Stories of Covid vaccination side effects or worse

Correlation Research In The Public Interest, which houses papers by Rancourt, Hickey et al., has this paper from October 30th that unpacks Care Homes.

Really, nothing not known here, yet in their words:

Confining vulnerable people into care homes during a pandemic produces the worst possible outcomes for them ― scientific article​

(Link to PDF of this media notice)

Governments have purported to correctly apply standard epidemiological models to create infectious disease policies during the COVID period, including to justify “protecting” vulnerable elderly individuals by isolating them from the general population in care homes.

In a new paper published in the peer-reviewed journal PLoS One, scientists at CORRELATION demonstrate that isolating vulnerable people from the healthier majority of the population actually produces the worst possible outcomes for them, according to these same standard epidemiological models of spread and transmission.

The article, entitled “Predictions from standard epidemiological models of consequences of segregating and isolating vulnerable people into care facilities”, was authored by Joseph Hickey, PhD and Denis G. Rancourt, PhD, of the non-profit CORRELATION Research in the Public Interest ( based in Ottawa, Canada.

The paper shows that the standard epidemic models, which have existed in the scientific literature for decades prior to the WHO’s COVID-19 pandemic declaration of 11 March 2020, unambiguously predict a significant increase in the infectious disease attack rate for the vulnerable population when it is isolated and segregated from the general population.

From the article:

“[T]he vulnerable population is harmed by isolation from the robust population and benefits from mixing with or dilution within the robust population, in terms of risk of infection during the course of the epidemic or pandemic.” …

“Whereas governments used theoretical epidemic models to justify most public health policies during the COVID era, within a tunnel vision of reducing risk of infection with a particular virus, they appear not to have considered what those same models predict about infection rates under conditions of care home segregation; and they appear to have disregarded the exponential increase of infection fatality rate with age. Care home segregation policies may have been responsible for many deaths attributed to COVID-19 in Western countries.”

The authors show that, in the present state of knowledge, isolation and segregation of the elderly is of no benefit in preventing deaths in epidemic or pandemic circumstances. The study is relevant to continued investigations of the acknowledged healthcare catastrophe that occurred in long-term care homes in Canada and other countries in the spring of 2020.

CORRELATION blog post about the article: Predictions from standard epidemiological models of consequences of segregating and isolating vulnerable people into care facilities
Mind boggles 🤦‍♂️

For the record, here's the text of the transcription:

Ladies and gentlemen, last month I wrote a letter to the EMA with Joachim Kuhs and six other colleagues from the European Parliament.
The European Agency responsible for the admission of medicines to the European market.
In this letter we asked for clarification on the many problems surrounding the COVID vaccines.
These problems are so big that we asked the EMA to withdraw the supply of the market.

This month we received an answer from the EMA on our letter, and this answer contained shocking facts.

First of all, the EMA explicitly states that it has only and exclusively allowed the corona vaccines on the market for individual immunization.
And absolutely not for control of infection and absolutely not for preventing or reducing infections.

And this is devastating for governments that have gone full on the campaign organ with the message "you do it for another".
None of this is true.

Not only did the EMA not allow the vaccines at all to prevent infections, the EMA goes even further and explains in its answer, and I quote,
"The EMA's assessment reports on the vaccine supply emphasizes the lack of data on infectivity."
In other words, the vaccines were not intended to prevent infections, and there is no data at all that substantiates that the vaccines help against infections.

In fact, the EMA states, "Repeating the exposure to the virus increases the chance of infections even in vaccinated people."
The massive government campaigns to get yourself vaccinated, to protect your parents, your neighbors, the weaker in society,
were not only unauthorized, but also completely nonsense and not based on facts.
But unfortunately it gets even worse.

The EMA says, "The vaccinations are exclusively for the protection of the vaccinated individual."
And before the individual, the patient, is vaccinated, the EMA must, and I quote again,
"All safety information must be carefully considered before administering or recommending a vaccination."
So you could only come to a recommendation for a vaccination after a doctor had determined that this was sensible in your case.
And because almost no one under the age of 60 had a chance of serious complications from the coronavirus,
there should be no one, but no one under the age of 60, vaccinated, on any exception.

So the sport halls full of vaccine-pickers were completely in conflict with the use of which the vaccines were administered by the EMA.
And it gets even worse. To assess the safety of the vaccines, it was essential for the EMA
that side effects would be properly registered.
And the EMA says about this, "We expect many reports of side effects that occur during or shortly after vaccination."
And that means that it is precisely in the first period after vaccination that complaints should be reported.

The government supported a policy in which these complaints were not reported in the first 14 days after vaccination,
because the vaccine would need 10 to 14 days to become effective.
All complaints in that period were attributed to the coronavirus.
And that is not only fraudulent, it is deliberately endangering human lives.

And I remind you again that we are still struggling with a gigantic, so-called unexplained, death.
In short, this information from the EMA is destructive for the implemented vaccination policy of Rutte and de Jonge.

The government knew that the vaccines would not protect against the spread of the virus,
but did not share this information with the citizens.
On the contrary, it forced the vaccines on our citizens with lies, tampered with the side effects,
and thus endangered the health of everyone who took such a vaccine.

The vaccination campaigns are being stopped as soon as possible, and it is simply not safe.
And they do not meet the requirements set by the EMA.
And the government and all political parties that supported this should be held accountable for their lies and fraud.
Females And Young Adults At Higher Risk Of COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects: Study

Females and young adults are at an increased risk of suffering from side effects after COVID-19 vaccinations. People who take three doses as compared to two may present different side effects, a Japanese study finds.

The study published on Scientific Reports in November studied 272 hospital employees who received the Pfizer vaccine as a second dose between January to June 2022.

None of the participants had a prior history of COVID-19 infection, and all of their symptoms were examined and diagnosed by doctors at the hospital.

They found "higher frequencies of COVID-19 vaccine-related side effects" and "worse outcomes with longer recovery from side effects" among females and younger adults compared to males and elderly adults, the authors wrote.

Third Dose Versus Second Dose​

The authors found different side effects were linked with different doses, and the side effects after third dose tend to be more long-lasting and severe compared to the second dose.

Axillary pain occurs much more frequently in people who have taken three doses as opposed to two. Headaches and joint pain is a side effect that tends to be prolonged following the third dose compared to the second or the first dose.

At the second dose common symptoms include asthma symptoms, ear fullness, numbness in the upper arm, and injection at the injecting site.

The author associated the symptoms that occurred after the second vaccine dose with an allergic response while headaches and joint pains after the third dose were linked with inflammation and immune dysregulation.

Health Practitioners Report Similar Findings​

Doctors and other studies have reported similar demographics in patients who report symptoms post-vaccination.

Additional vaccines also create a cumulative effect such that people who have taken more shots tend to be at a greater risk of worse symptoms, internist Dr. Keith Berkowitz, who has treated over 200 long COVID and post-vaccine patients, told The Epoch Times.

A Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention showed that the majority of people who report anaphylaxis are female.

Additionally, a JAMA Network Open study similarly showed that females tended to report adverse effects from Moderna and Pfizer vaccinations. The authors of the study reasoned that females tended to produce a greater number of antibodies after vaccination, and that the higher levels of estrogen and progesterone in females may also result in different symptom manifestations.

Younger people also tend to have a stronger immune system, and the side effects experienced by the patient may be a result of the immune response, the authors reasoned.

The COVID-19 mRNA vaccines induce the body to produce spike proteins. These spike proteins can damage the blood vessels and cause clotting, inflammation, and even autoimmunity. Greater symptom severity is suggestive of having more reactive symptoms due to the body's attempts to fight off the spike proteins.

While this may help in clearing spike proteins, it may also prevent recovery as the body directs its resources toward fighting an infection rather than resting and recovering. "If the immune system is functioning better ... the body functions better as a whole and the body can use its needed sources elsewhere," Dr. Berkowitz said.

Changing Demographics​

Nurse practitioner Scott Marsland of Leading Edge Clinic told The Epoch Times that in recent months he has seen a shift in his patient population.

"I have a lot more male patients these days and ... we're getting more patients who have had multiple vaccinations and boosters," Mr. Marsland said. Many of the patients now come from recommendations from friends and family who think that they may be suffering from vaccine side effects. Since these people have not been following the research on COVID-19 vaccine injuries, they tend to be a lot more skeptical and distrusting, he added.

Dr. Berkowitz similarly added that as the pandemic progressed, he started to get different patients with the majority being patients who have had several COVID-19 infections and also taken several doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. Dr. Keith said that since each infection and injection will increase the load of spike protein, "I'll list how many times have they had the vaccine and how many times have they been infected [to assess treatment]."
Malaysian singer Queenzy Cheng passes away at 37

Queenzy Cheng.jpg
Queenzy Cheng, who was filming since the morning, suddenly complained of dizziness and discomfort. After losing consciousness, she passed away approximately 40 minutes later.

While sitting in a chair after drying her hair, Queenzy Cheng mentioned feeling dizzy, having a headache, and experiencing vomiting. Despite emergency treatment by on-site staff, her lips, hands, and feet turned blue shortly after.

Although an ambulance arrived within 5 minutes, Queenzy Cheng had already passed away. The cause of her death is pending autopsy results.

Queenzy Cheng vaccine.jpg
mRNA Injury Series - YOUNG CARDIAC SUDDEN DEATHS are being blamed on "Congenital Heart conditions" - are some doctors deliberately covering up COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Sudden Cardiac Deaths

mRNA Injury Series.jpg
Dec.8, 2021 - Watson, LA - 16 year old 6’2 230lb football player Grayson Lane Temple died suddenly on Dec.8, 2021 - his death was blamed on a “genetic predisposition to a cardiac arrhythmia”

There have been many questionable young person deaths attributed to “congenital” or “genetic” heart issues, since COVID-19 Vaccines rolled out. I provide some detailed examples. Coroners and cardiologists are concluding “deaths of natural causes” but it seems they are just covering up vaccine deaths.
Stephen Colbert cancelled the Late Show due to a medical emergency which turned out to be a burst appendix.

Appendicitis has been reported as a potential adverse event after immunization with mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines, based on trial data,1 adverse event report data,2 and observational data.3 We evaluated the risk of appendicitis after receiving an mRNA COVID-19 vaccination and after diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with the risk of appendicitis in unvaccinated individuals.

Source: - Risk of Appendicitis After mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination in a Danish Population

Doubtful if he'll ever think that the vaccine might be a possible cause!
Steve Kirsch's presentation on MIT aired yesterday. I guess no comments are needed, a good summary of reliable statistics. This can be shown to someone who just woke up, and wants to know more about how bad things are:

For forum members blocked from accessing Rumble:
Top Bottom