Zadius Sky
The Living Force
It is my impression that some of the new members have the tendency to skim or skip the forum rules and go straight to "Agree." This tendency also includes skipping the quotes. The main quotes from writings of Boris Mouravieff and Georges I. Gurdjieff are very necessary and important. I read the rules twice before I clicked on "Agree" when I joined this forum, and I would re-read these rules every other week to refresh my mind.Laura said:Ohlove, as has been mentioned, you need to read the rules of this forum. There you will find that our work is closely tied to the work of Gurdjieff, Mouravieff, Castaneda and the Sufi Shaykh, Ibn al-Arabi. Also, the fact is, these concepts are well represented in the work of several modern psychologists such as Martha Stout, Barbara Hort, Elan Goulomb, and particularly in Dabrowski's theories of positive disintegration.
Ohlove, this forum is a place for discussion, not debate. We do quotes (sources) to back up our "opinions" of something or someone and without them, opinions are useless. If you want to say something nice about them, that's fine. But, if you want to say something about how they affect others, what they do, and the results - then we'd need "quotes" or sources to back them up (so we would go to those sources for verification).ohlove said:I'm sorry, this place seems for fighting, debating and all that stuff I left long ago. Beau, why are you asking me to point someone out and do quotes. I browsed this sight today, i felt dizzy.
When you say you'd get dizzy for browsing for "quotes," that's the sign of the predator pushing the "make her tired" button.
Perceptions are subject to change. And, no one is looking for a fight, as CarpeDiem mentioned.ohlove said:Sleep? I'm awake here, listening to you and reading and taking it all in, forgive me I'm still finding my way around. These are my personal perceptions, what I'm feeling here. It feels sort of contentious, like some are looking for a fight.
fwiw and my two cent.
Edit:
I've read one of Stuart Wilde books once a while back (I think it was "sixth sense"). It made me uneasy (in term of going into his "reality" where I felt uncomfortable being in and just had to get out), and it didn't "click." Same goes for David Icke.Russ said:I heard about Stuart Wilde a while back, he reminds me a bit of Joe Rogan, David Icke etc. (...)I get the impression that they think they're some kind of conduits for higher knowledge, and that it can only be attained through them, kind of like a delusional Jesus complex. And they can't really get out of it because they're in a sort of heirarchical system where they're always at the top, and when other people start to believe what they say, it makes them believe themselves even more, which can make the "noise" of their transmission even worse.