Transgender "out of the blue" - a new kind of Gender Dysphoria
- Thread starter RedFox
- Start date
This is a disgrace to whatever value statistics has/[had].
Laura Aboli she is the co-founder of World Check
Translate:
La carrière entrepreneuriale de Laura Aboli a débuté en 2000 lorsqu'elle a cofondé World-Check, une base de données de personnes politiquement exposées (PPE) et d'individus et d'organisations à haut risque, qui est rapidement devenue la norme de facto pour l'identification et la gestion des risques financiers, réglementaires et de réputation au sein des institutions financières et juridiques du monde entier. Suite au succès de World-Check, elle a cofondé Wealth-X en 2010, qui est devenu le principal fournisseur de renseignements sur les personnes très fortunées.
Après s'être retirée de ces deux entreprises en 2014, elle a poursuivi sa passion de toujours pour la décoration d'intérieur en créant une société de promotion immobilière et de design qu'elle continue de diriger. Née dans une famille d'artistes, Laura est passionnée par l'art, la sculpture, la musique et la danse. Son esprit critique et curieux l'a amenée à s'intéresser aux domaines de la métaphysique, de la spiritualité, de la santé et de la psychologie. Son expérience et sa volonté d'aider les autres l'ont amenée à se lancer dans l'arène publique afin de partager ce qu'elle considère comme des leçons de vie importantes dans son propre parcours. En mai 2020, poussée par la façon dont les événements entourant la pandémie mondiale affectaient les moyens de subsistance, les droits civils et la santé mentale des gens, Laura a fondé le Mouvement international démocratique uni pour la sensibilisation et la liberté (UDIMAF), une organisation dédiée à la création d'un monde meilleur par la sensibilisation, l'inspiration et la poursuite incessante de la vérité.
Last edited:
Maïanar
The Force is Strong With This One
Michelle Obama is not alone anymore. That's what I wanted to wrote, but forgot.
Menna
The Living Force
Give her all the information, science, when this trend started, what happens to organs, glands, hormones when surgery and meds are taken. Give her info on the % of those that have surgery/take hormones regret it.
Being on spectrum/ADD is tough. I was diagnosed with ADD in middle school my parents forced Ritalin down my throat …
I would lean into techniques, exercises, nutrition to help with spectrum/ADD… also maybe introduce her to new musics hobby’s…
She’s trying to grasp into something for stability and or meaning…trans topic is now in society so it comes across her eyes and ears…
I wouldn’t put a time on anything bc when 18 comes there it is… help her craft a reality with stability, meaning… I am not saying you aren’t trying or doing this but lean into it more instead of the fear or the rules about trans or not trans IMO
There are threads on this forum about autism/ADD and in a wholistic healthy way
In the 60’s how many young ppl said they wanted to be hippies and then the times change… not equation hippies to trans… but show her that it’s best to choose something with healthy longevity and not an unproven fad
From ZeroHedge via the Brad Jones for the The Epoch Times who delves into the depths of WPATH
Leaked Files From Transgender Association 'Shocking' And 'Horrific' Admission, Critics Say | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
and goes on to cite:
A Canadian endocrinologist then said:
...gender doctors are “often explaining these sorts of things to people who haven’t even had biology in high school yet,” adding that even adults have limited knowledge of many of these medical interventions.
[...]
Lastly:
“They push aside any patient mental health issue, regardless of whether its severe schizophrenia or a dissociative disorder,” she said. “They know that these people ... have severe mental health issues and they transition them anyway.”
Erin Friday, western U.S. co-leader of Our Duty, speaks at a seminar in San Francisco on Sept. 24, 2023. (Lear Zhou/The Epoch Times)
Ms. Friday, whose daughter formerly identified as transgender but has since accepted her female form, anticipates the WPATH Files will lead to congressional hearings.
The WPATH Files reveal much more than an organization that has overstepped its bounds, she said.
“They have admitted to medical malpractice. They have admitted to lying,” she claimed.
Hospital boards and medical societies, Ms. Friday said, would be “well-advised” to use the leaked WPATH Files as “an off-ramp,” to move away from such harmful practices.
Erin Friday, western U.S. co-leader of Our Duty, speaks at a seminar in San Francisco on Sept. 24, 2023. (Lear Zhou/The Epoch Times)It goes on and on and seems to only get worse for those who are not old enough to decide for themselves.
If the "off-ramp" were to take place en masse, one might hope that the lawsuits would fly fast and furious, however they all seem to have great ponerogenic shielded.
I just picked up The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness by Johnathan Hadit and I think it relates quite a bit to this phenomena.
I've just made it through the introduction and am now making my way through the first chapter and so far he's making a very interesting case about the impact on mental illness, the constant access to unlimited internet and the kind of internet that kids have been consuming since cellphones became a thing, truly breaks them down mentally and physiologically.
I've just made it through the introduction and am now making my way through the first chapter and so far he's making a very interesting case about the impact on mental illness, the constant access to unlimited internet and the kind of internet that kids have been consuming since cellphones became a thing, truly breaks them down mentally and physiologically.
meadow_wind
Jedi
I just stumbled on that one, but it's been published on the 12th of April.
It's not related to the "out of the blue" subject, but Trangenderism in general.
We certainly have reached the point of no return with mental health decline and society's collapse...
Meanwhile, I don't know how bad the situation is in Ontario, but in Quebec, there are often reports of patients dying in hospital corridors due to a lack of care which is caused by a lack of staff.
Ontario resident who wants both a vagina and penis wins public funding for unique surgery
A court has ruled Ontario must pay for a penis-sparing vaginoplasty for a person who identifies as neither fully female nor fully male
Ontario has been ordered to pay for surgery for a resident who is seeking to have a vagina constructed while leaving their penis intact. Denying the procedure would infringe on the person’s Charter-protected right to security of the person, an Ontario court said in its ruling. The unanimous decision by a three-member panel of judges of Ontario’s Divisional Court could expand access to a novel “bottom surgery” for people who identify as non-binary, meaning neither fully male nor fully female.
The Ontario resident, identified in court documents as K.S., has been locked in a legal battle with the Ontario Health Insurance Plan since 2022, when OHIP denied a funding request to have a penile preserving vaginoplasty performed at a clinic in Austin, Texas.
The surgery, which is not available anywhere in Canada, involves creating a vaginal canal, or opening, without removing the penis.
K.S., 33, was born male but identifies as female dominant and uses a feminine name.
OHIP denied her request for funding, arguing that the procedure is not included on its list of sex-reassignment procedures, and is therefore not an insured service. K.S. appealed OHIP’s decision to Ontario’s Health Services Appeal and Review Board, arguing that forcing her to have her penis removed would invalidate her identity and be akin to an illegal act of conversion therapy.
She also worried about the risk of complications and urinary incontinence from the urological rerouting, and the risk of orgasm dysfunction. She argued the procedure she is seeking abroad is like standard vaginoplasties performed in Ontario, but without the additional procedure, namely, the penectomy.
The appeal board overturned OHIP’s decision, ruling that a vaginoplasty is among the genital surgeries listed for public coverage and need not inherently include removal of the penis. The board therefore ruled the procedure eligible for public funding.
OHIP appealed the board’s decision to the Divisional Court, arguing the review board erred in finding a penis-sparing vaginoplasty is specifically listed as an insured service, and that it failed to consider that the unorthodox procedure is considered an experimental procedure in Ontario, and, therefore, not eligible for funding.
Just because vaginoplasty is listed as an insured service doesn’t mean any type of vaginoplasty qualifies, OHIP argued in court.
The court disagreed. Vaginoplasty and penectomy are listed as discrete, separate services on Ontario’s list of surgeries eligible for funding, the court said. “The fact that most people who have a vaginoplasty have it done in a way that also involves a penectomy” doesn’t change the provision. If the province had intended for only one type of vaginoplasty to be insured (vaginoplasty with penis removal) it should have drafted the list differently, the court said.
The court said the appeal board’s conclusion was also consistent with standards of care developed by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) — an influential group whose guidelines for gender-affirming care for children and youth were found to lack “developmental rigour” in a sweeping review released this week.
The WPATH standards “expressly refer to vaginoplasty without penectomy as a surgical option for some non-binary people,” Justice Breese Davies wrote in the court ruling.
While the court said it didn’t need to address Charter arguments, if there was any ambiguity concerning what should or should not be covered, the review board’s interpretation was also consistent with Charter values of equality and security of the person, the court added.
“The Charter-protected right to security of the person safeguards individual dignity and autonomy,” Davies wrote. Requiring a transgender or non-binary person born male “to remove their penis to receive state funding for a vaginoplasty would be inconsistent with the values of equality and security of the person.”
“Such an interpretation would force transgender, non-binary people like K.S. to choose between having a surgery (penectomy) they do not want, and which does not align with their gender expression to get state funding, on the one hand, and not having gender affirming surgery at all, on the other,” Davies wrote.
“Such a choice would reinforce their disadvantaged position and would not promote their dignity and autonomy.”
OHIP’s appeal was dismissed, and the province ordered to pay K.S. $20,000 to cover legal costs.
“This is a significant win for the transgender and non-binary communities,” K.S.’s lawyer, John McIntyre, told CTV News Toronto.
“We hope that OHIP decides to accept the decision of the court rather than seeking leave to appeal so that K.S. can move forward with her surgery she has been trying to get for years now.”
“K.S. is very happy with this unanimous decision,” McIntyre said in an email to the National Post. “The Divisional Court determined the existing language of the Health Insurance Act and the Schedule of Benefits clearly provided coverage for the procedure she sought.”
In earlier reports, National Post was told that gender-affirming surgeries at the Texas clinic range from US$10,000 to $70,000, depending on what is done.
It's not related to the "out of the blue" subject, but Trangenderism in general.
We certainly have reached the point of no return with mental health decline and society's collapse...
Meanwhile, I don't know how bad the situation is in Ontario, but in Quebec, there are often reports of patients dying in hospital corridors due to a lack of care which is caused by a lack of staff.
Ontario resident who wants both a vagina and penis wins public funding for unique surgery
A court has ruled Ontario must pay for a penis-sparing vaginoplasty for a person who identifies as neither fully female nor fully male
Ontario has been ordered to pay for surgery for a resident who is seeking to have a vagina constructed while leaving their penis intact. Denying the procedure would infringe on the person’s Charter-protected right to security of the person, an Ontario court said in its ruling. The unanimous decision by a three-member panel of judges of Ontario’s Divisional Court could expand access to a novel “bottom surgery” for people who identify as non-binary, meaning neither fully male nor fully female.
The Ontario resident, identified in court documents as K.S., has been locked in a legal battle with the Ontario Health Insurance Plan since 2022, when OHIP denied a funding request to have a penile preserving vaginoplasty performed at a clinic in Austin, Texas.
The surgery, which is not available anywhere in Canada, involves creating a vaginal canal, or opening, without removing the penis.
K.S., 33, was born male but identifies as female dominant and uses a feminine name.
OHIP denied her request for funding, arguing that the procedure is not included on its list of sex-reassignment procedures, and is therefore not an insured service. K.S. appealed OHIP’s decision to Ontario’s Health Services Appeal and Review Board, arguing that forcing her to have her penis removed would invalidate her identity and be akin to an illegal act of conversion therapy.
She also worried about the risk of complications and urinary incontinence from the urological rerouting, and the risk of orgasm dysfunction. She argued the procedure she is seeking abroad is like standard vaginoplasties performed in Ontario, but without the additional procedure, namely, the penectomy.
The appeal board overturned OHIP’s decision, ruling that a vaginoplasty is among the genital surgeries listed for public coverage and need not inherently include removal of the penis. The board therefore ruled the procedure eligible for public funding.
OHIP appealed the board’s decision to the Divisional Court, arguing the review board erred in finding a penis-sparing vaginoplasty is specifically listed as an insured service, and that it failed to consider that the unorthodox procedure is considered an experimental procedure in Ontario, and, therefore, not eligible for funding.
Just because vaginoplasty is listed as an insured service doesn’t mean any type of vaginoplasty qualifies, OHIP argued in court.
The court disagreed. Vaginoplasty and penectomy are listed as discrete, separate services on Ontario’s list of surgeries eligible for funding, the court said. “The fact that most people who have a vaginoplasty have it done in a way that also involves a penectomy” doesn’t change the provision. If the province had intended for only one type of vaginoplasty to be insured (vaginoplasty with penis removal) it should have drafted the list differently, the court said.
The court said the appeal board’s conclusion was also consistent with standards of care developed by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) — an influential group whose guidelines for gender-affirming care for children and youth were found to lack “developmental rigour” in a sweeping review released this week.
The WPATH standards “expressly refer to vaginoplasty without penectomy as a surgical option for some non-binary people,” Justice Breese Davies wrote in the court ruling.
While the court said it didn’t need to address Charter arguments, if there was any ambiguity concerning what should or should not be covered, the review board’s interpretation was also consistent with Charter values of equality and security of the person, the court added.
“The Charter-protected right to security of the person safeguards individual dignity and autonomy,” Davies wrote. Requiring a transgender or non-binary person born male “to remove their penis to receive state funding for a vaginoplasty would be inconsistent with the values of equality and security of the person.”
“Such an interpretation would force transgender, non-binary people like K.S. to choose between having a surgery (penectomy) they do not want, and which does not align with their gender expression to get state funding, on the one hand, and not having gender affirming surgery at all, on the other,” Davies wrote.
“Such a choice would reinforce their disadvantaged position and would not promote their dignity and autonomy.”
OHIP’s appeal was dismissed, and the province ordered to pay K.S. $20,000 to cover legal costs.
“This is a significant win for the transgender and non-binary communities,” K.S.’s lawyer, John McIntyre, told CTV News Toronto.
“We hope that OHIP decides to accept the decision of the court rather than seeking leave to appeal so that K.S. can move forward with her surgery she has been trying to get for years now.”
“K.S. is very happy with this unanimous decision,” McIntyre said in an email to the National Post. “The Divisional Court determined the existing language of the Health Insurance Act and the Schedule of Benefits clearly provided coverage for the procedure she sought.”
In earlier reports, National Post was told that gender-affirming surgeries at the Texas clinic range from US$10,000 to $70,000, depending on what is done.