The Rose of the World by Daniel Andreev

Just thought I'd mention that my reviews, on amazon.CA, are still up. Both mention Lobaczewski.

http://www.amazon.ca/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A1P8BX9EF4LF9Q/ref=cm_cr_auth/701-5425668-6433953?ie=UTF8&sort%5Fby=MostRecentReview
 
CarpeDiem, do you still need assistance in translating ? Let me know...

That's if you guys do not mind my english :)
 
NB: This is not a ‘good’ translation (every day brings a bag full of nasty surprises to someone’s ego bubble – I am in big troubles with tenses here). But i tried to preserve original author’s style. Wide strokes of native English speakers brush are Very Welcome

http://rozamira.org/da/jizn.htm

Life of Daniil Andreev Told by His Wife

In remote times - they seem remote by number of events that separate us and them - biographies usually began with listing of genealogy lineages. Probably, this close glazing into the terrain roots of personality is meaningful.

Father of Daniil Andreev - famous Russian writer Leonid Nikolaevich Andreev - was born in Orlovsk gubernia [province, a major administrative subdivision of the Imperial Russia] on that magnificent Russian terrain which was the native land of so many - inspiring and different - Russian writers. According to the family legend, father of Leonid Andreev was the illegitimate son of Oryol landowner Karpov (the name is yet unknown) and domestic girl Glafira. Barin [a Russian nobleman] married the girl to shoemaker Andreev - whence a surname originated. Mother of Leonid Nikolaevich, Anastasia Nikolaevna, - is the orphan daughter of bankrupted Polish ‘szlachcic’ [nobleman] Patzkovsky.

Daniil’s mother was polish by father Alexandra Mihajlovna Veligorskaja. Family name Veligorskije – is a [Russificated] form of a patrimonial name of one of the branches of Vielgorski Dukes (Vielgurski is more correct), deprived from their title and possessions for their participation in 1863 revolt. Alexandra Mihajlovna by maternal line was Ukrainian. Her mother, and grandmother of Daniil, was Evrosinya Varfolomeevna Shevchenko. The name Shevchenko, widespread in Ukraine, is not a concurrence, but family tights with Taras Shevchenko [Ukrainian poet]: Varfolomey Shevchenko was his second cousin, brother-in-law and blood-brother [ritual religious bonds between persons of godly, not mundane nature].

On November, 2nd, 1906, all these patrimonial lineages had been woven together in Berlin, when the second son of Leonid Nikolaevich and Aleksandra Mihajlovna, who was given a name Daniil by mother, was born.

Daniil Leonidovich always was - even up to strangeness - indifferent to his genealogical roots, never tried to carry out any genealogic research. All materials reported below are result of research; one could almost call them investigations, of join efforts of Oryol Literary museum employees and Olga Vasilevna Rojtsyna, the wife of the second cousin of Daniil’s brother Anatoly Mefodevich Levitsky.

Destiny was glazing into newborn’s cradle with awe and lucidity.

26 year-old Shurochka, absolutely healthy and cherished by her husband, has died from a ‘postnatal fever’ soon after giving birth to her second son. In many memoirs of contemporaries her darling, light image was lovingly kept together with accounts of how heartbreaking was her death for Leonid Nikolaevich. In some memoirs he appears going mad from suffering and tragedy. He could not stand seeing the newborn who was the cause of his wife’s death. It seemed that the child was doomed. But fortunately soon Elizaveta Mihajlovna Dobrova, the senior sister of Aleksandra Mihajlovna, has arrived from Moscow to Berlin. She has taken the orphan baby in which a life was hardly noticeable, to Moscow where the child found a wonderful family. This family can not be named differently but a native to Daniil. Up to six years Daniil had been taken continuous care by mother of Elizaveta and Alexandra, Busen’ka [loving name for ‘grandma’], Evrosinya Varfolomeevna Shevchenko. Iron-willed and strong-minded, she used unconditional sincere respect of everybody, all close and distant acquaintances surrounding her.

Perhaps, in our modern Babylon, with towers which fall long before the middle of construction is achieved, shapes of cities are almost indiscernible. And in fact each city had the unique spiritual shape, influencing spiritual outlook of its inhabitants: A person, living in Tver’, differed from a Petersburger, moscovite – from a person, living in Orlov.

Moscow accompanied childhood and adolescent years of Daniil Andreev.
Before entering Kremlin the child was removing a headdress at any season of the year despite of babysitter’s cries: he knew that that was the only way to enter Kremlin.

A Temple of Christ the Savior. It is vain to argue about its architectural perfection or imperfection as that building was a symbol of Moscow, and the image of the White Temple above a bend of Moscow- river and Andreev creativeness are inseparable.

Very typical for earlier Moscow Dobrov’s family lived in Small Levshinsky Lane. Till 1960-ties there was a two-storey small house, nothing remarkable. Building was very old, has gone through fire during Napoleon besieging Moscow. Such houses in Moscow ane known as prior-Napoleonic. Dobrovs lived on the first floor, and a kitchen and any auxiliary rooms were situated in a cellar with abrupt and narrow ladder leading there.

The entrance door was directly from a Small Levshinsky Lane – with a large copper plate on the door which read ‘Doctor Phillip Aleksandrovich Dobrov’. After entering the house, it was necessary to mount several wide wooden steps, and then a huge, in all wall, very beautiful mirror met everybody who entered the premises. A door with big white glasses directed futher to the left, into foyer. To the right from foyer there was a door to Phillip Aleksandrovich cabinet where his son Alexander Filippovich lived then; afterwards it was Daniil Leonidovich's room, and even later - ours with him, our favorite room, which was preserved in the book ‘Russian gods’ in the name of thechapter ‘From a small room’.

The door to the left from a foyer conducted into a hall. I have found it divided by curtains into several separate zones in which all senior generation of family huddled: Phillip Aleksandrovich, Elizaveta Mihajlovna and one more sister - Ekaterina Mihajlovna Mitrofanova.

It had occurred after 1917 Revolution when the whole Russian traditional mode of life in meeting human needs has been spoiled by ‘condensation’ and ‘community apartments’, which didn’t bring happiness to anybody, and spoiled more significant quantity of human lives than war, prisons and prison camps.

The hall played an immense role in Daniil's happy childhood. Dobrov’s house was the patriarchal Moscow house, hospitable and wholehearted. The house was opened for plenty of the most different, often discordant with each other people united on an intellectual level, breadth of interests and respect to each other.

I have still found echoes of it, as I have found a huge table in a frontward part of the partitioned hall, which had been moved apart on holidays with plug-in boards, in my opinion to up to five meters in length.

The room next to a hall previously was Phillip Aleksandrovich and Elizaveta Mihajlovna's bedroom, and at a door dividing these two rooms, more exactly - at a keyhole - small Daniil was sticking out, examining Shalyapin, Bunin, Skryabin, actors of the Art Theatre, Gorkiy, and many other Dobrov visitors.

Daniil not only loved Dobrov family – everybody loved them, - not only perceived this family as native, but often repeated: ‘How it is good, that I grew in Dobrov family, instead of being raised by father’.

Daniil's children's room was situated further along a corridor leading from a foyer into apartment. I have not found it any more, and only from his stories I know that all along the room, at a level of children's height, the portraits of governors of the invented by Daniil Tzar dynasty were hanging - an echo of his remembrance that had amazed his children's soul from ‘The Tsars’Gallery’ in the Kremlin where on the ceiling remarkable mosaic portraits of Grand dukes and Moscow Tsars were laid.

Daniil started to write very early, in the childhood. He wrote verses and prose: a huge epopee where action took place in interplanetary space. Planets were not those known to us, but invented. They had their own religious cults, which naturally were based on data, read from a children's adaptation of the Greek myths, but with very nice Daniil’s own addition: except for traditional Greek Supreme gods, gods of war and goddesses of love, there was also invented by Daniil god of Joy.

Up to school years Daniil studied at home. He had a teacher - to my shame, I forgot his name - obviously, he was a clever person and a talented teacher. The active and playful boy, upon an agreement with this teacher, restrained his character for two Sunday awards: if he behaved ‘well’ all the week long (possibly, the concept of ‘goodness’ was very extensible) then on Sunday the teacher drew to him one more letter of the Indian alphabet and carried him across new (for him) Moscow route of a tram.

Knowing that this spoilt, kind, inventive and playful little boy had cheerful and tender childhood, the following story sounds quite shockingly.

Beloved Grandma Evrosinya Varfolomeevna has died, when her favorite grandson was six years old. The grandson was ill with diphtheria, and the grandmother who looked after him, had seized the same diphtheria. The grandson recovered, the grandmother died.

The recovering child did see neither her death, nor funeral. Dobrov family did not know, how to tell him about beloved Grandma death.

Alexandra Filippovna, senior Dobrov daughter, has taken upon herself that difficult task. She started telling to the child that beloved Grandma was recovering in hospital, but started missing her daughter, Daniil’s mother; that to see her, it is necessary to die, but Grandma worries, if Daniil would allow that.
Diligence of Aleksandra Filippovna gradually led to that the boy wrote to the grandmother the letter where he let the Grandma join her daughter in paradise.

But melancholy about grandmother, desire to see unknown mother and conception of death as a road to Paradise which has developed in a children's soul, have led to unexpected result. In the summer after separation with beloved Grandma Dobrov family and Daniil lived nearby small Black river where his father Leonid Andreev had a small house (but not in his house), and the boy was caught on the bridge when he was going to drawn - not from suffering, but from his passionate desire to see the lost relatives.

The childhood turned into adolescence which coincided with 1917 Revolution and Russia being reduced to rubbles. The life became difficult and hungry, each family searched for any way to survive. F.A.Dobrov was preparing an unusual yeast supplement which was very useful and in great demand; it was known as ‘yeasts of doctor Dobrov’. Apparently, yeasts should be drunk, and it is not clear, why anybody in the family, including the inventor himself, did not keep the recipe...

Children Daniil and Tanya, his girlfriend from the age of three, a classmate in school and then his lifelong friend, Tatyana Ivanovna Olovjanshnikova, Morozova by husband, carried yeasts in accordance with orders across all Moscow. Having begun with these business campaigns, Daniil then wandered across Moscow alone during his young years, frequently all nights long - since evening till dawn.

Dobrovs were an orthodox family. Family celebrated all orthodox holidays, observed fastings; but there was no intolerance in them: everybody, being close with this family, was free in own beliefs, principles and even doubts. One of close friends of the house was an actress of Art Theatre, Nadezda Sergeevna Butova. From all her theatric roles I know only a role of mother Stavrogina in ‘Demons’. She has opened depth and spiritual beauty of orthodox rituals to 15-year old Daniil, he remembered that the rest of his life with gratitude.

But he was religious not by education, not by tradition, but by the whole of his personality makeup.

He studied in a private gymnasium which he graduated already as the school of the Soviet type. The gymnasium has been founded by Evgenia Albertovna Repman and Nadezda Fedorovna Fedorova. It was located in Merzlyakovsky Lane and known as ‘Repmanovsky’.

Daniil loved gymnasium very much and, apparently, had a reason for that. Unusual to an educational institution fact tells about an atmosphere in gymnasium. After 1917 Revolution Evgenia Albertovna lived in Sudak, Crimea. Being in a poor health, with paralyzed legs, she had no means of survival. Therefore her former pupils in gymnasium who graduated in 1920-ies, collected for her money on monthly basis. They proceeded to support her financially until the beginning of the World War II; and grand role in gathering this money belonged to Daniil.

I think, that his dream about a creation of a special school - the dream of all his life which was reflected in ‘the Rose of the World’ (education of superior, improved type of personality) - has soul roots in an original atmosphere of this gymnasium.

This dream is the creation of school for ethically gifted children; not young artists, biologists or wonder-kids -musicians, but children possessing special, namely sincere ethical properties of soul*.

*From what I know from Daniil's story, among every possible inventions of the 1920-ies was a story similar to this one: the destiny of three persons, connected with something like such group is known: one of them sunk rescuing a drowning man; the second left for a cave monastery on Caucasus; the third replaced a son to the mother who has left for monastery.

* * *
One girl, I shall name only her name, Galya, studied in one class with Daniil, - who he was fond of in the childhood and loved for many years since then. She did not love him; both their adolescence and young years were marked with a press of these troubled relationships of a deep friendship and non-reciprocated love. There was also a period of reciprocated love, and that is so vaguely referred to as a friendship – a deep sincere interest in each other, the mutual and deprived from any egoism desire of goodness, mutual understanding, - were kept to his utmost death.

Galya was the person of rare nobleness, charm and womanly hood. The cycle of poems ‘Moonstones’ is devoted to her.

Here it would be necessary to start to tell about Daniil Andreev's youth.

But I shall not do it. It is untimely. He has passed very dark and dangerous circles in the youth. No, he was neither drunkard, nor debauchee, anything ‘dark’ in usual sense of this term was not present in his life. In his life everything of the most essential nature always laid at a plane of irrational. The main burden of the terrible roads which he had passed during his young years was in plane of unreal. If these dark roads were absent, he would not write much of what he had written later, - the writer writes what his soul knows; it is impossible to invent anything - there would be no art in an invention. His first marriage pertains to his early marriage on university classmate at the Higher Literary Courses where he studied after graduating school. The marriage was strange and, certainly, he felt very guilty about this woman; that guiltiness he knew and remembered all life long. And she repaid him for a harm done to her with a friendship for all life. She began, much later, her efforts about his liberation from a prison and when I returned from a prison - helped me to take care about him.

I would like to note that the whole Daniil's life was accompanied by sincere, devoted friendship of women.
* * *
After graduation from Higher Literary Courses, he understood, that anything he had written could not be printed. Any fluctuations, any blackouts of soul never concerned his creativity, his truthfulness. Poet Daniil Andreev had not a place in the Soviet reality of that time.

The way out was found for him by his cousin Alexander Filippovich, a son of Phillip Aleksandrovich Dobrov. He could not become the architect after graduation from Architectural Institute because of encephalitis and had to work as a designer. He taught Daniil Leonidovich to write fonts, and that enabled him to earn a modest life.

Daniil never ceased to write.

Unusual features of Daniil’s personality defined also features of his creative talent:

- Palpable, real - using his own term - experience of other reality. That was the vision of the Heavenly Kremlin
above the Kremlin terrestrial appeared to him when he was fifteen;

- Stunning by its force and repeatedly proven experience of vicinity of Saint Seraphim in a temple during reading of orthodox Akafist to the God;

- Pre-sensation of an image of the Beast connected with an essence of a state, understood and described by Daniil later;

- Sensation, almost vision of woman-demons, dominating the Great cities;

- A powerful full of happiness touch to those whom he later named Elements of nature: fine creatures, spirits of terrestrial elements.

Andreev’s attitude to nature cannot be named as a love, considering under a word ‘love’ that usually is understood: an aesthetic admiration and comprehension of a vivacity of unpolluted ecological environment.

Everything around him: the Earth and the Sky, the Wind and the Snow, the Rivers and Flowers - was alive in direct, instead of figurative sense.

I remember, into what state of delight I brought him once when I admitted that I do not have doubts about real existence of protective home spirits and that I am a their friend – and therefore my place is so cozy...

He went barefoot always whenever possible. He was telling that he feels the Earth absolutely differently in different places. To my indignation: ‘Well, the Earth, as I understand it, is the only thing that it is possible to feel on dirty city asphalt!’ – He replied: ‘Impersonal sensation of human weight, very strong’.

Everything that is written in his big work ‘the Rose of the World’ about the nature had gone through him directly, as well as those chapters of the book ‘Russian gods’ devoted to nature.

During summers he lived near Moscow and in Crimea, but most of all he liked to leave for Trubchevsk. Unfortunately, I do not remember, how he has gotten there for the first time. But after seeing Trubchevsk for the first time he remained fascinated by these places. He liked pedestrian trips lasting for many days, almost always alone, barefooted, with a poor stock of simple meal (he ate a little in general) and tobacco – he was a chronic smoker. He was spending nights in casual haystacks, on a moss in a forest.

These travel inspired Daniil to write many poems. And poem ‘Nemerecha’ is the description of one of such trips.
* * *

We got acquainted in March, 1937. The person very close to both of us had acquainted us. He called Daniil on phone and asked him to walk down to the street. We were approaching Small Levshinsky Lane in the direction of a small house, and towards us a high, thin, harmonious, despite of being round-shouldered, person with very easy and fast gait was coming from the door of this house. There was a strong snow and I have remembered: ‘Blok’s’ night snowfall, the high person with swarthy face and dark narrow eyes. He had a very warm hand. In that way he entered my life, and I entered ‘The Dobrov’s house’ as everybody called it.

In 1937 I found the house in the sequent state: ‘elderly Dobrovs’ - Phillip Aleksandrovich already left work at the Second Town hospital and had a small private practice; Elizaveta Mihajlovna, a midwife was not working either.

The third of Veligorsky sisters, Ekaterina Mihajlovna lived together with them. She worked as a nurse in a psychiatric hospital, considering that insane persons require care and kindness the most. All three of them, as I already wrote, lived in the big room behind curtains, and the forward part of this room served as a dining room and in the same place there was a grand piano on which Phillip Aleksandrovich played in the evenings.

Except for the elderly family members and Daniil, Dobrov’s daughter, Alexandra Filippovna, and her husband, Alexander Viktorovich Kovalensky, a very interesting person, with original, somehow ‘cold-ardent’ mind lived in the third room belonging to the family. Translator of Konopnitskoj, Slovak, Ibsen, he was the unusual poet and writer. His works were not printed. He was reading his works to few friends. All his works were destroyed on Lubyanka - he and his wife were arrested on our ‘case’. In Daniil’s youth Alexander Viktorovich had significant and sometimes overwhelming disempowering influence on him.

Dobrov’s have not weaned from a habit to live with the open door. And this door was opened in a foyer where all tenants of an apartment and all visitors were passing by, and among tenants there was also a woman who had received a room under the warrant of People's Commissariat of Internal Affairs [NKVD]. They have lost so many friends in Lubyanka bowels in 1937! All victims were named in one of the chapters of the novel ‘Wanderers of night‘ which referred to ‘Martyrolog’. Daniil Leonidovich started to write this novel in 1937. Before starting it he worked on the poem ‘A song about Monsalvata’, somewhat based on medieval legends. He did not finish this poem and never returned back to it.

* * *
Since 1937, in essence, our common life with him was already underway, at first as very close friends, later as a husband and a wife.

The same way our family lived, large circle of people lived in those years, therefore I shall try to tell what our life was like.

The overwhelming majority of people lived at that time very poorly. Almost all lived in municipal apartments where, generally, where absolutely alien people incompatible with each other were violently piled up.

Now it is accepted that at that time frequent reductions of prices were common. Probably, I do not remember it; but I remember well, how we were buying 100 grams of oil or a thin slice of sausage - it was really very tasty and many kinds of sausages were available, but everybody looked at their prices... Also Muscovites were sending packages with macaroni to relatives in province.

But that was only a background whence the wholeness of life was emerging. The real life was comprised of excellent concerts in the Large Conservatory Hall; frequent meetings with friends – three or four persons at once, with muffled (from neighbors) conversations and discussions on abstract themes which apparently were of utmost importance for us.

Daniil Andreev who was writing a poem about Monsalvat at that time, was not only comprehensible in his obsession with these images, he was also infinitely precious and necessary for all of us. Because for us, Russians, all those involved into the Russian culture, the theme of the hidden sacred relic bearing the spiritual help to thirsting for it into the surrounding us terrible world, was, possibly, the most precious gift.

Probably, Rimsky-Korsakov opera ‘The Legend About Invisible City of Kitezh and Maiden Fevronia’ was not performed at the Big theatre in those years: it were not only us who understood urgency of the hidden sacred relic, but also those who destroyed orthodox Temples which were obvious relics; those who has reduced teaching of history at schools to the tendentious story about revolts and revolutionary movements where peasant revolts in Germany directly followed Spartacus story; those who broke crosses on Vladimir Solovev’s, Yasukov’s and Khomyakov’s tombs.

Orthodox Church with pulled out bells performed the Liturgy. There are no words to express worship for this unfading feat; it will be never stirred up by any external alluvial lie. The church has carried silent fire of candles in the hands held down by shackles.

Wagner's music sounded on concerts at the Conservatory, and there we heard sound of Monsalvat bells; ‘Loengrine’ was performed at the Big theatre - most likely because of thoughtlessness of Bolshevic officials ...

I do not know how to describe that atmosphere of weakening, sickening fear in which all of us lived during those years. It is difficult to outline ‘we’ - anyway, I meant all those whom I knew.

I think, that such fear [as in Bolshevik Russia after 1917], and during so long period, had not been felt during history of the civilized mankind before. First, the fear was manifested by quantity of groups of population exposed to it; secondly, because for inception of this fear no reason was necessary; and certainly, because of long-term extent of horror crippling our souls. It is a lie that 1937 (‘thirty damned... ‘, etc.) was the most terrible. Simply in 1937 the huge snake has crept up closely to communists, here was the reason to shout about it. And everything has begun from the beginning, since 1917 - 1918.

Personally for me sensation of this constricting fear on a throat, sometimes loosening its grip, sometimes strangling, appeared in 1931 – I was 16 when my uncle was arrested along Industrial party process. That expectation full of horror – ‘this night they will come here for my relatives!’ – was known to every woman. Many of those, who during the whole night was sitting still and unmoved in their expectations, or, sobbing, where mongering all over apartment because of half-hour delay of husband from work – ‘he has been taken in the street!’ – are simply not alive any longer. Some women even now are afraid to tell their stories.

That life, described close to reality, was a background of the complex action developed in the novel ‘Wanderers of night ‘.
In Moscow fallen asleep from horror, under a vigilant surveillance from all Lubyanka windows, which were brightly illuminated all the night long, the small group of close friends prepares to the time when the tyranny pressing everybody will fail and the spiritual food will be utmost necessary to people thirsting for it during wingless and terrible epoch. Each of these dreamers prepares to forthcoming changes in own way. The young architect, Jennie Morgenshtern, brings drawings of a Temple of the Sun of the World which should be built on Vorobjev Mountains. (By the way, it is the same place where the new Moscow University had been built later.) This temple became a symbol of our group. A cross crowns the Temple and the emblem of winged heart in the winged sun is inherent to it.

The supervisor, scientist Leonid Fedorovich Glinsky, a researcher of culture, history and mythology of India (a tribute of passionate love of Daniil to India), was the author of the interesting theory of alternation of red and dark blue epochs in history of Russia. Colors - red and dark blue - are conditional, but this conventionality is clear: dark blue as dominance of the spiritual, mystical, and red - as prevalence of material.

Perhaps, the greatest loss connected with destruction of the novel, was Moscow which was alive in it. Moscow appeared in the novel not like one of many ‘descriptions’ of Moscow of that period, but as alive, multi-plane, tragic city!

The protagonists of the novel met on the first presentation of the Fifth symphony of Shostakovich in the Large Conservatory Hall. We with Daniil were present at this concert. The Symphony was described in the novel, where Daniil revealed in words part after part its content that had been transmitted by ingenious composer through music. What happiness, that we were not familiar with Dmitry Dmitrievich Shostakovich! It would not be possible to him to refuse Daniil’s ‘decrypting’ of his music because it was correct and The Fifth Symphony is about how the human soul is pressed with the unbridled Elements of Evil and only a pray remains available to soul; on that note the Symphony ends.

A number of protagonists were a development of some parts of author’s personality: researcher of India Glinsky; poet Oleg Gorbov; archeologist Sasha Gorbov, enamored in the nature in the same way Andreev was. He comes back from Trubchevsk to Moscow in the beginning of the novel.

The novel certainly had an affinity to Dostoevsky tradition, which was passionately adored by Daniil Andreev. The novel was not imitation of Dostoevsky, but problems of the novel were similar to problems of novels of the great writer both by their ‘Russia-ness’ and by pertaining of these problems to universal truth - about Good and Evil and their manifestation in the world.

Daniil always came on a visit with notebook of verses or with the new chapter of the novel. Once he told me: ‘the best, which is in me, is this creativity. Now I am going to the friends with the best‘.

He was very timid and absolutely unable ‘to shine in a society‘. Therefore he could show his originality not directly, but as if having separated creativity from himself as it is done by an artist.

War has found him working on ‘Wanderers of night‘. He buried the manuscript and then returned to his verses. He had written a cycle of poems ‘Amber’, devoted to the real woman - her image is indirectly reflected in the novel. He worked on the poem ‘Germans’, but did not finish it as in the end of 1942 he was mobilized to Army.

Phillip Aleksandrovich Dobrov died two months prior to the beginning of war; Elizaveta Mihajlovna – in autumn of 1942; Ekaterina Mihajlovna - in the middle of war. Daniil, when returned from the front, didn’t found her alive.

He was qualified as ‘out-of-order’ soldier because of his health state. First he was commissioned to a staff of military units formed in Kubinka near Moscow; later, in the winter of 1943, he went on Ladoga Lake ice-road to the besieged in terrible Leningrad as a soldier of 196-th shooting division. His poem ‘The Leningrad Apocalypse‘; one of chapters of ‘Russian gods‘ are about it; and there is no need to retell the story here.

After Leningrad were Shlisselburg and Sinyavino - names which are unforgettable to those who have gone through war in the same way as Yelnya, Yartzevo and a lot of others...

* * *
Serving in a funeral military unit, Daniil Leonidovich buried those killed in communal graves, read above them orthodox mourning prays.

Once Daniil, when dragging shells, overstrained himself and got into sanitary unit. Then after recovery he was left in the hospital as an attendant; two persons have tried to keep him alive: the chief of hospital Alexander Petrovich Tsaplin and doctor Nikolai Pavlovich Amurov.

Experts were withdrawn from army during last months of the war to work in the rear. The municipal committee of Schedules the part of which he was as a font-artist has called him from front, and Daniil Leonidovich served the last military winter in Moscow, in the Museum of Communication as a designer.

Certainly, having had an opportunity to stay at home, he returned to his work on the novel. When the manuscript of the novel has been unearthed, it became evident that unskilled conspirator has buried it very badly: the novel has been written by hand, with ink, and ink has blurred all over manuscript.

He began writing all over again, now typing on the machine which by the way belonged once to Leonid Andreev and remained in Moscow only by chance. The revised manuscript, from chapter to chapter, became more and more significant.

Upon termination of war Daniil's close friends, geographers Sergey Nikolaevich Matveev and his wife Maria Samojlovna Kaletskaja, concerned by our really scandalous material disorder, have found for him quite unexpected form to earn money for survival. (myself, being a member of the Union of Artists, could not find any work, except for manufacturing of copies.) Daniil together with Sergey Nikolaevich has written the small book about Russian researchers of Central Asia Mountains. Matveev provided to the book his name of the respected scientist and a concrete material; and Andreev – a literary processing of this material. That work was not creative; it was fair, sincere, scientifically and literary qualified popularization of a scientific research.

The thin book had been printed in GeografGis; in 1946 the next order followed: the book about Russian travellers to Africa. Daniil worked on that material, soon to become one more little book, with incredible inspiration, he was striving to divide his time between book on Africa and his novel.

He searched for a material in Lenin Library. Once he came shining and told me that he has found data on the African river named after Nikolai Stepanovich Gumilev. The fact that Gumilev was the most favorite poet of Daniil Andreev, like Lermontov, Alexei Tolstoi and Blok; is clear from his verses, and that could not be different.

The book about Russian travelers to Africa has been written, typed and then the master-book got dispersed. I know nothing more about that book.

* * *
In April 1947 the strange offer has been made to Daniil Leonidovich: to fly to Kharkov together with two or three other persons and read there a lecture based on a material of yet not printed book about Russian travelers. What it really was, we never were able to know. Most likely, it has been a NKVD ‘mise-en-scene’ from the very beginning.

On April 21st early in the morning the automobile has arrived to pick up Daniil in which one person of impersonal look sat in the civilian, and the second person was in the civilian too, he was playing a busy ‘organizer’ of Daniil’s travel. I, standing by the door, said good bye to Daniil. On road to the aeroport he had been arrested, and I have received from Kharkov the telegram, with Daniil’s likewise signature, about his safe arrival.

On April, 23rd, in the evening, they came after me. The search lasted for fourteen hours. Certainly, they have taken the novel – it was a novel that they were looking for - and everything, that was hand-written or typewritten in the house. They have taken away me too - in the morning and, like Daniil, on an automobile.

To characterize the atmosphere of that time: there was only one woman, Anna Sergeevna Lomakina, who herself, as well as her husband, served her term in a prison camp, and a mother of small children; who from of all tenants living in our apartment was the only person who went out in a foyer to greet me when I was taken away by police in civilian. She approached me, kissed me and gave a little slice of black bread and little pieces of sugar. I am gratefully remembering that episode - that others did not act for fear.

Daniil was taken away to Lubyanka many times for two or three day periods during prior-to-war years: a system of preventive arrests during the days of the Soviet holidays was in function. Once such situation happened to him during the wartime at the front and about which he told casually.

Later many relatives, friends, acquaintances were taken away on ‘Andreev’s case’. Then many unfamiliar names were added to our ‘criminal group‘ because they were simply ‘of the same flock’.

There were no heroes among us on the process. I think that I was the worst; albeit signing ‘clause No 206’, i.e. getting acquainted with all documents pertaining to ‘Andreev’s case’ at the end of the process, I did not see differences in testimonies. Why on a background of heroic partisans, anti-fascists, and members of Resistance so many Russian intellectuals were so weak? Nobody likes to speak about it.

The concept of decency and treachery disappears on such scale. Many of those who slandered themselves and others (what sometimes was the same), deserve the greatest respect in the ‘other’ life.
I see two main causes. The fear that more than for one decade undermined any will to resistance in advance, and resistance mainly to ‘communist authorities’. The most part of people, certainly worthy a name of heroes, kept heroically during a short time and in extreme conditions, in comparison with their ‘ordinary’ life. Our norm was this exhausting soul fear, it was our daily life.

And that second reason was that we never were politicians. There is a whole complex of character traits which should be inherent in the politician - a revolutionary or a counter-revolutionary, it is all the same, - and we had it not.

We, in all our weakness and defenselessness, were a spiritual opposition to that epoch. Our hostility was terrible for an omnipotent tyranny. I think that those who have carried weak sparks of candle lights along through storms and a bad weather, while not always even realizing this, have completed their mission.
12
And I had one more mission to complete. I could not forget that the same Russian as myself sits and interrogates me opposite to me. That was used, i was deceived many times and I was caught on all possible provocations. And still even now, after having understood as inadmissibly wrong i was at the time, I cannot completely cut off ‘us’ from ‘them’. These are the different parties of one colossal national tragedy, and yes the Lord will help all of us, to whom Russia is beloved, to understand and overcome this terrible knot.

Also I have to say: everybody who was taken away in more recent times, knew that somebody’s voice will speak for them that ‘human right’ exist, that family and friends will make everything possible.

In those years people were taken away for ever. Arrest meant a dark torment, silence and suffering, and an thought about beloved relatives only multiplied despair.

Our judicial inquiry proceeded for 19 months: 13 months on Lubyanka, in internal prison, and 6 - in Lefortovo prison. A basis of charge against Daniel was his ‘anti-soviet’ novel and his verses which several persons read or listened. But that was not enough to the public prosecutor, and Daniel Leonidovich had been additionally charged with Criminal Codex article 58-8 (preparation of act of terrorism), Several other persons including myself have been charged with providing help in preparation of attempt . This nonsense – an attempt upon Stalin’s life - has been based on quite realized and extremely negative attitude to Stalin which now became almost obligatory, but was present in many soviet people ‘for eternity’. It is a lie that all the Russian people usually ready to admire anyone, have bowed to Stalin; basically those admired him the most for whom Stalin was necessary somehow.

Realness and genuineness of the novel have played an aggravating role. We were interrogated about its protagonists as they were real people, especially Alexei Jurievich Serpuhovsky who stand out in the group of protagonists by his readiness for actions, instead of being engulfed by dreams. As a matter of fact Serpukhovsky had no prototype in Daniil’s environment. Serpukhovsky character has been felt, caught by Daniil in all tragic ghost-ness of that life – such public figure had to be present in the novel. It is natural that investigators did not understand process of creativity and persistently interrogated about who had been the ‘real person’ behind Serpuhovsky character. Moreover, emphasizing simultaneously Andreev’s true intuition and vigilance of prosecution, the group of people which could be both characters of the novel and our friends has been arrested later. They were not our friends.

They searched for weapon for a while. We did not have any weapon. We were convicted by ‘trinity’ – a verdict authority composed of three persons. It means that no court was in place and persons convicted in the same process, did not see each other. We were led into cabinet one by one and read our verdicts. Daniel Andreev as the main culprit, (now it refers to ‘steam locomotive’), has received a verdict of 25 years of imprisonment. I and several other relatives and friends – we all got 25 years of prison camps. Others had been convicted to 10 years of prison camps.

It is necessary to tell that the 25-years verdict at that time was the maximum term. For the short period In the USSR the death penalty has been replaced with 25-year verdict. Thus we have survived. Be that process a little bit earlier or a little bit later - and we would be shot dead.

After consequence Daniil Leonidovich and I saw the certificate about burning the novel, verses, letters, diaries and Leonid Andreev's letters to the small son and Dobrovs who he loved very much. On this ‘Certificate’ Daniel Leonidovich has written - I remember approximately: ‘I Protest against destruction of the novel and verses. I ask to keep manuscripts until I will be released. I ask to transfer letters of the father to the Literary museum ‘. I think that everything of it was lost.

Daniel Andreev was transfreed to the Vladimir prison; several persons (myself included) - to Mordovian prison camps.

Sergey Nikolaevich Matveev has died in camp from ulcer perforation. Alexandra Filippovna Dobrova has died in camp from cancer. Alexander Filippovich Dobrov has died from tuberculosis in Zubovo-Polyansky house for disabled after he had been released and nowhere to live in Moscow.

* * *

That can seem strange: when we have met with Daniil and were inseparable since then until his death, we never told each other about process and imprisonment. Our experiences in prison camps were matching and we understood each other from a half-word, and to tell each other about essentially the same experience was not necessary.

I know that conditions of the Vladimir prison were very grave. I know also that close intimate friendships were born in prison among many prisoners, which helped them to sustain imprisonment.

At various times with Daniel Leonidovich were: Vasily Vitalevich Shulgin; academician Vasily Vasilevich Parin; historian Lev Lvovich Rakov; the son of general Kutepov; Georgian Menshevik Simon Gogiberidze, who spent in Vladimir prison 25 years; Japanese ‘military criminal’ Tanaka-San. Art critic Vladimir Aleksandrovich Aleksandrov who has been released prior to everybody else has helped, under Daniil's request, to find and put in order tombs of Aleksandra Mihajlovna and her mother on Novodevichie cemetery.

Certainly, prison-cell mates during the years spent in prison were more numerous but I do not remember their names.

One time the cell of the Vladimir prison in which some of above listed persons were held together, has received the comic name ‘academic’. Criminals were put into their cell. I do not know their quantity, and ‘quality’ is easy to imagine: only real criminals are convicted under criminal sentence.

The ‘academic’ chamber has easy met newcomers. V.V.Parin began to read for them lectures on physiology; L.L.Rakov - on military history and D.L.Andreev has written the brief guide how to write verses and taught them to write verses.

These three prisoners - Parin, Rakov and Andreev - have written two-volume ‘The Newest Plutarch’ - grotesque invented biographies of several figures. L.L.Rakov has supplied this unique book with wonderful figures.

And about dire moments Daniel told, for example, so: ‘You know, handkerchief is a great thing! If you spread oneunder yourself, and with another one cover yourself, you feel that is not so cold’.

* * *
Now I should try to write about the most important issue that is a source of creativeness of Daniel Andreev including the book ‘Russian gods’.

It is difficult to formulate it because it is necessary to speak about indemonstrable things. Those to whom the world is not limited to visible and perceived (and as a last resort as logically demonstrable) phenomena and to whom other reality is not less significant than surrounding material one, will believe without any proof. If our world is not unique, but there are others worlds means that between them interpenetration is possible –what one has to prove here?

Those to whom the Universe is limited to visible, heard and perceived phenomena will not believe.

I was telling about the moments in Daniel Leonidovich's life when the other world powerfully rushed into ‘this’ world. In prison these ‘bleedings through’ into other realms became frequent, and gradually before him the system of the Universe and the categorical requirement: to devote his poetic gift of a message about this system became evident.

Sometimes such states occurred in a dream, sometimes on the verge of a dream, sometimes in reality. Lermontov, Dostoevsky and Block guided Daniil in his dream journeys to the other worlds.

In such way his three masterpieces were born: ‘The Rose of the World’, ‘Russian gods’, ‘The Iron Mystery’. All of them are about the same: about structure of the Universe and about never ending struggle of Good and Evil penetrating this structure.

Daniil Andreev is a poet, instead of being a philosopher not only in verses and poems, but also in prosaic novel ‘The Rose of the World’. He is the poet in ancient meaning of this word where an idea, a word, a feeling, or music (in his creativity it is expressed as musicality and rhythm of verses) are merged in the unique phenomenon. Ancient cultures called such phenomenon a poet.

All nature of his creativity, his figurative, instead of logic, attitude to the world as a myth-in-progress to become - is a poetry, not philosophy.

Are distortions during transfer by means of the human language of images of out-of-this-world unfamiliar concepts possible? I think, that they are not only possible, but inevitable. The human consciousness brings habitual concepts, logic conclusions, even simply personal predilections and antipathies into everything it touches. But, it seems to me that reading Andreev, you are convinced of his aspiration to be of how much his talent to be a pure transmitter channeler of heard and seen suffices.

He did not have any ‘techniques’ or any ‘systems of meditations’. His unique spiritual exercise was an orthodox pray, moreover a pray with his own words’.

I think that the heart attack which he had in 1954 and which has been the cause of his early death (in 1959), was consequence of these conditions; it was a payment with a human flesh for that knowledge which had been opened to him. Nevertheless of how monstrous my words sound and of how infinitely is a pity that the Destiny has not given him at least several more years for work, nevertheless his death is not excessively enormous and, maybe, the purest payment for being immersed into those worlds which had been his destiny.

In ‘The Rose of the World‘ he introduces the concept of a harbinger, the artist who is carrying out communication between the worlds through his creativity. He was a harbinger himself.

Vasily Vasilevich Parin, the Soviet academician, physiologist, atheist who had became in prison a friend of Daniil, with surprise told to me: ‘there was such impression, that he does not write, in sense ‘composes‘, and hardly has time to write down a stream of words which flows onto him‘.

Daniil could not but write. He said to me that two years of front for him were graver than ten years of prison. Not from fear of death - the death in prison was quite real and it could appear more painful, than on war, but because of impossibility of creativity there.

Initially he wrote in the cell on casual scraps of a paper. During searches these pages were confiscated. He wrote again. All prisoners of the cell participated in preservation of pages I had written including ‘military criminals‘, Germans and Japanese who did not know language but helped to hide manuscripts from solidarity among prisoners.

After deaths of Stalin and Beria the prison bosses have been replaced. David Ivanovich Krot became in command in prison; he facilitated a prison routine regime, admitted the correspondence and appointments with relatives. My mother began to visit Vladimir prison for appointments which proceeded for hour or two; and I began to receive cards and the letters in the Mordovian camp; letters were filled up with verses, with the smallest handwriting which, possibly, has completely exhausted camp censors. Nevertheless, censors were hanging letters to us.

At that time draft copies of ‘The Rose of the World‘, ‘Russian gods‘ and ‘The Iron mystery ‘ were written; manuscripts ‘Ambers’, ‘Ancient memory‘, ‘Forest Blood‘, ‘Foothills’, ‘Moonstones’ written up to arrest were restored; the cycle of poems ‘The Mouth of a life‘ was written. Fragments from a poem ‘Germans’ which he has recollected, were included into the chapter ‘From a small room’ of the book ‘Russian gods‘.

* * *

Time passed by. In 1956 the Khrushchev Commission on revision of affairs of political prisoners had started its work. Commissions worked in all camps and prisons. Millions of prisoners were released. In my prison camp from two thousand women by the end of work of the Commission only eleven remained. During 1956 summer one of the great prisoners’ transportation roads, the railway Moscow - Karaganda through Potma was transporting released prisoners in all its trains, and along railways people were standing and waving hands greeting these trains.


I had been released right in the end of commission work and in very much routine way: the supervisor has entered our barrack and has told: ‘Andreeva, gather your belongings, you leave tomorrow ‘.

I left, in the midst of golden Mordovian forests. I was in Moscow on August, 15th; our first appointment with Daniil in Vladimir happened on August, 25th, 1956.

We have met in a tiny room. He already waited for me as he had been brought there earlier. He was very bony, gray-haired; his head was not shaved as it was necessary for prisoners. There is nothing to tell about our indescribable joy – he has lifted me in his hands.

The prison guard looked at us, full of sincere sentimental feelings, and she did not see how Daniil under a little table which was separating us has transferred me a folded-in-quarter notebook with verses, and I have hidden it in my dress.

The commission has decreased his term from 25 to 10 years. Eight more months remained, but that was not terrible, but the fact that at his release at the end of term the previous conviction was not removed, and it meant refusal in a registration in Moscow. He was dying and everybody knew that. He knew that too.

Such decision of the Commission has been caused by his own statement submitted to this Commission. The essence of his statement was as follows: ‘I was not going to kill anybody, in this part I ask o reconsider my conviction sentence. But, while in the Soviet Union there will be no freedom of conscience, no freedom of speech and no freedom of press, I ask to not consider me as a completely Soviet person‘. It was clear that it was necessary to insist on one more revision of verdict, but first of all it was necessary to rescue the draft manuscripts written in prison. Having understood, that for revision of his sentence he will be brought bring to Moscow, we have agreed, that he will leave manuscripts in prison. Having learned, that he has been brought to Lubyanka, I arrived in Vladimir prison as though on appointment. I had been led to the person in command, David Ivanovich whom I mentioned earlier. He has told me that Daniil Leonidovich had been taken away to Moscow, and has then given me a bag with his belongings, left by Daniil. In the bus on the way to Moscow I already snatched out from a bag a notebook with draft copies of verses and ‘The Rose of the World ‘. There was a deliberate mess: slippers, books, notebooks, a shirt, etc.

David Ivanovich knew, what he was giving me, and he has made it with conscience.

Verdict revision which had begun in Moscow was not promising a safe end at all.

Daniel Leonidovich told that interrogations were only during day time and stenographer was writing everything for record. Very soon, by character of questions, he has understood, that the inspector collected a material for new term, ‘was sewing a new sentence‘.

I succeeded in securing an appointment with this investigator – in front of me there was a character of Stalin time: large, heavy, with large face and ice-cold convex eyes.

I do not remember short and meaningless conversation with him. It was clear that everything was hopeless. A new term.

In prison camp for very short time my road crossed with 14-years road on camps of one woman - I hope that she is alive; her name is Valentina Pikina. In 1956 and 1957 she, already rehabilitated, worked in the Central Committee, being engaged in restoration in a party of the rehabilitated communists. We were brough together with her by rehabilitated old communists who served their terms in Mordovia. By her advice I have written the desperate application that my husband who was fatally sick, was interrogated, and I ask - as strange it now sounds – a psychiatric expertise. As V.P. has arranged everything I do not know but Daniil had been relocated to Serbsky Institute which at that time was not that black place what it became later. In three - four months the conclusion has followed: ‘labile mentality‘. It meant, that the fatal statement because of which his term had been preserved albeit somewhat reduced, he could have written in a condition of depression. And depression can come and pass.

Here below is how dire the situation was for him in his own words; he did not know about my efforts, there was no communication between us, except for parcels.

On one of interrogations he had been asked about his attitude to Stalin. ‘You know, how badly I speak‘.
deadly terribly – both for ‘the father of all the people‘ and for myself. Suddenly I have felt that something unusual was happening. The inspector sat motionlessly, having squeezed his teeth, and stenographer did not write anything down, certainly, after his sign. After that completely unrecorded interrogation he had been taken away to Serbsky Institute.

In the morning of April, 21st, 1957 he has closed a door of a huge fortress on Lubyanka into Moscow filled with the sunlight and has come on the Kuznetsky bridge 24, to a reception where I waited for him, stone immobilized from excitement. We have joined hands and went to Podsosnensky Lane to my parents because we did not have anything of our own.

* * *

The last chapter of the life of Daniil Andreev has begun.

We lived with him anywhere available: at my parents, at our friends’ summer residence, in the House of Artists in Maleevka (Union of Writers has made that offer), in the village beyond Pereslavl-Zalessky, in village on river Oka, in the House of Artists on Northern Caucasus. We even rented a tiny apartment on Ascheulov Lane in Moscow.

The first year we lived in misery: friends were collecting and bringing us money assuring that we did not know who was giving us crucial means to survive . In a year Daniil Leonidovich has been paid under the special petition of the Union of Writers for his smallest published by then book, and he has been given the special pension - 1200 rubles in old money (equal to 120 in new money). It was possible to pay for the apartment which has been rented first for money of my parents and friends, and to surround the dying Daniil with everything that only could alleviate his illness. I could not look for any job as it was impossible to leave Daniil and besides that, as it has happened, I was very seriously ill.

V.V.Parin has made everything possible to save the life of his friend: Daniil was treated in Cardiological Unit of Vishnevsky Institute. Вишнев
 
After release we have been met by Daniil’s loving friends. There also were new friends. One of such friends was the very young niece of Daniil’s cell-mate who cared about us very much. She was on a note in KGB because of her appointments with her uncle. When she began to visit us, she had been invited to KGB and had been ‘suggested’ to inform authorities on who visited us, and mainly, on what Andreev was writing. In reply to her words about exposed horrors and injustice committed to such people as ourselves, the official answer was simple and expressive: ‘Something done was worth it, and something – not. Somebody should have had a rightful place where they have been liberated from’.

Absolutely decent and clever girl has acted in a simple manner: she has softly distanced herself from us to have an opportunity not to answer any questions. She has told me this story several years after Daniil death. It was 1958.

* * *
Stenocardia of Daniil Leonidovich had an acute emotional character. Naturally, no physical activities were allowed; they were totally excluded from daily life. Nevertheless any excitement, any strong impression, even joyful, caused a heart attack.

Work was progressing. The disease was making headway too. They chased each other.

In the autumn of 1958 we left for the House of Artists, situated in the Goryachiy Kluch [Hot Key] on the Northern Caucasus. As it has happened, Daniil could not live in the House of Artists, situated in a valley because of evaporations of the thermal Hot Key. We have rented a small white house on mountain, and Daniil’s last, and thanks God, a wonderful autumn of his life started.

Huge plane trees looked like they were painted in gold in absolutely dark blue sky; the underbrush of azaleas burned in fire underneath; in the evenings I was heating an oven in tiny kitchen, and there was our favorite live fire. Crickets were singing behind our oven, and our landlord’s dog, a mongrel, which touchingly made friends with us, laid down at night before a threshold.

I even was going to paint landscapes what amased both of us as it was similar to a normal life.

Soon asthma attacks have been added to strong attacks of rear chest pains. On October, 12th, 1958 he has finished ‘The Rose of the World‘. I returned home with sketch-board for painting and approached him - he worked in a garden. Having added the last line, he has told to me very seriously and sadly: ‘I have terminated the book. But you know, I am not glad. As in Pushkin’s verse:
‘The desired instant has come: my long-term work is ended.
What is a not clear grief that secretly disturbs me?‘
And it was the end. Since this moment illness started to progress more quickly and quickier. There was such a feeling as if the angel who supported him all the time with the last line of this book has silently unclenched hands - and everything rushed towards death.

In the beginning of November, 1958 I have taken him to Moscow in hardship.

I can not list, recollect all anonymous people who helped us during these two years. I was the one directly caring about him and constantly addressing help requests to any first comers, never meeting a refusal.

In the end of February, 1959, at last, we have received a 15-meter room in two-room community apartment, and friends, having taken him from hospital, have brought him on their hands to the second floor of house N 82 on Lenin Prospect – at that time it was the last house of the city and waste grounds were located immediately further.

The last forty days of his life have started. They were absolutely unreal. He was dying in a hard way. His mystical soul, evidently, should have expiated something else on the Earth. And really - I did not allow him to die: I did not leave him for an instant, I seized doctors, demanding to do something else; and in essence, I was prolonging his agony. And in intervals there was his world because he did not let the manuscript slip out of his hands and plunged into them immediately after he felt a bit better.

Friends were replacing each other, they were arriving every day, bringing everything necessary and sitting in the kitchen, and coming into his room for a short while - he did not sustain longer visits. Our neighbor who was an absolutely stranger to us and absolutely a simple woman, in the early morning was taking away her two children and was leaving to relatives till the evening.

He did not wish to speak with anybody about the illness, and surprised with that he remembered the said previously and asked about what was important to a visitor.

Once he has dictated me the list of those whom he would like to see on his funeral - is it his expression... I have given the list to Boris Chukov, the true young friend, and he has tried to execute Daniil's will. He has made fine photos one month prior to Daniil’s death.

Absolutely shortly before the end he has asked me to recite to him the poetic collection ‘By green river precinct’. I have read it and also have looked at him. He had tears on his eyes. He has told, as about something altogether indifferent: ‘Good verses‘.

He died on March, 30th, 1959, in day of Alexey the Godly man. He is buried on Novodevicie cemetery, near his mother and grandmother, on a place bought in 1906 by Leonid Andreev for himself.

* * *
In 1958 we have been acquainted with the remarkable Moscow priest, archpriest Nikolai Golubtsov. Father Nikolai was professing and confessing us, and on June, 4th, 1958 he has married us in Riznopolozensky church on Shabolovka. The ceremony had taken place in an empty church, without chorus, with two friends as witnesses and with two church servants.

In four days we have departed to our wedding travel by a steamship Moscow - Ufa. It was wonderful, and at the time he felt still bearably. And manuscripts were with us. Once while sitting on a steamship deck, he has called me. I have run out from a cabin: we approached Yaroslavl, there was an early morning, and through a thinning fog Yaroslavl churches were shining. It was an image of the poem ‘Swimming to the Heavenly Kremlin‘ which he ‘did not have time to write’.

Illegally, from a ‘black’ entrance, with the help of nurses father Nikolai has entered the hospital room, where Daniil had been admitted for the last time, to profess and confess him. At home, utterly before death, he professed and confessed Daniil too. And then he read the burial service, at first at home, and then - in Rizpolozensky church.. The coffin stood on the same place, in St. Ekaterina ‘sector’, where we were crowned into marriage eight months prior to his funeral.

THE END

Could someone from native english speakers proofread the translation please? Thank you
 
Thank you. I will try to edit it and smooth it out for publication.
 
Thank you for translating this.

It was very touching to read and needless to say that I am ordering the book.
 
"Vasily Vasilevich Parin, the Soviet academician, physiologist, atheist who had became in prison a friend of Daniil,
with surprise told to me: ‘there was such impression, that he does not write, in sense ‘composes‘,
and hardly has time to write down a stream of words which flows onto him‘."

В транскрипциях сессий встречалось утверждение, что все "мастера" в истории получали ченнелинг.
Интересно, как бы Кассиопеяне охарактеризовали Даниила Андреева и его книгу "Роза мира".

Translation
In the transcriptions of the sessions met the statement that all "masters" in the history of the received channel.
I wonder how would C's describe Daniel Andreev and his book "Roza Mira".
 
There is a Foundation with the name Daniel Andreev: Организационные материалы Фонда им. Даниила Андреева "Фонд им. Даниила Андреева" mostly in Russian.

They have a Russian audio recording of the book Roza Mira: Тексты Даниила Андреева it consists of two rar compressed files with a total of more than 450 short audio files. In fact that is what I was looking for, I had found an audio in Russian of the first book in the Ringing Cedars series discussed here The Ringing Cedars and Anastasia The Russian of that story is not difficult, but I was looking for more substance. And a link in that thread led me here.
An English translation of the first six parts of Roza Mira is available here: Daniel Andreev - The Rose of the World

They also have threads on politics, religion and society, for an overview of the articles they choose, see Портал Родон. Метаистория, религия, геополитика, философия (метафизика, этика). Библиотека, музыка, живопись, видео

The site hosts a number texts: Портал Родон - Библиотека - религиоведение, философия, история, стихи, проза and has links to others including Russian libraries Собрание ссылок по Сети And there are links to music and art. The site reveals a group of people who are interested in many fields of knowledge.
 
An English translation of the first six parts of Roza Mira is available here: Daniel Andreev - The Rose of the World
By now all the chapters are available in English on Форум «Розы Мира» Даниила Андреева See: Daniil Andreev. «The Rose of the World» (download) and for online reading: The Rose of the World». Table of contents

About the author, Daniil Andreev, and the circumstances that led to the creation of the work, The Rose of the World, there is a text available on the site of lomonosvo.org, written by Lyudmila Vasilyevna Shaposhnikova (1926-2015) "Soviet and Russian writer, orientalist, public figure, Candidate of Historical Sciences, Honored Artist of the Russian Federation (2002)". The text is a part of a book: L. V. Shaposhnikova. Earth's creativity of cosmic evolution. Moscow: International Center of the Roerichs, 2011, Pp. 281-291.

In this post, after her article, there are a few comments on the Roerichs, as well as the conclusion of an analysis based in Orthodox Christianity, with a final link, but without details to an article in Kommersant that has a third view of the book.

In the article by Shaposhnikova, there is mention of a V. I. Vernadsky. This refers to Vladimir Ivanovich Vernadsky, a prominent scientist with many interests. Machine translating from the Russian Wiki, there is:
Vladimir Ivanovich Vernadsky (28 February [12 March] 1863, Saint Petersburg, Russian Empire — 6 January 1945, Moscow, USSR)— Russian[7], Ukrainian[8] and Soviet [9] natural scientist, thinker and public figure.

Academician of the Imperial St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences (1912). Full State Councilor (1911). One of the founders and first president of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences (1918-1921)[11][12]. Founder of scientific schools (mineralogy, geochemistry) and science of biogeochemistry. One of the representatives of Russian cosmism. Winner of the Stalin Prize of the first degree (1943).

His research interests included mineralogy, crystallography, geochemistry, geology, soil science, radiogeology, biology, paleontology, biogeochemistry, meteoritics, philosophy and history of science. In addition, he was engaged in organizational and social activities.
The author of the article, L. V. Shaposhnikova, refers to the work of Nicholai Konstantinovich Roerich (1874-1947) most known for his paintings, and his wife, Helena Ivanovna Roerich (1879-1955) a Theosophist writer and the founder of Living Ethics (Agni Yoga). [The Theosophical Society was founded in New York in 1875 by Russian born Helena Petrovna Blavatsky (1831-1891), described as its principal thinker, together with Henry Steel Olcott, William Quan Judge, and 16 others..] The Roerichs were contemporaries of George Ivanovich Gurdjieff (1866/1877-1949) and Pyotr Demyanovich Ouspensky (1878-1947) as well as the father of Daniil Leonidovich Andreev, Leonid Nikolaievich Andreev 1879-1919), a prominent Russian writer. Considering both background and contemporaries, Daniil Andreev did not emerge out of nowhere, and in addition put out a lot of efforts under harsh circumstances.

Personal Experience of Daniil Andreev by L. V. Shaposhnikova
Daniil Leonidovich Andreev was arrested in 1947, when a new wave of repression began after the war. You may ask - for what? No way. This 'for nothing' included the most fantastic crimes that had nothing to do with the overwhelming majority of those arrested. He sat in a cramped prison cell, where, besides him, there were many different people. The prison was called the Vladimir Central and enjoyed a very bad reputation. I believe that those who sat with him in the cell had no idea who he was. Perhaps they knew that he was the youngest son of the great Russian writer Leonid Andreev, the author of one of the brilliant articles – 'Roerich's Empire'. In the article, between the lines, there was clearly a mysterious echo of another world. For the prisoner of the Vladimir Central, strange as it may seem, this other world was more real and closer than for his father. He also knew Roerich, whom he considered one of the outstanding creators who managed to convey in his paintings the other world and the cosmic mood that distinguished a number of famous artists and philosophers of the Silver Age.
About the Vladimir Central Prision where Daniil Andreev was held, there is:
Vladimir Prison was established by the Russian Empire in 1783 by decree of Empress Catherine II, located about 160 kilometres (100 mi) northeast of Moscow. The building began to be built in 1781, and was completed on August 15, 1783. The architect was Nikolai von Berg. In 1906, it became known as Vladimir Central and contained political prisoners. At the beginning of 1921, shortly after the rise of the Bolsheviks to power, Vladimir Central became the first of several special-purpose prisons, politisolators, intended to incarcerate opponents of the regime.

Vladimir Central was later part of the system of "special camps and prisons" organized on the basis of the USSR Council of Ministers resolution No. 416-159 February 21, 1948 "On the organization of the Ministry of Internal Affairs camps with a strict regime for keeping particularly dangerous state criminals". The resolution widened the range of political prisoners for the detention in Vladimir, including spies, saboteurs, terrorists, Trotskyites, Mensheviks, Socialist-Revolutionaries, anarchists, ethnic nationalists, white émigrés, participants in other anti-Soviet organizations, and those with ties to any anti-Soviet or enemy activities. The last official name of the prison was "Vladimir special prison of the MGB of the USSR".
The text about Andreev continues:
Daniil Andreev, who by a whim of fate found himself in a prison cell and spent ten difficult and humiliating years in it, lived as if in two worlds. One was the world of the Soviet prison, with all the forced and horrifying details of its life, the other was the radiant and inspired world of the Highest State of matter and subtle high-vibrational energy. In Daniel Andreev, the unconnected worlds– the Highest and the Lowest-were united. When he came out of the Higher, glittering world, he immediately found himself in a stuffy cell with people exhausted by captivity and hunger, who had become slaves of a terrible and cruel state, people who, due to such circumstances, had lost their human form. Going from one world to another could be compared to going from hell to heaven and coming back to hell again. No mythology, no human imagination could have imagined such a thing. One simply has to wonder how the earthly heart of Daniil Leonidovich withstood the martyrdom of such transitions. None of the cellmates could see it. Their human structure and level of consciousness could not touch the Higher, they were not privy to the secret of a different state of matter. In the prison cell with them was the messenger of the space forces, who arrived on Earth with his space mission. Outwardly, the messenger was no different from his fellow prisoners. Nor was it unusual for him to lie down on his bunk and turn his face to the wall. Little did they know that he was no longer in the cell at that time. His 'spacesuit' remained in the cell, if you can call it a dense material shell, and the thin internal structure was in contact with the amazing and sometimes unknowable world, the worldview, the world of magical transformations. He, Daniil Andreev, carried the message of this world to Earth, carried the message of a higher cosmic consciousness and metahistory, unknown to Earth historians, but very necessary for the earth historical process. At night, he wrote down what he saw there, in the other world. His cellmates, broken by the day's torment, slept uneasily and restlessly. He could work with the certainty that no matter what, they wouldn't wake up until the early hours of the morning. 'I remember,' he wrote, ' how the rows of human faces turned towards me gradually became dimmer and seemed to recede somewhat in space; or rather, it seems that I myself was receding from them, rising above the ground. In the distance, on the horizon, I could still see a semi-transparent mountain range, as if made of chrysolite; suddenly I noticed that the mountains were beginning to emit an amazing glow. Fluttering rainbows crossed the sky, and at the zenith appeared wondrous luminaries of different colors, and the magnificent sun could not outshine them. I remember the feeling of breathtaking beauty, incomparable delight and amazement. When I looked down, I saw that the crowd of mourners was no longer there, the whole landscape was completely transformed, and I realized that the moment of my transition to the higher layer had already passed'1. After the transition described here quite accurately, Andreev found himself in the 'World of Singing Flowers', a higher dimension than Earth.

According to D. L. Andreev, no one prepared him by any practice for a state in which he saw what others did not see. In addition, as he claimed, he did not have a supervisor who could help him with his advice in such cases. But at the same time , it presupposed the activity and assistance of 'invisible implementers'2, who were clearly backed by Cosmic Hierarchs, just like the Roerichs and V. I. Vernadsky. This makes it possible to talk about a common source in their contacts and visions. Both the Roerichs, V. I. Vernadsky, and D. L. Andreev had significant energy accumulations of past lives in the 'bowl'. It is known that in this case, practical training is not necessary. The rich knowledge stored in the 'bowl' and the conscious or unconscious ability to use it in terrestrial conditions are a feature of the messengers of cosmic evolution. Since the 20s of the last century, the Space Hierarchs, through their messengers, have been opening up three channels of meta-knowledge for Russia, which are necessary for lifting our country to a new stage of cosmic evolution.

The manifestation of Andreev's special spiritual abilities began very early, even in 1921. The date itself is very significant, because it is very close to 1920, when the cosmic creativity of the Roerichs and Vernadsky began. The closeness of dates confirms once again, along with the closeness of views, that all three channels that represented the creativity of cosmic evolution on Earth operated according to the same plan. Certain differences in the messengers who operated in these channels were associated with the individuality of each, the difference in fate, character and karma itself.

Here is what Andreev wrote about his impression in connection with the first manifestation of his unique abilities. 'The first event of this kind, which played a huge and in many ways decisive role in the development of my inner world, occurred in August 1921, when I was not yet fifteen years old. It happened in Moscow, at the end of the day, when I, who by that time had become very fond of wandering aimlessly through the streets and dreaming pointlessly, stopped at the parapet in one of the squares surrounding the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour and raised above the embankment. Moscow's old-timers still remember what a wonderful view opened from there to the river, the Kremlin and Zamoskvorechye with its dozens of bell towers and colorful domes. It was evidently past seven o'clock, and the churches were ringing for vespers… The event of which I have spoken opened up before me, or rather above me, such a raging, blinding, incomprehensible world, which embraced the historical reality of Russia in a strange unity with something immeasurably greater above it, that for many years I inwardly fed on images and ideas that gradually flowed from there into the circle of consciousness. The mind could not cope with them for a very long time, trying to create new and new constructions that were supposed to harmonize the inconsistency of these ideas and interpret these images.'3

After that, the visions continued and, of course, required their own understanding. Daniil Andreev had a philosophical mindset and a fairly broad humanitarian education. In 1933, he had a vision that was very significant both spiritually and historically. 'In November 1933, I accidentally – quite accidentally-went into a small church in Vlasyevsky Lane. There I found the akathist to St. Seraphim of Sarov. As soon as I opened the front door, a warm wave of descending choral music flooded right into my soul. I was seized with a state of mind about which it is extremely difficult for me to speak, and even in such a protocol style. An irresistible force forced me to kneel, although I had never liked to take part in kneeling before: my spiritual immaturity had led me to suspect that there was something servile in this movement. But now kneeling wasn't enough. And when my hands rested on the threadbare carpet worn by thousands of feet, some secret door of the soul opened, and tears of incomparable blissful delight gushed uncontrollably. And, to tell you the truth, I don't really care what experts in all kinds of ecstasies and raptures will call and in what category they will attribute what happened after that. The content of these minutes was the ascent to Heavenly Russia, the experience of the Synclite of its enlightened ones, the otherworldly warmth of spiritual streams flowing from that center that is rightly and accurately called the Heavenly Kremlin. The great spirit who once passed through our land in the form of Seraphim of Sarov, and now is one of the brightest lamps of the Russian Synclite,4 approached and bent down to me, covering me like an epitrachylea with a tent of streaming rays of light and gentle warmth. For almost a whole year, until this church was closed, I went every Monday to the akathists of St. Seraphim – and-amazing! 'I experienced this state every time, over and over again, with relentless vigor.' 5

And another vision that shocked him already at the front of the Patriotic War. 'At the beginning of 1943, I participated in the passage of the 196th Rifle Division on the ice of Lake Ladoga and, after a two-day journey across the Karelian Isthmus, entered besieged Leningrad late in the evening. During the journey through the deserted, dark city to the place of deployment, I experienced a state that somewhat resembled that long-ago, youthful one at the Savior's Church, in its content, but not so colored: as if breaking through the specific atmosphere of the front-line night, first shining through it, and then absorbing it into itself, it was painted severely and gloomily. Within him, the confrontation of irreconcilable beginnings darkened and glittered, and their staggering scale and the great demonic essence yawning behind one of them inspired awe and horror. ...And only the radiant radiance of his approaching enemy-our hope, our joy, our defender, the great spiritual leader of our motherland-saved my mind from irreparable damage.'6.
The author of the Rose of the World not only recorded cosmic visions, but also looked closely at the process of their origin and manifestation. As a result of these observations, we have the most valuable material belonging to the meta-scientific experience. D. L. Andreev identified three stages in this subtle material process. I give his own description of these stages, which give us a clear idea not only of Andreev's own experience, but also have a general meaning for understanding such movements. 'The first stage consists in an instantaneous internal act that takes place without the participation of the subject's will and, it would seem, without any visible preliminary preparation, although, of course, in reality such preparation, only taking place beyond the threshold of consciousness, should take place.

The content of this act is a lightning-fast experience of the essence of great historical phenomena that cannot be divided into any concepts and cannot be expressed in any words, but covers huge swaths of historical time. The form of such an act is a minute or hour that is overly saturated with dynamically boiling images, when the person feels like someone who, after a long stay in a quiet and dark room, would suddenly be placed under the open sky in the midst of a storm-terrifying in its grandiosity and power, almost blinding and at the same time overflowing with a sense of exciting bliss. About such a fullness of life, about the very possibility of such completeness, the individual had no idea before. Whole epochs are synthetically covered at the same time, a whole – if I may say so – metahistorical cosmos of these epochs with great principles struggling in it. It would be a mistake to assume that these images are necessarily visual in form. No, the visual element is included in them, as well as the sound element, but they themselves relate to these elements in the same way as, for example, the ocean relates to hydrogen, which is part of its water. It is extremely difficult to give an idea of this experience in the absence of any exact analogies with anything else that is better known.

This experience has a tremendous effect on the entire mental composition. Its content so surpasses everything that was previously in the circle of consciousness of the individual that it will feed the soul world of the survivor for many years to come. It will become his most precious inner possession.

This is the first stage of metahistorical cognition. It seems appropriate to call it a metahistorical insight.

The result of the insight continues to be stored in the depths of the soul – stored not as a memory, but as something alive and living. From there, over the years, individual images, ideas, and entire concepts gradually rise into the circle of consciousness, but even more of them remain in the depths, and the survivor knows that no concept can ever cover and exhaust this metahistory cosmos that has been revealed to him. These images and ideas become the object of the second stage of the process.

The second stage does not have the same instantaneous character as the first: it is a chain of states – a chain that runs through weeks and months and manifests itself almost daily. It is an inner contemplation, an intense assimilation, a concentrated gaze – sometimes joyful, sometimes painful-into historical images, but not closed in themselves, but perceived in their fusion with the second, metahistorical reality behind them. I use the expression “to look” here conditionally, and by the word “images ' I mean again not only visual representations, but synthetic representations that include a visual element only in so far as what is contemplated can have a visually representable appearance at all. At the same time, it is extremely important that the content of such contemplation is largely the phenomena of other-dimensional layers of materiality; it is clear that they can be perceived not by the physical organs of sight and hearing, but by some others that are present in our being, but are usually separated as if by a blank wall from the zone of daytime consciousness. And if the first stage of the process was characterized by a passive state of the individual, who became, as it were, an involuntary spectator of a stunning spectacle, then in the second stage it is possible, to a certain extent, to direct the action of the personal will – sometimes, for example, in the choice of this or that object of contemplation. But more often, and precisely in the most fruitful hours, images come up involuntarily, radiating, I would say, such fascinating power and revealing such a multi-layered meaning that hours of contemplation turn into weakened semblances of minutes of insight. With a certain creative predisposition of the subject, these images can sometimes become the source or pivot, the axis of artistic works; and however dark and severe some of them may be, the greatness of these images is such that it is difficult to find an equal pleasure that is caused by their contemplation.

It is metahistorical contemplation, I think, that we can call this second stage of the process.

The picture created in this way is like a canvas on which individual figures and perhaps their overall composition are clear, but other figures are vague, and some gaps between them are not filled in; other parts of the background or individual accessories are not present at all. There is a need to clarify indistinct connections, fill in the remaining voids. The process enters the third stage, which is most free from the influence of extrapersonal and extra-rational principles. It is clear, therefore, that it is precisely at the third stage that the greatest mistakes, incorrect introductions, and overly subjective interpretations are made. The chief hindrance lies in the inevitably distorting interference of the mind; it seems almost impossible to get rid of it completely. What is possible is that by grasping the inner nature of metahistorical logic, it is sometimes possible to reconstruct even the workings of reason in its direction.

This third stage of the process is naturally called metahistorical comprehension'7.

Understanding the three stages of the process of contact with the world of a higher state of matter is one of the most interesting aspects of internal work. D. L. Andreev clearly felt the difference in perception between the earthly world and the higher world at the first stage. Historical information that came from an otherworldly source was something whole, undivided. Such a phenomenon was based on a different time or timelessness, in which it was difficult for him to navigate. He couldn't tell if it was an hour or a minute. Such a difference in time was theoretically already felt by modern science, but the experience of perception of a temporary phenomenon belonged in this case to someone who came into contact with another world. This was and still is the value of the experience of the scientist and philosopher D. L. Andreev. In addition, he defined the metahistorical information that he came into contact with as figurative. His own knowledge of the inner world allowed him to understand what is actually happening to him and his perception of the unknown mysterious world. In this regard, he introduced a new formulation into the study of metahistory – metahistorical cognition. And those who have thoroughly studied Living Ethics and V. I. Vernadsky's reflections on the new system of cognition can easily understand that metahistorical cognition is the most important feature of the new system of cognition as such. At its core, metahistorical knowledge was so vast and profound that Andreev introduced a real formulation – a metahistorical cosmos encompassing the worlds of various high states of matter. Only the real experience of contact with such worlds gave Andreev the opportunity to see their reality, from which it is possible to begin its scientific understanding. Once again, it should be noted that modern science has not yet reached either metascience or its heart – metahistory.

Describing the second stage of the ongoing process, D. L. Andreev wrote about the metahistorical contemplation that occurs in the inner world of the observer of this process. Such metahistorical contemplation can lead to differentiation of the whole image structure and isolation of individual images. This result can be achieved only in intense artistic creativity. Here again we see another serious confirmation of the close connection of the metahistorical source with true art.

D. L. Andreev rightly called the third stage of the process metahistorical comprehension, which is intense creativity associated with real assessments of what is happening.
In the following paragraph, there are references to a few more names:
"Tyuchev", Fyodor Ivanovich Tyutchev (1803-1873), Russian diplomat and poet. (On a .de domain there is an article, maybe originally in German, but now only available in Russian)
Joan of Arc (1412-1431)
St. Sergius of Radonezh (1314-1392)
"Loyola", Ignatius of Loyola (1491-1556)
"Hegel", Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831)
"Goethe", Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832)
"Comte", Isidore Auguste Marie François Xavier Comte (1798-1857)
"Bakunin", Mikhail Alexandrovich Bakunin (1814-1876)
Finally, by developing a picture of the metahistorical source based on his own experience, he writes about the metahistorical sense, one of the most important elements of metahistory. A metahistorical feeling is formed in a person over many lifetimes, and not everyone can access this feeling. Only on the basis of this feeling does a connection with a metahistorical source arise, the ability to engage in metahistorical cognition, metahistorical contemplation, and metahistorical comprehension. All these metahistorical phenomena form the most important basis of cosmic consciousness, which determines the formation of new cosmic thinking and on which all three creative channels of cosmic evolution, represented in Russia by the Roerichs, V. I. Vernadsky and D. L. Andreev, worked. 'The feeling,' the latter wrote, ' which Tyutchev beautifully conveyed, when a person feels himself a participant in a certain historical mystery, a participant in the creative work and struggle of great spiritual – or rather, transphysical-forces that powerfully manifest themselves in the fateful moments of history; could Joan of Arc have accomplished her feat without this feeling? How could St. Sergius of Radonezh – otherwise a true anchorite and ascetic - have taken such a decisive, even leading, part in the political storms of his time? Without this feeling, could the most important popes have tried for centuries to implement the idea of a world hierocracy, and Loyola to create an organization that consciously seeks to master the mechanism of the historical formation of humanity? Without this feeling, could Hegel, by the mere work of reason, have created the Philosophy of History, or Goethe the second part of Faust? Would the self-immolation of the schismatics have been conceivable if the icy wind of eschatological, metahistorical horror had not cooled in them all their attachment to this world, which, as it seemed to them, had already fallen under the power of the Antichrist? A vague metahistorical feeling, not enlightened by contemplation and comprehension, often leads to distorted concepts, to chaotic actions. Do we not sense a certain metahistorical pathos in the grandiose tirades of the leaders of the French Revolution, in the doctrines of utopian socialism, in the cult of Humanity of Auguste Comte, or in the calls for universal renewal by destroying all foundations – calls that take on the tone of Bakunin's mouth that makes us recall the passionate appeals of the Jewish prophets, although the nineteenth-century orator puts a new meaning, even the opposite of the worldview of the ancient prophets? You could ask hundreds more questions like this. The necessary answers to these questions will lead to two important conclusions. First, it will become clear that in the total volume of both Western and Russian culture, the underlying layer of apocalyptic experiences can be found in an innumerable number of phenomena, even those that are alien to it at first glance. And secondly, that metahistorical feeling, metahistorical experience, unconscious, vague, chaotic, contradictory, is constantly interwoven into the creative process: artistic, religious,social, and even political. ' 8

Here the author of' The Rose of Peace ' presented the metahistorical feeling in its development and determined the influence of this important feeling on various processes of our historical life. The power of this influence was different, ranging from 'traces' and some elements of this feeling and ending with absolute mastery of it. Andreev himself, being a messenger, as there is no doubt now, possessed it to the full, coming into contact in various forms with other worlds. In addition to the form of vision, Andreev used the form of traveling through various worlds, both high and low. A similar journey was made by Dante in his time. His unique book 'The Divine Comedy' tells in detail about such a journey. Andreev's journey was more extensive and diverse. It covered many structures of the universe of various states of matter. The book 'Rose of the World' is a real reflection of many structures of the Cosmos, understood by a deep philosopher, such as Daniil Andreev. It is a modern and unique metahistorical source, such as Living Ethics and the works of V. I. Vernadsky related to cosmic thinking. Andreev's contact with the worlds of a different state of matter and obtaining metahistorical information undoubtedly confirms his messenger creativity and mission, which is necessary for the formation of a new cosmic thinking.

Wandering, the most important form of contact with otherness, usually occurred at night, in a deep sleep. But this was not a dream, but a real entry of his subtle body into the subtle worlds. There is no doubt that such information received by him is necessary for the formation of cosmic thinking and understanding of cooperation with the Higher Worlds. In The Rose of the World, we also encounter the problem of the Hierarchy of the Cosmos. Andreev calls them 'great brothers', which we read about in Living Ethics, in particular in the book 'Infinity': 'We, Brothers of humanity...' In both sources, the meaning of Brothers, or cosmic Hierarchs, is common. The slight differences that arise are related to the personality of those who wrote these works. It must be said once again that neither V. I. Vernadsky nor D. L. Andreev were familiar with Living Ethics, although they created according to its ideas. Andreev met his brothers both at night, during his wanderings, and during the day, in the presence of many cellmates. However, they didn't know anything about it. 'The nearness,' he wrote, ' of one of the great brothers caused an increased heartbeat and a thrill of solemn awe. My whole being greeted the other with a warm, tender love, like a precious friend who sees through my soul and loves it, and brings me forgiveness and comfort. The approach of the third caused me to bow my knees before him, as before a mighty one who had risen incomparably higher than I, and his proximity was accompanied by a stern feeling and an extraordinary intensity of attention. Finally, the approach of the fourth caused a feeling of exultant joy-world joy – and tears of delight. I can doubt a lot of things, and I can be suspicious of its authenticity in my inner life, but not in these meetings.

Did I see them during these meetings? No. Did they talk to me? Yes. Did I hear their words? Yes and no. I could hear, but not with my physical hearing. It was as if they were speaking out of the depths of my heart. Many of their words, especially the names of the various layers of Shadanakar9 and hierarchies that were new to me, I repeated to them, trying to convey them as closely as possible in the sounds of physical speech, and asked: is this correct? Some of the names and names had to be clarified several times; there are also some that we couldn't find a more or less accurate representation of in our sounds. Many of these strange words uttered by the great brothers were accompanied by phenomena of light, but they were not physical light, although they can be compared in some cases with flashes of lightning, in others with glows, in others with moonlight. Sometimes they were no longer words in our sense at all, but whole chords of phonetic consonances and meanings. Such words could not be translated into our language at all, we had to take one of all the meanings, and one of all the consonant-sounding syllables – But the conversations did not consist in individual words, but in questions and answers, in whole phrases that expressed very complex ideas. Such phrases, without being divided into words, seemed to flash, imprinted on the gray sheet of my consciousness, and illuminated with an extraordinary light what was dark and unclear for me, what my question concerned. Rather, they were not even phrases, but pure thoughts that were transmitted to me directly, in addition to words.

Thus, the path of metahistorical insights, contemplations and comprehension was supplemented by transphysical wanderings, meetings and conversations. ' The descriptions in the Rose of Peace of high meetings with the Great Brothers are quite real and cannot be questioned.

Features of such meetings were given in a number of historical works, as well as in the works of the Roerichs. I believe that V. I. Vernadsky also had such meetings, but being very careful even in his diary entries, Vladimir Ivanovich did not consider it possible to write about it. Much of his diary reads between the lines.

These meetings were conducted through all three channels and were of a guiding nature. They seemed to unite all the messengers working in the three channels of cosmic evolution.

Also interesting is the statement in the 'Rose of the World' of the problem, which Andreev calls deep. Reflecting on what he saw, heard, and felt, he focused on one of the most important points – memory as such. The information he was dealing with was divided into two parts from the point of view of memory. The one that related to events that were not special and not important was poorly remembered. Contacts with the Higher One were remembered in all their details and remained in the memory not only for a long time, but also forever. He attributed this information to deep memory. In order to be preserved in deep memory, information must be highly spiritual and in contact with matter of a high energy state. This observation of Andreev allows us to determine what this 'depth'is. In Living Ethics, much has been said about an important energy center in the human structure, called the 'chalice'. The 'chalice', which is closely connected with the heart chakra, is a store of knowledge and creative achievements that a person acquires during their lives. The content of the 'chalice'also depends on the level of consciousness of this person and his spirituality. There are empty 'bowls', and there are 'bowls' - authentic treasures. Only a high level of consciousness and spirituality of a person gives him the opportunity to 'open the cup' and revive the memory of the spiritual treasures contained in it. In this case, a person gains the ability of deep memory. Andreev's abilities were very high, and, apparently, he observed and felt the 'bookmark' of his information of spiritual knowledge in the 'bowl', or the depth of his inner world. Such a process and its conscious perception, and in the case of D. L. Andreev it is so, are of great evolutionary importance. He felt this process and found a precise definition for it – 'deep memory'. This deep memory of Andreev was the rarest phenomenon of human interaction with his open ' cup 'at the very beginning of' laying ' in it another, new spiritual information, about which a long, if not eternal, memory is preserved. The process of deep memory gives us the opportunity to once again correlate the information of the philosophy of cosmic reality with the real knowledge presented in the Rose of the World.

'Rose of the World' is not only a metahistorical source, but everything that we find in it is confirmed by the author's own practical experience and philosophically understood by him. The integrity and logic of the presentation of this work gives us the opportunity to talk about the metahistorical teaching outlined by D. L. Andreev. In this teaching we see an extremely important concept of the creative influence of the worlds of the highest state of matter on earthly life. Much of this teaching is related to the ideas of Living Ethics, and first of all, it can be noted that both teachings and sources are fundamental, each in its own way, in the formation of cosmic thinking. Both the Living Ethics and the Rose of the World give an idea of cosmic evolution, emphasize the need for contact with the Higher Worlds, and set themselves the task of transforming and reorganizing earthly life. The metascientific and metahistorical aspects of the concept of both sources play an important role in the future of our planet.

The concepts introduced by D. L. Andreev-metahistorical cognition, metahistorical contemplation, metahistorical comprehension, and metahistorical feeling-are most closely related to the Higher cosmic Matter, the cosmic Hierarchy, and cosmic evolution in general. Without this interaction, nothing important or good can be done on Earth. Conscious disregard for the connection with the Higher violates one of the most important cosmic laws – in evolution, the lower is guided by the Higher. Without this guidance, without this guidance, the lower remains the lower, and after a while it descends even lower. Our various planetary crises are the result of a disregard for the metahistorical process on Earth. As we know, this process covers the main areas of human creativity – science, philosophy, art, religion. Failure to recognize metascience and its most important part – metahistory – in these critical areas causes irreparable damage, first of all, to the development of both the individual and the entire planet as a whole.

He was released from prison only in 1957, 4 years after Stalin's death.
1748430272852.png
Daniil Andreev with wife-Alla Andreeva
From the biography of Alla Alexandrovna Andreeva (1915-2005) there is about the time she was married to Daniil Andreev:
1945. Divorce from Ivashov-Musatov. Marriage to Daniil Andreev.

Arrests. The D. Andreev case [edit]
1947, April 21. Arrest of D. Andreev on denunciation. Sentence of the Special Meeting of the MGB: 25 years in prison.

1947, April 23. Arrest of A. A. Andreeva. A search. 13 months of investigation in Lubyanka. Charges of anti-Soviet agitation (Articles 58-10), participation in a counter — revolutionary group (Articles 58-11), preparation of a terrorist act-the assassination of Stalin (58-8). Detention in prison.

1948. Transfer to Lefortovo prison by personal order of the Minister of Internal Affairs V. S. Abakumov. Six months of investigation and interrogation. Verdict of the Special Meeting of the MGB: 25 years of maximum security camps.

1949. Stage to Potma (Mordovia), the 13th camp point. Arrival at the camp.

1949—1956. Work in a camp at a clothing factory, in a library, as a decorator, in EHF (cultural and educational part). Participation in amateur performances (concerts, performances). Correspondence with D. Andreev and his mother.

1956. Release. Certificate of removal of a criminal record. Residence permit in Moscow. Return to Moscow. Meeting with parents and friends. Restoration in the Moscow Art Gallery. Trips to the Vladimir prison for visits with her husband. Getting his case reviewed. D. Andreev's referral for examination to the Institute of Forensic Medical Examination named after V. I. Abramovich. Serbian to Moscow.

1957, April 23. D. Andreev's release from prison.

1957, July 4. Rehabilitation of D. Andreev. Life in Moscow. D. Andreev's disease. Completion of his work on the book 'Rose of the World'.

1959, March 30. D. Andreev's death in Moscow. He was buried at the Novodevichy cemetery.
Returning to the article:
'I am gravely ill,' he wrote, ' and the years of my life are numbered. If the manuscript is destroyed or lost, I won't have time to recover it. But if it ever reaches even a few people, whose spiritual thirst forces them to read it to the end, overcoming all its difficulties – the ideas embedded in it can not fail to become seeds that give birth to sprouts in other people's hearts. …

But nothing can shake my conviction that the most terrifying dangers that threaten humanity now and will continue to threaten it for centuries to come are the great suicidal war and absolute global tyranny.'10 These words completed the work of Daniil Andreev's bulletin.

As for the others-V. I. Vernadsky and E. I. and N. K. Roerich-we can say the following. We see the ideas of a new science and a new era in the scientific works of Vladimir Ivanovich. Elena Ivanovna left behind a Living Ethic - the philosophy of cosmic reality, which is gaining popularity in Russia with great hardships and difficulties. Nikolai Konstantinovich gifted our planet and, first of all, Russia with a huge collection of truly great paintings that are imbued with cosmic ideas of Living Ethics. Both Elena Ivanovna and Nikolai Konstantinovich preserved for us the memory of the Great Teacher, the Cosmic Hierarch, whose messengers they were.

The current situation can be approached differently. From an earthly and formal point of view, the messengers are gone, and the three cosmic directions, led by the Higher Worlds and Cosmic Hierarchs, seem to have weakened. But in reality, this is not the case. It must be remembered that the time of the Higher Worlds differs from that of the earth in its wholeness, or timelessness. Our years are their seconds, our centuries their hours. The three space channels laid down in the 20s of the last century continue to operate and increase the necessary energy. The Earth must enter a higher stage of cosmic evolution. But this will happen if the need for a new cosmic thinking is understood and realized, and when communication and cooperation with the Higher Worlds will become the basis of our life, and cosmic laws will not only be known, but also fulfilled.

1. Andreev D. Collected Works, Vol. 2: Rose of the World, pp. 116.

2. Ibid., pp. 66.

3. Andreev D. Collected Works, Vol. 2: Rose of the World, pp. 62-63.

4. A special cosmic structure where the 'hosts of enlightened human souls' live (see: Short Dictionary of names, terms and names often mentioned in the text / / Ibid., pp. 593.5.

5. Ibid., pp. 64.

6. Andreev D. Collected Works, Vol. 2: Rose of the World, pp. 64-65

7. Andreev D. Sobranie sochineniy [Collected Works], vol. 2: Roza Mira, pp. 60-62.

8. Bespredelnost' 44.

9. Andreev D. Sobranie sochineniy [Collected Works], Vol. 2: Roza Mira, pp. 67-68.

10. Andreev D. Sobranie sochineniy [Collected Works], vol. 2: Roza Mira, p. 7.

L. V. Shaposhnikova. Earth's creativity of cosmic evolution. Moscow: International Center of the Roerichs, 2011, Pp. 281-291.

The article was first published on the portal on 4.03.2022
Above there was:
We see the ideas of a new science and a new era in the scientific works of Vladimir Ivanovich. Elena Ivanovna left behind a Living Ethic - the philosophy of cosmic reality, which is gaining popularity in Russia with great hardships and difficulties.
Ludmila Shaposhnikova was the leader of a "Mezhdunarodny tsentr Rerikhov" (Ru Wiki), International Center of the Roerichs (ICR) in Moscow and was behind a film translated into English: Roerich. The Call of Cosmic evolution (2013) The museum (Russian Website), remains closed since 2017. It was/is located close to the Cathedral of Christ the Savior in Moscow:
2025-05-28 142446.png

Note on the Roerichs
The Russian Wiki of Nikolai Roerich is very much longer than the English. The same goes for the Russian Wiki for Elena Roerich. See also the Roerichs family website. From the Wiki of Elena Roerich, has:

Elena Ivanovna Roerich (nee Shaposhnikova) (January 31 (February 12), 1879, Saint Petersburg — October 5, 1955, Kalimpong, India) was a Russian religious philosopher[3] (in some sources, a philosopher[4] or an esoteric philosopher[5]), writer, and public figure.

She claimed to have received clairvoyant messages from Mahatma Moria. [6] On the basis of Elena Roerich's diary entries, a series of books on the religious and philosophical teaching of 'Living Ethics '('Agni Yoga') was published[7]. In 1994, the Council of Bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church excommunicated followers of Elena Roerich's teaching 'Agni Yoga' [8].

Author of the book 'Fundamentals of Buddhism', translated into Russian two volumes of' The Secret Doctrine ' by Elena Blavatsky, as well as selected Letters of Mahatmas ('The Cup of the East'). The ideas expressed by Elena Roerich in Agni Yoga have a strong influence on the structures and development of the New Age in Russia[9].
For Laura's comments on Blavatsky see the the search results here. Among them are:
Session 5 December 1994
Q: (L) Okay. Now, I would like to know, for the sake of all the Theosophists around the world, what was the source of the information in the book "Isis Unveiled" by Helena Blavatsky?

A: Orions STS and STO. 6th Density.

Q: (L) So, her information was from both sides? And it is up to the reader to figure out which is which?

A: Good idea.
And in this thread:
To put to rest any illusions about Helena Blavatsky, you will need to read:
The Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor: Initiatic and Historical Documents of an Order of Practical Occultism - by Joscelyn Godwin

Nicholas Roerich appears one time in the Sessions:
Session 15 April 2000
Q: (L) What stone was Nicholas Roerich returning to a temple when he made his trek into Siberia?

A: Stone was diamond from Persia.

Q: (L) What kind of UFO was it that he sighted at the time that he made the dedication of this temple; considering also that this was on the direct line of Tunguska?

A: UFO was a probe.

Q: (L) Was it there because they were there, or was it unrelated?

A: Related.

Q: (L) What was the significance of this diamond?

A: Energized.

Q: (L) By what?

A: Not by: for.

Q: (L) Energized for what?

A: Link.

Q: (L) Link to what?

A: Your move.

Q: (T) For the wave?

A: No, Terry, we are reminding Laura that this is not 20 questions.


A Russian Orthodox Christian about the work of Daniil Andreev
Having read how a Roerich related person views The Rose of the World and the experience of Daniil Andreev, how would a Russian Orthodox writer understand it? One indication may be in the translation from the RU Wiki about Elena Roerich:
In 1994, the Council of Bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church excommunicated followers of Elena Roerich's teaching 'Agni Yoga'
Unsurprisingly, given the positive review by Ludmila V. Shaposhnikova, one finds on Православный портал «Азбука веры» | Православный сайт an article by: V. Y. Pitanov, The secret of the 'Rose of the World', which after many paragraphs and 125 references to the book and other texts ends:
Let's summarize our reasoning. 'The Rose of the World' is a mystical teaching created by a person who did not have a Christian spiritual experience. Apparently, Daniel Andreev did not know the Holy Scriptures very well. Daniel Andreev received these revelations while in prison and, as can be assumed, not in the best psychological state. The teaching of the Rose of the World is contradictory in its content, and the theological terminology used in the book is applied incorrectly. The Rose of the World revives ancient heresies, particularly modalism. Declares that Jesus Christ has failed in His mission on earth, effectively making Him a failure. The author claims that the purpose of writing his book is to delay the coming of the antichrist, but if you highlight the signs of the coming of the antichrist, relying on the Holy Scriptures, you can see that the author does not fulfill the task set for himself. On the contrary, it distorts the Gospel, puts material well-being above spiritual well-being, completely changes the teaching about Jesus Christ, calls for the concentration of all political and spiritual power in the hands of the followers of the Rose of Peace, that is, it does everything that, according to the Holy Scriptures, is signs of the power of the antichrist himself. Finally, he rejects the Incarnation of God, which, according to the Holy Scriptures, is also a manifestation of the spirit of Antichrist: 'Recognize the Spirit of God (and the spirit of error) in this way: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God; but every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh, It is not from God, but it is the spirit of the antichrist (emphasis added - V.P), of whom you have heard that he is coming, and that now he is already in the world' (1 John 4: 2-3).

The secret of the 'Rose of the World' is that Daniil Andreev, being a puppet of the forces that he sought to fight when he became the author of the' Rose of the World', was one of the forerunners of the Antichrist, preparing for his arrival.

In the comments somebody wishes to argue and gets this response:
Hello. The main idea of this work - 'Roses of the World' is not a soulful composition. Find at least one Orthodox author who has a different point of view on this issue. [...]
He says Orthodox, but it would not surprise if many Christian fundamentalists in the West would share the same view.

Of course there are also other voices in Russia, and while it will be too long to include it, for a fairly recent article, see from Kommersant 20.12.2024, 00:03 this article: Superknowledge of pain (In Russian)
 
Back
Top Bottom