The Situation In Germany
- Thread starter Ursus Minor
- Start date
-
- Tags
- german election 2021
The well-known coronavirus critic Reiner Fuellmich has been sentenced to three years and nine months' imprisonment by Göttingen District Court. The court is convinced that the 66-year-old former lawyer embezzled a total of 700,000 euros in donations from the "Corona Committee" for private purposes. Fuellmich testified during the trial that he had wanted to protect the money "from the state".
According to the court, he transferred 200,000 euros to his wife's account and a further 500,000 euros to his own account, including for house and garden work. This was done without the consent of the three other shareholders of the "Corona Committee", as several German media reported unanimously. The court saw this as a violation of the company's articles of association. Source bluewin.ch
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich — international lawyer, truth-teller, and fierce critic of COVID tyranny — has just been sentenced to 3 years and 9 months in a German prison. No acknowledgment of the 1.5 years of unlawful imprisonment he has already endured. No justice. No mercy. No due process.
He exposed the lies. He challenged the machine. And now, the system he tried to hold accountable has locked him away.
According to the court, he transferred 200,000 euros to his wife's account and a further 500,000 euros to his own account, including for house and garden work. This was done without the consent of the three other shareholders of the "Corona Committee", as several German media reported unanimously. The court saw this as a violation of the company's articles of association. Source bluewin.ch
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich — international lawyer, truth-teller, and fierce critic of COVID tyranny — has just been sentenced to 3 years and 9 months in a German prison. No acknowledgment of the 1.5 years of unlawful imprisonment he has already endured. No justice. No mercy. No due process.
He exposed the lies. He challenged the machine. And now, the system he tried to hold accountable has locked him away.
In Germany the defence of the institution declared the AfD as "secured right-wing extremists". The report where it is written is not available and kept secret, of course. The AfD announced to go legally against the defamation.
rtde.online
AfD kündigt juristische Schritte gegen Einstufung als "gesichert rechtsextremistisch" an
In einer ersten Reaktion auf die Erklärung des Bundesamtes für Verfassungsschutz ließ das Führungsduo der AfD, Tino Chrupalla und Alice Weidel, mitteilen, dass man sich gegen die Diffamierungen weiter juristisch zur Wehr setzen werde.
I overheard a group of German men (probably in their 50ies) today discussing this declaration about AfD as "secured right-wing extremists" while scanning their smartphones. They thought it would be a step in the right direction. I thought quietly in my mind, no, it would be not. Sadly, many Germans are still so very blind.
On another instance just very recently a work colleague commented about rural villages in the proximity of our city, and in our state - how many "Reichsbürger" and "Nazis" there are. She said, when it was commented that there's a beautiful lake in one of these places, that it is beautiful as long as it is being kept clean from garbage and other trash (the latter meaning people with right-wing views). I was shocked, to state it simple. I think the following applies: 'Never again is happening again - though not in the sense as many think.'
Well, just had to get this off my chest.
On another instance just very recently a work colleague commented about rural villages in the proximity of our city, and in our state - how many "Reichsbürger" and "Nazis" there are. She said, when it was commented that there's a beautiful lake in one of these places, that it is beautiful as long as it is being kept clean from garbage and other trash (the latter meaning people with right-wing views). I was shocked, to state it simple. I think the following applies: 'Never again is happening again - though not in the sense as many think.'
Well, just had to get this off my chest.
The 'Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution' has no basis for making objective decisions as it is made up of party politicians and dominated by the present-day government.
Any 'secured' findings by this bunch are just party politics.
Only the 'Federal Constitutional Court' (which may be impartial or not) could decide whether a party is extremist enough to be banned.
The court had banned the neo-nazi SRP in 1952 and the communist KPD in 1956.
The operatives of the current political system are definitely scared of sueing for a ban on the AfD, so even if this party would be right-wing extremist (which it isn't) there is no infringement of the law.
Possible court proceedings would only boost the popularity of the AfD, they would take some time, and the verdict might only come after the demise of the current Federal Republic.
Any 'secured' findings by this bunch are just party politics.
Only the 'Federal Constitutional Court' (which may be impartial or not) could decide whether a party is extremist enough to be banned.
The court had banned the neo-nazi SRP in 1952 and the communist KPD in 1956.
The operatives of the current political system are definitely scared of sueing for a ban on the AfD, so even if this party would be right-wing extremist (which it isn't) there is no infringement of the law.
Possible court proceedings would only boost the popularity of the AfD, they would take some time, and the verdict might only come after the demise of the current Federal Republic.
Here is the translation of the article now (by grace of DeepL, like the previous one). It happens to be a piece from a mainstream newspaper:
Excitement at church congress in Hanover: “Is my son dark enough?”
An offer at the church congress in Hanover leaves many people flabbergasted. White children are excluded. Can that be okay?
It should be a celebration of faith and have an impact on society: The Protestant Church Congress in Europe. From Thursday (May 1) to Sunday (May 4), tens of thousands of Christians will come together to pray and sing, but also to debate social developments. An offer is causing a stir in the run-up to the event. It's about a workshop for children on Saturday.
In keeping with the Kirchentag [church congress - my transl.] motto “Courageous - strong - valiant”, the workshop is intended to give children inspiration for their everyday lives and empower them. But not all children are welcome!
Irritation over offer: “It divides into ‘them’ and ‘us’”
The invitation to the event clearly states: “This offer is aimed exclusively at Black, Indigenous and Children of Color.” This restriction has caused a lot of criticism, and not just because of the unclear definition of who is considered indigenous or native in Germany.
The author Hasnain Kazim, whose parents come from Pakistan, finds clear words on X. He considers the offer to be “fundamentally wrong”. He continues: "It divides, probably unintentionally, into ‘them’ and ‘us’. And could my child, who has a white mother and me as a father, take part? Is my son dark enough?"
Church congress criticized
In fact, children from Ukraine, for example, also seem to be excluded from the offer, as they are not “children of color”. The opinionated “Welt” journalist Anna Schneider posted on X: “Just imagine what would happen if it said: ‘Only for white people’!”
There is also displeasure in the Bundestag about the offer at the Kirchentag. CDU MP Günter Krings told Bild that “the division of society into minorities and individual groups does not correspond to my understanding of the churches' mission of evangelical promulgation”.
Excitement at church congress in Hanover: “Is my son dark enough?”
An offer at the church congress in Hanover leaves many people flabbergasted. White children are excluded. Can that be okay?
It should be a celebration of faith and have an impact on society: The Protestant Church Congress in Europe. From Thursday (May 1) to Sunday (May 4), tens of thousands of Christians will come together to pray and sing, but also to debate social developments. An offer is causing a stir in the run-up to the event. It's about a workshop for children on Saturday.
In keeping with the Kirchentag [church congress - my transl.] motto “Courageous - strong - valiant”, the workshop is intended to give children inspiration for their everyday lives and empower them. But not all children are welcome!
Irritation over offer: “It divides into ‘them’ and ‘us’”
The invitation to the event clearly states: “This offer is aimed exclusively at Black, Indigenous and Children of Color.” This restriction has caused a lot of criticism, and not just because of the unclear definition of who is considered indigenous or native in Germany.
The author Hasnain Kazim, whose parents come from Pakistan, finds clear words on X. He considers the offer to be “fundamentally wrong”. He continues: "It divides, probably unintentionally, into ‘them’ and ‘us’. And could my child, who has a white mother and me as a father, take part? Is my son dark enough?"
Church congress criticized
In fact, children from Ukraine, for example, also seem to be excluded from the offer, as they are not “children of color”. The opinionated “Welt” journalist Anna Schneider posted on X: “Just imagine what would happen if it said: ‘Only for white people’!”
There is also displeasure in the Bundestag about the offer at the Kirchentag. CDU MP Günter Krings told Bild that “the division of society into minorities and individual groups does not correspond to my understanding of the churches' mission of evangelical promulgation”.
At some point in time the wokesters will find out that they will have to exclude themselves from the society they are preparing as they are too white, too rich, too heterosexual, and they are still consuming too much meat, using their cars too often while spreading world-wide tourism producing tons and tons of carbon dioxide. They seem to have wasted their white privilege for nothing.
They are a good example of evolution gone wrong.
They are a good example of evolution gone wrong.
In Germany the defence of the institution declared the AfD as "secured right-wing extremists". The report where it is written is not available and kept secret, of course. The AfD announced to go legally against the defamation.
AfD kündigt juristische Schritte gegen Einstufung als "gesichert rechtsextremistisch" an
In einer ersten Reaktion auf die Erklärung des Bundesamtes für Verfassungsschutz ließ das Führungsduo der AfD, Tino Chrupalla und Alice Weidel, mitteilen, dass man sich gegen die Diffamierungen weiter juristisch zur Wehr setzen werde.
Meanwhile Sahra Wagenkecht (head of the BSW) has clearly stated that it is wrong to categorize the AfD as “right extremists“, which is somewhat surprising because she herself fueled that nonsense quite a bit:
Then today, something that has never happened in the Bundesrepublik happened; Merz wasn‘t confirmed chancellor in the first round of voting:
Merz scheitert im ersten Wahlgang bei Kanzlerwahl
Das gab es noch nie in der Geschichte der Bundesrepublik: CDU-Chef Merz hat bei der Kanzlerwahl im ersten Durchgang keine Mehrheit erreicht. Er erhielt in geheimer Abstimmung nur 310 Stimmen - sechs weniger als benötigt.
While Wagenkecht now clearly says that Merz is the biggest election fraudsters in german history after the second Worldwar and hasn’t succeeded to become chancellor:
Supposedly now they can have a second vote to confirm Merz as chancellor at the latest in 2 weeks from now. It could be that we will have new elections soon.
A second vote was carried out quickly after Merz failed in the first round and he was confirmed in the second vote: So his chancellor now. 
Meanwhile, the AfD is also openly talking about the biggest election fraud in Germany history after WW2:
The mainstream is also talking about a very unstable and untrustworthy beginning for Merz and co, so the collapse of this new "government" might already be a forgone conclusion/plan. Let's wait and see how long they can keep the charade going before new elections take place.
Meanwhile, the AfD is also openly talking about the biggest election fraud in Germany history after WW2:
The mainstream is also talking about a very unstable and untrustworthy beginning for Merz and co, so the collapse of this new "government" might already be a forgone conclusion/plan. Let's wait and see how long they can keep the charade going before new elections take place.
Sen. Tom Cotton has asked Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard to refrain from sharing intelligence with Germany’s domestic intelligence agency days after the country’s spy arm labeled the far-right Alternative for Germany, or AfD, as an “extremist” political party.
Cotton requested that, until Germany treats the AfD as a “legitimate opposition party” and not as a “right-wing extremist organization,” Gabbard should direct the U.S. intelligence agencies to halt sharing intelligence with the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV).
He also asked that Gabbard deny Berlin’s potential requests to assist in surveilling the AfD and review if intelligence agencies during former President Biden’s administration “cooperated with German requests to surveil the AfD or other opposition parties.”
The German BND intelligence service has always been an affiliate of the CIA. If Tulsi Gabbard can turn the agency around to serve the Trump administration the new German government might have a hard time keeping anything secret from the public.
Now it's official: The Merkel's open-door policy is falling apart.
naorma
The Living Force
If he will stick to that, Austrian will probably get more migrants . . . .
axj
The Living Force
A win for the AfD for now, maybe connected to the pressure from the US (threat of no more intelligence sharing with Germany):
Trending content
-
-
Thread 'Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?'
- wanderingthomas
Replies: 30K -
-
