In this article by Derrick Broze, he makes a pretty startling claim in this article below. Worth a read for sure. I posted about this before, but it's worth mentioning again, I think.
In 2017 Johns Hopkins Center of Health Security ran simulations of a coronavirus pandemic called SPARS. What can we learn from this exercise?
www.thelastamericanvagabond.com
He claims the 'unification of every program we use in the sense of it all being tied to one easily-trackable digital identity' is one of the markers leading up to SPARS, the next planned pandemic.
Basically, there was a gaming exercise, entitled SPARS, run in 2017 by the shifty creatures at John Hopkins. A good overview is detailed in the first minutes of this new
Corbett Report video, with some comments from Derrick Broze.
Of particular note to us on the forum in the SPARS Event is the point of origin -
Saint Paul, Minnesota. Talk about a red flag. The city named after Paul being used for a new pandemic. Not only that,
the actual plague may be named after Saint Paul. And its point of origin? A church.
From Boze's article:
In mid-October 2025, three deaths were reported at a
church in St. Paul, Minnesota. Two church members recently returned from a trip to the Philippines. While their deaths were initially assumed to be influenza, laboratory results later disproved this theory. Eventually, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirmed that the three patients were infected with a novel coronavirus, known as the
St. Paul Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SPARS-CoV, or SPARS).
The session below suggests that the destruction of symbols is a kind of warfare that is just as real as bombs and bullets. I would say it this war is fought on an informational level, and affects the mass human subconscious. The goal is the destruction of Christianity as an ancient technology of the Soul:
Laura said:
(Pierre) I wanted to ask about Notre Dame de Paris. Was it an accident?
A: No
Q: (Pierre) Now, a lot of conspiracy theories are about this massive real estate project, making money, etc. What was the fundamental motive of this arson at Notre Dame?
A: Destruction of symbol: Our Lady Mother, i.e. Earth.
Q: (Pierre) I noticed often in those false flag operations they have prepared in advance a conspiracy theory for the mass audience. Here the conspiracy theory is money. It's about getting oil, getting fancy buildings.
But really, behind that, the real perpetrators are working on deeper things like symbols, ideologies, feelings.
(L) Symbols are so important. It's like the movie V for Vendetta. He was talking about Parliament as a symbol.
(Chu) It's the collective unconscious. And how did they do it? Was it thermite or what?
A: Normal fire elements. It didn't take more than that.
Q: (L) Accelerant of some sort. And then it's in such a place that it's hard to get any firefighters in there, and there were delays. So, is it possible that STS forces were controlling the minds and hearts of the people involved setting the fire and dealing with the fire?
A: Yes!!
Q: (L) Okay, any other questions?
(Pierre) But it was not a normal citizen thinking...
(L) No, it was controlled individuals.
(Pierre) Isolated individuals, or intelligence group organized?
(L) I would say it's probably what we call the crypto-geographic thing working on a lot of people.
(Pierre) Not Mossad?
(L) I don't think it has to be Mossad all the time.
(Pierre) It feels very cabalistic here. Christianity is the old time enemy.
(Joe) If it's social engineering, if it's an attempt to affect the mass mind by destroying one of the symbols, that would play into the...
(Pierre) Let's ask: Who did it?
A: Not one entity. Fire was set by manipulated Muslim group.
Q: (L) And who was manipulating the group?
A: Your favorite STS intel agency.
Q: (Joe) Mossad?
A: Yes
Q: (Pierre) Yeah.
(Joe) It was basically a terror attack.
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) It's the same modus operandi: a bunch of manipulated Muslims.
(Pierre) But this time, unlike similar scenarios, the media didn't point the finger immediately to some Muslim terrorists. It would have been a perfect opportunity to further demonize the Muslims and push up the clash of civilizations. Why didn't they offer to the public audience a Muslim patsy?
(L) Well, in case you haven't noticed, they haven't been doing that so much lately After the last couple of Muslim incidents like the Charlie Hebdo and Muhammed Merah, everything got turned around! Now Muslims are the oppressed! They are a protected species!
(Joe) The agenda over the past number of years has been to create in the minds of Western Christians the idea that Muslims are evil terrorists. And then whenever the programmed people rise up and say, "Muslims are evil! We don't want them here!" the manipulators tell them that they're evil racists and they should shut up. So, people have already kind of assumed that it was Muslims...
(L) They put them in this situation because it's cognitive dissonance.
(Pierre) So they are so programmed into thinking these thought patterns that you don't have to give the patsy.
(Joe) There were so many other events around the ND fire about other Christian churches with fires or attacks. There was a lot of suggestion that Muslims were doing it.
(L) They have manipulated things around now to the point where Christianity can be basically demonized and destroyed after they'd already manipulated Christians to think that Muslims are terrorists. So now, they're the bad guys for thinking what they've been manipulated to think. They've essentially put themselves in the position of being subject to destruction.
(Chu) It's like a super-evil way of gaslighting people.
(L) It's insidious. As far as I can see, Islam and Judaism as they are practiced today based on what Israel Shahak wrote, those are the closest things to materialistic Satanism that I've ever seen. And I'm not whitewashing Christianity either, but there are some foundational things about it that were truly good and benevolent.
A: Yes
Q: (L) If people could get back to the original Paleochristianity then the world would be a different place. But you're certainly not going to get there by materialistic Darwinism.
(Pierre) But when you look at history with a lot of distance, the feeling I get is that the most fundamental dynamic is that: the destruction of Christianity. And all we see today is...
A: How do you propose that they could make it possible to destroy Christianity?
Q: (L) Well, exactly what they're doing. Set up an opposition and then defend the opponent as a downtrodden minority.
(Joe) The point is that... I mean, you have in your head that there's going to be some kind of clash of civilizations, but that doesn't seem to be the point. If you look at social media today, they've gotten to the point where Christians are denounced as basically atavistic racist backward nutjobs. When they...
(Artemis) I think they want to speak...
A: It was the plan all along. Beware! It is coming to fruition and only those who stay awake and aware can navigate. The STS forces are determined to quash awareness and the possibility of seeding a new reality.
Q: (L) So you're saying that - and I guess you've said it before - that the importance of tuning the antennae of a group of people, the importance of staying awake and aware, is because you then become a receiver for creative energies?
A: Yes yes yes!!!
Q: (Joe) Is it that people who have a certain awareness which is equivalent to information or ideas or conception of the world in their mind, that this contributes building blocks for a new reality?
A: It is not that those who endure to the end will be saved, but that those who endure to the end shall save others. It is your choice to be among those who choose to be a part of the vanguard of the new reality!!!
So, what does it mean to 'stay awake and aware' to this SPARS scenario? Boze makes a really good point in the Corbett Report video. There are two new technologies gamed in the scenario. If one or both arrive, it would be a strong indication that our reality is being groomed in the SPARS direction. From Derrick Boze's article:
The exercise describes the world of 2025 as
“more connected, yet more divided” with near universal access to wireless internet. The report discusses a new technology known as
(1) internet accessing technology (IAT), which is described as
“thin, flexible screens that can be temporarily attached to briefcases, backpacks, or clothing and used to stream content from the internet.” New social media platforms also affect the digital landscape, including
(2) ZapQ, a platform that
“enables users to aggregate and archive selected media content from other platforms and communicate with cloud-based social groups based on common interests and current events.”
So I'm thinking about ZaqQ in terms of what you're observing. Of course, it's framed in vague terms of 'users' being 'enabled' in order to 'be themselves' or whatever, but it could be something much more nefarious is planned. My hunch is that it's more like users being
used in order to be useful for surveillance, data-mining, and social control.
