Trump Elected: The True MAGA Era Begins, Now What?

I saw yesterday much was being made by the other side about Trump not putting his hand on the bibles that Melania was holding during the swearing in. Haven't had time yet to check around and see is there is any explanation for that today.
Noticed that yesterday while watching it live, but the reason behind it seemed to be in the guy leading that part of the procedure, if remember right.

In contrast to Vance's guy just before Trump, who waited for all the family to gather around Vance when he started to recite the oath, Trump's guy started with the oath almost immediately after it was announced, Melania had hardly any time to stand up and Trump was already repeating the words of the oath. At the time she was by his side with what looked like two books in her hands, Trump was already at second or even third line repetition. At that point he was so focused on the guy and what he was saying, it seemed there was no point anymore in locating the books or Melania holding them.

In the speech afterwards though, Trump did mention and made several references and emphasis on the God in the context of christianity or more precisely America and the US.
 

Moscow comments on Trump’s ‘two genders’ diversity rollback​


"The decades-long US promotion of the diversity and inclusion agenda should be investigated on an international level, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova has said."

"Zakharova stated that officials in Washington have been forcing other countries “to show solidarity with what they called anti-scientific narratives,” which in essence was “the very propaganda that kills both the body and the soul.”

“Can you imagine how many people’s lives have been ruined over the years of promoting this nonsense?”
Zakharova wrote on Telegram."

“What should hundreds and hundreds of thousands of people do now, who have been forced to accept the ideology of amputating healthy genitals and replacing them with artificial ones?” she added."

 
I saw yesterday much was being made by the other side about Trump not putting his hand on the bibles that Melania was holding during the swearing in. Haven't had time yet to check around and see is there is any explanation for that today.
Trump's guy started with the oath almost immediately after it was announced, Melania had hardly any time to stand up and Trump was already repeating the words of the oath. At the time she was by his side with what looked like two books in her hands, Trump was already at second or even third line repetition. At that point he was so focused on the guy and what he was saying, it seemed there was no point anymore in locating the books or Melania holding them.
Yes, as msasa says; the guy already started with the oath before any of the family gathered around! I don´t know the procedure, but he should have noticed people coming to front and wait!
By the time Melania came with the Bibles, Trump was already all into repetition. She did move a bit in hope he will notice her, but one cannot interrupt the oath!
X is full of wild theories on that one, and also on hand gestures and all sorts of stupid things, and of course - Melania´s hat. :rolleyes:

For me Melania's hat choice was all about shielding her eyes from her enemies. It's been mentioned how angry she is about the feds raiding their home. Gotta imagine she was staring daggers at the Bidens and Clintons.
I was searching a bit on Melania today and, among other things, I found that sunglasses are sort of a signature of Melania.
Since the whole inauguration was to be inside AND since she was to be surrounded with snakes in suits, no wonder she choose to wear a hat that covers her eyes.

On that note, if some of you ever looked at the designer´s fashion sketches, they draw oversized hats that cover top of the model´s face or half of the face. So, I think that Melania looked stunning - like she popped out of designer´s sketch book! Her fit body and that outfit - like it was made for her!

On the note of that outfit she wore; I personally liked her better in that blue outfit she wore during the first inauguration, but this is more badass vibe "You guys messed with my husband, but now I´m the queen bee so be aware!" :cool2:
Also, this time she has chosen an American independent designer, as opposed to high fashion European designers she usually wears, and I think that was really thoughtful of her to promote American designers.

Another thing why I think that the hat brought so much attention is that I don´t think that Americans are "used to" (for the lack of better word) women wearing hats at such gatherings. One might think that one of the reasons people worship their politicians is because they have no royalty, like UK has. If you look at the royal gatherings, almost all women wear hats - from simple hats to most eccentric ones. So maybe the hat is also part of the "queen bee" message.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2025-01-21 at 08-54-47 CBP on X On Tuesday @CBPSouthTexas officers intercepted 30 p...png
    Screenshot 2025-01-21 at 08-54-47 CBP on X On Tuesday @CBPSouthTexas officers intercepted 30 p...png
    838.7 KB · Views: 25
  • Screenshot 2025-01-21 at 08-56-44 Crime Intel on X Germany Police conducted a major operation ...png
    Screenshot 2025-01-21 at 08-56-44 Crime Intel on X Germany Police conducted a major operation ...png
    625.3 KB · Views: 26
  • Screenshot 2025-01-10 at 13-17-17 Port Director Michael W. Humphries on X Great interception! ...png
    Screenshot 2025-01-10 at 13-17-17 Port Director Michael W. Humphries on X Great interception! ...png
    505.5 KB · Views: 25
I found this video showing Eric Trump being caught by his wife doing this gesture, told him to stop it seems.

Is it again some sign of allegiance ?


I tried reading her lips and I think at the end of the exchange she says something like "...stand back so that others can see".
 
I saw yesterday much was being made by the other side about Trump not putting his hand on the bibles that Melania was holding during the swearing in. Haven't had time yet to check around and see is there is any explanation for that today.
He did it first time around. My thinking-processes though just produced the following explanation: Melania was a bit late, and besides she was wearing that hat that was keeping her at some impractical distance.
LOL THAT hat should have been mandatory during Covid, not the masks. Lost opportunity!
 
I understood the basic concept of tariffs, but had no idea what a central part they played historically in the American economy. This graphic was featured in a recent podcast that was very informative.
View attachment 105204

It is notable that the big dips coincide with major events in America. Slave revolts and wars of independence around 1811, the Texas revolution in 1835, the end of the Civil War at the big dip before 1870 and it stayed cut in half. Then another big cut at the end of WW1 in 1920, and another at the end of WW2 at 1945.
 
I understood the basic concept of tariffs, but had no idea what a central part they played historically in the American economy. This graphic was featured in a recent podcast that was very informative.
View attachment 105204

Right, and I've been trying to understand how it all works nowadays. The Fed money-printer started up back before WW1, and creates value out of nothing to maintain the Empire. American taxpayers are on the hook for that with trillions in debt. These debt-dollars get sent to other countries, via foreign aid, and these other countries HAVE to use American dollars, otherwise they were basically excluded from the global economy - this is why the BRICS+ alternative to the SWIFT payment system was such a big deal recently. Other countries also have HAD to use American dollars only on certain things and in certain ways - otherwise they'll get 'austerilized' through structural adjustment policies, or outright destroyed like Libya/Gaddafi. So Free Trade agreements are better understood as Empire extraction agreements. America then receives cheap goods and services as part of these Free Trade deals, as well as political obedience, in return for sending out their debt-dollars. Maybe I'm oversimplifying, or missing something...

Trump's executive order to actually suspend all foreign aid for 90 days was a pretty bold move. Unless I'm missing something, seems to me like it's anti-Empire to the core. There's still a lot wrong of course, and 90 days is a small window, but still, it flies in the face of an economic system that's been consolidating Team America World Police since WW1. It'll be super interesting to see how his tariff plan plays out. If the capital from tariffs can be redirected to resource extraction, manufacturing and infrastructure - the real economy - and not just feed the Finance, Real Estate and Insurance parasites, then that would truly be something.
 
Not only were Bezos and Zuckerberg “on Trump’s side“ during the inauguration with his cabinet and family members but also Apple chief Tim Cook. All people I trust little and were pretty anti Trump. While Cook was visibly communicating and laughing with Killary and the other psycho gang members on the other side.

What are Zuckerberg and co really up to? More then meets the eye or just sanity and/or economic interests? Do they have a conscious or unconscious mission from the PTB?
I said this back on election day and the day after:
With the massive disaster that the Ukraine war is for the west and how it revealed the inadequacy of NATO military technology, industry, and production, I believe that a certain very influential faction of the the PTB actually wants Trump in office so that they can start a revival of the US economy and begin working towards achieving some semblance of parity with Russia and China.

A Kamala presidency would have been on the cards if the Ukraine war went the way they expected, but I think it's back to the drawing board for the PTB.

Putin and Russia may have just bought us another 20 years of relative peace and prosperity in the west by not capitulating to the economic and military pressure and thus showing to the controllers in the west that they have no way of prosecuting their wars for global domination before they actually build up their military and economic power to a level that can match Russia and China.

To be honest, I can't find a better explanation for why they would put up such an incompetent and moronic candidate up for election.

I think the Dems will try what they can to steal the election, but, based what I've seen from the media and pundits so far in this campaign, I think that the word from way on high is to let Trump win. If they can go to war anytime soon, then it makes no difference if Trump is in office. They need peace and economic prosperity with just enough tension to justify military spending, which they'll have no problem getting Trump to play along with.

My bet is on Trump tomorrow.

I think that they need someone to take the fall for the imminent defeat in Ukraine and transferring the economy onto a war footing.

The US is not in a position to prosecute hot wars with Russia, China or Iran at the moment. They need to keep the temperature just high enough to convince Americans to increase military spending. And to be able to increase spending, they need to revive the economy.

Trump is the man for all of those jobs. He's anti war and think skinned, so he'll be able to take the heat for leaving Ukraine out to dry. He's also all about the economy and progress. They'll probably keep the conflicts simmering but I don't think there will be more chaos than there was in the past 4 years.
I would say that these developments where we have all of these business interests suddenly shifting away from wokism into actually looking to grow the economy confirm my conjecture above.

Trump is the guy to bolster the American Empire and put it into a position where it can compete with China and Russia again. A lot of the stuff that he'll do will be good for Americans and the world, but I think he's being allowed to implement these things because the controllers need them to be implemented to further their interests.
 
James O’Keefe joins Savage to share the findings of his latest exposé. O’Keefe shares that during a covert operation, he recorded Pentagon advisor Jamie Mannina discussing strategies with retired generals aimed at countering President Trump’s as he takes back the White House. The conversation took place in a public venue, where the operative, who has experience in the FBI and counterintelligence, mistakenly thought he was on a date with an undercover female journalist. Mannina indicated that he had engaged in discussions with retired military leaders to consider measures that could be taken to hinder Trump from overstepping his authority in his term. This startling revelation raises significant concerns regarding the actions and intentions of government officials, particularly those linked to defense contractors. Both O’Keefe and Savage stress the critical role of investigative journalism, while expressing concern over the diminishing presence of rigorous reporting in mainstream media.



 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom