war' about to kick off?

We'll be giving our perspective on this interesting question. We'll also be looking at recent worldwide weather and 'environmental' anomalies and bringing you a new theory of cloud formation and its link to "global warming" and a never before heard explanation of what is causing those pesky sinkholes that have been swallowing cars and people for the past several years. We'll also be explaining why, given that there has been a stark reduction in solar activity in recent years, there have been more severe storms on the planet, when, according to official science, less solar activity should mean a quieter planet, weather-wise.

We hope you'll join us for an in-depth look at the recent goings-on on our increasingly topsy-turvey world. We're live from 2-4pm EST (8-10pm CET).
 
Looking forward to the show, as always! :)

I wonder if "April Drop Dead Date" could be related to this topic.
"April Drop Dead Date" - maybe it's just me, but it kinda sounds like some kind of war term/designation with military connotations. Don't know why, and I'm probably wrong, but since I first heard it, the first association that popped to my mind, was that it might have something to do with war, or be related to it. Maybe it's because I've had quite a few dreams that war is starting again and/or because there was a war in my country when I was very little, and perhaps some visceral memories/feelings remained.

ADDED: Well, the Cs said the following about "April Drop Dead Date": "Given the window, and developments around the corner, this question will answer itself.", so I guess we will know what it means when it becomes possible to know it.

Sorry, if it's off topic.
 
I've considered this possibility of a WWIII, and what came to mind was Joe's article JFK and the ‘F**king Crazies’. Were it not for JFK, we might already have had a WWIII by now - and this time around, there's no JFK to put a stop to the madness if things head that way. Though it remains to be seen what Putin comes up with - what he actually has in mind.

Looking forward to the show.
 
Really looking forward to this one, as well. While the chance is certainly there that things could escalate to all-out-war, I think the U.S/West doesn't really want to face a military opponent that is capable of fighting on equal terms and winning. FWIW.
 
SeekinTruth said:
Really looking forward to this one, as well. While the chance is certainly there that things could escalate to all-out-war, I think the U.S/West doesn't really want to face a military opponent that is capable of fighting on equal terms and winning. FWIW.

The Russians and the U.S./NATO are not on 'equal terms' militarily. If the Russians and U.S./NATO were to go to war, provided that the U.S./NATO refrained from occupying Russian soil, the Russian forces would be forced to withdraw their military back to their borders. The U.S./NATO has no reason, at the present time, to be concerned with being militarily defeated by the Russians. Nuclear capabilities notwithstanding, the U.S./NATO air strike capabilities would enable them to devastate Russian fuel production and economy, including foreign imports, which would would be necessary for the Russians to continue a war. The U.S./NATO Air and Naval capabilities, including those of other allied countries, are, at the present, superior to the Russians. But, that is not to say that the Russians are a second rate military, they are not. Both the U.S./NATO know that nothing will be gained by an all out war. Neither side can ever hope to take over the other one's sphere of influence and doesn't want the chaos of a power vacuum in the other one's absence. The current tension is due to overlapping spheres of influence and competing interests. If the Russians don't withdraw their military from the Ukraine, I wouldn't expect the U.S. to do much more than the equivalent of 'un-friending' Russia on its Facebook page and possibly write some pretty harsh things using all-caps and exclamation points.
 
Críostóir said:
The Russians and the U.S./NATO are not on 'equal terms' militarily. If the Russians and U.S./NATO were to go to war, provided that the U.S./NATO refrained from occupying Russian soil, the Russian forces would be forced to withdraw their military back to their borders. The U.S./NATO has no reason, at the present time, to be concerned with being militarily defeated by the Russians. Nuclear capabilities notwithstanding, the U.S./NATO air strike capabilities would enable them to devastate Russian fuel production and economy, including foreign imports, which would would be necessary for the Russians to continue a war. The U.S./NATO Air and Naval capabilities, including those of other allied countries, are, at the present, superior to the Russians. But, that is not to say that the Russians are a second rate military, they are not. Both the U.S./NATO know that nothing will be gained by an all out war. Neither side can ever hope to take over the other one's sphere of influence and doesn't want the chaos of a power vacuum in the other one's absence. The current tension is due to overlapping spheres of influence and competing interests. If the Russians don't withdraw their military from the Ukraine, I wouldn't expect the U.S. to do much more than the equivalent of 'un-friending' Russia on its Facebook page and possibly write some pretty harsh things using all-caps and exclamation points.

Well, that assumes that wars are fought and won based on what everyone normally thinks about military might, politics, strategies, and so on. It also assumes that our estimations of military might, which are based on what we think we know based on what we are told (by people who are crazy), are actually accurate.

But history has shown repeatedly that ultimately, war has very little to do with any of that. For example: Who armed/helped the Nazis? How did Germany go from a relatively small country to a nation-conquering evil superpower in such a short time?

So, to me, the question is: Just how crazy are the crazy people who run this bizarre world? Well, we know the answer to that one... But who knows what will happen.
 
Mr. Scott said:
So, to me, the question is: Just how crazy are the crazy people who run this bizarre world? Well, we know the answer to that one... But who knows what will happen.

And how crazy can they drive common people?
If the war broke out today I would likely have 99% of family and friends in Poland support EU and USA's "lawful interjection".

If the PTB are aware of how successfully they have brainwashed the general public, it's scary to admit, they could start a war, and many people would be up for it..

When in a discussion on social media I tried to broaden my good friend's picture regarding Ukrainian situation and linked her to an article about US financial support for protesters and rioters, she replied "I hope so". :headbash:

The obliviousness of people about what is going on in the world today goes back to 9/11, where most have lost their confidence in the official story, but are equally far from seriously considering alternative scenarios-and their vast implications. Likely just because of these vast implications.

With the above in mind, how hard is it to reach any level of objectivity regarding current affairs for someone in such a position.. ?

Very much looking forward to another inquisitive show.
 
I guess 9/11 is really the point that separates the wheat from the chaff.

Everybody who realizes this simple fact and is able to draw a logical connection to everything that happened all around the world after it, should find it fairly easy to not fall for the propaganda now...

But I guess that's wishfull thinking since also people who realized this humongous lie, fall for the propaganda now again from the same culprits. :headbash: It's like they can't think logically at all. Very very sad and dangerous.
 
Well, just to put it out there for what its worth, here is what I think right now:

Although, it does seem like the unrest in the Ukraine has been orchestrated by intelligence agencies, I don't think that an EU alignment is their goal, given what appears to be happening: partisan conflict. It looks to me like the unrest is, in itself, the goal and I suspect that this is to lure the Russians to act militarily. Allegorically, it is like someone is setting the Russian's porch on fire, they have to either put the fire out, or it will spread to the rest of their house. Even the U.S. missile shield plan in Eastern Europe seemed to be a provocation to lure the Russians into intervening militarily. It looks like it is someone's plan to bog the Russians down militarily.

As of right now, I suspect that the reason for this covert action in the Ukraine is because the Russians have intervened and prevented an escalation in the Middle East, and thus a war with Iran. My guess is that someone has reasoned that if the Russians are busy in their own conflict they will be less influential in Middle Eastern affairs.
 
Apparently there was just a 4.5 Earthquake in Crimea:
http://inagist.com/all/439974391380590592/

Very interesting if true...
 
There was indeed an earthquake just of the coast of Crimea:

http://www.emsc-csem.org/Earthquake/earthquake.php?id=362664&utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter#summary:

unbenannt2PBYBU.png


http://www.ceme.gsras.ru/cgi-bin/ccd_quake_tmpe.pl?dat=02-03-2014&x=10&y=6:

unbenannt22XSIBD.png


http://inagist.com/all/439974391380590592/:

unbenannt21NWFKA.png
 
Críostóir said:
... the unrest is, in itself, the goal and I suspect that this is to lure the Russians to act militarily. Allegorically, it is like someone is setting the Russian's porch on fire, they have to either put the fire out, or it will spread to the rest of their house. Even the U.S. missile shield plan in Eastern Europe seemed to be a provocation to lure the Russians into intervening militarily. It looks like it is someone's plan to bog the Russians down militarily.

As of right now, I suspect that the reason for this covert action in the Ukraine is because the Russians have intervened and prevented an escalation in the Middle East, and thus a war with Iran. My guess is that someone has reasoned that if the Russians are busy in their own conflict they will be less influential in Middle Eastern affairs.

True, the plan seems the same, if we can't control it ourselves, create chaos so no one else can. Pretty basic mindset for a selfish mind. The part about keeping the Russians busy is used in politics all the time here in the USofA... you tell lies about your opponent to keep them busy clearing their name, it keeps them on the defensive and puts a negative view in the mind of the masses, which is your goal, as once a negative view is set, it's hard to get people to change it... they simply aren't concerned enough about the truth.

I don't think the plans were to bog down the Russians militarily, as the NWO set has pretty much gotten their way for so long without much complaint or protest that hasn't been easily defeated and made to look bad, such as Occupy WallStreet... which used old 60s style policies of camping out etc... they should have dressed and appeared as workers of Wall Street, wouldn't the tv image be much different? Then it would look like the cops were against 'us'... the viewers, the electorate etc. But that was a lesson for that crowd... think before you act... times change, adapt or die.

I don't think the Russian response in the ME is any different, as the policy towards Russia is the same as always, fake revolution and utilization of local oligarchs under your patronship.... there are always some greedy locals willing to play game with the imperial set, same throughout history... and for the empire, local sponsorship is best until it's no longer needed... once the local masses have been conditioned to your worship and rule. This Kiev gambit seems just another attempt at the same game. They keep doing the same thing everytime, so it gets easier and easier to spot. If I had to complain about Putin, it would be that he hasn't educated his people about these things that I know of... the NGO thing, which is usually some Western intel agency in charge, same with the media, business, even some of the 'arts' etc. He definitely has learned to keep silent like a poker player. The only problem with that is that this game involves the audience and not just those players placed around the poker table.

In the end, it is a numbers game, and the NWO crowd will continue playing the same game until something stops them.... they are so mechanical, programmed, thinking seems anathema to their being... Mindlessness, not brain dead... the brain is programmed and performing as desired. The only anger seems to be like a spoiled child that is used to getting its way. A temper tantrum could erupt by the politico puppets and the militaries might need to step in to safeguard their state.
 
If there is already a one world government... then surely the whole Russia vs US/EU thing is just for show? To what end though?

Is it not Russia who as recently as last year were saying that comet streaks in the sky over russia were in fact missile tests? Does this not mean they are also in the game of hiding the truth?

But hey, there are all sorts ofgroups and divisions in the corridors of power... whatever game they are playing, it seems to be of their own making and us the normal people just happen to be the pawns on the chessboard.

The whole situation in Ukraine just seems to be theatre, one in which a country gets sacrificed for some as yet unknown ends...

I personally don't think WW3 will ever happen, for the simple reason, people will say, whatever the dispute, it is not worth it. The psychos can try but the normal people have seen enough of war to know it just aint worth it, especially if the government comes knocking to get every able bodied person on the battlefield. What are they going to do? Arrest everyone?... Alternatively, they can have their high tech wars with us, us the spectators.
 
The problem with the term "world war" is that people imagine the same type of war as in the 1940's. Today the technology is different, the means of mass manipulation are different, and therefore the way to wage a war is different. We can safely consider that we are already in a world war, especially after 911. But because we still have those old black and white images from the last century, we are not able to recognize this one. OSIT
 
Thank you SoTT Talk crew - so many darn fronts to all these events you speak of in our days for people to grasp.
 
Back
Top Bottom