The work of Pofessor Corrado Malanga-Gensis I

[RflctnOfU]

Venusya, it seems like you are quite emotionally attached to the conclusions Malanga has come to. As others have stated, you are declaring this to be truth with a 'T'. I am curious what research you have done regarding this topic? I suspect that you have NO personal experience, other than reading Malanga's work - though I could be wrong.

Proclamations don't mean diddly in 'these here parts'.

BTW, why are you so eager to convince this forum that Malanga's conclusions are correct??

Kris

 

[anart]

Hypnosis doesn't reach the soul, only the unconscious mind, ...

not, it's wrong. Hypnosis can reach soul: there are three steps: the human mind (it's the first to entry in contact with), the active alien mind (the 2th) then tyhe soul (the last). Evidently you are not able. Just only Malanga ,here,discovered that. i hope you own experts who know about contact soul too.

Venusya, in order to give you an opportunity to get up to speed on the material on this site, your posting privileges have been removed. You are so invested in this newage nonsense that you are unable to interact here with any degree of clarity. So, if you are sincere about interacting here, you now have the time and access to read all you'd like to get up to speed without feeling the need to defend your sacred cows.

 

[obyvatel]

We have also been told that all is illusion, we are the products of thought, our minds are controlled and so on.

If the source of "all is illusion" is Asian/Indian philosophy, a very very brief historical summary of what was considered as illusion may be useful. In the post Vedic period, the quest was for something which could stand by itself without being dependent on anything else - a timeless, causeless independent entity which would fit the prevailing definition of "real". The Buddhist schools could not find anything which had such a nature - hence their view of reality was dominated by the themes of "dependent origination", "impermanence" and "void". The Vedantic school of Hinduism conceived of an entity called "Brahman" which had these qualities and came to promote a non-dual (advaita) world view where only the Brahman is real and the apparent multiplicity of existence is illusion. The terms "enlightenment" or "self-realization" are used by the respective schools to denote an experiential understanding of their respective core views.

The general view that something real exists but it is often not seen as it is due to our lack of knowledge and faulty perception seems to be most probable based on available data - at least that is my current understanding.

 

[Joe]

I think we need to consider the likelihood that there are relative truths based on the level of awareness that any group of people possess. Take humanity for example. We live in a 3rd density world, where "everything is illusion" because it is theorised that everything here is but a reflection of higher density dynamics. The same could possibly be said for 4th density. So, sure, everything here is probably "illusion", but within that illusion there is relative truth and relative lies. Our job is to discern which is which. We can talk about there being "higher truths" all day long, but if we can't practically access them, or more importantly, if we cannot step them down or make them relative and practicable to our daily lives in 3D, then they end up being so much "navel gazing".

People who are overly enamored of higher realities etc. tend to want to use them to escape from having to face into and learn the lessons of this level of being, which include separating (relative) truth from lies as best we are able.

 

[SoCurious]

Thanks for all the thoughtful comments. This is such an amazing forum.