anart said:Seems Lloyde was trying to basically tell you the truth in his off camera moments - this is much bigger than him and someone in his position has no clue who's behind it.
Actually part of his act from the start was to make him appeal to "conspiracy theorists".
That's why he openly questioned the physical damage in our 2006 interview and what that David Icke book was all about.
He didn't read that book. If you notice he wasn't able to cite a single thing from it when I asked.
So no, I don't believe Lloyde was trying to tell the truth, I think he was trying to minimize his role by playing up his simple image and nice demeanor and the fact that he is a "small man" who just happened to "come across the highway" with something really big. But what's clear is that the evidence proves this was not by chance.
Anyway I'm not deluding myself nor did I mention anything about "court" bringing him for questioning.
But I DO believe there are plenty of honest public servants even though the system and the dark powers who run it are corrupt.
And I DO believe that people can reach a point of critical mass and force accountability.
I wouldn't do what I do if I had no hope.
True it won't be easy and yes it will take a mass awakening but honestly, IF just IF we are able to permeate the dumbed down complacent consciousness of the general public then we just might stand a chance.
I think 9/11 is a golden opportunity because it was so sloppy, and we have so much evidence. We're seeing more and more cracks in the armor and I feel that exposing this crime could very well be the ticket that finally sparks enough outrage to inspire real action.
Call me idealistic or naive, but I will forever remain hopeful and will forever fight for justice.