Show #55: Is World War 3 Imminent? Russia Vs USA, Sinkholes and Weird Weather

I think this is the author and paper Pierre mentioned:

http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_17_1_freund.pdf
 
Regarding the fires and the C's possibly giving an explanation...tried to look for it, but couldn't find it. Maybe there is some confusion with cases of sudden lightning in the clear sky? There was a case of a little girl that died this way. That's when the C's gave the answer that it was a weapon testing.

But maybe they also talked about fires? Several years ago there were some additional cases that had to do with fire. Like the story about a boy from Colorado Springs and his shoe that melted. It was posted on SOTT, but couldn't find the article. Here it is:

_http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_9470287

An 8-year-old boy out walking with family members in Colorado Springs severely burned part of his foot on an underground patch of burning coal dust that had heated the ground to 800 degrees Fahrenheit.[...]

The fine "coal spoil" dust may have been discarded from a nearby mine decades ago and has mixed with soil and vegetation over the years. It appears to have spontaneously caught fire, said Al Amundson, an engineer with the Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety...

As for Sicily, in 2011 there was this strange case:
http://www.sott.net/article/230028-Italy-Clocks-in-Sicily-Mysteriously-Jump-Ahead
 
Thank you Sott team for such an enlightening show! :D

It's wonderful that these matters are being discussed because there is so much lies and disinformation surrounding them which are, in some people's minds, carved in stone.

The HAARP reaction to the Black Sea earthquake, as an example, was quickly latched onto as a possible explanation.

mkrnhr said:
The problem with the term "world war" is that people imagine the same type of war as in the 1940's. Today the technology is different, the means of mass manipulation are different, and therefore the way to wage a war is different. We can safely consider that we are already in a world war, especially after 911. But because we still have those old black and white images from the last century, we are not able to recognize this one. OSIT

Could a similar thing have happened during WWII? That people thought they weren't going to end up in a war or weren't already in one. I don't think official history would have written down the Nazi invasion truthfully, as it happened.
 
Pashalis said:
There was indeed an earthquake just of the coast of Crimea:

http://www.emsc-csem.org/Earthquake/earthquake.php?id=362664&utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter#summary:

unbenannt2PBYBU.png


http://www.ceme.gsras.ru/cgi-bin/ccd_quake_tmpe.pl?dat=02-03-2014&x=10&y=6:

unbenannt22XSIBD.png


http://inagist.com/all/439974391380590592/:

unbenannt21NWFKA.png

As far as I can see this earthquake was actually happening earlier today, in the morning at 05:34 local time...
 
SMM said:
Could a similar thing have happened during WWII? That people thought they weren't going to end up in a war or weren't already in one. I don't think official history would have written down the Nazi invasion truthfully, as it happened.
Maybe those who know that period can comment further, but I think lots of people were in a self-calming denial (thinking that it would never come to them), probably believing that progress and technological civilization was synonymous of virtue.
 
luke wilson said:
If there is already a one world government... then surely the whole Russia vs US/EU thing is just for show? To what end though?

There are benefits to the manufactured Ukraine debacle and the sabre-rattling over Russia that go beyond mere geopolitical strategy and accrual of wealth in the form of opening up a country’s internal market to predatory capitalism.

The American elite has thrived over the past 70 years because they had an ‘arch enemy’ that they could to present to the public. Having an enemy to fight against does two main things aside from actually fighting against him: it keeps the public afraid and therefore in thrall to ‘authority’ to keep them safe, i.e. it safeguards the rule of the elite over the people;

it invigorates the war industry on the basis of that fear through the production of the tools of war that generate massive profits for defence contractors and their political friends who pass through that revolving door between highly paid government positions and the highly paid positions that government creates through funding defence contractors.
 
4 things are worth mentioning, I think :

- China has to be integrated into the equation. In case of open conflict between the US and Russia, China would certainly back up Russia. Then what do we have here ? A military giant and an economic giant joining their forces. Who can be mad enough to challenge them ?

- Israel’s will. If there is really a plan to expand its borders from the Nile to the Euphrates and create the “Grand Israel”, then a generalized chaos is an opportunity. The rabbi Ron Chaya explains it with the fighting cocks parable. The video is in French so I’m gonna sum it up: “ Rabbi : Tell all your lords that in 3 days, we’ll make our cocks fight. I’ll bring my own one and win. Fine. Everyone brings his strongest animal, powerful, cruel… The rabbi comes with a small one, afraid, not looking ready for a fight at all. All the cocks are thrown in the arena and start fighting, the fight is terrible, but the small one hides in a corner. At the end of the fight, all the cocks are dead except the small one, alive.”
_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xp-XfFbFzNc

- The US is bankrupt and does not have the money to wage a large-scale war. Janet Yellen (FED governor) is reducing the quantitative easings, not increasing them. The actions undertaken in Venezuela, Syria and Ukraine appear to me as low-cost wars.

- The general bankruptcy of western countries.

All of this to say that on a purely military basis, I do not believe in a 3rd world war, at least not in the current conditions. If there are only psychopaths or/and zionists at the US military headquarter, then fine, but is it the case ? I do not think so because otherwise WW3 would have started earlier, like at the end of 2012 with an attack against Iran (that Israel demands). Are the US high level officers not mainly WASPs ?

On the other hand, war is a good solution to solve the western bankruptcy. Another solution is to Cyprus our accounts (I bet on this one).

mkrnhr said:
The problem with the term "world war" is that people imagine the same type of war as in the 1940's. Today the technology is different, the means of mass manipulation are different, and therefore the way to wage a war is different. We can safely consider that we are already in a world war, especially after 911. But because we still have those old black and white images from the last century, we are not able to recognize this one. OSIT

I agree. I would add that it is as Marx said, that capitalism would trigger the war of everyone against everyone. Cannot we see it with mass unemployment and poverty ?
 
voyageur said:
Thank you SoTT Talk crew - so many darn fronts to all these events you speak of in our days for people to grasp.

Yes thank you, and a great service with such truly qualified commentary on the bigger picture.

Pierre carried on his facebook page the other day an image which helped me understand the cosmic ray and cloud cover dynamic he was on to in this episode, so for others who need a graphic to better understand:
1960988_727931720574749_1360509766_o.jpg

When solar activity decreases, solar winds (low energy cosmic rays) decrease, but also the Sun’s magnetic shield weakens allowing a greater amount of high energy cosmic rays to enter the Solar system and ultimately our planet.

When reaching the Earth’s atmosphere, the primary cosmic rays are virtually all brought to a halt , they combine and interact with the atmosphere particles leading to swiftly moving particles called “secondary cosmic rays”. This particle mayhem occurring between 15 and 25 km above our heads leads to only one kind of particle that is able to reach the Earth’s surface in large number and without substantial loss of energy: muons.

Muons are exactly like electrons except for their mass, they are 200 times heavier than electrons. Muons have an extremely short live and they quickly transform into electrons. But, because of their very high speed muons have enough time to go deep into our atmosphere and spread electrons along their whole atmospheric journey.

In the drawing we can see from top to bottom how cosmic rays (yellow arrow) generate (via muons) electrons (red circles). Electrons accelerate the formation of clusters (turquoise blue circles) made of positively charged molecules in suspension in the atmosphere like clay dust, carbon, sulfur dioxide (green circles) eventually leading to stable and electrically neutral clusters (blue circles) which act as condensation nuclei (dark blue circle) around which water droplet can form.

This directly leads to an increase in cloudiness. And, overall , clouds have a strong cooling effect: if nothing else changed removing the cloud canopy would increase the Earth’s surface temperature by about 10° Celsius .

The above depicts one of the processes through which reduced solar activity leads to global cooling: a weaker solar activity increase the incoming high energy cosmic rays that in turn increase, via atmospheric electrons, the cloudiness which is a major cooler.
 
Excellent show, as usual.
My Sundays are now organized around your broadcasts: "Nobody bother Daddy from 11AM TO 1PM!"
THANK YOU!
 
Just got done listening to this show a couple of hours ago. Thanks for another great show! I hope more people will be able to spot all the lies and "the pot calling the kettle black" of the Ukraine situation - as well as understanding the cosmic changes.
 
luke wilson said:
If there is already a one world government... then surely the whole Russia vs US/EU thing is just for show? To what end though?

I wouldn't be so sure that the existence of one world gov't out rules the possibility of a war.
Things could be for show, as much as they could lead up to a real war. The world is already overpopulated, the crisis is reaching everywhere at this point. If the elites are dreaming of a one world government with a subdued and reduced population of peasants, a war could well do it for them. They would easily survive it, especially because they are a shadow government, so no one knows who they are really, not that much people know they existat all.

luke wilson said:
I personally don't think WW3 will ever happen, for the simple reason, people will say, whatever the dispute, it is not worth it. The psychos can try but the normal people have seen enough of war to know it just aint worth it, especially if the government comes knocking to get every able bodied person on the battlefield. What are they going to do? Arrest everyone?... Alternatively, they can have their high tech wars with us, us the spectators.

The problem here, I think, is that it was the same way at least after WW1, everyone said "never, ever again".
People never want the war, but it still can be considered necessary, I mentioned people in Poland that i know, who would likely think it was necessary if the war broke out now.

Hermann Goering's quote from the Nuremberg Trials sums up quite well how this is done:
Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY.

This is already happening with all european media talking about Russian invasion in Ukraine, calling it war already..

Shinzenbi said:
- China has to be integrated into the equation. In case of open conflict between the US and Russia, China would certainly back up Russia. Then what do we have here ? A military giant and an economic giant joining their forces. Who can be mad enough to challenge them ?
(...)

That's indeed an important part of the equation, and the only at this point that could prevent the hell breaking loose- On this basis people would, in fact, assume that it's not worth it.

Shinzenbi said:
On the other hand, war is a good solution to solve the western bankruptcy. Another solution is to Cyprus our accounts (I bet on this one).
Does one possibility out rule the other?
I lack the specific knowledge to tell, it is an open question..
But it wasn't it always the recession and crisis that invited war? whenever people were miserable and looked for scapegoats..

I would like to think that war isn't an option too, but it never seemed to be and they did still break out.

More parts of the equation can be also considered, the ones under the political and economical surfaces; like the what is, in fact directing the secret government and other powerful people? I think, one possibility is being discussed in the "Stargate Conspiracy" by Lynn Picknett and Clive Prince.
(synopsis: _http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/stargate/stargate07a.htm)

Laura also mentioned, especially in earlier podcasts, the fundamentally Christian elites in America, who believe that if they break out a war, the Messiah will finally come and do the final judgement, etc..

I wouldn't be so sure about the level of cold calculations carried out regarding this world situation with such a shady foundation of people underneath these affairs. They certainly have to deal with some level of logic, as they aren't completely alone "up there", but then again, Hermann Goering quote comes back to mind, and so on.

It's a very thick plot..
 
mkrnhr said:
SMM said:
Could a similar thing have happened during WWII? That people thought they weren't going to end up in a war or weren't already in one. I don't think official history would have written down the Nazi invasion truthfully, as it happened.
Maybe those who know that period can comment further, but I think lots of people were in a self-calming denial (thinking that it would never come to them), probably believing that progress and technological civilization was synonymous of virtue.

Sebastian Haffner who wrote 'Defying Hitler' had this to say:

There are few things as comic as the calm, superior indifference with which I and those like me watched the beginnings of the Nazi revolution in Germany, as if from a box at the theatre. It was, after all, a movement with the declared intention of doing away with us. Perhaps, the only comparably comic thing is the way that now, years later, Europe is permitting itself exactly the same indifferent attitude, as though it were a superior, amused onlooker, while the Nazis are already setting it alight at all four corners.

Laura mentioned it in another thread, but according to Sebastian Haffner the Germans suffered a nervous breakdown. Maybe this also happened/is happening to other nations? Just speculating.

The sequence of events is, as you see, not so unnatural. It is wholly within the normal range of psychology, and it helps to explain the almost inexplicable. The only thing that is missing is what in animals is called 'breeding'. This is a solid inner kernel that cannot be shaken by external pressures and forces, something noble and steely, a reserve of pride, principle and dignity to be drawn on in the hour of trial. It is missing in the Germans. As a nation they are soft, unreliable and without backbone. That was shown in March 1933. At the moment of truth, when other nations rise spontaneously to the occasion, the Germans collectively and limply collapsed. They yielded and capitulated, and suffered a nervous breakdown.
 
Thanks guys for another excellent show! :)

With all the theatre of geo-political dramas seemingly accelerating and intensifying, it made me think of something the Cs said from 16 October 1994.

"Q: (L) what is the quorum?

A: Deeper knowledge organisation. Totally secret to your kind as of yet. Very important with regard to your future."

Well, with the scenery and props moving into place, the global stage seems set for a final show, possibly. Could it be time for some highly placed actors to read from a different script?

To be in a position of power, and thus able to make effective changes, would invariably mean adopting a similar persona or mask of the psychopathic elite. Hard to tell if Putin for example, is one of these 'sheep in wolf's clothing'.

I guess, "by their fruits ye shall known them."

Looking forward to next weeks show, another great guest. :)
 
Back
Top Bottom