Hey guys,
i was thinking about one of the last sessions and a few thoughts came to my mind when reading Gabor Mate's In The Realm of Hungry Ghosts, the session transcript is the following:
The thought that awareness does not imply a soul was incredible to say the least, but anyhow, my thinking went something like this:
so the question goes, do some of the experiences mentioned that the body must go through in order for the soul to find a suitable vehicle to step in, so to speak, include traumatic events? such that would engender addiction in the terms described by Gabor Mate in his book?
If so, how does this relate to the resilience mentioned by Marta Stout in the Myth of Sanity? when she talks about only some of her patients being able to overcome trauma, is this resilience indicative of a soul working through karma successfully? and conversely, the individuals that trauma trough addiction destroys, would it be safe to assume that these individuals are organic portals?
i was thinking that trauma is so widespread that there's plenty of experiences taking place constantly for the soul to choose from, so to say, but then i was also thinking that not everyone comes out alive of these experiences, if the soul is an element that plays a factor , then it sheds new light on trauma, making it somewhat of a trigger positioned on a timer of sorts for a future disintegration (in the terms of Dabrowski) to occur, something a souled body could use for further growth, maybe even as a part of a plan, like a school curriculum.
what do you guys think?
Alejo
i was thinking about one of the last sessions and a few thoughts came to my mind when reading Gabor Mate's In The Realm of Hungry Ghosts, the session transcript is the following:
A: It cannot be set in stone; remember that about half of all babies never house individualized souls. In some cases it can be very early, and others, as late as early adulthood.
Q: (Pierre) Wow.
(Galatea) So I guess they're waiting around the body's frequency to change.
(L) So, is that true? A soul can be hanging around, and there's, say for example, a body that's close to the frequency they need, but not quite, and they have to wait until something happens or changes?
A: Yes
Q: (L) What can change frequency?
(Perceval) Experience.
(Pierre) Knowledge.
(L) Yeah, puberty, thought, experience.
A: Yes
Q: (L) Perspectives change via experience I think.
A: Yes
Q: (Galatea) Awareness of something?
(L) All kinds of things can change frequency.
(Galatea) Does that mean it's possible for something else to take over the body in the meantime?
A: Yes
Q: (Galatea) Does it get kicked out when the soul comes?
A: Yes
The thought that awareness does not imply a soul was incredible to say the least, but anyhow, my thinking went something like this:
so the question goes, do some of the experiences mentioned that the body must go through in order for the soul to find a suitable vehicle to step in, so to speak, include traumatic events? such that would engender addiction in the terms described by Gabor Mate in his book?
If so, how does this relate to the resilience mentioned by Marta Stout in the Myth of Sanity? when she talks about only some of her patients being able to overcome trauma, is this resilience indicative of a soul working through karma successfully? and conversely, the individuals that trauma trough addiction destroys, would it be safe to assume that these individuals are organic portals?
i was thinking that trauma is so widespread that there's plenty of experiences taking place constantly for the soul to choose from, so to say, but then i was also thinking that not everyone comes out alive of these experiences, if the soul is an element that plays a factor , then it sheds new light on trauma, making it somewhat of a trigger positioned on a timer of sorts for a future disintegration (in the terms of Dabrowski) to occur, something a souled body could use for further growth, maybe even as a part of a plan, like a school curriculum.
what do you guys think?
Alejo