Using Women to Destroy Men via Leftist Feminism and Liberalism

Gateway Pundit posted an article about US marriages lasting longer. Not overly optimistic, but a trend in direction towards more stability.

Number One Sign That America Is Becoming Great Again: Marriage Stability Soars in Latest Analysis

As it turns out, marriages so far this decade show the most stability out of any other decade in modern history except for the 1950s, according to data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.

Just 15% of marriages started between 2010 and 2012 ended in divorce within their first 10 years.

“If later-year divorce rates look more like the 1960s, then we should see about 40% of these marriages end in divorce,” the Institute for Family Studies said. “But if marriages trend toward further stability, then we see under 40% of first marriages ending in divorce.” That’s still far too high. But it’s better than the recent incredibly dismal conditions surrounding marriage and divorce.

There are a few reasons as to why this is the case.

“Newer marriages have already shown higher stability, and this may be because newer marriages are more selective,” the Institute for Family Studies said. “In the 1980s, 80% of adults married by the age of 30. Between 2000 and 2012, just 64% of adults had married by then. The composition of the married population has changed.” In other words, a smaller share of people are getting married, and when they do get married, they are usually tying the knot at an older age........

Not overly optimistic sounds like a good description but I guess that's slightly better than pessimistic. I've seen a graph recently on Facebook via Marjorie Taylor Greene and others:

1754276124270.png The 1950s ideal of sorts of being young with a family and a white picket fenced home kind of vanished.
 
I find this text on 16th-century gynocentrism interesting.


Lucrezia Marinella (c.1571-1653) was a Venetian author and early advocate of gynocentric feminism. She describes gender relations in Europe as based on males acting as “servants,” “subjects,” “beasts of burden,” or “butlers” toward women who are universally viewed as men’s superiors.

The following excerpts are from her book The Nobility and Excellence of Women and the Defects and Vices of Men:

THE REASONS FOR MEN’S NOBLE TREATMENT OF WOMEN AND THE THINGS THEY SAY ABOUT WOMEN

“Even though men upbraid and defame the female sex each day in garrulous and biting language, and search in every possible way to obscure the noble actions of women, they are forced in spite of themselves, by consciences that are governed by truth, to honor worthy women and praise them to the skies. They do this in words and in writings that demonstrate women’s superiority beyond any doubt. We see constantly and in every place and occasion that women are honored by men. That is why men bow to them and make way for them when walking, why they raise their hats to them and wait on them at the table like servants, accompany them bareheaded in the streets, and give up their seats to them. These obvious signs of honor are performed toward women not merely by low, plebeian men but also by dukes and kings, who raise their hats whether greeting princesses or ladies of mediocre condition.
 
Back
Top Bottom