Truth memes

Spot on , that and trans-marginal inhibition

Session 13 September 2009 :

(...) So, like narcissistic tendencies and everything, that's why for our own sake we need to clean ourselves. (DD) Is this why they've injected so many drugs into the culture to just weaken people?

A: Yes and remember also transmarginal inhibition principles.

Q: (L) One of those principles is that even strong dogs that could not be broken in ordinary ways, if they subjected them to physical trauma like surgery, or illness, or something like that, that that would weaken them to the point where they could be turned. So torture is also part of this process.

A: Yes

Q: (L) And we live now in a culture of torture which is basically a soul-smashing culture.

A: Yes

(...)
 
When you browse the Substack home feed, that most notes are kind of homemade cookery (not wrong!), and that:

Capture d'écran 2025-03-27 203137.png


The article dates 2022 - here is an excerpt:

What does this mean? It means that although the CTMU does not dispute the status of Buddha and Mohammed in their respective religious frameworks, neither does it claim that their personal profiles "distribute" over the members of any healthy society in a truly exemplary way. Not everyone can be born into wealth and power as was Buddha; moreover, although the existence of God as a hyperconscious entity is an unavoidable entailment of certain aspects of Buddhist philosophy, he was all but silent on the issue of God's existence. Similarly, a society in which everyone is an aggressive and acquisitive warlord who lives by the sword and uses it mercilessly to enforce his will would quickly descend into Somalia-style chaos. This implies that despite their elevated spiritual status, neither Buddha nor Mohammed qualifies as a universal physical, moral, and spiritual exemplar for mankind.

Ethics is not about mere adherence to a legalistic code of behavior. Although deontology and consequentialism are often contrasted in philosophical reasoning, it is ideally consequential as well as deontological. It is supposed to conform to a set of absolute rules that are good in themselves - for example, the Ten Commandments, the Golden Rule, or the Kantian categorical imperative, which rely on Logos insofar as absolute ethical rules are justified only in terms of absolute truth and reality - but it is no less true that the expected consequences of good actions conforming to good rules are supposed to be beneficial rather than harmful, leading to positive rather than negative outcomes for all concerned. The rules, absolute though they may be, should conduce in the real world to a rational "utilitarian" expectation of as much good as possible for as many as possible without egregiously violating individual rights.

🌊 🌠
 
Back
Top Bottom