Trump Elected: The True MAGA Era Begins, Now What?

Alma.Innovadora said:
I think seeing all of this just as a "resources" issue is limiting. It's a screen for people who don't see a little beyond it all. If you only see him with the manual of "international treaties" under his arm, you only see that, a war for "natural resources". If they can't see beyond, the meaninglessness of this world would drive us crazy because nothing makes sense. But that "nonsense" is their system, so it is functional for them to generate the results that only benefit them and inherent to a greater purpose as well.

They always had the resources at hand, it was never impossible, unlike them, who when they have them, sanction and block everyone.

There is not a leftist or anyone in Ukraine against their aims of conquering natural resources. Ah! but they started killing people/human resources in those areas to also pull Russia into a conflict. They could have stayed only until the coup, but it was not enough, it was not the only objective.

For example, "Brazil is shaping up to be the world's largest oil producer by 2025." now they have Lula as a pawn... why the hell create a conflict in Venezuela or another country close to them for the same thing? Maduro has never refused to negotiate the purchase and sale of oil with the EE.UU. Oh, they just don't want to pay for it, plus they say it's a worse kind of oil, so what the hell do they want? put another pawn in power and that's it. It's just that they're really annoying, a pineapple on the ass.

Russia has a better way to generate the gas they need in Europe, they have benefited from it, ah! they kicked the table the moment the EE.UU ordered them and now they have the gall to say that Russia wants to keep all the gas.

The worst thing is that wherever they go, from our perspectives, they damage everything. In the event that these psychopaths achieve the conquest of Russia, China, Venezuela, Iran, etc. They will damage everything and make the world worse because it is their nature, they need to generate misery.

Even the issue of money doesn't even make sense anymore. How many more millions do these companies need? by God if everything they earn is enough to maintain the world if only they would change the way they exploit resources and people. That hasn't worked either and it doesn't suit them. They create the necessary misery to then offer a solution with no real intention of doing anything. Because that's their goal, just to create "problems". Every minimal thing that can be useful for humanity, they use only proportionately to destroy and annoy!

Every year I read "such a country will be the largest exporter in this or that"... in other words, there are plenty of resources!, just sit down to negotiate, but no, it's a call to dethrone, kill, cleanse, conquer and fill your belly. Predators at last.

Psychopaths can leave Trump with an America in very bad state, so bad as they want, but if Trump decides to create a strong "publicity relationship" with Putin (and/or China?) with it, that allows him not to continue allocating his resources that contribute to the deterioration of the US, stopping the war in Ukraine, controlling the fighting dogs better in Europe, in addition to the great internal cleaning in your country that is not easy at all, it is very nice to be true that ramification, but the chaos cannot be less, too much disturbance for psychopaths, too much loss of control for them and necessary to create resistance.

Trump can't keep playing everyone's enemy, he has to ally with those who were his enemies before, because the allies of the United States at the moment, they are the worst employees he can have. They will bankrupt your company/country, which is surely the intention. Massive layoff! They will also be crying for unjustified dismissal... the last straw (laughter).
Click to expand...
agree - also major offenders such as the Blackrock mob, bankrupt countries via financed coups and wars then land grab and profit from the debt incurred - as they dictate the foreign policys of many governments.
 
Saki said:
What are the odds of less censorship and more open discussion?
Click to expand...
I'd say good, if you can take the word of the incoming FCC Head, Brendan Carr. This reply to Nicole Shanahan about Newsguard is very encouraging:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1860854182535639111

Yep.NewsGuard positions itself as the Internet’s arbiter of truth. Of course, it is nothing more than an Orwellian outfit that operates for the purpose of censoring viewpoints that fall outside an approved narrative.Its conduct has also led to collusive ad boycotts, which may violate antitrust and competition laws. The FTC and DOJ can examine that. At the FCC, Section 230, as relevant here, only protects “good faith” actions. Given NewsGuard’s concerning track record and the fact that it is under congressional investigation for its impact on protected First Amendment speech, I will say this for now: Any tech company that continues to rely on NewsGuard is putting its Section 230 protections in serious jeopardy. More to come on this…
Click to expand...
 
Here's an excellent pick by Trump: Dr. Jay Bhattacharya for Director of the National Institutes of Health. Very much a critic of the covid policies. You can scroll his X profile and see how based he is on health. One example

https://twitter.com/x/status/1861226586080722963

It seems pretty clear that Trump sees the way covid was managed in the past as a mistake. Between RFK Jr. and Bhattacharya, we should be in good hands should there be another manufactured pandemic.
 
This is interesting. Trump's team is going to attempt to avoid the Deep State's surveillance of their communications including office bugs and phone taps. Another move based on his experiences during his first term. From ZeroHedge:

President Trump’s Chief of Staff, Susie Wiles, announced the Trump transition team has refused to sign an MOU with the Government Services Administration (GSA), and will not be using cell phones, computers, offices or “any technology” provided by the GSA. This is a smart move to avoid the Deep State surveillance situation that was faced in the first term.

In the first Trump administration, the GSA had wiretaps, office bugs, and gave all the electronic communication information from the Trump transition to the FBI, IC and later Robert Mueller. In essence, the GSA spied on the Trump team, then gave all the data to the operatives who were in place to target them. The Trump team is not making this mistake again.

The Trump transition team is also not going to use the office space provided by the GSA and will instead have their own offices and security systems in place to coordinate the transition to power.
Click to expand...
 
gottathink said:
Just listening to a Fox News report about multiple threats being made against the lives of the Trump administration nominees and their families. The deep state is going after them now. Better include them in our prayers.
Click to expand...
Does that mean that it is a revolution from the top? Or is it to become more of a revelation of who was in power all along?

Anyway, Russia does not expect all that many changes in its foreign policy. Below are excerpts from a couple of articles:

Trump may be Oreshniked on Ukraine even before he gets to China
Andrey Sushentsov is a program director of the Valdai Club and dean of MGIMO's school of International Relations. He's one of Russia's top analysts. Sushentsov released this pearl to TASS, among other things:

"Trump is considering ending the Ukrainian crisis, not out of any sympathy for Russia, but because he acknowledges that Ukraine has no realistic chance of winning. His goal is to preserve Ukraine as a tool for U.S. interests, focusing on freezing the conflict rather than resolving it. Consequently, under Trump, the long-term strategy of countering Russia will persist. The U.S. continues to benefit from the Ukrainian crisis, regardless of which administration is in power."

Sushentsov fully recognizes how "the U.S. state system is an inertial structure that resists decisions it deems contrary to American interests, so not all of Trump's ideas will come to fruition."

That's just one graphic illustration, among many, that Moscow harbors no illusions whatsoever about Trump 2.0.
Click to expand...
And in FSB chief warns of escalation over US-backed strikes on Russia
Washington's authorization for Kiev to carry out attacks on internationally recognized Russian territory using Western-supplied long-range weapons will inevitably lead to an escalation of the conflict, the head of Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB), Aleksandr Bortnikov, has warned.

Moscow must be prepared for any provocations from Washington, London, and their allies, the FSB chief said, specifically noting that US President Joe Biden and his team were likely to aggravate the situation in the key global regions as much as possible before leaving office in January.

"The main goal is to hinder the new administration's potential opportunities for a political solution to the accumulated problems," Bortnikov claimed.

He also expressed doubt that the incoming Trump administration would take a drastically different course, stating that "it is unlikely that the election of a new US president will lead to a fundamental change in Washington's foreign policy."

Bortnikov accused the US and its partners of using the most "unsightly methods" to create chaos in the post-Soviet space, and turn it into a cheap resource base.
Click to expand...
Even if changes will not be radically different in the foreign policy of the US, more people have become aware of what has, and what is going on, That is a positive development.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom