yea I thought the sameDeedlet said:Too bad, it looked like it had potential.
yea I thought the sameDeedlet said:Too bad, it looked like it had potential.
Sid said:I am probably over-stating but this was the crappiest of the crappy crap I ever watched.
adam7117 said:Number 33 features prominently.
.....
It smacks of one big warning to researchers into the paranormal that they are going to be hurt, permanently abducted or driven to insanity by pursuing the truth. That in itself is probably close to the money but they took it to gruesome dark places like psychosis, murder and suicide.
Franco said:Real footage of actors, there is nothing "real" in this movie, it's a movie, just like blair witch and paranormal activity though not marketed as such.
Unless you really believed those people lifted off the bed/couch when they underwent a hypnosis session?
and isn't the success of the psychopath's lies require a thread of truth to wrap the lies around? I guess this is what I contemplated after viewing this movie- the thread of truth, but in the context of issues covered in these books. I hope the excerpts sited weren't taken out of context too much, but would encourage anyone who felt disturbed by this movie to read Laura's work in these books, if you haven't already. Knowledge Protects! Learn to discern and all that jazz.The Wave, vol 7 in High Strangeness, pg 340 (from "the long and careful exposition of the facts, the data, the observations that lead up to the following remarks" in regards to the role of the psychopaths in the negative hierarchy")
And we see that the ultimate aim of the psychopath, as living representatives of the [Non-Being] hierarchy, is to master creative energy. To assimilate it to the self, to deprive others of it by inducing them to believe lies. Because, when you believe the lie of the psychopath, you have given him control of your Free Will - the essence of Creativity.
The planetary entity is the focal point of a specific density of mind/body interaction. At certain cosmic moments, or "crossroads", such a planetary entity may be scheduled to polarize into a highter density. The Negative hierarchy sees this as a "ripe moment" to induce that polarization to take place negatively so that the planetary entity will participate wholly in the Negative fourth density reality rather than the positive reality. Negatively polarized beings require a negatively polarized planetary base from which to function, just as higher-density positive beings need positively polarized planetary bases.
The Hermetic maxim again: Economics of light energy above, and economics of control of minds and will below. They want to use humanity's own creative energy to "lock" our planet under their domination.
What we see now in terms of the diminishing resources of our planet, the intensified UV bombardment of our atmosphere, is not an "unfortunate but inevitable byproduct of industrialization": it is part of the deliberate, covert effort of the Negative hierachy to prepare the biochemical and electrical composition of this planet for negative polarization.
There are such things as "evil planets: and dark stars. And the real question at this time is: Is Mother Earth about to become one?
Quote from High Strangeness... by Laura Knight-Jadczyk, pg 341
...Humanity is being set up to be batteries to fuel an "event" that the Entropic forces hope will result in their aims of being masters of the planet in fourth density.
What do you think this means?
You don't think that six billion people on the planet have aligned themselves consciously with the force of Creation do you? And we know there aren't a whole lot of them ready to graduate to conscious alignment with Entropy either.
So what does the Matrix want?
LIFE FORCE.
3D Resident said:Well I finally got around to seeing this film. I don't know how some people thought it was "crappy", since it scared the living hell out of me and I thought the acting was very good. As I was watching it though, and seeing the supposedly "actual footage", something told me it didn't look genuine, and I recalled reading somewhere a year ago that the "real events" weren't real at all. Then I reached the end of the movie, and read the text about what had happened to the people in the film, which got me thinking, "So it WAS real after all". And here I am now, after having found out that my original gut instinct was right and that no, it wasn't real, and it was all done as a marketing gimmick. I gullibly believed that no one would lie to the camera with "What you are about to see is based on real cases". There wasn't even a disclaimer in the credits at the end saying it was fictitious, which I find to be very disturbing. I really don't know how that can even be legal quite frankly. Yes I know we are lied to all the time by Hollywood, but to do it so blatantly with no disclaimer is really a first, is it not?
During the opening credits, a disclaimer states that Fargo's story is a "true story" based on an actual kidnapping and murder case - although the white-on-black inter-title's claim is questionable and has been disputed. [The end credits state: "The persons and events portrayed in this production are fictitious."] However, the tongue-in-cheek claim of authenticity lends an air of credibility to the ghoulish account.
THIS IS A TRUE STORY. The events depicted in this film took place in Minnesota in 1987. At the request of the survivors, the names have been changed. Out of respect for the dead, the rest has been told exactly as it occurred.