The quandry of the Boomers.

The war on Baby Boomers, and to an extent, Gen Xers, is real.

I'm witnessing now, in real time, an enormous push, reflected in social media, to accomplish greater generational divide, with Baby Boomers as the targeted punching bag. Disinformation and identity politics as tools of division work very well. I see hints that leftist politicians have been encouraging this enmity among younger generations. Some example posts, found in just ten minutes, are below.

I see continuation of generational divide-and-conquer and distraction from the real source of social problems. I also see the effect of Marxist indoctrination even among conservative younger people, as some are now equating Boomers with leftists (hippies especially). Advancing the Marxist ideal of reducing (then eliminating) private property and reducing (then eliminating) the Western middle class, and also the PTB desire to reduce population can be seen first and foremost in putting home ownership out of reach of the young. Home ownership is private property, real wealth, entry to the middle class, and the means to start families. Add the costly insurance scam, college loan scam, high interest rates, grocery & energy inflation (Net Zero's aim), and joblessness for college graduates and it's obvious why younger people are frustrated and angry and more susceptible to socialist ideologies. Yet, I see, repeatedly, the charge that Boomers are the most propagandized generation in history, as if it hasn't worsened since the 1950s.

I have seen projections that Millennials and Gen-Xers will inherit an astonishing $90 to $125 trillion as their parents and grandparents pass away. Being fewer in number, it's said that this will make them the "richest" generation in history. I don't think the PTB can let this happen. They need ways (beyond healthcare costs and inheritance taxes) to steal everything the older generations have accumulated.

Look up "managed decline" on YouTube for many descriptive videos of the economic problems happening similarly in the West.

1755075596279.png
 
Last edited:
For the Boomers, thank you for letting us 'go' from childhood, and for being 100% predictable, specially in the worst case scenarios.

For any other Gen, just want to say, don't make a GenXer angry, 'cause you'll learn all the possible practical uses of a mop.
 
The war on Baby Boomers, and to an extent, Gen Xers, is real.
I would agree that there is some strong resentment. I once worked with a 38 y.o. retiree from the Navy who was already earning a 50% pension for life, and had a full time job he intended to keep till 65. He was in good shape, financially. But he hated boomers and constantly railed against them for getting social security. I thought that was odd, given his perpetual government hand-out. There must have been some deep-seated issue there that he wasn't willing to explore. It is so much easier (and gratifying) to close one's eyes and blame rather than think.

However, many of the "spontaneous," "grass-root" comments above sound like bots, which would make it a PTB organized scheme, as you noted -- let's keep the divided states of america divided.
 
Last edited:
The war on Baby Boomers, and to an extent, Gen Xers, is real.

I'm witnessing now, in real time, an enormous push, reflected in social media, to accomplish greater generational divide, with Baby Boomers as the targeted punching bag. Disinformation and identity politics as tools of division work very well. I see hints that leftist politicians have been encouraging this enmity among younger generations.
Absolutely! And not just on social media, you hear it in ordinary conversation too. I have heard my nephew and other young people complaining about how the selfish boomers have wrecked everything.
 
Absolutely! And not just on social media, you hear it in ordinary conversation too. I have heard my nephew and other young people complaining about how the selfish boomers have wrecked everything.
Have a listen to Tucker Carlson go off on how horrible the Boomer generation is as he interviewed Charlie Kirk recently. He is definitely not helping the situation. Video is about 12 minutes long.

 
This is a very interesting discussion. Yes, this divide between the generations is palpable (and it's an age-old problem) but labelling them as "boomers" or "millennials" pushed the divide even further in my opinion; the term "millennials" also gained a pejorative touch. And now the "boomers" are mostly called "old white men" by those younger generations who largely identify themselves with or favor the trend of being "woke" and what is related to that.
 
Absolutely! And not just on social media, you hear it in ordinary conversation too. I have heard my nephew and other young people complaining about how the selfish boomers have wrecked everything.
Boomers are the ones that created instated and keep preserving their "system and status quo" so much so that all generations after them need to scramble around reinventing their lives. ....A lot of mess has been created as consequence. The mops will become the next AI. "Just you wait...Mr. Higgins, just you wait."

I am not a bot, BTW.
 
However, many of the "spontaneous," "grass-root" comments above sound like bots, which would make it a PTB organized scheme, as you noted -- let's keep the divided states of america divided.
I'm afraid the comments are occurring irrespective of borders, addressed to the current powers dominated by geriatrics controlling through policies.
 
That's a lot of broad brush painting! Boomer here. Not all of us are rich. I only had one friend whose parents footed the bill for college, so we were saddled with debt too. 22% interest for medical school loans in the 80s! But there seemed no worries for the future back then, so I agree times were better. That was the beginning of HMOs and smaller hospital closures around Chicago, so the writing was already on the wall.
I didn't know anyone growing up that didn't hustle for money from an early age (baby sitting, paper routes, yard work, cleaning, harvesting tobacco, whatever), or working in restaurants while in high school and college. Today I see very few young people doing this. Maybe because there aren't so many jobs out there. I don't accept that my generation was spoiled, except that we lived in more optimistic circumstances. How does it help to blame older people?
 
No such thing as a unified boomer theory. In fact, the hallmark was division and disruption. It’s a mistake to label and associate the boomers, or any generation, with the brush you’d paint the “leaders” during the same time. Nixon, LBJ, the Kennedy’s, George Wallace, MLK: all VERY different and representative of the fracturing of society which was the essential element post WWII. To paint the boomers with a single can of paint is an impossible oversimplification.

1962 to the early 70’s was arguably more overtly dysfunctional and destabilizing than what is going on today with the exception of the agendas of control being pushed today. When the financial dam breaks, food shortages arrive and the cosmic connection unleashes the earthquakes etc, it WILL be worse than that previous period and then current gens will have Something even greater than the boomers to be blamed for! lol 😝
 
To continue, we were mostly trying to cope, and get by in the midst of YOOGE rapid changes. The previous “greatest Gen” was in a very unified and aligned fight vs fascism. And then vs communism. They were manipulated with the common enemies theme which defined that era.

The boomers went from the nuclear threat (fear trauma) into total disruption and disintegration which was pretty much kicked off with the assassination of JFK. Then came the rebellion narrative, Music explosion, drug explosion, viet nam war, racial explosion followed by stagflation. Backlash, whiplash, flak and blowback at every turn.

I think “the boomers are selfish” narrative comes from the fact they were able to accumulate wealth (mainly due to dumb luck) which the current gens find out of reach. Bottom line, the parasitic, psychopathic over-class is conveniently blaming the boomers for what they themselves have accomplished. Furthermore they will say the destruction and confiscation of that boomer wealth (which should rightly be passed to Gen X etc) is deserved.
 
I think “the boomers are selfish” narrative comes from the fact they were able to accumulate wealth (mainly due to dumb luck) which the current gens find out of reach. Bottom line, the parasitic, psychopathic over-class is conveniently blaming the boomers for what they themselves have accomplished. Furthermore they will say the destruction and confiscation of that boomer wealth (which should rightly be passed to Gen X etc) is deserved.
I think part of the issue is there are some boomers who tell younger generations to do things just like they did to make a life for themselves. The problem is that boomers had a much better situation. Here's an interesting substack that discusses one big issue - home ownership.


I saw this chart making the rounds on Twitter this week, and it stopped me cold. While the specific figures combine data from multiple sources, the trend is undeniable: in 1950, over half of 30-year-olds were married homeowners. By 2025, some analysts project that number as low as 13%.



That's not a societal transformation. It's not an economic fluke. It's the visible outcome of an invisible strategy—one that extracted everything it could from a three-generation arc and left only illusions in its place.

They'll tell you people just choose differently now—that marriage rates fell because of changing values. But people can't choose what they can't afford. When the economic foundation for family formation disappears, cultural changes follow inevitably. That chart doesn't show us changing values or new priorities. It shows systemic breakdown, disguised for decades as freedom.

It maps the slow evaporation of the social contract. For one generation, adulthood was a starting point. For the next, a struggle. For the latest, an abstraction—marketed endlessly but almost never attained. What began as a rite of passage has become a paywalled simulation.


The post–World War II boom was never sustainable. In hindsight, this was obvious. It relied on conditions that were always time-limited: cheap energy from newly tapped oil fields, industrial monopolies before globalization kicked in, dollar hegemony that exported inflation globally, and a demographic pyramid with more workers than retirees. It was a golden window, not a golden age. And when the window closed, the illusion had to be maintained—through leverage, narrative, and ever-increasing sacrifice from the generations that followed.

The math quietly stopped working. Boomers bought homes for two or three times their annual income during an era when interest rates would fall for the next four decades—turning their mortgages into wealth-building machines as rates dropped from 15% to near-zero. Today's buyers face five to six times their income—or more in major cities—while rates can only go up from historic lows. Where Boomers rode a 40-year tailwind of falling borrowing costs that inflated their assets while deflated their debt, current generations face headwinds at every turn. The Federal Reserve data confirms this unprecedented decline, showing rates falling from over 18% in the early 1980s to near 2.6% by 2021.



The housing market itself tells the story: recent data shows over 500,000 more sellers than buyers - not because homes are affordable, but because an entire generation has been systematically priced out.



The institutions that promised stability—education, government, media, finance—mutated into extraction machines. Still speaking the old language, they now served a different purpose: to keep people compliant inside a system that no longer offered a way out.

This wasn't merely economic. It was existential. The foundations of meaning—family, ownership, stability—were quietly downgraded to lifestyle preferences, and then systematically priced out. People without homes are easier to relocate. People without families are easier to isolate. People without rootedness are easier to govern. Beau: The above is the social engineering created by the PTB and their 4D masters IMO

The Boomers didn't design the con, but they lived in its payout phase. They received land, pensions, and a functional society. Many still believe they earned it, unable to recognize how thoroughly their reality was engineered from the start. Their children were left trying to replicate a model that no longer existed. Their grandchildren have grown up in the wreckage, wondering why their competence and effort never translate into traction.

This didn't happen by accident. As I've documented in The Technocratic Blueprint, we're witnessing the culmination of a century-long plan—a sophisticated pump and dump scheme where the bill is finally coming due. The architecture for this extraction has deep historical roots, dating back to systematic changes in how America was governed and how citizens were legally classified. What followed was a long, slow harvest of the population—one that disguised control as progress, debt as opportunity, and collapse as evolution. The postwar boom didn't contradict that system—it lubricated it.

Now, the mirage is gone. What was once promised can no longer be afforded. The institutions that upheld the illusion are spent. They extract, but no longer inspire. They preach equity while enforcing dependence. They sell empowerment while removing agency.


And still, they insist the dream is alive.

But here's where the extraction becomes truly sophisticated. As the traditional American Dream died, a new form of participation emerged: digital membership in what amounts to a global dollar club. As KF recently explained in his analysis of the GENIUS Act, stablecoins—digital bank accounts disguised as innovation—have exploded to serve 400 million users globally while generating massive profits for their issuers.

The trade-off is stark. Boomers got real assets with relative transactional privacy. The next generation gets digital "assets"—stablecoin wallets, app-based banking, algorithmic financial services—in exchange for comprehensive surveillance. What looks like financial inclusion is actually the infrastructure for total economic monitoring.

This represents the systematic replacement of real value with declared value across every domain. America has become a "club promoter" for the global dollar system, offering relaxed entry requirements that have drawn hundreds of billions into U.S. treasury-backed stablecoins. Users get access to "dollar-denominated wealth" through stablecoins that pay them no interest while the issuers pocket billions from the treasury yields. It's the same extraction model that's been systematically engineered through culture and media for decades, just scaled globally and digitized.

Experts in these systems, like Aaron Day, warn this represents a "backdoor CBDC"—applying existing financial surveillance laws to what was previously private money.

The surveillance trade-off is particularly insidious. In the short term, these systems offer less monitoring than traditional banks—no extensive paperwork, minimal identity verification. But once everyone is locked into the digital infrastructure, America can impose far stricter controls than ever before. Every transaction becomes trackable, every account becomes freezable, every economic participant becomes manageable.

We're witnessing the replacement of physical ownership with digital access—and calling it progress. Where Boomers built equity in homes, the next generation builds balances in accounts that can be monitored, modified, or eliminated with keystrokes.

But charts don't lie. That one chart—the brutal slope from 52% to 13%—says what no institution will admit: the old system is dead. It wasn't lost. It was liquidated—and we were the product.


What gets built in its place remains an open question. The GENIUS Act's full-reserve model could enable either unprecedented control—or the first real challenge to fractional-reserve banking in a century. But as Catherine Austin Fitts has pointed out, the Act contains no protections against programmable money, potentially creating private CBDCs with even less oversight than government-issued digital currency. As she explains, 'the issuing is not centralized, it's dispersed. But if you look at the control mechanism of a social credit system and we know the federal government is doing remarkable things to pull together all the data they need to do a social credit system controlled by private corporations, tech companies, essentially.' The outcome isn't predetermined—it's being decided right now.

The good news is that once the spell breaks, you stop trying to win the rigged game. You stop competing for scraps and start building something real. Not a nostalgic replica of a world that's gone—but a new structure, grounded in truth, agency, and actual sovereignty. The chart that documents the death of the old dream becomes the blueprint for something better—if we're honest enough to read what it's really telling us.
 
That’s what I meant by dumb luck. Being born in a favorable time during the life cycle of the empire. Perfect circumstances to prosper even if you were clueless. Work save invest buy property and get “rich” on paper. All those old formulas for success no longer work, given currency devaluation, absurd property valuations, economic decay and financial malfeasance. But once again, it is the system controllers and manipulators rigging things with the end on mind to consolidate and concentrate wealth and power in fewer hands. Average Joe Boomer just went along for a nice ride for a while. He is dying off now and it’s up to the Millennials to figure out how to preserve some of that wealth still left for Gen X and Z etc. Good luck. The sharks are holding the Aces.
 
Back
Top Bottom