Yeah, the same picks and info circulating all over the net - X, TG, VK, not-MSM websites. Nothing official yet. Still suspicious.FWIW, Intelslava has the following article on it's Telegram channel with a picture of the detainee.
Yeah, the same picks and info circulating all over the net - X, TG, VK, not-MSM websites. Nothing official yet. Still suspicious.FWIW, Intelslava has the following article on it's Telegram channel with a picture of the detainee.
Carlson has made no secret of the fact that he is in Russia and what he intends to do, so I would be very surprised if the Ukrainians did not try to assassinate him. Rather, all of us here kept our fingers crossed that nothing would happen to him.Tak, te same typy i informacje krążą po całej sieci - strony X, TG, VK, strony nie-MSM. Jeszcze nic oficjalnego. Wciąż podejrzane.
Maybe now that he has said, on the record, that he believes the election was stolen you can give him the benefit of the doubt as to why he hadn't said it before.Of course Carlson did not understand Putin. Carlson does not even understand the 2020 election was stolen from Trump.
"They put a lot of people on this issue, they checked a lot of precedents, and they sent me a 10-page memo about it, and their honest conclusion was, 'Don't do this.' And of course, it infuriated me. So I was lecturing on the phone and I had another call with a senior lawyer and he said, 'Well, look, a lot will depend on the questions you ask Putin. If you're seen to be too nice to him, you could get arrested when you come back.' And I was like, 'You're describing a fascist country. Right. You're saying that the US government will arrest me if I don't ask the questions they want me to ask, is that what you're saying?' 'Well, we just think based on what's happened, that that's possible. So I'm just telling you what happened,'" Carlson described.
Nope, that clip is not enough for me. I watched this because you brought it to my attention, and the clip is not about the hardcore vote rigging, ballot stuffing, hacking election machines, and stopping counting in middle of election night to rig it some more. In the clip, he talked about censorship and withholding information from people, which is beside the point. Trump still won 2020 despite the censorship, which Carlson does not seem to understand in the clip.Maybe now that he has said, on the record, that he believes the election was stolen you can give him the benefit of the doubt as to why he hadn't said it before.
OUTLINE: 0:00 - Introduction3:53 - Putin20:07 - Navalny41:20 - Moscow1:00:48 - Freedom of speech1:07:03 - Jon Stewart1:19:48 - Ending the War in Ukraine1:29:15 - Nazis1:37:42 - Putin's health1:48:47 - Hitler1:58:12 - Nuclear war2:16:31 - Trump2:33:27 - Israel-Palestine2:39:37 - Xi Jinping2:53:34 - Advice for young people2:58:53 - Hope for the future
Just started watching it myself, decent interview, it's actually good, even though he backtracks a lot of what he's said about Russia and Putin, but it's a good way to know where he stands with most issues.I started watching this long interview of Lex Friedman with Tucker Carlson. Sorry if it was already mentioned and I missed it.
I can get a lot clearer. I can say the 2020 election was stolen from Trump through voting fraud, hacked voting machines, fraudulent paper ballots, discarding ballots for Trump, and so forth. Carlson in that clip pointed to none of these, and instead pointed to censorship and covid, so he's wrong.You can’t get much clearer in terms of expressing your believe that the 2020 election was stolen IMO. By the way, Tucker also stated it as clearly recently in one of his X videos.
I was mad about it all eight days I was there because I feel like I’m better informed than most people because it’s my job to be informed. I’m skeptical of everything and yet I was completely hoodwinked by it.
Thanks for sharing, I'm almost done watching. Its been quite enjoyable! Although Carlson still didn't get his answers (hehe), I'm glad he's chasing those "why?" questions and able to express them openly. I'm hoping it'll be a good shift in the public sphere, especially since it feels like there's been an unspoken taboo about itI started watching this long interview of Lex Friedman with Tucker Carlson. Sorry if it was already mentioned and I missed it.
Just started watching it myself, decent interview, it's actually good, even though he backtracks a lot of what he's said about Russia and Putin, but it's a good way to know where he stands with most issues.
I'd recommend it, I'm about halfway done with it.
Yes, or it could also mean that there are openly Nazi sympathizers in the military and in the government and it is not denounced or illegal, it is embraced. That ideology is the one behind their policies of extermination of anything opposed to their goals, and the West is backing it and using it to attack Russia, and they are bent on getting rid of it.Can see their point (for western observers stuck on what they think is Nazi), however what it means to Russians (Polish et al.) has a different meaning. Their understanding might (might) simply be that there is a neo-nazis regime that has forced itself, with western backing, to reemerge as ideology. To take at all costs, reanimated by 'operatives,' oligarchs, puppeets and the western Intel/NATO or not, military/industrial/biological/banking complex.
Yes, or it could also mean that there are openly Nazi sympathizers in the military and in the government and it is not denounced or illegal, it is embraced.