Using Women to Destroy Men via Leftist Feminism and Liberalism

Thanks for this topic, to add I found the following I came across also helpfull to understand the gravity of the situation better.

NYT, getting even more deranged by the day as seen in one of their tweets:


PJW presenting shocking information about the issue in the following video:

Top Feminist Says Put Men in Concentration Camps (4:05 Min)

To rant a bit, feminists are right in one thing when they are stereotyping man. Whenever a guy do approaches them, it surely can’t be because of their splendid personalities. I think that Earth across creation is known for a wide variety of depressing facts. One of them for having the most toxic and lamest females in the galaxy. Thanks to Feminism.
 
Thanks for this topic, to add I found the following I came across also helpfull to understand the gravity of the situation better.

NYT, getting even more deranged by the day as seen in one of their tweets:


PJW presenting shocking information about the issue in the following video:

Top Feminist Says Put Men in Concentration Camps (4:05 Min)

To rant a bit, feminists are right in one thing when they are stereotyping man. Whenever a guy do approaches them, it surely can’t be because of their splendid personalities. I think that Earth across creation is known for a wide variety of depressing facts. One of them for having the most toxic and lamest females in the galaxy. Thanks to Feminism.
There are crazy and toxic people of both genders. I think you could find vile sexist media with any take on gender issues. Females have have been historically oppressed since the beginning of time, it's not suprising to me, that this anti-human, twisted logic feminsism is a result of that. The powers that be will pervet any positive human right movement. They did it with race, sexuality, spiritualty, everything ! The point is to keep supporting the oppressed and minorities and keep doing the right thing despite all the madnesss.
 
Hi Desertwolves

I wasn't really planning to go in full detail but just share some things that add to the overall craziness when it comes to feminism. Also my rant below at my comment is just like said, meant as a rant. Just saying in case people might take it 100% serious.

The powers that be will pervet any positive human right movement. They did it with race, sexuality, spiritualty, everything ! The point is to keep supporting the oppressed and minorities and keep doing the right thing despite all the madnesss.

But who are really being the oppressors and ones being oppressed when it comes to ideologies such as liberalism? And how does it function. I think it's important to figure this out. To share my take on it and sum it up in 3 factors which go very well in combination with each other.

1. Terrible people who enforce ideologies by using the ‘’victim card’’ to rally a segment of the population in order to oppress others. (The ones being blamed for being the oppressors are the real ones being the one’s being oppressed)

2. Actually believing that ''co-existence'' can only happen if one dominates the other.

3. (Most importantly I think) Lack of taking responsibility in one’s life and and instead embracing ideologies that blame all misgivings in your life on others. With liberalism those prominently are: Men and white people.


And yes, equal opportunity for both genders is and should be a basic human right. Thing is, and just to share my view on this, there is actually such a thing as gender roles and those are not meant to suppress but goes in line with the potential lessons they personal carry within that body. Tell everyone there are no genders and you destroy ‘The School’ and by that create a lot of choas along the way. (I guess that like usually it’s a thought out 4STS plan)

As for feminism, it would be terrible to see that if a backlash ever occurs. Women are going to put back in the kitchen for the next 100 years to put it bluntly with basically no rights to choose their own path.

I guess that all we can do is to make people aware of dangerous ideologies and instead help them to rise above them. But to that, we have to figure out how they entrap people. And most of the time, that means that we've to figure and sort ourselves out first in order to not fall for for such ideologies and become pawns for the people who stir them. (See point 3 I shared)
 
Last edited:
Shamefully - sick! I'm totally embarrassed! The featured 3 minute video is immature, degrading and disgusting!

A feminist theater play with a telltale name "Salon Vagina!" expected to enlighten school kids about "the pussy" has caused many angry reactions among ordinary Swedes.

17.10.2018 - Swedes Cringe as Feminist Theater Teaches School kids about Female Genitalia
Swedes Cringe as Feminist Theater Teaches Schoolkids About Female Genitalia

The cultural institution Skolscen sydost (School Scene Southeast), which organizes performances in kindergartens, elementary schools and high schools, has presented the feminist play "Salon Vagina!" to be staged in Blekinge County's schools next year, Swedish Radio reported.

The performance shows three feminist actresses singing about female genitalia while spreading their legs. An excerpt from the play posted on YouTube shows them chanting "pussy, fanny, muff, beaver, slit" while standing on their heads with legs spread wide open. "I want to call mine a canary bird. It's nothing unusual," one of the actresses says in the show.

Our play is a peppy humor show about female genitals. It feels great to do theater for children in the upper secondary school, something we felt was needed," actress Malin Karlsson told Swedish Radio.

On its website, "Salon Vagina!" is described as a "playful and humorous take on stigmatized female sexuality," which also "explores the cultural history of the vagina, its symbolic, scientific, religious and everyday role."

"With singing, dancing, motion and humor, we explore norms and taboos. We investigate and cross the boundaries of how a woman should be," the feminists write on their website.

The performance, which is set up in collaboration with the Swedish Association for Sexuality Education (RSFU), is about 60 minutes long and is followed by another 30 minutes' "aftertalk." The regular price is SEK 150 per student ($16).

The trailer posted on YouTube has gathered a plethora of negative reactions from Swedes, with comments ranging from "decadence and nihilism" to "child abuse" and "utter madness." Some ventured that if a similar play was made by, for and about men, it would have instantly triggered accusations of patriarchy and male chauvinism.

"[Swedish Radio journalists] finally get to write about "pussy" while at work, and you're paying for this," columnist Jan Sjunnesson tweeted wryly.

The topic of female sexuality has of late received a lot of attention in the Swedish media. Recently, the Menstruation Association (Mensen) received a SEK 500,000 ($56,000) contribution from the newly established Gender Equality Authority for a project aimed at "breaking the taboo around women's periods" and create a "period-friendly" work environment, which has raised many eyebrows in Sweden.
 
i have to say a simple thing, and i am thankful this thread exists.
women in so many positions and speaking in their highly pitched voices and so fast just ruin my day.
i cant, or do not want to stand it any more.
women EVERYWHERE !!!
every woman WANTS TO LOOK ATTRACTIVE, ok, but attractive to whom ??? not to me...
so doing they ALL LOOK ALIKE.
our world becomes a place invaded by an alien species THE FEMALE...
i am not alone with my view: please read henry makow.
i wonder how many likes i will get...
 
i have to say a simple thing, and i am thankful this thread exists.
women in so many positions and speaking in their highly pitched voices and so fast just ruin my day.
OK. You are in control of how you feel though. People don't exist to make you happy. Have you thought about taking control over your feelings and not letting your day be ruined? Go outside, touch grass, and come to the realization that you are allowing yourself to be miserable for no reason.
i cant, or do not want to stand it any more.
women EVERYWHERE !!!
OK. What is the practical result of that feeling? Are you going to go around acting like a crazy person towards every woman you encounter? Treating a person poorly because of something they can't control is the way children act. This post reads like something an immature child would write.
every woman WANTS TO LOOK ATTRACTIVE, ok, but attractive to whom ??? not to me...
A lot of that is status-related, women competing with each other. It's not necessarily done for you or men in general.
so doing they ALL LOOK ALIKE.
our world becomes a place invaded by an alien species THE FEMALE...
i am not alone with my view: please read henry makow.
i wonder how many likes i will get...
Makow has been discussed, not favorably. You appear to have been captured by the social engineering pitting men against women (and vice versa). Your enemy is not women, it's the psychopaths who created feminism as a social contagion. The issue is that you are unable to get out of your own head and realize that's what is happening. You allow yourself to be captured by them.
 
Feminists who do not value the traditional family unit seek to ruin todays boys


Posted: 13 Aug 2018 09:19 AM PDT


The amount of damage that modern day social justice warriors and feminists are causing today is astonishing. It shouldn’t surprise any of us to see the kind of damage that these people would cause in the modern world. There was an article in the New York Times not too long ago called “What Feminists Can Do For Boys.” I will tell any of you who have not wasted your time reading the New York Times article the words of feminists author Jessica Valenti are barely worthy of lining your bird cage with. Right underneath her name on the New York Times article you can see that she is the author of six books on feminism. For those who have not wasted their time reading the New York Times article I will tell you up front that the words of Valenti are barely worthy of lining a bird cage with. However, seeing that she has written six books on the topic of feminism and I never know when I’ll need some extra toilet paper they might be an interested investment, or perhaps I’ll just pull out a hundred dollar bill and use a match to light it on fire.
I can only hope that not all feminists are as bad as the writer of the article, because if they are then someone really needs to encourage them to stop and think before they speak. In her article she tries to present the argument that feminists can help boys become good men, but lets be completely honest. Feminism is the cause of a lot of the problems that men have to deal with today. Feminists don’t want to help boys become men. They want to dilute and weaken the next generation of men so that they can completely send everything that is considered traditional masculinity into a state of extinction. A large number of the modern feminists have declare war on men as much as social justice warriors have declared war on the statues and everything else that represents white history and culture.

In a Dana Carvey stand up comedy called “Squatting dogs tell no lies” while speaking about scientology he once asked what would it take to make a scientologist say, “whoa man, now, THAT Is whack?!” I personally found this question funny as hell at the moment when I heard it. In the year 2018 I have an answer for that question. Point them in the direction of Valenti and other feminists who share her thoughts. I believe that the women who share these views have got to be brain washed, because no woman worth any respect could really be this far out of her mind. I’m not speaking as a man who hates women, because I don’t hate women. One of my publishers, Stefanie Nicholas is a woman who I hold a lot of respect for. I am also the father of a 16 year old daughter who is sometimes going on 30 and I honestly believe that my daughter can do anything that she sets her mind to. But for me to say that I respect feminists? I won’t say that I could never respect a feminist. I will just say that I have not met one yet who I respect, but like the little kid in Angels in the Outfield once said, “it could happen.”

Some how these women have this insane notion that men in our natural state are prone to oppress women. They believe that our natural god given instincts to protect and provide is evidence of a desire that we as men feel to keep women pushed down and held under the weight of oppression. In her article Valenti wrote that while young women and girls have resources that they can turn to in order to seek support and an escape from restrictive cultural influences, boys do not have this escape. She feels that the lack of an “escape” makes young boys who will be tomorrows men more susceptible to misogynist hucksters peddling get manly quick platitudes and dangerous online extremist communities.

The words of Jessica Valenti completely blow my mind, because they make me ask myself was this woman thinking at all before she spoke? Instead of pointing to a weak man or a criminal with a bad history of spouse abuse for an example of the truth of her words she points her finger at the Canadian psychology professor, Jordan Peterson. There is just one major problem with trying to use Peterson as an example that supports her words. That problem is Jordan Peterson completely disproves everything that she claimed in her article. Peterson did not rise to fame by being a woman hating misogynist. He rose to fame because he is a prime example of what it means to be a good man while being someone who is responsible and strong enough to think for themselves. He is an example of what it means to be the kind of man who is committed to their family and kids. The kind of man I am willing to bet that Jessica Valenti has no experience in dealing with or she may have a different view when it comes to men.

There is only one reason for a feminist to believe that Jordan Peterson is a misogynist woman hater and that is because his very existence goes against everything that they wish to promote. No real feminist wants people, let alone other women to be strong enough to think for themselves. Instead feminist want to tell people what to think and feel and if you disagree with them then you must be a sexist misogynistic woman hater. Unless of course you’re a woman. If you’re a woman who disagrees with feminist then they see you as weak and an example of everything that they feel women shouldn’t be. But if you are a woman who is weak enough to let a feminist tell you what to think and feel then they like you. Feminists do not believe in the power and advantage that comes from the traditional family unit. Instead they promote things like family and the institution of marriage as being oppressive to women.

There is only one thing that Jessica Valenti got right in her whole article. Young boys need someone. They need someone who cares enough to intervene and help mold them while teaching them how to grow up to be the men of tomorrow so that they can hopefully have families of their own and mold the next generation. But the person that todays boys need are not feminists. If we leave todays boys in the hands of feminists they are going to be worse off than they would be if they had been left to fend for themselves. What todays boys need is their father or a father figure. They need strong honorable men in their lives. It was a strong honorable man who inspired me to stay in high school and helped teach me lessons that I carry with me today. I am so grateful for everything that my ROTC instructor taught me. He taught me things like loyalty, duty, respect, selfless service, honor, integrity, and personal courage. Seven values that I still carry with me nearly twenty years later. These are just some of the lessons that a good man can teach a boy and no where in these values are women oppressed. The problem is that when boys don’t have that strong male presence in their life then they will turn anywhere that they can get what it is they are missing from not having a father. They will turn to things like drugs, they will turn to gangs, worse they will turn to these feminists who will ruin them for the rest of their life.

The true modern day feminists wants to promote the idea that the traditional family unit with traditional values is a toxic environment and something that should be seen as bad. The truth is that real feminists hate anything that is remotely traditional. They believe that the traditional family unit teaches boys to suppress their emotions and that this suppression of emotion is what leads todays boys to become tomorrows toxic men. I personally can not remember a time when I have ever told my son that it is wrong to cry. In fact when I have heard other family members get onto him about his crying I have been quick to come to his defense and let it be known that I will not allow my son to be taught that he shouldn’t express how he feels placing myself between him and other members of my family. I don’t know any parent who taught their son to play with guns. But crying and playing with guns are second nature to most boys. That is where the father figure comes in. A strong father figure can harness these natural instincts that boys are prone to have, train them, mold them, and teach boys that these natural instincts are okay while being dealt with in a proper healthy way.

So if the traditional family unit does not teach boys to become toxic woman haters and violent what does? The lack of a good father. Not every man who sticks around is a good father. A man who will call his wife a b*tch in front of their children and anywhere near where there is a chance that the children can hear him is not a good father. What that does is show an example that the woman is not worthy of respect. If a husband doesn’t respect his wife, the children have no reason to either. The son will likely grow up and do the same in the future when he has a woman of his own. If you are a father who has a daughter what you are doing is teaching your daughter that this kind of toxic behavior is normal to expect in a man and you are setting her up to end up in a toxic relationship herself. Then when that little girl becomes a woman and finds herself in an abusive relationship or the boy grows up and abuses the woman who he ends up with, when it comes time to blame someone all you have to do is look in the mirror. It is important not to confuse a man who just chose not to leave and chose to pay the bills for being the same as a good father. They are not the same. That is why I am not saying that the lack of a mans presence in his life is what causes a boy to grow up and become violent. I am saying that the lack of a strong and good fatherly figure is what leads boys to become violent later on in life.

The modern day feminists contribute a lot to the fatherlessness in America. They have taken the good men in the world and demoted them from being seen as providers and protectors of the family that is worthy of the respect of their wife and kids to being nothing more than primitive. Feminists encourage todays girls and daughters across America to not depend upon men and to see the institution of marriage as something that is very much like a form of slavery. They have rejected everything that makes a good man, a good man, and continually encourage all of America to do the same. If feminists genuinely want to help todays boys become the good men of tomorrow then the best thing they can do is leave our sons alone.
i do not get it.
is piece written by laura?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chu
OK. You are in control of how you feel though. People don't exist to make you happy. Have you thought about taking control over your feelings and not letting your day be ruined? Go outside, touch grass, and come to the realization that you are allowing yourself to be miserable for no reason.

OK. What is the practical result of that feeling? Are you going to go around acting like a crazy person towards every woman you encounter? Treating a person poorly because of something they can't control is the way children act. This post reads like something an immature child would write.

A lot of that is status-related, women competing with each other. It's not necessarily done for you or men in general.

Makow has been discussed, not favorably. You appear to have been captured by the social engineering pitting men against women (and vice versa). Your enemy is not women, it's the psychopaths who created feminism as a social contagion. The issue is that you are unable to get out of your own head and realize that's what is happening. You allow yourself to be captured by them.
dear beau, i agree, i am an immature child of 82+. why did you spend so much time to educate me??
 
There's some good information here on a father's involvement in a child's life, although it's a "coffee chat" type discussion so it's a little long.




I always thought feminists were driven by animosity to some degree. To me it didn't make sense to blame an oppressive patriarchy if you're all in it together. Perhaps there may have been more of the well-meaning feminists around in the early days, although there certainly was a negative orientation towards men from at least some of them.
TWO hours !!!
 
Whoa, dude, Stefan. You are doing a whole lot of fast, sloppy painting with a very broad brush dipped into a massive can labeled "Assumptions and Stereotypes".

Or so it seems to me

Yes you make some valid points, but....the crassness is repugnant to my delicate sensibilities! 🙀

Or maybe I am just a Pollyanna with higher aspirations for humanity than is warranted.
if you are so delicate, why are you on this forum??
 
Life is tough, and from the view that old stereotypes still prevail in keeping the roles in a family for men and women, what you say has facts behind that cannot be ignored. So if a woman wants to raise a family by herself, the society nowdays has created the ideological frame for her not to be labelled negatively for her actions. The point, however is that in establishing the ‘new common understanding in society’ Men are portrayed as either villans or opressors, or as men changing genders to become women, or in as any and every other way than the man as the kight in shining armor or as the wise father or, or. Imho that is as bad as previous stance of society, and it will pass as the initial matriarchal societies have vanished. As long as women can use guns,men can also wash dishes. But make that the result of their choice, passion or dedication and not as prescribed by society.
neither do i have a gun neither do i wash dishes. but my wife has a dishwasher.
 
Paying another woman to do what another woman, being the mother, should naturally do - is completely stupid.

As for grannies, unfortunately, if you have a child at 25 or even 30, it's highly unlikely that the granny will be able to take care of your kid(s) while you're "busy at work", because guess what? She, too, will still be working.



Sadly, a lot of women are brainwashed to think that personal fulfillment can only happen in the workplace, through a "carrier". As for women liking to get busy, women have always worked and have always been busy (***see below). I think it's more about being given the opportunity to have a "high professional status", "climb the ladder" and become as "powerful" (whatever that means!) as men.

I don't get it that some people think that "in the past", women stayed at home to raise the kids, that their world revolved around the stove and the nappies. Working-class women in cities had to work just like everybody else. Only well-off women from the bourgeoisie or the aristocracy enjoyed the luxury of staying home, and even then, most of the time, the kids were taken care of by nannies!

In rural areas, women worked in the fields, tended to the garden and the cattle, took care of the parents and step-parents, all the while raising their kids.

Many of them don't have a pension today because they never had an official professional status, though they significantly contributed to the workdload along with their husband.

I guess there's no perfect system. Yes, mothers staying at home to raise kids (at least during their first years of life) and the husband providing for the family is an ideal, a perfect solution, but it was never a reality for most people, except among the aristocracy/the wealthy, or the middle-class in the 60's-70's.

The current epidemic of divorce and the propaganda against men is a serious problem. Some propose that a potential way to tackle that epidemic (along with the issue of single parenting) would be a tightening of divorce laws, but I think it's taking the problem backwards. A more commonsense solution would be to tighten marriage and parenting laws (as in, comprehensive background check before allowing people to marry and have kids, as is proposed by Adrain Raine in a futuristic scenario, in his book The Anatomy of Violence). That's a controversial issue, but it gives food for thought!

*** Below is an interesting extract from Graham Robb's book The Discovery of France:
isn't it evident? in the past and in rural society EVERYONE, male, female, child, horse, cow, bull, donkey, chicken had to work. only the rooster had his preferred job, and was otherwise useless. and still, there was no chicken power...
 
Thanks for this topic, to add I found the following I came across also helpfull to understand the gravity of the situation better.

NYT, getting even more deranged by the day as seen in one of their tweets:


PJW presenting shocking information about the issue in the following video:

Top Feminist Says Put Men in Concentration Camps (4:05 Min)

To rant a bit, feminists are right in one thing when they are stereotyping man. Whenever a guy do approaches them, it surely can’t be because of their splendid personalities. I think that Earth across creation is known for a wide variety of depressing facts. One of them for having the most toxic and lamest females in the galaxy. Thanks to Feminism.
remember oedipus...
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom