While meandering thru assorted topics on the forum and articles on Sott, I ended up w/ this past article by Pierre w/ it's connection to his book, Earth Changes and the Human-Cosmic Connection:
https://www.sott.net/article/279645-Mummy-why-is-Daddy-wearing-a-dress-Daddy-why-does-Mummy-have-a-moustache#
From the article:
What are the odds that the gay rights movement has been 'evolved' to the transgender rights movement w/ exactly the same players behind it? Me thinks me smells a rat! And note that the 'everything changed' reboot was put into motion w/ President Kennedy's assassination > Johnson & Nixon - dupes & foils for the actual perps advancing their agenda.
Have to add this last bit - Pierre wrote:
"At first it aimed at stopping homophobia and discrimination" ...
So now is the aim stopping genderphobia and discrimination - I'm not even sure if that's supposed to be funny or serious. :/
I am sure that it's a rerun from the same playbook - these guys simply can't come up w/ anything new and keep using the same tactics over and over. No wonder it seems like a really bad time loop as the cold war gets resurrected along w/ race war and all the other 'pokes' to keep humanity from unifying.
https://www.sott.net/article/279645-Mummy-why-is-Daddy-wearing-a-dress-Daddy-why-does-Mummy-have-a-moustache#
From the article:
It's amazing how different the world was less than a century ago. Homosexuality existed of course, but when Grandma was a young lady, things were simpler, much simpler. In most cases, children had one mummy and one daddy, men loved women and women loved men, family members lived together under the same roof. Men were manly and women were womanly.
I guess it had been this way for centuries if not millennia and there was no reason for such fundamental and natural principles to ever change. Well that was until the 1960's and its 'revolution'. Then, pretty much everything changed.
Revolutions are rarely the spontaneous, popular, liberating movements depicted by official history. Some are organized from the beginning by a pathological clique to further its own interest at the expense of the people that they hystericize, instrumentalize, sacrifice and use as a democratic smoke screen. Some other movements start with a genuine popular insurrection to be soon infiltrated by one of the above mentioned cliques that will implement their 'counter-revolution' leading to even worse living conditions for the common people, that is, you and me. See for example the so-called 'French revolution' that was followed by the aptly named 'the Terror', one of the darkest periods of French history.
The 60's revolution is no exception. While it initially may have shown some signs of authenticity (black civil rights movement, anti-war movement) and a genuine attempt by some to establish a better society, it soon became co-opted and derailed.
The deliberate injection of massive quantities of drugs, media lies, the control of the music industry, the infiltration of activists groups, the use of violence, the rise to power of double-agent leaders soon led to results diametrically opposed to what was originally envisioned.
If there is one individual who perfectly illustrates this whole period of history and the role played by double-agent 'leaders, it is: Daniel Cohn-Bendit. Most of our U.S. readers have probably never heard of this peculiar individual, and it's a pity, because the details of his 'career' are rather edifying.
Overnight, the mediocre undergraduate student born in a rich German Ashkenazi family became the leader of the French May 68 'revolution'. While French President De Gaulle was being pressed to resign and the whole country was on the verge of a civil war, Cohn-Bendit was invited by the mainstream media to present his twisted vision of the new world.
He focused on freedom in general and sexual freedom in particular. Sexual freedom is not necessarily a bad thing, but his interpretation of the topic is rather singular and doesn't actually have much to do with freedom.
To give you an idea of Cohn Bendit's inner landscape, in his 1975 book The Great Bazaar he wrote extensively about his interest in pedophilia. A few years later while speaking on a national TV channel, in front of millions of viewers, he described in detail the 'interactions' he had had with a 5 year old girl! [Talmud anyone? She was 3 yrs and a day old after all.] Of course he blamed the victim and accused the child of taking the initiative, although he did admit some personal liability to the extent that his good looks made him irresistible to this little child! Bendit made these statements 40 years ago, yet no part of his depraved confession has ever been deemed legally actionable by French authorities.
On the contrary, during the subsequent decades Cohn-Bendit went on to occupy prominent political positions: deputy mayor of Frankfurt, party leader, founder of a European party, member of the European parliament, etc.
When the system systematically grants key political positions to such an individual, you realise how 'anti-system' the person really is.
For several years, Cohn Bendit was the leader of the Green party, which, in a nutshell, gives more importance to animals and plants than to humans [i.e. Agenda 21], supporting for example bio-fuel development: feeding cars instead of humans, drastically reducing the surface of agriculture land dedicated to food production while billions of people are already starving.
Interestingly, Cohn Bendit, leader of the 'revolution' movement in France was not even French, but German. But do nationalities really matter at this point? As Gilad Atzmon describes in his book The Wandering Who?, the 'wandering' Jews have no nationalities. Unlike the vast majority of Jews who are fully integrated into the society in which they live, the 'wandering' ones use countries as hotels, and serve only the interest and twisted psychology of an elitist [Zionist?] community. [Perhaps some 'non-wandering' Jews do the same]
Since the 1960's 'revolution', in the name of freedom, reform and progress, the very foundations of our civilization have been steadily undermined. Far from peace activism, and anti-racism, one of the main topics of this on-going transformation has been the gay rights movement.
What are the odds that the gay rights movement has been 'evolved' to the transgender rights movement w/ exactly the same players behind it? Me thinks me smells a rat! And note that the 'everything changed' reboot was put into motion w/ President Kennedy's assassination > Johnson & Nixon - dupes & foils for the actual perps advancing their agenda.
Have to add this last bit - Pierre wrote:
"At first it aimed at stopping homophobia and discrimination" ...
So now is the aim stopping genderphobia and discrimination - I'm not even sure if that's supposed to be funny or serious. :/
I am sure that it's a rerun from the same playbook - these guys simply can't come up w/ anything new and keep using the same tactics over and over. No wonder it seems like a really bad time loop as the cold war gets resurrected along w/ race war and all the other 'pokes' to keep humanity from unifying.