Syria, Iraq, Iran, in line with Afghanistan

[David Topi]

You can not help but notice that, just paying attention to any map, most of the countries that are "hot" at this moment are in straight line, one by the other.

As for the reasons for what the PTB may have for it, one of the geopolitical interpretations that do arise is the creation of a corridor between the opio lands in Afghanistan and the mediterranean sea.

Among other reasons, which pretty much maybe well hidden and nothing to do with what we may deduce by reflecting about what we see going on there, the fact that from the EU (Cyprus) you can get straight into Syria, cross to Iraq, pass to Iran and get to Afghanistan, creates the possibility that a nice highway crossing central asia would make easier for the black ops to get the money they need to keep running.

No less that generating constant turmoil and fear is still a great main dish for the STS entities feeding on us, so if you profit to make some changes at geopolitical level, increase the flow of drugs into EU and the rest of the world, keep the population worried, make more money for your own plans and so on, well, it seems to me that it could not be better part of the world for it.

Just some night thoughts...

 

[katsung47]

They have one thing in common. They are (were ) not under the control of US. (Before US invasion). It's US strategy two.

The strategy one was to destroy USSR. USSR collapsed in 1990.

The strategy two is to conquer oil rich countries to have their oil resources under control. So far they got Iraq, Libya and the next step is Iran.

After Iran, strategy three, it will be China. It's very clear.

 

[katsung47]

They also have another thing in common - with rich natural resource, either oil or mine.

Bin Laden is a living plant.

In 1990, Soviet bloc collapsed. US intelligence turned its resource which used to deal with Soviet bloc to the new target - Mid-east countries which are rich in natural resource. Bin Laden, an asset of the CIA in Afghanistan war(against Russian), was revived in this new project as a false flag - Islamic extremist. He went to Sudan first in 1991.

The Sudanese offered to arrest Bin Laden and extradite him to Saudi Arabia .

_http://www.infowars.com/saved%20pages/Prior_Knowledge/Clinton_let_bin_laden.htm [link deactivated by moderator]

Saudi and US didn't take the offer with various excuse because Bin Laden is a living plant they deployed there.

In 1995, Bin Laden tried to set up a connection with Saddam but was refused.

Exhaustive review finds no link between Saddam, al Qaida

A September 2006 report by the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that Saddam was "distrustful of al Qaida and viewed Islamic extremists as a threat to his regime, refusing all requests from al Qaida to provide material or operational support."

The Senate report, citing an FBI debriefing of a senior Iraqi spy, Faruq Hijazi , said that Saddam turned down a request for assistance by bin Laden which he made at a 1995 meeting in Sudan with an Iraqi operative.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20080310/wl_mcclatchy/2875005

Sudan may have felt the danger to accomodate Bin Laden. In May 1996, the Sudanese asked bin Laden to leave. He went to Afghan and stay there until now.

In August 1998, Sudan and Afghanistan were bombed by US missiles.

In 2001, after 911, Afghan, facing US invasion, made an offer but failed.

Bush rejects Taliban offer to hand Bin Laden over
* Taliban demand evidence of Bin Laden's guilt

guardian.co.uk, Sunday 14 October 2001 22.19 BST

http://www.politic.co.uk/18142-remember-osama.html

In Bin Laden's recent 20 years, the countries he went or tried to go, have something in common: They all have rich natural resources. Sudan and Iraq have oil. Afghan has rich mine. '

Afghanistan to develop $3 trillion in mining potential
DUBAI | Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:14pm
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE69O3JP20101025

He didn't go to Yemen, Somali or Syria for his "revolution" because they are resource poor countries, not in US interest list. He didn't go to Saudi or Kuwait. Because they are US allies. He only went to Sudan, Afghan, or Iraq (intended to) because these three countries were not controlled by US at that time. As a living plant, he gave US the excuse to activate attack on these three countries. (Even Saddam realized that Bin Laden was a dangerous living plant and rejected him, Iraq at last was invaded with an unexisted WMD)

 

[katsung47]

703. War on Iran in February (1) (1/21/2012)

In last December I learned that my brother and sisters would have a trip to India and Dubai between Feb. 2 to Feb 15, 2012. Since my relatives used to be arranged for a trip when the Feds has a new plan, that means there will be a new framed case in February and it always comes with big events as distraction- false flag terror attack, war, natural disaster or all of them.

A news proved my allegation. It will be Iran war this time.

Russian military experts say the U.S. is likely to war against Iran in early February
Date:2012-01-17
http://www.9abc.net/index.php/archives/72360

Why does the Feds choose February as operation time? Because there was a president election in Taiwan on Jan 14. National Party competed with Democratic Progressive Party for that seat. National Party is pro-China while D.P.P. pushes for independence of Taiwan. Of course, Beijing wants to see the National Party to win the presidency of Taiwan.

On the other hand, China is a key component in war on Iran. China is a big customer of Iran. It shares 20% of exported oil of Iran. China opposed war on Iran for its own interest. So if US wants the Iran war, it must buy the agreement of China. The D.P.P. of Taiwan became the chip of the deal and was sacrificed in 1/14/2012 presidential election.

On 1/10, Treasury Secretary Geithner visited China to confirm the secret deal.

1/14, Payment confirmed

Taiwan's China-friendly president wins re-election
January 14, 2012 A.P.
|

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/01/14/taiwans-china-friendly-president-wins-re-election

1/15, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao started his trip to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, United A.E. (all are US allies) to pick up other payments from the secret deal.

China, Saudi Arabia and the New Oil Alliance - 16 January 2012
http://goldnews.bullionvault.com/china_oil_011620126

1/19, China confirms the deal to turn against Iran.

China Begins to Turn Against Iran

January 19, 2012 2:26 PM
During Premier Wen Jiabao’s visit to the Persian Gulf, he struck deals with a number of countries, including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, many of whom are worried by Iran’s nuclear ambitions. China, which has long been one of Iran’s only allies and a major customer for its oil exports, now seems to be turning its back on Tehran. From the Telegraph:

“China adamantly opposes Iran developing and possessing nuclear weapons,” [Wen] said.

China appears to have sent a message to Iran that it could not rely on Beijing’s unstinting support by reducing its imports of oil at a time when the US and Europe are promoting an embargo on the country.

The Washington Post reported that China trimmed its oil imports from Iran in January from a daily average of around 550,000 barrels to 285,000 barrels a day.

Chinese foreign policy experts said the statement demonstrated that Beijing would not allow its international position to end up beholden to Iran.

http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2012/01/china-begins-to-turn-against-iran/

 

[Rich]

1/19, China confirms the deal to turn against Iran.

China Begins to Turn Against Iran

The following seems to be China supporting Iran:

13th April 2012:

Exclusive - Iran to expand oil tanker fleet ahead of sanctions

Iran's oil shipping operator NITC is expanding its oil tanker fleet with the first of 12 supertankers to be delivered from China in May, fortuitous timing for the OPEC member as Western sanctions force Tehran to rely more on its ships to export oil.

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/04/13/uk-iran-china-idUKBRE83C0FY20120413

20th April 2012:

Japan to insure Iran oil shipments to counter EU sanctions

Japan’s government may insure tankers carrying Iranian oil, joining China and India in responding to European sanctions blocking private providers.

The Japanese Transport Ministry held discussions with the Japan Shipowners’ Association about providing insurance, Akimitsu Ashida, chairman of the group representing the country’s shipping companies, said at a conference in Tokyo. India is considering sovereign guarantees, and Chinese government officials also met to discuss ways to prevent sanctions from disrupting Iranian oil shipments.

http://tehrantimes.com/economy-and-business/97099-japan-to-insure-iran-oil-shipments-to-counter-eu-sanctions (Bloomberg)

 

[PopHistorian]

katsung47 wrote << They have one thing in common. They are (were ) not under the control of US. (Before US invasion) >>

Geographical proximity is one thing they have in common. But I think they are targeted not because they weren't under US control, but that they weren't so well under international PTB control. They don't or did not have effective puppet rulers, either because the rulers are too self-reliant or just plain ineffective and therefore weren't doing the job for the PTB. The US military is just the muscle, the enforcer being wielded by others to make everyone "join the club," OSIT. I get this idea, in part, from the recommended book The Secret Team, by Col. Prouty.

I would expect places that are the most "foreign" to the West, and that reject Western influence the most, to be painted as convenient "enemies." This way, the PTB can take maximum advantage of popular ignorance and lie their faces off with most impunity.

The Islamic influence on all of these cultures you mentioned has similarities, and the effects of that influence are sometimes antithetical to the standard world culture emanating from the West, which has been crafted by the PTB for their benefit. Everything from cultural values governing family life, to the degree of indoctrination by gov't schooling, to self-reliance and self-sufficiency of smaller groups in places like Afghanistan, to the attitudes toward money, the influence of standard central banks over the local gov't -- these things and more are very important to the PTB in their quest to control all.

I agree that these countries being "in straight line, one by the other" is really convenient. Imagine how different the US public attitude might be if troops were actively waging war on culturally more dissimilar countries like Venezuela, North Korea, and Somalia or Burma instead, all at the same time. Surely it's easier to, again, use popular ignorance to paint one West Asian enemy as being just like another.

 

[katsung47]

1/19, China confirms the deal to turn against Iran.

China Begins to Turn Against Iran

The following seems to be China supporting Iran:

13th April 2012:

Exclusive - Iran to expand oil tanker fleet ahead of sanctions

Iran's oil shipping operator NITC is expanding its oil tanker fleet with the first of 12 supertankers to be delivered from China in May, fortuitous timing for the OPEC member as Western sanctions force Tehran to rely more on its ships to export oil.

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/04/13/uk-iran-china-idUKBRE83C0FY20120413

You didn't pick up a right story. I takes a year or so to build a supertanker. The contract must have been signed sometime ago. You use past tense to describe a present case.

 

[katsung47]

704. Iran war (2) (1/28/2011)

Be noticed that on 1/10, Treasury Secretary Geithner visited China. I allege it was to confirm the secret deal. Next day, there was such a news:

Harper to visit China, seeking higher oil sales
By David Ljunggren | Reuters – Wed, Jan 11, 2012


OTTAWA (Reuters) - Prime Minister Stephen Harper plans to visit China next month as his government looks to open new markets for oil sands crude in the wake of Washington's decision to delay approval of a major pipeline from Alberta to Texas.
After winning power in 2006, Harper's Conservatives initially took a cool line with China and cited what they described as Beijing's poor human rights record.

http://news.yahoo.com/harper-visit-china-seek-deeper-economic-ties-202731193.html

For the war on Iran, puppet Canada government ignores Beijing's poor human rights, now has a warm line to satisfy China's great appetite on oil.

On Jan. 18, news reported that "Obama rejects oil pipeline from Canada, triggering loud controversy". Of course, it is not for the consideration of environment as he said. It is part of the secret deal for Iran war.

All these events: Geithner's China visit, Harper's plan to visit China for oil export to China, Obama's reject of the oil pipeline from Canada, Chinese Premier Wen's visit to Gulf and new deals with these oil countries, were done within ten days - from Jan.10 to Jan. 18. The technical details must have been prepared in advance. That plan should have started from last November.

My last clear warning for Iran war date was October. see "691. October 21 plot (11/1/2011)". It signals with Harold Camping's World End Day prediction and FBI's case of "Iran plans to assassinate Saudi ambassador in US soil".

Since November, they were preparing this big one - bribe China. Part of this plot is NDAA. It was proposed in late November. When Obama signed it into law on 12/31, I wrote on 1/2, "700. National Defense Authorization Act (1/2/2012)". On point 5, I said,

"5. War on Iran is their major goal. With great possibility, there will be false flag nuclear attacks on US cities to justify the Iran war. Most people realize the truth of the 911 attack. This law is created to deal with the people who won’t believe this government anymore when such “terror attack” happens again. "

I would say my observation was very accurate. One week later, we saw all these events relate to Iran war.

 

[SeekinTruth]

The war drums have been going for years. It should be kept in mind that strategic escalation of war rhetoric is mainly intended to keep people distracted and anxious. An actual war can also be used this way, but may not be needed.

The Earth Changes seem to be what the main concern to distract the people is all about.

 

[katsung47]

715. War as a distraction in April 14 plot (4/14/2012)

The Feds used to create big events to distract the framed case as I always said. In this April 14 plot they prepared a war.

1. War crisis in Korea Peninsula. North Korea announced to launch a ballistical missile between 4/12 to 4/16. The core date is 4/14.

2. War on Iran.

World powers to hold talks with Iran on April 14:
BRUSSELS | Sun Apr 8, 2012
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/04/08/us-iran-nuclear-ashton-idUKBRE8370BD20120408

It's not a talk. It's an ultimatun. A war could have happened any time at US' will when April 14 talks started. Simply because Iran won't accept a "surrender" demand. Here is the rare report news:

US Gives Iran 'Last Chance' Warning

Obama demands concessions as crucial talks begin in Istanbul later this week

By Guy Adams

April 09, 2012 "The Independent" - -Iran must immediately close a large nuclear facility built underneath a mountain if it is to take what President Obama has called a "last chance" to resolve its escalating dispute with the West via diplomacy.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article31029.htm

US Offers to 'Negotiate' if Iran Surrenders;

Thoughts on Negotiation Tactics; Obama Threatens War

By Mike Shedlock

April 09, 2012 "Information Clearing House" --- President Obama has stepped up the rhetoric against Iran with an offer to "negotiate". His offer is no offer at all, it is a demand to surrender.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article31034.htm

3. Eliminate any possible anti-war voice. Based on his religious stance, Pope will certainly against any new war. At this time, if the Iran war happens, his voice will be absent. Watch the time coincidence.

Could it Be? Another Resignation? “Pope Benedict to step down April 15 2012″ from Kauilapele's Blog

Posted by Ram Arjuna on March 9, 2012 at 12:00pm

http://2013rainbowroundtable.ning.com/profiles/blogs/could-it-be-another-resignation-pope-benedict-to-step-down-april-

 

[katsung47]

U.S. Military Announces Syria War Plans Are Ready

Posted by Alexander Higgins - June 14, 2012

The U.S. military has completed plans to conduct operations against Syria which all involve large numbers of U.S. troops and extended operation.

Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, tells CNN that the U.S. military has completed planning to conduct a variety of military operations against Syria in the event orders are issued.

The plans outline a variety of operations which Pentagon officials tell CNN all involve a large number of U.S. troops and involve a long-term deployment into the region.

The Pentagon’s war plans seem to focus on three areas of importance – direct military actions Syria, securing alleged weapons of mass destruction depots, and providing military support to neighboring nations to keep the war contained within Syria.

Officials warn the civil war inside Syria will lead to a situation on the ground with a level of violence committed by insurgent forces far greater than what the US faced in Iraq.

http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2012/06/14/military-announces-syria-war-plans-ready-146531/