Twin Terror Attacks? New Year's Day 2025: Truck plows into crowd in New Orleans, Cybertruck explodes at Trump Hotel in Las Vegas

Flashback to 12 years ago on the History Channel when Mathew Livelsberger and Tim Kelly participated in a TV reality show on the History Channel.


Past terrorist attacks with manifestos.

Manifesto linked to El Paso gunman rails against 'Hispanic invasion' of Texas | The Times of Israel

Texas Walmart shooting suspect 'wrote hate-filled racist manifesto' before massacre | Metro News

Terrorism expert on New Zealand attack and manifesto

Manifesto Emerges in Norway Terror Attack

2023 Nashville school shooting manifesto

Unabomber (Ted Kaczynski) Manifesto

Jim Adkisson Knoxville Unitarian Universalist church shooting manifesto

The manifesto was mailed to NBC News an hour and a half after Cho had first opened fire. Upon receiving the package on April 18, 2007,

Christopher Dorner's Manifesto February 07, 2013
 
#2 His Signal safety number changed once before the explosion and then his photo and safety number changed AFTER the explosion (see photo from our Signal group chat).
This is key data. I'm not sure about the photo change after his rental exploded (which they tell us is where and when he died), but it is verifiable that Livelsberger's Signal number changed on Dec 29th. It's possible that he himself changed it, but then it's also possible that it was changed by someone else.

More from the 'Green Beret' X account about this:


For those who can't view that entire post:

We cannot trust any of the information contained in the emails or messages from Matt Livelsberger after December 29th when his Signal safety number was changed.

For those of you unfamiliar with Signal, it is a peer to peer encrypted messaging app that assigns you a unique safety number based off of your phone and SIM card.

It only changes if your Signal account is loaded onto a new phone or SIM.

It automatically lets everyone in conversations with you know if your safety number has changed.

Matt’s changed on the 29th.

All information sent by Matt after the 29th must be treated as misinformation. The emails to Shawn and Sam were sent on the 31st.

Why hasn’t this been addressed?

'Green Beret Nap Time' further posts:

If you are scared for your life and running from the feds, you don’t transfer any personal accounts from your personal phone to a clean burner, and you don’t rent a damn Tesla that is a rolling trackable live-streaming computer. None of this is making any sense.

Separately, on the issue of Livelsberger's Signal account having also changed after the explosion, this X user claims to have shown that to be the case:

 
I'd buy it if it were more low key, like an anonymous Reddit or 4chan post, but I have a hard time seeing even an incompetent psyops manager signing off on a narrative like this.

<snip>

I'm thinking the story here might be more complex. Like, what if Livelsberger was supposed to come forward as a whistleblower, claiming all these things, or just feeding them to certain people behind the scenes. The govt would have plausible deniability. The narrative would be introduced into the mainstream, some would believe him, but there would not be any confirmation or denial - just as is the case with most such "whistleblowers". But then, a third party ends up using him as a patsy, either aware or unaware of the whistleblower angle, making a mess in the process.
If you're assuming one central 'chain of command' signing off on a 'psy-op', then yes, good luck making it all consistent. But if instead, as you allude to, there's factional wrangling re 'disclosure', you have one plot eclipsing another.
 
FWIW, sonar21.com delving into the NY twin terror attacks with Nima interview of Larry C. Johnson (his site and article's author) and Johnson/Judge Napolitano/Ray McGovern. I've just started watching the first vid with just Johnson and his skeptical take on what's being presented concerning these two attacks. His comment regarding the FBI totally on target.

Please note this from Johnson:
I am also posting my chats today with Nima and Judge Napolitano. I did not have any of the information I have presented above when I did those interviews. Had I known what I know now, I would have had a different take.
This is in reference to the Livelsberger email and the Shoemate/Ryan interview. I hope to catch his next interview that takes this information into account.

Also, comments to articles can sometimes be even more enlightening than the substance of the webpage. 40 so far for this one.
 
I don't know if this is new footage of the moment the Cybertruck exploded, or a 'zoom' of previously-published footage, but it appears to show that the person inside the vehicle - presumably Livelsberger - was upright in the driver's seat at the moment of the explosion, possibly suggesting that he did not shoot himself in the head with a Desert Eagle - or any other gun.


Guy in the first video says "100%". I wouldn't go that far. If he was dead, and wearing a seatbelt, I doubt his body would slouch forward. Maybe his head slightly. Cybertruck driver seats look like this:


Second video is even less convincing: a handful of pixels changing as the camera angle changes.

One other thing: during the police press briefing the other day, they said Tesla told them that the truck can't drive itself without a responsive person in the driver's seat. The ability to override that probably exists, but it at least suggests that barring a very sophisticated hack to override the system without leaving a trace, the vehicle can't drive a corpse. Here's the manual on full self driving:


A camera watches you and the system periodically gives you commands you have to follow to ensure you're paying attention. E.g.
If the cabin camera does not have clear visibility of the driver's hand and arm locations, Full Self-Driving (Supervised) periodically displays a message reminding the driver to apply slight force to the steering wheel.
If the driver repeatedly ignore prompts to apply slight force to the steering wheel or to pay attention, Full Self-Driving (Supervised) displays a series of escalating warnings and, if those warnings are ignored, disables for the rest of the drive and displays the following message.
If the driver does not resume manual steering, Full Self-Driving (Supervised) sounds a continuous chime, turns on the warning flashers, and slows the vehicle to a complete stop.
 
New data dump from LVPD, this time some footage of Livelsberger at a charging station in Kingman AZ, his last stop before Vegas:


Is that from cameras on (or in) the Cybertruck itself?
Looks like it. It has multiple cameras for self-driving, and I guess it records all of them!

Google's AI says:
You can control whether to share camera recordings with Tesla through the vehicle's touchscreen. By default, images and video are not transmitted to Tesla unless you enable data sharing.
Since this was a rental, maybe recording sharing was turned on as a default?
 
Guy in the first video says "100%". I wouldn't go that far. If he was dead, and wearing a seatbelt, I doubt his body would slouch forward.
He's just shot himself with a Desert Eagle though!...

Unless he had previously duct-taped his head to the headrest, it's not going to stay upright after taking a .50 bullet, at close range, from the most powerful handgun on the market.
 
Back
Top Bottom