Vaccinated persons emitting a code that can be captured by bluetooth

Well, everybody can look into microscope but to correctly interpret what you see you need years of study, there are no shortcuts. Even guy himself states he is an amateur, it tells quite a lot about level of confidence we should maintain regarding his work.
...
In the meantime, people, most of them vaccinated, are emitting a signal that is currently being picked up via bluetooth, whether it's bluetooth or some other protocol, the fact remains.
 
The C's indicated that the injections create some sort of antennae in the body to receive signals - and that this was apparently one of the things used during the 'UAP flap' in December to test people's will.

Receiving signals is one thing, emitting signals is another. It does seem unlikely that this nanotech would emit a signal that is compatible with the Bluetooth system.

I don't know if anyone did studies or experiments where other potential sources of BT signals could be definitely ruled out. All I've seen are anecdotes such as "This person on an empty beach went into the water and the BT signal went away", etc.
 
Are you sure it is the case or you relay on other people assurance?
Both. If you need to see it to believe it then make your own researches. A friend of mine did them and extensively worked on the topic up to helping an official test made in France in the presence of a bailiff who acknowledged the facts and at the same time this was mentionned in the french reportage i mentionned in this post.
I also did some tests but just quick ones which remained intriguing and going in the same direction.

I don't know if anyone did studies or experiments where other potential sources of BT signals could be definitely ruled out. All I've seen are anecdotes such as "This person on an empty beach went into the water and the BT signal went away", etc.
A good couple were done, and as said above, under the supervision of a bailiff.
Before that, i never heard that our bodies could emit a signal, there is tech on going behind.


Now i extrapolate about, it's my personal feeling : it looks like they were already injecting these technologies before the covid shoots, but at a small scale. What is the actual situation, that i don't know. Maybe it's a failure, as many of the PTB projects, and if it's the case i would say it's because an healthy body naturally get rid of these techs (even more helped by supplements like NAC, Glutation and some others). But what do they do exactly, how do these things proceed to achieve this, this is not well known, probably auto-assembling nanobots. What we can declare almost for sure is that this completely is aligned with their aim to control all people, to trace them - this is what many name the mark of the beast.
 
Already back in 2008 there were public reports of research into several kinds of energy production with nanotechnology within the body:


The expected energy output could be in the microampere range apparently, which is also how much BT requires in the lower range.

Maybe this nanotechnology is not even self-assembling but was in the injections in its final form.
 
Already back in 2008 there were public reports of research into several kinds of energy production with nanotechnology within the body:


The expected energy output could be in the microampere range apparently, which is also how much BT requires in the lower range.

Maybe this nanotechnology is not even self-assembling but was in the injections in its final form.

Theorizing
"The on-chip battery — the world's smallest to date — still has a minimum energy density of 100 microwatt hours"
That's about what uses BT during advertising, so we have one hour of fun and then kaput

Yes, it could even self-assembly (why not) into some passive antenna structure which would facilitate reception and retransmission of original signal on the cellular scale, it could even attach itself to nervous system and act as coupling between both

But that's a completely different technology, nothing to do with tiktok trend of ppl connecting to tv with vax bt and such
 
As the article from 2008 I posted states, there are several potential ways for nanotechnology to get energy inside the body, maybe even without any kind of battery:

Energy sources are desperately needed for nanorobotics, microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), homeland security and even portable personal electronics. It is hard to imagine all the uses such infinitesimal generators may eventually find.

Researchers are pursuing several different routes toward power generation on a miniature scale. Options include exploiting random vibrations or motions (such as those near a roadway), temperature gradients (for example, ground temperature is fairly constant several meters below the surface), biochemistry, and external energy sources such as ultrasonic waves or even audible noises.

Most likely what is in the injections is a type of nanotechnology that is not publicly known, maybe some kind of "homeland security" secret development.
 
According to the C's, the nanotech in the injections is even partly alien-developed:

January 30th 2021

(Joe) Are there chips in any of the vaccines they're administering?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) Which ones? Pfizer?

A: Selective and specific.

Q: (Joe) And what is the purpose of these chips that are administered selectively?

A: Control.

Q: (Joe) Control of individuals?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) What kind of control can they affect with those?

A: Tracking and other.

Q: (Joe) Can they have an influence on people's thoughts and behavior?

A: Not thoughts, but physiology.


Q: (L) So they don't need something like that for controlling thoughts. They've got other things for that. But they could probably put something in there that could trigger something that would go off in your body and like create an illness, or...

(Joe) Is that being done for experimentation purposes to do it on more people at a later point?

A: No. Raw control.

Q: (L) No experimenting necessary. They've already done that.

(Andromeda) Are they chips like we think of them, like computer chips? Or is it a higher technology?

A: Nano.

Q: (Joe) Is there anything specific about the people they select, or is it random?

A: Difficult to control.

Q: (L) Obviously, somebody who's easy to control would just, ya know...

(Joe) But then my next question is how do they decide who needs it...

(Niall) Maybe it depends on what they say on Facebook? Those who are dissident get targeted for a chip.

A: Knowledge protects. Review what you have learned about "alien" implants.

Q: (Pierre) But then the most uncontrollable ones won't get the vaccine. They'll refuse it.

A: True. Wishful thinking.

Q: (L) So it's wishful thinking on their part that they think they can get any uncontrollable people controlled?

A: Yes


Q: (Pierre) They will control the individuals that are already sheep.

A: Yes

Q: (L) Okay. Any other questions?

(Artemis) Who created this nanotech? Humans or aliens or inspired by aliens?

A: Both.
 
Lay back, take a deep breath, and observe the elephant in the room from a different perspective. The info on this subject has been available as peered reviewed reports , and documented scientific conferences have been made available for a few decades now. I'm surprised that this topic has not gained more traction then it has. If I find a twenty year old pdf on nano biological remote manipulation from UFT buried in some file I'll post it. But I'll send this tidbit as an appetizer for now. Lol
 
Last edited:
As the article from 2008 I posted states, there are several potential ways for nanotechnology to get energy inside the body, maybe even without any kind of battery:



Most likely what is in the injections is a type of nanotechnology that is not publicly known, maybe some kind of "homeland security" secret development.

Im completely hypothesizing but i imagine that you could power nanotech with just emf fields present around, especially in the city but perhaps not only, it should work, but i doubt it gonna be anywhere close to enough for transmitting bt advertising all day long

Yeah, it is highly probable that most of our tech is alien inspired so nothing out of ordinary here, but "A: Selective and specific." sounds very limited to me, as if they were targeting certain figures not a segments of the population
 
In Luxembourg, the newspaper "Luxemburger Wort" is the biggest and most known one of the country.
Today, at least the 23/4, they wrote an article on their site. I'm a bit astonished, i thought they would have avoided the topic.
It's in german, i give the link and the translation below in quote mode.

This guy, Amar Goudjil, is the one i mentionned in my previous answers. I applause his courage, he's very bold to do what he's doing.
Of course, about the article, nothing new, it's a good example on how the MSM works : focus on form but not substance, the real topic.
Well, it's not what is written in the article which is important, it's the fact that they wrote an article about, and this will, for sure, help some people to connect the dots, or not. I highlighted in the text a sentence he said during the talk, knowing him, he did that to leave one mark.

If you have extra positive or protective thoughts/prayers, do not hesitate to address some to him, he's one fighter at the frontline of the defense of our freedoms.


Translation to english :
Petition hearing in the Chamber
Vaccination opponents shock Parliament with statements on Covid vaccination

Five years after the Covid pandemic, a petition was debated in the Chamber on Wednesday. The petitioners attracted attention with questionable statements.

‘An independent commission must collect witness statements and analyse what happened.’ In front of MPs on Wednesday, Amar Goudjil defended his petition calling for such a commission on Covid policy. His petition had already received almost 5,000 signatures in March 2023. However, the debate in parliament only took place on Wednesday.

‘What is your definition of independence?’ asked ADR MP Alexandra Schoos. Amar Goudjil pointed out that ‘a list of duties must be drawn up with disinterested and righteous people’. The Frenchman, who lives in Luxembourg, works as a management consultant and has a degree in demography and sociology.

He explained that he was vaccinated against tuberculosis as a child, but then had to be treated in an intensive care unit for seven weeks. ‘My brothers, who were also immunised, suffered the same fate. This was not the case for my parents and sisters, who had not received the vaccine.’

The petitioner accused the healthcare system of being influenced by the pharmaceutical industry and facing conflicts of interest. ‘It is problematic that the healthcare system in general is completely parasitised by the pharmaceutical lobby,’ claimed Goudjil.


Questionable support
Astrid Stuckelberger, who holds a doctorate in public health from the University of Geneva, supported Amar Goudjil in the Chamber on Wednesday. She accused the WHO of being influenced by the pharmaceutical industry, which repeatedly causes the same damage. We need to take a closer look and follow the example of US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, who set up a commission of enquiry into vaccine damage. As a reminder, the anti-vaccinationist Kennedy claimed that vaccinations caused autism in children.

The French daily newspaper ‘Libération’ scrutinised Stuckelberger's profile. Among other things, she was involved in the conspiracy film ‘Hold Up’, in which a worldwide ‘manipulation’ of Covid-19 is denounced. ‘Since the beginning of the pandemic, she has stood out with dubious statements that are largely fuelled by conspiracy theories,’ writes Liberation. Among other things, she claimed that ‘children of vaccinated parents are not normal’.

Stuckelberg contributed to several WHO reports. According to the Swiss online magazine Heidi, she has been using this experience since the Covid outbreak ‘to legitimise her claims and give them a veneer of competence’.

Goudjil wants a commission to find out what exactly these vaccines are made of. ‘If you don't find nanotechnologies in the vaccines, I agree to go to jail for two years at my expense,’ Goudjil said. He noted that ‘vaccination in general is a pure scam’ and emphasised that no vaccination has an impact on reducing pandemic waves.

LSAP MP Paulette Lenert contradicted this claim and recalled that vaccination had relieved the pressure on intensive care units during the Covid period.

In response to a question from the former Minister of Health, the petitioner explained that he had filed a ‘complaint for crimes against humanity’ in October 2020. However, Goudjil did not specify who the complaint was directed against in front of the MPs. The complaint was dropped without consequences, and a further complaint is pending at international level, according to the Frenchman.


‘Luxembourg gets off worse than Afghanistan’
‘Luxembourg is not doing so badly, but it was better in Afghanistan because there were no masks and no physical distancing,’ argued Goudjil, calling for the necessary analyses to be initiated in order to understand what could have gone better.

‘I have the feeling that we have different positions and that we will not agree on this,’ said Health Minister Martine Deprez (CSV). She emphasised that she was used to working with facts and recalled that, according to an OECD report from 2022, Luxembourg had coped well with the Covid-19 pandemic.

During the pandemic, 1.44 million vaccine doses were administered in Luxembourg. ‘For all these doses, we received 2,500 confirmed adverse reactions, of which more than 70 per cent were not serious, they were minor,’ explains Martine Deprez.

Of the 35 complaints lodged with the Ministry of Health against the effects of the vaccines, four have been dismissed as no causal link could be established. The Ministry of Health is in the process of compensating those affected by two others.

The Minister of Health recalled that a motion was voted on that is currently examining ‘which measures implemented by the individual Covid laws can be included in a public health law’.

Parliament cannot set up a commission of enquiry into vaccines that were not produced in Luxembourg, explained the president of the petitions committee, Francine Closener (LSAP), after the debate. ‘This goes beyond the competences of a Luxembourg parliament and we are not equipped for this’, said Closener.

She assured that both the government and the opposition are interested in drawing conclusions from the pandemic. ‘However, I would also like to say once again that colleagues here are resisting the general suspicion that people from this House have benefited from the pandemic or from the vaccination itself. None of the MPs here want to let that stand,’ emphasised the LSAP MEP.
 
Already back in 2008 there were public reports of research into several kinds of energy production with nanotechnology within the body:


The expected energy output could be in the microampere range apparently, which is also how much BT requires in the lower range.

Maybe this nanotechnology is not even self-assembling but was in the injections in its final form.

I am not so sure

about self-assembling nanotech was used in the artificial modRNA injections. I remember that in the beginning Pfizer had used magnetic beads in order to "clean up residual DNA from the other injection material", but we know today that neither bacterial DNA nor the beads were cleaned up. Anyway, those beads lead to the magnetic effects soon discovered and documented as magnetic objects surprisingly got stuck to peoples arms at the injection site.

Later they changed that process, e.g not using magnetic beads anymore. Nevertheless, whatever the alternative was - it didn't really clean up anything either, given the excessive high DNA contaminations found later *rolling my eyes*

What does happen
is that LOTS of research is done into the area of nanotech sensors vs human beings (Electromagnetic Bridging Interfaces). So, they are working on it at many levels, I bet.


EurAAP.jpg

Stockholm
From 30 March - 4 April 2025, a conference was held in Stockholm by the EUCAP (next year 2026 held in Dublin), about all that stuff. They write: "EuCAP is the largest antennas and propagation conference in Europe"


I still saved the link to the brochure - which gives you a creepy insight...


Electromagnetic_bridging_interface.jpg.jpg


Abstract

Nanotechnology is enabling the development of cutting-edge sensors and actuators capable of detecting events at the nanoscale with high sensitivity. These advancements are driving the creation of nano-sensing and nano- actuating systems designed for in-vivo applications, paving the way for real- time health monitoring and targeted therapies.

To enable communication between these nanodevices, electromagnetic nano-communication has been proposed, leveraging the terahertz and optical frequency bands, including infrared and visible light. Through these frequencies, this course will equip participants with a comprehensive understanding of recent advances in antenna design and electromagnetic propagation theory at the nanoscale, while focusing on intra-body applications.


Learning objectives

After completing this course, participants will be equipped with a solid understanding of the fundamental principles and recent advancements in nanoscale communication technologies, particularly within the context of intra-body communication.

They will be able to:

  1. Explain the basics of nanotechnology and its role in developing nanosensors, nanoactuators, and communication systems for intra-body applications.

  2. Understand electromagnetic nano-communication principles, specifically using terahertz and optical frequency bands for enabling communication between nanodevices within biological environments including tissues, cells and proteins.

  3. Apply antenna design concepts tailored for the nanoscale, considering the challenges and opportunities posed by theunique properties of the human body as a communication medium.

  4. Analyze electromagnetic propagation models within the body, and understand how different frequency bands behaveand how to optimize their performance.

  5. Evaluate emerging applications of nano-communication in fields such as neurological disorders, targeted drug delivery, cancer detection and health monitoring.

  6. Critically assess current research and technological trends, enabling them to contribute to ongoing developments in nano-communication and related fields.

  7. Analyze the photothermal effect of electromagnetic nano-communication as well as the safety limits, while making connection with the current standardization.
 
Back
Top Bottom