Not a 'story' of Covid injection side effects, but raw data from VAERS that Zachary Stieber was able to recently get released from the CDC. More links in the article for more data.
Like the article states, it is now clear why they tried to hide them.
CDC Finally Released Its VAERS Safety Monitoring Analyses for COVID Vaccines via FOIA
View attachment VAERS data January 2023.webp
Like the article states, it is now clear why they tried to hide them.
CDC Finally Released Its VAERS Safety Monitoring Analyses for COVID Vaccines via FOIA
View attachment VAERS data January 2023.webp
CDC Finally Released Its VAERS Safety Monitoring Analyses for COVID Vaccines via FOIA
January 5, 2023 • by DailyClout
And now it’s clear why they tried to hide them.
By JOSH GUETZKOW
SUMMARY
- valve incompetencies, pericardial and pleural effusion, chest pain, appendicitis & appendectomies, Kawasaki’s disease, menstrual irregularities, vitiligo, and vaccine breakthrough infection.
- The safety signals cannot be dismissed as due to “stimulated,” exaggerated, fraudulent or otherwise artificially inflated reporting, nor can they be dismissed due to the huge number of COVID vaccines administered. There are several reasons why, but the simplest one is this: the safety signal analysis does not depend on the number of reports, but whether or not some AEs are reported at a higher rate for these vaccines than for other non-COVID vaccines. Other reasons are discussed in the full post below.
- In August, 2022, the CDC told the Epoch Times that the results of their safety signal analysis “were generally consistent with EB [Empirical Bayesian] data mining [conducted by the FDA], revealing no additional unexpected safety signals.” So either the FDA’s data mining was consistent with the CDC’s method—meaning they “generally” found the same large number of highly alarming safety signals—or the signals they did find were expected. Or they were lying. We may never know because the FDA has refused to release their data mining results