The Situation In Germany

Another display of diversity in Germany:

More than 30 injured after machete-wielding attacker sets fire to homes and rams van into shops in Germany: Syrian man, 41, is arrested​

Published: 15:17 BST, 29 September 2024 | Updated: 21:32 BST, 29 September 2024

A Syrian suspect has been arrested following chaos in Germany, with fires tearing through two blocks of flats leaving 30 people hurt - including eight children.

Two of the children who were hurt are in a life-threatening condition
after inhaling smoke, according to local media.

They were reportedly thrown from windows to escape the flames, landing on cushions placed on the street in the city of Essen.

Neighbours tried to reach up with ladders to help people escape, but they weren't long enough to reach the upper floors so brave residents worked together to lower children from the roof.

Footage posted on X shows a van ramming through two shops a short time after the fires in a rampage, allegedly targeting people connected to his wife who had left him.

The van caused damage but no injuries and a 41-year-old Syrian man was arrested at the scene on Saturday.

Seriously, all of that because his wife left him?

Some portals report of 31 injured people, including 8 children.


As this portal stated:
There has been a spate of knife attacks in Germany in recent months committed by mostly Syrian and Afghan migrants. Among the most tragic incidents was the brutal killing of three festivalgoers by a 26-year-old Syrian failed asylum seeker in Solingen in August, and the murder of a policeman by a 25-year-old Afghan failed asylum seeker in Mannheim in May.

With the anti-immigration AfD party constantly increasing its popularity, and registering its first regional electoral victory at the beginning of September, the left-liberal government has decided to react, reinstalling temporary border checks at all of Germany’s borders, and announcing new measures to deport failed asylum seekers. But the opposition AfD and the centre-right CDU think this is not enough, and that illegal migrants should be pushed back at the border.

Yeah, current government attempt of any kind of immigration control (and to win points in the elections) is too little too late:

Death of Schengen: Germany Reinstates Border Checks Amid Migration Surge​


The German government has decided to implement temporary border checks on all of its land borders for the next six months in an attempt to curb illegal crossings into the country, the Interior Ministry announced on Monday, September 9th.

“We want to further reduce irregular migration. To this end, we are now taking further steps that go beyond the comprehensive measures currently in place,” Interior Minister Nancy Faeser said. She added that border checks are necessary until the EU’s external borders are sufficiently reinforced through joint action, although Brussels still lacks the legal framework for that.

According to Faeser, the measure is justified by the need to protect the country’s internal security from the “acute dangers posed by Islamist terror” and cross-border crime, as well as to alleviate the crushing “burden” on municipalities of having to accommodate and integrate too many asylum seekers.

Germany has already previously implemented similar measures along its borders with several neighboring countries, but the new move would extend border checks to all nine of its neighbors: Poland, Austria, France, Denmark, the Czech Republic, Switzerland, Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands.

The checks currently in place, which will soon expire, will also need to be extended for their periods to match the new ones, Faeser said. The leading members of the ruling ‘traffic light coalition’—Chancellor Scholz’s socialist SPD, the Greens, and the liberal FDP—are to meet later on Tuesday at the Ministry to discuss further details, but the plan is that the new checks will come into effect starting next week.

Despite the apparent necessity for the measures, the announcement immediately caused a backlash in Brussels and around Europe. Politicians slammed the decision for contributing to the ongoing, gradual breakdown of the EU’s borderless free movement area, the Schengen Zone, and said that the move would hurt border communities that depend on daily cross-border commutes.

“One of our most important freedoms is being jeopardized to send a political signal,” a liberal Dutch MEP from Renew said, advocating for external border protection instead—even though her party was also responsible for the lack of sufficient external protection measures in the EU’s new Migration Pact.

German opposition parties also regard the decision as a political move rather than a genuine effort, especially after the governing parties’ humiliating defeat in the recent regional elections in Saxony and Thuringia earlier this month and before the upcoming vote in Brandenburg in less than two weeks.

The staunchly anti-migration Alternative für Deutschland (AfD)—which won first place in Thuringia and ran the centrist CDU a close second in Saxony—reacted skeptically to the government taking a page out of its playbook after calling similar initiatives too extreme for months. “Oh, suddenly border controls? Wasn’t that ‘just Nazi?’” AfD co-president Alice Weidel replied to the news.

The CDU—the biggest opposition party, which has been riding anti-migration sentiment and calling for tougher border controls to stay ahead of AfD—voiced mild skepticism of the effectiveness of the plan, questioning whether it will actually involve turning back migrants after they have been caught crossing the border illegally.

“If the Federal Government wants us to go down this path together, then it will only work if we really do carry out comprehensive refoulement at Germany’s external borders,” CDU leader Frierdich Merz said.

However, Austria was quick to react saying that it would not accept any migrants if Germany tried to turn them back from its borders, foreshadowing an escalating diplomatic conflict between the two countries.
 
No controls at German borders !

Somewhere, I don't know where - but it was recently documented that at Germany's street borders - there was ABSOLUTELY NO CONTROL what so ever to be seen. If i (re-)find the source article and images, i will post it here of course.
 
Germany Border Control

Funny, on the same evening, in the latest "HomeOffice" no. 478 at Nuoviso, talked about the subject of border control three times / with three different people. The reviews are mixed; one says there are barely any controls, the other (Helmut) who is on a journey to check various points along Germany's borders, even doing a reportage about it, he says that yes, there are border controls in several places. Sometimes lighter, sometimes a bit heavier since 2-3 weeks. They pick out some vehicles, often with foreign numer signs - while in other places it seems a bit thin / sporadic.

However, what isn't sure at all is, if any people are being sent back (e.g. people without passport or papers). It is said, that border control can't send back people who say "Asylum".

 
There was a debate between Wagenknecht (BSW) and Weidel (AfD), the heads of the two large anti-establishment parties. I haven't watched any German debates in probably at least a decade, but this one seemed interesting.

They both agree that Russia started "an illegal war", but also point out that Russia's red lines were ignored and promises of not expanding NATO were broken - and that it is necessary to negotiate instead of sending more arms to Ukraine.

They also more or less agreed on migration, with only the minor difference that Wagenknecht thinks that those who are well-integrated by now (language, job) should have a chance to stay.

One big difference was of course the economic politics, with Weidel advocating cutting down on expenses, while Wagenknecht wants to take on more debt to finance infrastructure.

And the biggest disagreement is what according to Wagenknecht makes it impossible to go into a coalition with the AfD - the so-called "Hoecke group" within the AfD, which is much more nationalist than Weidel. In fact, Weidel herself was in favor of removing Hoecke from the party before, but she tried to deflect from this issue - in turn highlighting Wagenknecht's communist roots.

One other thing that stood out was the moderator - the chief editor of the Welt newspaper which organized the debate. Not only was he constantly debating them with the establishment line, but one of his questions was just bizarre: "How did you commerorate the attack on Israel a year ago?" Weidel answered that she spent the day with her Jewish friends, while Wagenknecht did point out that Israel killing 40,000 civilians in response is a crime too. And again, the defense of the genocide from the moderator was "Hamas is using human shields".

Considering that Wagenknecht is half-Iranian, that may explain her more nuanced stance on Israel.

Wagenknecht and her party are also in favor of stopping arms deliveries to Israel, while Weidel and the AfD think that "every country has the right to defend themselves" and even denied that Germany ships weapons to Israel.

What is interesting is how the "far-right anti-establishment" parties all over the West are firmly in the Zionist camp, while the "left-wing anti-establishment" parties are much less so.

The debate itself is behind a paywall, so I watched it (with obnoxious commentary on top by a Zionist) on Rumble - apparently having a commentary ensures that it cannot be deleted:

 
There was a debate between Wagenknecht (BSW) and Weidel (AfD), the heads of the two large anti-establishment parties. I haven't watched any German debates in probably at least a decade, but this one seemed interesting.

They both agree that Russia started "an illegal war", but also point out that Russia's red lines were ignored and promises of not expanding NATO were broken - and that it is necessary to negotiate instead of sending more arms to Ukraine.

They also more or less agreed on migration, with only the minor difference that Wagenknecht thinks that those who are well-integrated by now (language, job) should have a chance to stay.

One big difference was of course the economic politics, with Weidel advocating cutting down on expenses, while Wagenknecht wants to take on more debt to finance infrastructure.

And the biggest disagreement is what according to Wagenknecht makes it impossible to go into a coalition with the AfD - the so-called "Hoecke group" within the AfD, which is much more nationalist than Weidel. In fact, Weidel herself was in favor of removing Hoecke from the party before, but she tried to deflect from this issue - in turn highlighting Wagenknecht's communist roots.

One other thing that stood out was the moderator - the chief editor of the Welt newspaper which organized the debate. Not only was he constantly debating them with the establishment line, but one of his questions was just bizarre: "How did you commerorate the attack on Israel a year ago?" Weidel answered that she spent the day with her Jewish friends, while Wagenknecht did point out that Israel killing 40,000 civilians in response is a crime too. And again, the defense of the genocide from the moderator was "Hamas is using human shields".

Considering that Wagenknecht is half-Iranian, that may explain her more nuanced stance on Israel.

Wagenknecht and her party are also in favor of stopping arms deliveries to Israel, while Weidel and the AfD think that "every country has the right to defend themselves" and even denied that Germany ships weapons to Israel.

What is interesting is how the "far-right anti-establishment" parties all over the West are firmly in the Zionist camp, while the "left-wing anti-establishment" parties are much less so.

The debate itself is behind a paywall, so I watched it (with obnoxious commentary on top by a Zionist) on Rumble - apparently having a commentary ensures that it cannot be deleted:


Words are one thing, actions are another. Or in other words, judge people and parties by their fruits and actions. So far, understandably, we haven't had a chance to judge Wagenknecht/BSW in that regard since they haven't been in any real power position yet. A similar thing is the case with Weidel/AFD, although in their case we can say that they have been on the scene quite a bit longer and had more flirting with power than BSW. But also almost nothing compared to established parties/politicians. But so far, AFD seems to have been rather consistent, although again, they haven't had any real power yet.

One thing that really robbed me the wrong way about the AFD was their behavior before, during and after "the pandemic". In a number of ways, they were even more extreme than parties in power (in the negative sense)! And as has been mentioned, there were already some not so good signs from BSW as well. That is why I'm thankful that I haven't voted for either party yet. On the other hand, Wagenknecht was pretty much the only famous German politician with something to say that was pretty much against what was happening DURING "the pandemic".

If either party gets into any kind of real power position, and their actions match their words, then I could think about voting for either of them.
 
My guess/bet at this point is that Wagenknecht/Lafontaine are the real deal and that they have their hearts in the right place and want to do something good. Although, if that is the case, I personally have quite some distaste in how they go about it.
 
I think Wagenknecht's BSW can get into power pretty soon, at least in a couple of the regions. The AfD might be able to go into coalitions with the CDU if the AfD continues to increase the number of its voters and/or if Hoecke is removed from the party. Though I don't know how much of the success of the AfD is due to Hoecke's positions.
 
I like the way Wagenknecht is running rings around the contenders for prime minister in eastern Germany.

She will be making them sign symbolical statements declaring that they are against the stationing of intermediate range NATO missiles on German soil, that they are in favor of peace talks instead of more weapons for Ukraine, and in the case of Brandenburg Wagenknecht is demanding support for the endangered Schwedt oil refinery which used to be the hub for Russian oil and natural gas.

Born in 1969 in East Germany we can expect her to be pretty fluent in Russian which could give her an important role in a future rapprochement between Germany and Russia.
 
Joseph Farrell analyses the deployment of the elite GSG-9 unit to prevent further Nordstream-type attacks on critical infrastructure:

GERMANY DEPLOYS ELITE GSG-9 UNIT TO BALTIC SEAPORT OF NEUSTEDT​

So when Germany announces the deployment of the unit via media "leaks and stories" - Der Spiegel has long been suspected of playing the role of "government mouth piece" like the New York Times or Washington Post - the purpose is to serve notice to the real guilty parties that any further sabotage of German infrastructure will be first met with deadly force, and questions of the national identity and connections of the perpetrators of any such event will be asked post facto.

The bottom line? In my opinion, the cracks in NATO just grew a significantly larger, even though the story may seem "small"...
 
Back
Top Bottom