melatonin said:
Im not saying we arent getting controlled, what im saying is that it isnt happening at the level where police would get involved.
Theres allsorts of secret agencies and probably incredible technology to deal with anyone thats a genuine threat, which is probably incredibly rare.
I think the awakened community has been brainwashed into thinking they are a threat for aquiring knowledge over the internet, when the 'powers at be' couldnt care less.
They are happy for people to feel like they are powerful, when its an illusion, its keeps them quiet, and is a distraction from people making real in-roads.
I never said the O.P. didnt experience something traumatic, he did, and i feel for him. I just cant see the connection with the bigger picture. It doesnt exist imo.
I understand what you are saying, but let me tell you a story that make the bigger picture a little bit more obvious.
Here in Germany, there is a man called "Michael Winkler". He have a little internet site and write daily columns on it. I like his side because of the simple layout, the style he write, his humor and his insight into political processes. Though he never read political ponerologie, his understanding of the structures are pretty close to reality. But of course, I don't agree with every word he say and some of his political opinions seems just overdrawn, but I respect him for what he stands up against.
To make a long story short, this man had written a text back in 2005 in which he showed how the numbers of the Jewish victims of the holocaust differs from source to source. He speculated, that the official number of victims is used to exert control over the political system here in Germany and also over the minds of the German population. I read that text and all he did is to weight possibility's. He was very caustically and in retrospective, his words were chosen unwise. This text isn't accessible anymore because of the following circumstances.
He was denounciated by a young man to the police because of this one text. The police classified it as subversive because of it's "potential to disrupt the public stability of the law". The point is because of his
potential! And this directly relates to what Kniall said:
Kniall said:
melatonin said:
Sounds like a rather crap experience. (Understatement).
Theres no reason to think you were being targeted though imo.
I have noticed in the self proclaimed 'awakened' community, that alot of people hate the police.
They do alot of good work aswell, and enforce alot of laws that are needed.
They do alot of dirty work, and deal with some genuinely disgusting people, so they have to take harsh measures at times.
No point walking in blowing kisses to someone who you think could be carrying is there?! :)
This is exactly the sort of paramoralistic crap that is shoved down people's throats through government, media and culture. It's no different from "we torture people because they
could be bad guys" and "the bomb
could be ticking down."
And because of that he was considered as "potential subversive", his house was stormed, his hardware confiscated and he was convicted by court. The whole story can be read here:
_:http://www.michaelwinkler.de/Pranger/040707.html
The thing is, I don't consider myself as dangerous to the system or specially targeted, but neither did he. The reasons why a person find himself in such a situation doesn't depend on rational thinking. Just have a look about what Laura and her crew have to deal with "Jean" right now. Does anyone negate the connections to the bigger picture? I mean, its obvious that she is also considered as dangerous and therefore specially targeted. And on top of it, not for the first time.
There is more than enough evidence that certain people
are considered as a potential threat and that those people are also part of the "awakened community who acquiring knowledge over the internet".
So, you can do nice and in line with the law as much as you want, but that doesn't mean that you are protected from the arbitrariness of the system itself. If they come to your door, then what? Maybe in your absence the cassiopeans were labeled as a terrorist association in your country. And maybe you are marked as a donator and therefore as a supporter of terroristic activities. Does it make sense? Well, not really, but rational thinking isn't one of they favorite tools.