Transgender "out of the blue" - a new kind of Gender Dysphoria

i only watch videos in mute. who is she?
Laura Aboli she is the co-founder of World Check
Screenshot 2023-12-25 at 21-19-15 About Privacy Policy.png
Translate:
La carrière entrepreneuriale de Laura Aboli a débuté en 2000 lorsqu'elle a cofondé World-Check, une base de données de personnes politiquement exposées (PPE) et d'individus et d'organisations à haut risque, qui est rapidement devenue la norme de facto pour l'identification et la gestion des risques financiers, réglementaires et de réputation au sein des institutions financières et juridiques du monde entier. Suite au succès de World-Check, elle a cofondé Wealth-X en 2010, qui est devenu le principal fournisseur de renseignements sur les personnes très fortunées.

Après s'être retirée de ces deux entreprises en 2014, elle a poursuivi sa passion de toujours pour la décoration d'intérieur en créant une société de promotion immobilière et de design qu'elle continue de diriger. Née dans une famille d'artistes, Laura est passionnée par l'art, la sculpture, la musique et la danse. Son esprit critique et curieux l'a amenée à s'intéresser aux domaines de la métaphysique, de la spiritualité, de la santé et de la psychologie. Son expérience et sa volonté d'aider les autres l'ont amenée à se lancer dans l'arène publique afin de partager ce qu'elle considère comme des leçons de vie importantes dans son propre parcours. En mai 2020, poussée par la façon dont les événements entourant la pandémie mondiale affectaient les moyens de subsistance, les droits civils et la santé mentale des gens, Laura a fondé le Mouvement international démocratique uni pour la sensibilisation et la liberté (UDIMAF), une organisation dédiée à la création d'un monde meilleur par la sensibilisation, l'inspiration et la poursuite incessante de la vérité.
 
Last edited:
This is such a difficult thing for any family to go through.
A few years ago, my daughter decided she is Trans. She is on the spectrum and also has ADD.
She has changed her name and wears "boy" clothes. I have told her that she must wait until she is 18 to make permanent decisions regarding her body. [As in no hormones or surgery] I pray that she changes her mind before 18.
I am in no way transphobic, if she had ever even shown the slightest twinge of this issue while growing up, I would be behind her. She was and is still a girl.
As a parent it's hard, what she is going through is harder.
Give her all the information, science, when this trend started, what happens to organs, glands, hormones when surgery and meds are taken. Give her info on the % of those that have surgery/take hormones regret it.

Being on spectrum/ADD is tough. I was diagnosed with ADD in middle school my parents forced Ritalin down my throat …

I would lean into techniques, exercises, nutrition to help with spectrum/ADD… also maybe introduce her to new musics hobby’s…

She’s trying to grasp into something for stability and or meaning…trans topic is now in society so it comes across her eyes and ears…

I wouldn’t put a time on anything bc when 18 comes there it is… help her craft a reality with stability, meaning… I am not saying you aren’t trying or doing this but lean into it more instead of the fear or the rules about trans or not trans IMO

There are threads on this forum about autism/ADD and in a wholistic healthy way

In the 60’s how many young ppl said they wanted to be hippies and then the times change… not equation hippies to trans… but show her that it’s best to choose something with healthy longevity and not an unproven fad
 
quotes: Reimer said that the previous Swedish guidelines were based upon the WPATH Standards of Care 7 (SOC7) but when the internationally respected professional association released its SOC8, debate broke out amongst Swedish doctors over the removal of all lower age limits and the inclusion of eunuch” as an innate gender identity even children can possess. Reimer, as well as many other experts, believes this is a sign that WPATH is not a scientific organization but instead an activist group.
From ZeroHedge via the Brad Jones for the The Epoch Times who delves into the depths of WPATH


“But while WPATH publicly supports minors and their families consenting to these hormonal and surgical treatments based on a nebulous inner sense of self, privately, some members admit that consent is not possible,” states the report. “Behind closed doors, WPATH-affiliated healthcare professionals confess that their practices are based on improvisation, that children cannot comprehend them, and that the consent process is not ethical.”

and goes on to cite:

In video footage of an internal WPATH panel, Dianne Berg, a child psychologist, said experts wouldn’t expect children and youth to fully understand the effects of transgender procedures, because it is “out of their developmental range to understand the extent to which some of these medical interventions are impacting them,” according to the report.

A Canadian endocrinologist then said:

...gender doctors are “often explaining these sorts of things to people who haven’t even had biology in high school yet,” adding that even adults have limited knowledge of many of these medical interventions.

[...]
A California law even enables 12-year-old children “to run away from home and seek refuge in LGBTQ homes to emancipate themselves” to pursue medical interventions such as the use of puberty blockers, cross-sex hormone replacement therapy, and surgery without parental consent, she said.

This is all being justified and underwritten by these pseudo-medical standards even when doctors privately and openly admit they don’t know all the long-term effects of “their radical procedures” or how to deal with them, she said.

Lastly:

They push aside any patient mental health issue, regardless of whether its severe schizophrenia or a dissociative disorder,” she said. “They know that these people ... have severe mental health issues and they transition them anyway.”

Erin Friday, western U.S. co-leader of Our Duty, speaks at a seminar in San Francisco on Sept. 24, 2023. (Lear Zhou/The Epoch Times)
Ms. Friday, whose daughter formerly identified as transgender but has since accepted her female form, anticipates the WPATH Files will lead to congressional hearings.

The WPATH Files reveal much more than an organization that has overstepped its bounds, she said.

They have admitted to medical malpractice. They have admitted to lying,” she claimed.

Hospital boards and medical societies, Ms. Friday said, would be “well-advised” to use the leaked WPATH Files as “an off-ramp,” to move away from such harmful practices.

It goes on and on and seems to only get worse for those who are not old enough to decide for themselves.

If the "off-ramp" were to take place en masse, one might hope that the lawsuits would fly fast and furious, however they all seem to have great ponerogenic shielded.
 
I just picked up The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness by Johnathan Hadit and I think it relates quite a bit to this phenomena.

I've just made it through the introduction and am now making my way through the first chapter and so far he's making a very interesting case about the impact on mental illness, the constant access to unlimited internet and the kind of internet that kids have been consuming since cellphones became a thing, truly breaks them down mentally and physiologically.
 
I just stumbled on that one, but it's been published on the 12th of April.
It's not related to the "out of the blue" subject, but Trangenderism in general.

We certainly have reached the point of no return with mental health decline and society's collapse...
Meanwhile, I don't know how bad the situation is in Ontario, but in Quebec, there are often reports of patients dying in hospital corridors due to a lack of care which is caused by a lack of staff.

Ontario resident who wants both a vagina and penis wins public funding for unique surgery

A court has ruled Ontario must pay for a penis-sparing vaginoplasty for a person who identifies as neither fully female nor fully male

Ontario has been ordered to pay for surgery for a resident who is seeking to have a vagina constructed while leaving their penis intact. Denying the procedure would infringe on the person’s Charter-protected right to security of the person, an Ontario court said in its ruling. The unanimous decision by a three-member panel of judges of Ontario’s Divisional Court could expand access to a novel “bottom surgery” for people who identify as non-binary, meaning neither fully male nor fully female.

The Ontario resident, identified in court documents as K.S., has been locked in a legal battle with the Ontario Health Insurance Plan since 2022, when OHIP denied a funding request to have a penile preserving vaginoplasty performed at a clinic in Austin, Texas.

The surgery, which is not available anywhere in Canada
, involves creating a vaginal canal, or opening, without removing the penis.
K.S., 33, was born male but identifies as female dominant and uses a feminine name.

OHIP denied her request for funding, arguing that the procedure is not included on its list of sex-reassignment procedures, and is therefore not an insured service. K.S. appealed OHIP’s decision to Ontario’s Health Services Appeal and Review Board, arguing that forcing her to have her penis removed would invalidate her identity and be akin to an illegal act of conversion therapy.

She also worried about the risk of complications and urinary incontinence from the urological rerouting, and the risk of orgasm dysfunction. She argued the procedure she is seeking abroad is like standard vaginoplasties performed in Ontario, but without the additional procedure, namely, the penectomy.

The appeal board overturned OHIP’s decision, ruling that a vaginoplasty is among the genital surgeries listed for public coverage and need not inherently include removal of the penis. The board therefore ruled the procedure eligible for public funding.

OHIP appealed the board’s decision to the Divisional Court, arguing the review board erred in finding a penis-sparing vaginoplasty is specifically listed as an insured service, and that it failed to consider that the unorthodox procedure is considered an experimental procedure in Ontario, and, therefore, not eligible for funding.

Just because vaginoplasty is listed as an insured service doesn’t mean any type of vaginoplasty qualifies, OHIP argued in court.

The court disagreed. Vaginoplasty and penectomy are listed as discrete, separate services on Ontario’s list of surgeries eligible for funding, the court said. “The fact that most people who have a vaginoplasty have it done in a way that also involves a penectomy” doesn’t change the provision. If the province had intended for only one type of vaginoplasty to be insured (vaginoplasty with penis removal) it should have drafted the list differently, the court said.

The court said the appeal board’s conclusion was also consistent with standards of care developed by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) — an influential group whose guidelines for gender-affirming care for children and youth were found to lack “developmental rigour” in a sweeping review released this week.

The WPATH standards “expressly refer to vaginoplasty without penectomy as a surgical option for some non-binary people,” Justice Breese Davies wrote in the court ruling.

While the court said it didn’t need to address Charter arguments, if there was any ambiguity concerning what should or should not be covered, the review board’s interpretation was also consistent with Charter values of equality and security of the person, the court added.

“The Charter-protected right to security of the person safeguards individual dignity and autonomy,” Davies wrote. Requiring a transgender or non-binary person born male “to remove their penis to receive state funding for a vaginoplasty would be inconsistent with the values of equality and security of the person.”

“Such an interpretation would force transgender, non-binary people like K.S. to choose between having a surgery (penectomy) they do not want, and which does not align with their gender expression to get state funding, on the one hand, and not having gender affirming surgery at all, on the other,” Davies wrote.

“Such a choice would reinforce their disadvantaged position and would not promote their dignity and autonomy.”

OHIP’s appeal was dismissed, and the province ordered to pay K.S. $20,000 to cover legal costs.

“This is a significant win for the transgender and non-binary communities,”
K.S.’s lawyer, John McIntyre, told CTV News Toronto.

“We hope that OHIP decides to accept the decision of the court rather than seeking leave to appeal so that K.S. can move forward with her surgery she has been trying to get for years now.”

“K.S. is very happy with this unanimous decision,” McIntyre said in an email to the National Post. “The Divisional Court determined the existing language of the Health Insurance Act and the Schedule of Benefits clearly provided coverage for the procedure she sought.”

In earlier reports, National Post was told that gender-affirming surgeries at the Texas clinic range from US$10,000 to $70,000, depending on what is done.
 
i only watch videos in mute. who is she? elle est mignonne. she should get pregnant...
@heinrich ,

Since the video is captioned you could have still tried to understand the captions with a translator for English to French like Deepl if necessary.

The woman is Laura Aboli and she was speaking at the Better Way Conference of 2023.

The woman was right on if you ask me to warn others about Transhumanism so why are you acting like she needs more awareness by becoming pregnant? Seems like you need to get a more accurate understanding of what she was really trying to say before advising her to get pregnant.

I personally do not like the format of the new Twitter which is now X. It was difficult to identify where the source video came from but I finally tracked it down.

I do not know if you can understand English but here is a YouTube video of her at the Better Way Conference 2023:

 
I finally tracked it down.
If I would have continued reading I could have found the YouTube video sooner since @Ca. gave an excellent reply with her biography but I think the YouTube video of Laura Aboli is worth watching with good captions. I think she provides a concise and excellent summary of the intentions of the Transgender and A.I. promoters that are profound. I do think it is not just a Transgender agenda but a Post-Humanist agenda as well.
 
Last edited:

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom