Stories of Covid vaccination side effects or worse

OK, this is not about a specific person's experience with getting the shot. However this presentation speaks to what people may be getting in those syringes.

Bottom line,
"Who knows, because it will never be the same thing in all instances !!!!"

Just listen for 10 minutes starting from 22 min mark, because the dramatic part is there. Then if you find that interesting listen from the beginning.

The problems with manufacturing were noted in the EU toward the end of 2020 !!!!!!!!!
I doubt much was changed since then in how this stuff is made today. Plus some things ,based on the information of the presenter, they can not be changed.
Thus anyone taking this is in a huge experiment whose data is being hidden as best as they can.

Problem they have is that at some point you just can't hide it. We are there IMHO, but it simply is not being presented that way in the MSM.

In case you missed it, drug interaction (drugs people take all the time) with what is injected into them IS AN UNKNOWN. They pretend as though this is not an issue by nearly (being generous to use this word) NEVER mentioning it.

From 2013


Gosh I have seen this video (from L Maria Gutschi), but I can't remember where. Possibly in the Corona Investigative Committee ? No wait, it was from a video conference between Sasha Latipova and L Maria Gutschi (Team Enigma). One of my list i wanted to write about. Very, very good !

It is about the contents and technologies used for the C-19 injections, it's complications and what they botched, where they made changes, and the areas where they got better (e.g. the nanolipids structures). The funny thing with my memory is, that when I re-remember that i have seen a certain video - i see exactly the environment and what I did, while listened to a video.

Anyway. Here is the video (39 min), from L. Maria Gutschi without distraction, solely focusing onto the content itself.

English, 39 min

Video Desciption:

Maria is a pharmacist and a regulatory specialist from Canada. She has thoroughly reviewed Pfizer's manufacturing documents and identified glaring and unsolvable problems. The product should be considered adulterated. Note that the quality tests described in Pfizer's documents only apply to batches (bulk product) and do not specify any product conformity tests at the dose level (as administered). This is a glaring violation of existing regulations for pharmaceutical products.
 
I hadn’t “heard” of her before, either.
I took a bit of time this morning and read several of her essays on this link, and I must say, her comments, statements and observations are based on far more than “assumptions”.

Here is a snippet from her background:

“I am an ex-pharmaceutical research and development (R&D) industry executive and entrepreneur. I spent 25 years working in the industry in various roles, countries and ultimately managing my own companies. I worked initially as an econometrics and management consultant, and later as clinical trials contractor for 60+ pharmas, large and small. My clients included Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, AstraZeneca, GSK, and many smaller biotechs. I worked with “channel partners” such as large contract research organizations (CROs) - Parexel, PPD, ICON, and others. I interacted with the FDA and other regulators on behalf of my clients, and as a member of Cardiovascular Safety Research Consortium on subjects related to assessments of cardiovascular safety of new drugs in clinical trials. Around that time, I met Robert Califf who is now the Commissioner of the FDA. He was my business competitor and was running rather poor quality cardiac safety trials for pharma at an academic lab at Duke University. There is a thin line between “poor quality” and “fraud” in clinical trials, but we will return to this topic.”

For what it’s worth, I highly recommend reading everything she has written.

If you look at her education, she's an MBA.
Not saying she wouldn't have picked up on some expertise being involved in the industry, but she's not exactly an expert.
In any case, it sounds like she's trying to discredit the entire idea that viruses can be manipulated, at least from what I read on this thread.
The Veritas video seems legit to me, especially after the guy had a complete meltdown after being confronted.
Pfizer and the media are just completely ignoring the revelations even though it was one of the most viewed videos on Twitter these days.
Only mainstream outlets that covered this are Fox with a segment by Tucker and Newsweek with a pathetic attempt at casting aspersions.
It's quite unbelievable how much influence over public opinion these elites have. Boggles the mind even though I've known this for ages.
 
It seems real. Journalist finds his target, gets him drunk and secretly films him…… works so many times!
George Webb weighs in on this Walker case saying it is a psyop / hoax:



WK commented on this in the Coronavirus thread. This Walker dude may have embellished his Pfizer role, but he could very well know what is going on in the developing of mutant strains.
 
I hadn’t “heard” of her before, either.
I took a bit of time this morning and read several of her essays on this link, and I must say, her comments, statements and observations are based on far more than “assumptions”.

Here is a snippet from her background:

“I am an ex-pharmaceutical research and development (R&D) industry executive and entrepreneur. I spent 25 years working in the industry in various roles, countries and ultimately managing my own companies. I worked initially as an econometrics and management consultant, and later as clinical trials contractor for 60+ pharmas, large and small. My clients included Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, AstraZeneca, GSK, and many smaller biotechs. I worked with “channel partners” such as large contract research organizations (CROs) - Parexel, PPD, ICON, and others. I interacted with the FDA and other regulators on behalf of my clients, and as a member of Cardiovascular Safety Research Consortium on subjects related to assessments of cardiovascular safety of new drugs in clinical trials. Around that time, I met Robert Califf who is now the Commissioner of the FDA. He was my business competitor and was running rather poor quality cardiac safety trials for pharma at an academic lab at Duke University. There is a thin line between “poor quality” and “fraud” in clinical trials, but we will return to this topic.”

For what it’s worth, I highly recommend reading everything she has written.
I looked not only at the article but also at the comments, including the ones she "liked." In the comments they continue to debate "viral story", Cvd and "pandemic" exclusively in 3d terms. What is missing as we know well here is an important part of the issue. That is not to say that there are not useful insights, but until a leap, or even an attempt at a leap of understanding is made, one remains in the useless loop of the dialectical swamp. Ihmo.
 
George Webb weighs in on this Walker case saying it is a psyop / hoax:
Interesting comments were made about his past practices by others. Also, the ego stroking of who did what first is strange but a common occurrence on tweeter. But it does put the spotlight on George. Some tweeters are also saying that Project Veritas was set up.

Screenshot 2023-01-28 at 07-16-54 Darren of Plymouth 🇬🇧 on Twitter.png

Screenshot 2023-01-28 at 06-50-50 Madhuri on Twitter.png
Screenshot 2023-01-28 at 07-02-09 George Webb - Investigative Journalist on Twitter.png
1674886887826.png
Meanwhile:

As expected bay area news is silent on it all. The timing, of distractions, seems to be more interesting than the reality.

Screenshot 2023-01-28 at 06-22-07 The NPC Show (@TheNPCShow) _ Twitter.png
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2023-01-28 at 07-07-17 George Webb - Investigative Journalist on Twitter.png
    Screenshot 2023-01-28 at 07-07-17 George Webb - Investigative Journalist on Twitter.png
    1.8 MB · Views: 3
Interesting comments were made about his past practices by others. Also, the ego stroking of who did what first is strange but a common occurrence on tweeter. But it does put the spotlight on George. Some tweeters are also saying that Project Veritas was set up.

It's a guessing game who is being set-up here.

I believe Mr. Pfizer fell for the trap after drinking a bit which then led to him discussing what Pfizer was doing in general terms. Speaking to a "date" I doubt he would describe things the same way in which he would do that speaking to a professional. Hence, the complaint by some that what he says is "way too simple" is a bit over critical. This story will certainly have the effect of taking people's attention away from the disaster happening in Ukraine. It is also a distraction from the fact that Pfizer has not completed this,

In the Malone discussion about this video there is , as always, repetition of the "Wuhan lab virus". Suggesting that US could not have had any hand in this besides the fact that Fauci (on his own) funded some research there. So those long forgotten stories of strange illnesses near labs in the US, certainly were not related to Covid. So the narrative continues, "It was the Evil China". Well I have my doubts seeing what has come out of Ukraine on this subject. And then to think that Fauci on his own was the decider of what and how was done I'd say, "No way in Hell". Viral Research is most certainly a National Security matter in any country. Fauci was only an administrator who was the visible moving part of the whole process.

We are being fed finely ground salami of those things that can not be hidden anymore. Then vigorously mixed such that the Public is probably completely disoriented, if they are aware at all of any of this information. A good example of this "he said she said" is the admission by a Pfizer rep that they did no testing on transmission. Well transmission protection was touted left and right about these shots on TV and in radio, when the therapeutic was rolled out.


CLAIM: Pfizer admitted to the European Parliament that it had not tested the ability of its COVID-19 vaccine to prevent transmission of the virus before it entered the market, proving the company lied about this earlier in the pandemic.

AP’S ASSESSMENT: Missing context. Janine Small, president of international markets at Pfizer, told the European Parliament on Monday that Pfizer did not know whether its COVID-19 vaccine prevented transmission of the virus before it entered the market in December 2020. But Pfizer never claimed to have studied the issue before the vaccine’s market release.


So when will they start talking just as loudly about the injured and the dead from these clot shots ? Because going after this "on the date" Pfizer employee is a big nothing in my opinion, as compared to the consequences/damage of these clot-shots on a person's health/life.
 
Matt Ehret on his TG channel is now also saying that ‘Pfizer gate’ is a hoax, and that Georg Webb “is an excellent journalist”. I dunno…GW has claimed some things in the past which turned out not to be true.

If the whole thing is a setup, what would be the purpose? To distract, discredit, muddy, play peeps against each other?

What a tangled web.
 
Australian Olympian and rugby player, Simon Dunn, 35, died suddenly

Simon Dunn

Dunn’s body was reportedly found at his home in Sydney. Police said the death was not suspicious and were going on the assumption that there was a medical reason for Dunn’s passing, according to Yahoo Sports.

A cause of death has not been reported.

Dunn was the nation’s first openly gay Olympic bobsledder.

Ruby Rose Management confirmed the news of Dunn’s death with a statement saying: “About 10 am on Saturday, January 21, 2023, police were called to a unit on Crown Street, Surry Hills, after reports the body of a man had been found inside. The body is believed to be that of the 35-year-old occupant. Officers from Surry Hills Police Area Command have commenced inquiries into the circumstances surrounding his death, which is not being treated as suspicious.”


🙏
 
George Webb weighs in on this Walker case saying it is a psyop / hoax:



WK commented on this in the Coronavirus thread. This Walker dude may have embellished his Pfizer role, but he could very well know what is going on in the developing of mutant strains.
I get the impression George Webb was being smug, "a know it all" but I didn't see him produce evidence to back up what he was saying. Not sure if I missed it.

In any case, I don't think the guy went to Yale as George Webb is saying. He went to the university below which is evidenced at 04:04


It's also collaborated by various bits of information produced by PV

FnXaEzPWIAMk3cY.jpg

IMG_20230127_210156_811.jpg

I think there is a big thing being made about the guy being a "Director" at his age. It shouldn't be confused for a "company director" who has certain statutory requirements placed about them.


I think in Pfizer's case the title simply relates to rank and pay grade within the organisation. He's probably that grade due to his level of education and previous level of employment at the Boston Consulting Group. If he was being paid $100k+ at BCG and moved to Pfizer, it would only be for higher pay and so he'd have to fit into the pay structure within Pfizer - it may well be that the level of pay put him directly at the Director level in pfizer. It's not uncommon to find people who are young at some of these conglomerates being at a high pay grade level - scary... right, but true.

My take of the guy is clearly his brains are way ahead of his level of character development. The guy must have some academic talent coupled with some consulting talent to have ended up at BCG. Sadly this doesn't mean he is mature or well developed from a character perspective. As to why he spilled all the beans, to answer that question we must first find out who his "date" was and what previous interactions they had together.

To me it seems like PV has some group of ladies / guys who basically seduce executives and such for information. How many dates do they go to before they get a person comfortable to start spilling company secrets? What's the story behind this! How do they meet there "mark" as it were etc.

As to PV having been set up by DARPA etc, feels like a stretch. Is it so inconceivable to think Pfizer and the like in their hubris don't think they can work out how a virus will mutate so that they can produce a vaccine a head of time? Surely they'd think mutation whilst it appears random may be governed by some rules and if they knew those rules then voila - money money money.

Just my thoughts.
 
This is the Elephant in the Room in all the nations ( and more) mentioned in this video.


I don't know, but is Tucker, Malone and the other high visibility individuals focusing on it ????
My impression is NO, but I could be wrong.


When you don't want to find something you don't look for it.
Then you can honestly say "I didn't see anything."
 
UK: Tributes to amateur footballer, Luke Abrahams, 20, who died suddenly as loved ones remember ‘amazing’ friend

Luke Abrahams

Luke Abrahams passed away suddenly in the early hours of January 23.

The 20-year-old, from Northampton, played for Blisworth FC and Hunsbury Hawks FC in the Northants Combination and the Nene Sunday League. He was also linked to AFC Spinney.


🙏
 
I get the impression George Webb was being smug, "a know it all" but I didn't see him produce evidence to back up what he was saying. Not sure if I missed it.

In any case, I don't think the guy went to Yale as George Webb is saying. He went to the university below which is evidenced at 04:04


It's also collaborated by various bits of information produced by PV

View attachment 70338

View attachment 70339

I think there is a big thing being made about the guy being a "Director" at his age. It shouldn't be confused for a "company director" who has certain statutory requirements placed about them.


I think in Pfizer's case the title simply relates to rank and pay grade within the organisation. He's probably that grade due to his level of education and previous level of employment at the Boston Consulting Group. If he was being paid $100k+ at BCG and moved to Pfizer, it would only be for higher pay and so he'd have to fit into the pay structure within Pfizer - it may well be that the level of pay put him directly at the Director level in pfizer. It's not uncommon to find people who are young at some of these conglomerates being at a high pay grade level - scary... right, but true.

My take of the guy is clearly his brains are way ahead of his level of character development. The guy must have some academic talent coupled with some consulting talent to have ended up at BCG. Sadly this doesn't mean he is mature or well developed from a character perspective. As to why he spilled all the beans, to answer that question we must first find out who his "date" was and what previous interactions they had together.

To me it seems like PV has some group of ladies / guys who basically seduce executives and such for information. How many dates do they go to before they get a person comfortable to start spilling company secrets? What's the story behind this! How do they meet there "mark" as it were etc.

As to PV having been set up by DARPA etc, feels like a stretch. Is it so inconceivable to think Pfizer and the like in their hubris don't think they can work out how a virus will mutate so that they can produce a vaccine a head of time? Surely they'd think mutation whilst it appears random may be governed by some rules and if they knew those rules then voila - money money money.

Just my thoughts.
Totally agree. This whole "it's a setup" shtick is the same as the "no virus" shtick or any other one that places the PTB firmly back in control in the minds of the public.
The truth is that the PTB doesn't have nearly the level of control that many in the alternative space would like to believe.
This Pfizer revelation is pretty clearly legitimate and anyone saying otherwise without real evidence is just muddying the waters either intentionally or because they still subscribe to the notion that the PTB is some kind of all powerful entity.
 
Totally agree. This whole "it's a setup" shtick is the same as the "no virus" shtick or any other one that places the PTB firmly back in control in the minds of the public.
The truth is that the PTB doesn't have nearly the level of control that many in the alternative space would like to believe.
This Pfizer revelation is pretty clearly legitimate and anyone saying otherwise without real evidence is just muddying the waters either intentionally or because they still subscribe to the notion that the PTB is some kind of all powerful entity.
There are some in the alternative that believe the PTB are all-knowing, all-powerful and all that transpires in our reality is part of a plan orchestrated by them. The alternative is to think that things are just random, coincidental and haphazard which is equally not as satisfying. Perhaps the truth lies somewhere in the middle.
 
Back
Top Bottom