Stories of Covid vaccination side effects or worse

‘Intelligent and ambitious’ trainee solicitor, 26, suffered ‘excruciating’ headaches before dying from a blood clot after having Astra-Zeneca Covid vaccine, inquest hears​

By Stewart Carr For Mailonline - Published: 15:35 BST, 26 April 2022 | Updated: 12:32 BST, 27 April 2022
  • Oli Akram Hoque, 26, was given the Astra Zeneca vaccine on March 19 last year
  • Mr Hoque, of Ilford, East London, later complained of 'excruciating' headaches
  • After a seizure, a CCTV scan showed he suffered a rare blood clot from vaccine
  • His condition deteriorated and he died in hospital in Romford on April 15, 2021
Oli Akram Hoque, 26.jpg

A trainee solicitor tragically died from a rare blood clot weeks after taking the AstraZeneca Covid vaccine, an inquest heard today.

Oli Akram Hoque, 26, from Ilford, received a dose of the vaccine on March 19 last year before suffering increasingly 'excruciating' headaches.

His condition deteriorated and resulted in his death at Queen's Hospital in Romford, on April 15, 2021 - one month before his 27th birthday.

In his written statement to East London Coroners' Court, Oli's grieving dad Bablul Hoque described his son as 'bright, intelligent, and ambitious', recalling his impressive CV which included work at Arsenal FC and the Citizens Advice Bureau.

Mr Hoque said the City University graduate had taken the vaccine in Ilford, where he lived with both parents and 'subsequently complained of headaches'.

Britain's medical regulator recommended under-30s should get an alternative to the AstraZeneca vaccine in early April when it became clear that younger people were at greater risk of the clots.

A total of 79 Britons have died with blood clots thought to have been caused by the AstraZeneca vaccine after being vaccinated with it — out of around 50million doses.

The vaccine can set off a chain reaction which leads to the body confusing its own blood platelets for fragments of virus.

For reasons the scientists are still probing, the body then mistakes these platelets as a threat and produces antibodies to fight them.

The combination of the platelets and the antibodies clumping together leads to the formation of dangerous blood clots.

Mr Hoque said Oli had gone to the Urgent Treatment Centre located at the Royal London Hospital ten days before his death on April 5. However, he says he was 'discharged without proper diagnosis or investigation' with an injection to stop him being sick.

He said Oli 'requested a scan to be carried out but his request was declined'.

Later Oli had a seizure and was taken to Queen's Hospital where a CT scan identified a blood clot, he was then put on blood thinners. He later died in hospital.

Oli's only medical history was a childhood asthma diagnosis with no mention of migraines

Mr Hoque said: 'I was devastated by the news. I am unable to come to terms with the fact my son Oli is no longer with us. He was only 26-years-old and had his whole life ahead of him.

'He is dearly missed by everyone. I hope all the underlying factors will be taken into consideration. I sincerely hope every possible measure will be taken by the authorities to make sure this does not happen to anybody else in the future.'
Coroner Nadia Persaud then called Oli's sister Anika Hoque to give evidence.

Recalling the period just after the vaccination, she said: 'He did say he had some headaches but it was not anything excruciating, it was just a headache that would go away with time. But as the time went on the pain was getting worse and worse it seems.'
By April 5 Ms Hoque recalled Oli 'spent most of his time in bed'. She continued: 'I said to him a couple of times he was not himself, very quiet, the headache did not seem to be going away with medicine and painkillers.

'Then at night I said you should go to A&E. He actually agreed too. I was quite surprised so I knew it must be serious.
'I accompanied Oli to the Royal London Hospital on April 5. We arrived at the hospital and despite the excruciating headache Oli was suffering from we waited 20-30 minutes before a nurse came in and sent Oli to a different department. He was very slow.
'Incredibly, we were kept waiting for what felt like the worst few hours of my life, we kept seeing patients who were seen and immediately discharged.'

She said they were eventually seen and Oli explained he had been suffering 'severe and consistent headaches'. She added: 'Oli mentioned he had vomited blood and feels dizzy when he stands up and had never suffered headaches like this before.'
During the conversation she said the doctor asked if he had taken the vaccine and he confirmed he had taken the Astra-Zeneca vaccine 'very recently'.

Speaking to a court which included 13 lawyers acting on behalf of various health bodies, Ms Hoque said: 'I suggested the doctor carry out a head scan but he insisted this would not be necessary and gave him some co-codamol.'
Ms Hoque explained she had looked up NHS advice on headaches and was worried about her brother due to the 'sudden onset' of the headaches which she understood to be a 'red flag'.

'I trusted the doctor to know best, I trusted him in that moment,' she said.
Describing the doctor's tone as 'condescending', she added: 'At the very least he seemed to be in a rush to discharge us.'
She said: 'It brings tears and I get overwhelmed with emotions when I remember we were on our way to leave the hospital and Oli stopped and looked very confused, he did not want to leave without a proper diagnosis.'

She told the court they then went back into the doctors room and Oli was offered an injection for his sickness.
'The doctor said everything is fine and gave him the injection, he said it takes about 15 minutes to kick in then he should be fine,' she said.

Ms Hoque then recalled leaving the hospital after she said they were left on their own. However, a representative of the hospital told the court that they were told to wait.
'There was no reason for us to leave,' Ms Hoque said. 'I believe any suggestion Oli left is an oversight and attempt to mislead the coroner's hearing.'

Closing her statement, she said: 'The condition could have been diagnosed if it was given due attention. Young people of his age deserve better. I will not get my brother back. My parents have not recovered from the shock.'
The inquest continues.

The British-made AstraZeneca vaccine is thought to have saved about a million lives from Covid and was the backbone of the UK's initial rollout in early 2021, helping it to become the most vaccinated country in the West.
But concerns about clots saw its restriction in under-40s in the UK in spring and led Pfizer and Moderna's vaccines being favoured for young adults and as boosters.

It was outright banned in many European countries and the US decided not to purchase a single dose.
The first inquest into a death linked to the AstraZeneca jab was concluded in September last year.
Mother-of-two Alpa Tailor, 35, from London, suffered a stroke a week after getting the jab with symptoms including slurred speech and a facial droop. She died two weeks later.

In another case mother-of-two Michelle Barlow, from Wigan, died from blood clots 16 days after getting her first dose of the vaccine. Doctors initially mis-diagnosed her symptoms as gastroenteritis.

 
The symptoms for these two continue even now, months after their last injections. One with headaches, the other with brain fog, and it impacts their work schedules.
A quick update (seven weeks later) on my triple-jabbed, close co-coworkers. The one with persistent brain fog still complains of this weekly and sometimes stops working, trying to clear it. The other with the persistent headaches (who also rushes to get "tested" at every malady) recently decided to undergo tests, because of them, at a hospital, because they won't go away. I would expect no diagnosis from such tests. I'm most concerned for this one, who recently joined a jogging club that is pushing for runs up to ten miles. "Exertion intolerance" due to heart inflammation is the way I heard one doctor refer to the epidemic of chest pains (and worse) among professional athletes and others less than 50 years old. It's surreal to be watching these things unfold in real time among people who are utterly uninformed about jab side-effects.

It's also sickening to see B. Obama publicly shake his head and look amazed as he states that despite how safe and effective these jabs are, "20% of Americans are still unvaccinated."

I'm still seeing a far-elevated number of reports of deaths, usually no cause given, among middle-aged people on my social-media networks.
 
An Israeli study done on 700,000 people shows that double-vaccinated people are 27 times more likely than unvaccinated people to be re-infected.
This does not surprise me. I have continually heard of people (friends, work colleagues, friends of friends etc) who have developed their second covid infection despite, in many cases, being triple vaccinated. Sometimes I have conversed closely with those very same people but I have not been infected again. Despite my comments about the vaccines obviously not being effective I am continually reminded that they were never intended to stop covid - only stop people from dying of covid :huh:
 
This does not surprise me. I have continually heard of people (friends, work colleagues, friends of friends etc) who have developed their second covid infection despite, in many cases, being triple vaccinated. Sometimes I have conversed closely with those very same people but I have not been infected again. Despite my comments about the vaccines obviously not being effective I am continually reminded that they were never intended to stop covid - only stop people from dying of covid :huh:
Steve Kirsch, today Substack, says it was never possible to even tell if the vaccines would stop anybody from dying. This article from a year ago, from BMJ is one of three papers he put forward as important today. This one is quite straight-forward. For example: "If the frail elderly are not enrolled into vaccine trials in sufficient numbers to determine whether there is a reduction in cases in this population, “there can be little basis for assuming any benefit against hospitalisation or mortality,” he warns."

Covid-19 vaccine trials cannot tell us if they will save lives | BMJ
 
This video from James Corbett regarding the proposed Global Pandemic Treaty. In other words a perpetual declaration of pandemics to control the population as and when the PTB see any social unrest directed to them, a psychopathic action IMO, they can declare a pandemic anytime day of the week. Supply chains of goods locked in ports for weeks on end. Fights for toilet tissue for gods sake, what will happen when the shelves are empty, just like Soviet Russian in the 90's.


And as we have seen from the past two years, lock downs, nations in stasis and the economies tanked, only this time, will it be used as a ploy, for civil unrest regarding escalating cost of living, energy crisis, and food shortages, and mass starvation in some parts of the world.

A pertinent reminder OSIT

Kissinger: “Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people.” US strategy deliberately destroyed family farming in the US and abroad and led to 95% of all grain reserves in the world being under the control of six multinational agribusiness corporations.​

and this Quote

1651197257596.png




Food for thought, in this world that is being created at this time
 
This video from James Corbett regarding the proposed Global Pandemic Treaty. In other words a perpetual declaration of pandemics to control the population as and when the PTB see any social unrest directed to them, a psychopathic action IMO, they can declare a pandemic anytime day of the week. Supply chains of goods locked in ports for weeks on end. Fights for toilet tissue for gods sake, what will happen when the shelves are empty, just like Soviet Russian in the 90's.


And as we have seen from the past two years, lock downs, nations in stasis and the economies tanked, only this time, will it be used as a ploy, for civil unrest regarding escalating cost of living, energy crisis, and food shortages, and mass starvation in some parts of the world.

A pertinent reminder OSIT

Kissinger: “Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people.” US strategy deliberately destroyed family farming in the US and abroad and led to 95% of all grain reserves in the world being under the control of six multinational agribusiness corporations.​

and this Quote

View attachment 58192




Food for thought, in this world that is being created at this time
French Sott published a Focus with a quite substantial content on that subject on last October, if anyone reading French is interested:

Le renforcement des pouvoirs de l'OMS — Le nouveau Traité international sur les pandémies, la fin de la souveraineté des Nations et le Nouvel ordre mondial

Translation of the title: "Strengthening the powers of the WHO - The new International Treaty on Pandemics, the end of the sovereignty of nations and the New World Order".
 

BY Madhava Setty and Jennifer Smith TIME April 29, 2022

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) earlier this spring recommended women who are pregnant, recently pregnant, who are trying to become pregnant now or who might become pregnant in the future get the COVID-19 vaccine.


The CDC made the recommendation after concluding, in a Jan. 7 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, that data support the safety of COVID vaccination during pregnancy.


By comparing COVID vaccination during pregnancy to those unvaccinated during pregnancy, the agency determined COVID vaccines were not associated with preterm birth or with delivering a child who was born smaller or less developed than expected, also known as small-for-gestational-age (SGA).


In this article, we examine flaws in the CDC study that led to the agency’s wrongful conclusion that COVID vaccines are “safe” for pregnant women.


First, some background.


Including Pregnant Women in Clinical Trials​


Pregnancy is a precarious time not just for the expectant mother but most importantly the developing fetus. Expectant mothers are advised not to drink alcohol or caffeinated beverages and not to eat raw foods such as sushi and deli meats.


A lot of medications are contraindicated during pregnancy including simple pain meds like non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (Ibuprofen), antidiarrheals, decongestants, antihistamines, nasal sprays and expectorants.


Women are advised not to take these medications during pregnancy because they pose potential risks to the developing fetus.


For decades, expectant mothers have been considered a vulnerable group to be shielded from potential harms of research for the sake of their fetuses’ health.


In 1977, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued guidelines excluding pregnant women and women “with childbearing potential” from phase I and phase II clinical trials, where new drugs are tested for safety and efficacy.


This view stemmed, in part, from tragedies caused by two now-infamous drugs that were widely prescribed to pregnant women in the mid-20th century: thalidomide, which caused thousands of children around the world to be born with flipper-like limbs and other birth defects, and diethylstilbestrol, which was linked to higher rates of cancer in both mothers and the daughters born to them.


This view changed however in 1993, with the passage of the National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act, which sought to increase gender and racial diversity in clinical trials.


Federal regulations currently require any study involving pregnant women to meet 10 criteria, including that, “where scientifically appropriate,” data first be collected on pregnant animals and non-pregnant human subjects to assess risk, and that any risk to mother or fetus be “the least possible for achieving the objectives of the research.”


Reproduction Toxicity Studies in Animal Models Hinted at Dangers Early On


While the companies developing the COVID-19 vaccines have done preliminary studies in animals, their studies were limited to rodents. The vaccine makers did not conduct studies on non-human primates, recognized as the closest animal models to humans regarding genetics, physiology and behavior.


Nevertheless, Moderna’s own Assessment Report to the European Medicines Agency Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use on March 11, 2021, included a study for reproductive and developmental toxicology on female rats during gestation.


The report noted (page 50: Reproduction Toxicity) an increase in the number of fetuses with common skeletal variations of one or more rib nodules and one or more wavy ribs. Additionally, the number of pups born to vaccinated rats was lower than the number in the unvaccinated rats.


Most importantly, the authors explicitly stated, “In this study, no vaccine dose was administered during the early organogenesis [the period during embryonic development of an animal when the main body organs are formed], to address the direct embryotoxic effect of the components of the vaccine formulation.”


One month earlier, Pfizer reported in its Feb. 19, 2021, Assessment Report to the same committee that pregnant rats demonstrated a greater-than-2x increase in pre-implantation loss in exposed animals compared to controls.


The authors of the Pfizer report further stated (Page 50: Reproduction Toxicity) that “a very low incidence of gastroschisis, mouth/jaw malformations, right-sided aortic arch, and cervical vertebrae abnormalities” occurred in litters of exposed rats, and that these findings were within historical control data.


This finding brings up an important question: Why compare the incidence of these major congenital abnormalities with “historical” controls and not with the controls themselves?


As late as April 2021, the CDC still maintained there was limited data surrounding the safety of COVID vaccines for women who were pregnant or breastfeeding. The agency advised women who were pregnant or breastfeeding to consult with their physician before getting vaccinated.


But were obstetricians made aware of the potential safety signals appearing in animal models?


And how were physicians able to decide whether or not a COVID vaccine was appropriate for their pregnant patients if the CDC wasn’t offering any guidance at that time?


CDC’s Latest Study: A Closer Look at the Details​


Using data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink — a CDC vaccine safety monitoring system the public cannot access — the CDC study identified 46,079 pregnant women with live births and gestational age.


Of those, 10,064 (21.8%) received ≥1 COVID vaccine doses during pregnancy from Dec. 15, 2020, to July 22, 2021.


Nearly all (9,892, or 98.3%) of the pregnant women included in the study were vaccinated during the second or third trimester.


The authors found that among unvaccinated women, the rate of premature births was 7% compared to 4.9% in those who had received either one or both vaccine doses.


The rate of small-for-gestational-age in both vaccinated and unvaccinated mothers was equal (8.2%).


The authors thus conclude that “… receipt of COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy was not associated with increased risk for preterm birth or SGA at birth.”


5 Flaws in the CDC Analysis


On closer examination, we identified the following five deficits in the CDC study:


  • Cohorts were not well matched. There were greater than three times more African American women in the unvaccinated group than in the vaccinated group. The CDC acknowledges the African American race is a risk factor for preterm birth and may be as high as 50% greater than in white women.

There were also greater than 50% more mothers in the unvaccinated group classified as having inadequate prenatal care. Obesity, also a risk for preterm birth, was also overrepresented in the unvaccinated group (29% vs 23.9%) compared to the vaccinated.


  • No adjustment for mothers with a history of preterm birth of SGA. The authors did not address this potential confounder.
  • COVID infection, another potentially important confounder, was present in the unvaccinated group at a 25% greater incidence than in the vaccinated cohort (3.5% vs 2.8%). There was no mention of when in the pregnancy the infection was detected.Viral infections early in pregnancy are particularly deleterious to the developing fetus. This should have been an important risk factor to quantify independently, especially when establishing a risk-versus-benefit ratio of vaccination.
  • The CDC data indicate a 7.7% risk of preterm birth in mothers having received one of two vaccines. This represents a 10% greater risk than in unvaccinated pregnancies. This increased risk is not mentioned in the discussion. Moreover, the adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) in this population is given as 0.78, indicating a 22% risk reduction in preterm birth in vaccinated mothers, seemingly conflicting with the raw data. (A request for clarification from the corresponding author was not answered).
  • The most glaring deficit in the CDC analysis is the scarcity of vaccinated mothers who received a vaccine in the first trimester in this study. The risk of untoward outcomes (birth defects, miscarriages) in pregnancy is greatest during the first third of pregnancy, a time when crucial embryonic structures are developing. This is the period of time where maternal health is particularly important, and exposure to toxins, infections and certain medicines must be minimized or eliminated entirely if possible.

Only 172 of more than 10,000 (1.7%) vaccinated mothers in the study received a vaccine in the first trimester. The incidence of preterm birth and SGA were not mentioned in this small cohort because of limited numbers.


Nonetheless, the authors arrive at the stunning conclusion: “CDC recommends COVID-19 vaccination for women who are pregnant, recently pregnant (including those who are lactating), who are trying to become pregnant now, or who might become pregnant in the future (4) to reduce the risk for severe COVID-19–associated outcomes.”


CDC Not Required to Provide Access to Its Data or Subject Its Analysis to Peer Review


The Vaccine Safety Datalink uses data reported from nine large healthcare organizations, serving only 3% of the U.S. population. The system collects electronic health data from each participating site.


This database is accessible only to researchers outside the CDC and only by request. Requests may be accommodated after a research proposal is submitted and approved by the Research Data Center of the National Center for Health Statistics.


CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports can, as in the case of the agency’s analysis of COVID vaccine safety in pregnant women, be based on data that is not necessarily publicly available.


The agency’s analyses are not subject to peer review. Nevertheless, the reports are often widely cited as the official scientific position.


Conclusions


The CDC’s determination that COVID vaccination is safe in pregnant women is unfounded.


Cohorts were poorly matched. There was an inexcusably low representation of women who were vaccinated early in their pregnancy in their analysis. This is a period where any exposure to medical interventions will have a greater potential for risk to the fetus.


Broadly recommending vaccination for all pregnant women including those who are trying to become pregnant is particularly unwarranted.


This report places the CDC’s purported commitment to its mission of disease control and prevention on full display. The agency’s conclusions arrive more than a full year after the CDC authorized COVID vaccinations and are based on retrospective data alone.


In other words, the CDC is willing (and apparently allowed) to make safety determinations only after the experimental vaccines have been widely and indiscriminately deployed.


This is a shocking departure from the higher standards of prudence that are demanded during pregnancy, a time where two lives are potentially at risk and poor outcomes can lead to a lifetime of potential consequences.


It should be noted that several of the authors of this study reported potential conflicts of interest.


One author reported institutional research funding from Pfizer, and another from Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson. A third author has a career grant from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.


Originally published on Children’s Health Defense


© 01/25/22 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.


Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
 

By Enrico Trigoso
April 27, 2022 Updated: April 29, 2022

‘What I’ve Seen in the Last 2 Years Is Unprecedented’: Physician on COVID Vaccine Side Effects on Pregnant Women​


Former Pfizer VP: 'Adverse impacts on conception and ability to sustain a pregnancy were foreseeable'

Dr. James Thorp is an extensively published 68-year-old physician MD board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as maternal-fetal medicine, who has practiced obstetrics for over 42 years.

Thorp told The Epoch Times that he sees 6,000–7,000 high-risk pregnant patients a year and has seen many complications among them due to the COVID vaccines.

“I’ve seen many, many, many complications in pregnant women, in moms and in fetuses, in children, offspring,” Thorp said, “fetal death, miscarriage, death of the fetus inside the mom.

“What I’ve seen in the last two years is unprecedented,” Thorp asserted.

Thorp explained that although he has seen an increase in fetal death and adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with the COVID-19 vaccination, attempts to quantify this effect are hampered by the imposition of gag orders on physicians and nurses that were imposed in September 2021, as reviewed in the publication “Patient Betrayal: The Corruption of Healthcare, Informed Consent and the Physician-Patient Relationship” (pdf).

At the beginning of January, the FDA was ordered to release its first large batch of documents related to Pfizer’s COVID jab trials, of which over 10,000 of about 450,000 pages have been made public so far.

From the first day of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine rollout on Dec. 1 2020 through Feb. 28, 2021, 1,223 deaths and 42,086 adverse events were reported to Pfizer.

Among the adverse events, particularly alarming are the ones that affected pregnant women. The documents say that there were 274 pregnancy adverse events, of which 75, or 27 percent were “serious.”

“49 non-serious and 75 serious, reported clinical events, which occurred in the vaccinated mothers. Pregnancy related events reported in these cases coded to the [patients] Abortion spontaneous (25), Uterine contraction during pregnancy, Premature rupture of membranes, Abortion, Abortion missed, and Foetal death (1 each). Other clinical events which occurred in more than 5 cases coded to the [patients] Headache (33), Vaccination site pain (24), Pain in extremity and Fatigue (22 each), Myalgia and Pyrexia (16 each), Chills (13) Nausea (12), Pain (11), Arthralgia (9), Lymphadenopathy and Drug ineffective (7 each), Chest pain, Dizziness and Asthenia (6 each), Malaise and COVID-19 (5 each),” reads the previously confidential Pfizer documents (pdf).

The CDC website recommends the COVID vaccines during pregnancy in order to “prevent severe illness and death in pregnant women.”

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) also “strongly recommends that pregnant individuals be vaccinated against COVID-19,” adding that pregnant women’s complete vaccination should be a “priority.”

Thorp repeatedly emphasized that it’s not that everybody got their shots when the vaccine was first distributed.

“They were not all administered [on Dec 1, 2020,]” Thorp said. “All the lots that were sent out were deep-frozen on-site and then they were administered slowly over that eight weeks.”

The amount of BioNTech vaccines shipped worldwide at the time has been redacted in the aforementioned document.

Why did they redact that? That would have been unbelievable information that would give you the exact numerator and denominator,” Thorp said.

The “general overview” table says that there were 29,914 “cases” related to females, 9,182 in males, and 2,990 people with “no data,” of which 19,582 are “recovered/recovering,” 11,361 “not recovered at the time of the report” and 1,223 “fatal.”

Former Pfizer VP Had Given Warnings​


Michael Yeadon is a big pharma veteran with 32 years in the industry. He retired from Pfizer whilst occupying the most senior research position in that field.

“On December 1, 2020, We detailed a series of mechanistic toxicology concerns which we believed were reasonable to hold, unless & until proven not to occur,” Yeadon said in a statement to The Epoch Times.

“Among those was that adverse impacts on conception and ability to sustain a pregnancy were foreseeable.”

“It’s important to note that none of these gene-based agents had completed what’s called ‘reproductive toxicology.’ Over a year later, this battery of tests in animals still has not been done. So there was and still is no data package supporting safety in pregnancy or prior to conception.”

Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg and Yeadon detailed the concerns on the issue: the spike protein from the virus encoded in the vaccines was related to a minor extent to syncytin that plays a crucial part in the carrying of a baby to term.

Yeadon had hoped, back then, that their concerns were paid attention to, since they had already seen the tragedy of thalidomide, a sedative drug that caused congenital malformation, over 60 years ago.

“During 2021, I came across two further pieces of evidence which made it much more likely that there’d be adverse effects on pregnancy from COVID-19 ‘vaccines.'”

“It looked like someone had tried to dismiss our concerns by testing for evidence of the particular problem we’d warned about in Dec. 2020. Unfortunately, all they did is to reinforce our concerns. We’d envisioned the risk that, in responding to the synthetic piece of virus spike protein, women’s immune systems would also make an immune response to their own placental protein,” Yeadon said. “That’s exactly what was reported in the pre-print paper.”

“Based on this concern alone, all of these experimental products as a class should have been completely contraindicated in women younger than menopause.”

mRNA Products Accumulate in Ovaries​

Another concern that they had not initially noticed was that “the mRNA products (Pfizer & Moderna) would accumulate in ovaries,” Yeadon stated.

“An FOI request to the Japanese Medicines Agency revealed that product accumulation in ovaries occurred in experiments in rodents. I searched the literature based on these specific concerns and found a 2012 review, explicitly drawing attention to the evidence that the lipid nanoparticle formulations as a class do, in fact, accumulate in ovaries and may represent an unappreciated reproductive risk to humans. This was ‘a well known problem’ to experts in that field.”

A 2012 study says that after testing with different mouse species and Wistar rats, “a high local accumulation of nanoparticles, nanocapsules and nanoemulsions in specific locations of the ovaries was found in all animals.”

Referring to the study, Yeadon told The Epoch Times that “The authors tell untruths. They say something like ‘there was no increase in anti-syncytin-1 antibodies.'”

“No, that’s wrong. Their data is clearly 2.5X increased after vaccination and obviously statistically significant (functional significance is looking confirmed by the miscarriage rate),” Yeadon noted.

“What they’ve done is cute. They’ve chosen a completely arbitrary level they scribed on the figure below which they claim nothing matters. No evidence whatsoever for that claim. In fact, in the discussion, they confess we don’t know the relationship between antibodies and the impact on function.”

The former Pfizer VP believes that the pharmaceutical industry “definitely knew,” since 2012, that the lipid nanoparticles would accumulate in the ovaries of women that took the vaccines.

“No one in the industry or in leading media could claim ‘they didn’t know about these risks to successful pregnancy.'”

A lipid nanoparticle is an extremely small particle, it’s a fat-soluble membrane that is the cargo of the messenger RNA, Thorp said.

“From data that we have, there appears to be a concentration of the lipid nanoparticles, which are very, very small particles, which are in the vaccine that are injected into the arm,” Thorp said, “and then the vast majority of those are dispersed throughout the entire body.”

“They appear to concentrate in the ovaries, and they appear to cross all God-made barriers in the human body, the blood-brain barrier, the placental barrier during pregnancy, into the fetal bloodstream, and all the fetal tissues inside the womb, crossing the blood-brain barrier in the fetus, the baby in the womb, which is very concerning,” he noted, since the eggs produced by women are limited in number, and they would be “exposed to a potentially disastrous toxic lipid nanoparticle.”

Dr. Christiane Northrup is a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist with more than 30 years of experience and the former president of the American Holistic Medical Association. She also served on their board during the 80s and early 90s.

She told The Epoch Times last October about how were women being affected by the vaccines.

“Women are having bleedings. The doctors in our area are doing hysterectomies in young women, like 30-somethings, they said, ‘Oh, it’s not unusual.’ Let me tell you, as a board-certified gynecologist, that’s very unusual. Women’s periods are messed up all over the place … I’ve had a huge Facebook group of thousands of women talking about this situation that was removed,” Northrup said.

My profession is famous for embracing treatments that later on turn into disasters: For example the drug thalidomide that results in limb effects in hundreds of babies, the Dalkon shield IUD that was touted as the birth control method of choice for women who had never had children—and then made hundred of them sterile from infection. And of course, there is DES (diethylstilbestrol) that was given to thousands of women for nausea of pregnancy—and results in reproductive abnormalities in both male and female offspring—including sterility,” Northrup added on Tuesday.

Pfizer and Moderna did not respond to requests for comment.
 
Study showing 26% increase in cardiac arrest among 16-39 youth during vaccine campaign (but not in peak COVID) compared to same period in 2020. MIT study on emergency room call data Israel.

41598_2022_10928_Fig1_HTML.png


 
Back
Top Bottom