Vaccinated persons emitting a code that can be captured by bluetooth

[dredger]

One french article that is making the link between graphene, nanochips, communication protocols and more generally the technology visibly (could also say "strangely") linked to the subject of this thread.
It's mainly based on a publication of 2015, but other dates are listed, from 2011 to 2019. Visibly the author received a more complete file from an astrophysicist and while compiling the data to write an article, she stumbled on this sub-subject which "pushed" her to write a kind of preliminary article.

As it's in french, i post the link to the auto-traduction to english, you can find the original article in french with this link

CO-RO-NA pour système de coordonnées et de routage pour les nanoréseaux!

LE NBIC promu par l’OCDE.

lilianeheldkhawam-com.translate.goog

Fun that they named it CORONA, which stands here for "Coordinate and Routing system for Nanonetwork"



One excerpt :
The particularities of nanosensors introduce many challenges in the realization of WNSNs. On the one hand, the miniaturization of conventional antennas to meet the size requirements of nanosensors would require the use of very high operating frequencies (hundreds of Terahertz), which would limit the feasibility of WNSNs. To overcome this limitation, the use of graphene-based nano-antennas and nano-transceivers has recently been proposed.


It touches the domain of electronic + biology and i can't much comment, but this looks like an interresting lead helping to better figure out what is behind these observations of Mac address type codes emitted by vaxxed people.

 

[altomaltes]

@altomaltes & @Artex - you both gave yourself a good reason to make a try. Easy to do : going the middle of nowhere with friends, ensure they have no device with them (put your devices in the car, parked at 100+ meter), and do as many tests you wish. then please come back here post your results.

Update of the info I posted yesterday. The article on the french blog was updated with this information (link)
It added one image of what the codes look like on the "BLE sniff" (note anymore "Blue sniff") application displays, here's one example :
View attachment 52269
These kind of numbers are named UUID, it's known in the IT domain, it's a temporary unique identifier (we even developed internally a tool that use them).

Aim of my re-post here is to have at least one person here with iphone testing this, whether seriously with cooperative friends, or make some tries when surrounded by many people. Of course, there will always be people saying that these codes can come from other devices, but hey, we act here also a reseach group, no ? So it's not needed to come here and say things like "i do not believe" ... i mean, no offense, but think twice about : if i created this thread it's that I'm confident about this a being a reality, and this was demonstrated even in front of a judicial officer in at least 3 countries : some people, mostly vaccinated ones, are emitting a bluetooth signal.

Whether you trust other's work (it's part of what we name "networking") or you go on making your own tests. The good news is that it's easily done.

As written 2 posts above, but this time i present this from another angle : this subject, once sufficiently known and spreaded, will be a gold or major argument for anybody who would have to defend himself in front of a tribunal if judged for refusing to be jabbed.
... but i see an even greated impact of such information on the vaxxed people once they'll understand that it's a reality.

Glitches in the matrix does happen.
What I said where the physical limitations of a bluetooth signal, both in wavelength and in transmit power from a nanometric device.
If you want this, you need to break some physical laws. Maybe alien tech could do that, but it has some nosense. What is the reason to transmit in a known and easily detectable protocol?
I celebrate your way of testing things by yourself, but if this test was done accurately enough, the reasons behind it can be surprising.

 

[Tycho]

I had downloaded the Blue Sniff app myself, but the numbers made no sense to me and didn't look like typical MAC addresses (in order to look those up in the of you suggested databases).

Bluetooth IDs are totally different from MAC addresses.....

 

[Tycho]

If there is a techie on this thread, it would be interesting to see if this is is true, or I simply dont detect anything because there is nothing to detect.
In any case I am not too convinced about this. How can you disable iphone to detect vaccine blue tooth codes and not detect other codes? Far fetched IMO - but I have no idea how this technology works so I might be wrong.

I am not too convinced either atm. To filter on driver (or any other) level would be easy if the bluetooth IDs all have a the same set of prefixes in the IDs though.

 

[Tycho]

What is the reason to transmit in a known and easily detectable protocol?

Global mass rollout/implementation within a short time?

 

[Tycho]

"La Quinta Columna" reported they did find a nano-router in a "vaxx" vial. The layout of the nano-router corresponds with a patent for this tech. Then it seems to be possible to create nano-antennas for this and "a lot of other" frequency ranges. I did just read about this a couple of days ago. I can search for the sources if requested.

(This one is from La Quinta Columan in spanish language, use google translator)

Redes de nanocomunicación inalámbrica para nanotecnología en el cuerpo humano

Después de la identificación de puntos cuánticos de grafeno GQD en muestras de sangre de personas vacunadas , nanoantenas fractales de grafe...

corona2inspect.blogspot.com

 

[dredger]

Bluetooth IDs are totally different from MAC addresses.....

I agree, the codes returned are just codes, they they needed a numbering system, a format, and this format looks like a mac address but it can be anything. It doesn't mean that it won't be used as a Mac Address, even if it seems to be a temporary one renewed each X hours, it's sufficient to establish the connexion then exchange data, send a specific command to the chipset then receive a response from it.

Glitches in the matrix does happen.
What I said where the physical limitations of a bluetooth signal, both in wavelength and in transmit power from a nanometric device.
If you want this, you need to break some physical laws. Maybe alien tech could do that, but it has some nosense. What is the reason to transmit in a known and easily detectable protocol?
I celebrate your way of testing things by yourself, but if this test was done accurately enough, the reasons behind it can be surprising.

We are at the observation stage, not all vaccinated emit a code but mainly, some unvaccinated also emit a code, and this is where it get complex and would requires more tests with more people, all done seriously.

In the meantime, have you at least conducted your own test with friends ? Bring them in the middle of nowhere/nature, with no electronioc devices with you except a smartphone that can detect these codes, and conducted some tests ? I advise you to do it as you seem to be still doubtful about. This ain't a complicated test to put in place.

-----

One of the basic question to ask is the following one : is it normal that a human body emit such a code ?
If the answer is no, then the next question which make sense is : from where does this emitted code comes from ?

 

[altomaltes]

Global mass rollout/implementation within a short time?

Some capable to perform the kind of technology your nice article mention sould have no problem with the implementation.
Consider this way. One of the issues occident blames Russia is poinsoning disidents whith Novichok. No sense. This is a rather old agent.
If you want to poison someone, like Hugo Chavez, you have a plethora of newer and silent agents.
The only reason you want to use such unfashioned poison is to "sign" the operation. Munch like a mafia agent left a cutted off horse head on your bed.
The Occam Razor gives us the more probable reason, the simplest.
People is starting to realize that this jab has serious consequeces:

Protests over post-vaccination deaths spread across South Korea

One of the most vaccinated nations on earth is seeing increased public pushback over Covid-19 jabs, as demonstrators in South Korea are demanding accountability for deaths that they blame on the shots.

www.rt.com

And elites want all of us ( except themselves ) jabbed, so the there is an information war. The best way to silence a good reason is to bury it among bad, unserious or misleading ones. This is a survival skill for squids and octopusses.

 

[Ellipse]

This seems to be the source site (Spanish) of infos given in this post.

There is a lot of informations. So much that it can't be be handled if you're not a specialist but it explain the technology at the root of it: 1 atom thick graphene. It's plausible because I remember of an article several years ago about IBM explaining and showing a photo of the word "IBM" wrote with atoms. Wikipedia article is here (2013) so it's 8 years ago.

Apparently the know how to produce this thick graphene layer and then remove atoms to build the circuitry they want. Even if it's not 1 atom thick, and I think it's not, it's incredible small. Make me think of the kind of technologie, mentionned in the session where the C's explain to Laura that spy microphones where installed in her home by putting it into cockroaches products (an old session).

Graphene is therefore a compound that has only one atomic layer, as it is similar to a sheet and not to a volume, we speak of a two-dimensional material. Its height, with a single layer of atoms, is the smallest that can be created. However, it should be noted that there are many variants of graphene. Thus, we speak of graphene even if it has several layers (up to 10 layers).

At this scale of size, we are dealing with a nanomaterial. If we take 1 mm and divide it by 1000 we get 1 micrometer and this is almost the limit observable with an optical microscope. Let's divide again by 1000 and let's get a gauge (nm) At this scale, we use electron microscopes that send electrons on the sample to be analyzed.
Graphene is extraordinary in many ways. Consider that an imaginary hammock with a surface area of 1 square meter would weigh only 0.77 milligrams, less than a single cat's mustache. However, such a hammock could support the weight of a 4 kilogram cat!


If such a hammock were made of a steel sheet of the same thickness, it would weigh only 40 grams, or 100 times less than graphene.

By attaching molecules to it, graphene can be modified. This chemical functionalization will make it soluble in a fluid or even magnetic. Thanks to this ability to functionalize this material, there is a whole chemistry and physics specific to graphene.

 

[dredger]

A good new french article on the general subject of nanotechnologies inside the vaccines.
This article has a link to a 53 pages document but which is not (yet) free, you have to pay 9,9€ to download it

Here's the article :

Nouveau dossier : Vaccins Covid et contrôle des populations via les nanoréseaux injectés - Le Courrier des Stratèges

Nous annonçons la sortie d’un nouveau dossier inédit de 53 pages intitulé « Vaccins Covid et contrôle des…

lecourrierdesstrateges.fr

(could maybe be re-posted on sott.fr ?)

I translated it to english via deepl, here it is :

New dossier: Covid vaccines and population control via injected nano-networks​

​

We announce the release of a new 53-page dossier entitled "Covid Vaccines and Population Control via Injected Nano-Arrays". Several teams of independent researchers from different disciplines have done since June 2021 what the health authorities in Western countries have not done and have not wanted to do: observe the contents of experimental Covid vaccines using microscopy and spectroscopy. The nanotechnologies identified and their analysis provide an insight into what the pharmaceutical industry and those who operate behind the scenes want to do with citizens.​

​

Public opinion is poorly informed about the technological possibilities that have arisen over the past 15 years and that have made it possible to investigate and control not space, nor the depths of the sea, but the human body and particularly the brain thanks to nanobiotechnologies.​

​

Nanotechnology in the 4 vaccines​

Recent discoveries (2021-2022) through independent observation and analysis of vaccine sera by biologists but also chemists, nanotechnology or biotechnology specialists, experts in bioinformatics, wireless telecommunications, nano-networks or the Internet of Things, are leading us to gradually understand what they are planning and have started to do with citizens, all over the world. This new dossier takes stock of what we know today.​

​

Because I was confronted with the disbelief of some readers on several occasions when a transhumanist project was mentioned in our lines, I took the decision to investigate the subject and provide the scientific evidence required. The work of Dr. Campra, Mik Andersen (pseudonym) and other multidisciplinary teams can advance evidence of what is observed in the vaccine serums of the 4 products that have currently received conditional marketing authorization: Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson. Comparing the results of the observation of the sera with information from scientific publications allows us to understand and reconstitute a puzzle that is both readable and worrying.​

​

Overwhelming evidence​

Like a majority of readers, I wondered about the effectiveness or harmfulness of nanoparticles in an organism, the effectiveness of nano-routers or nanoantennas in what amounts to a wireless nano-network. Finally, what influence can nanotechnologies have on our DNA (discussed in an article) and on our neurons? What is proposed may leave some people speechless, but the evidence is presented in this dossier:​

​

1. What has been found to be illicit in the Covid 'vaccine serums'?​

1.1 Nanosensors​

1.2 Nano antennas and plasmonic nano antennas​

1.3 Rectifying nano antennas​

1.4 Hydrogels for nanotechnology​

1.5 Codecs (encoders-decoders) and logic gates​

1.6 Graphene oxide​

1.7 Graphene nanopoulps or hydra​

2. Nano-computing and WBAN (Wireless Body Area Network)​

2.1 Some basic principles of nano-computing and bioinformatics​

2.2 Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs)​

2.3 Powering a WBAN​

2.4 Self-assembly of DNA crystals​

3. Forced transhumanisation of populations through inoculation of complex nano-networks​

3.1 Presentation of a synthetic model of the WBAN based on the analysis of Covid vaccine sera​

3.2 Communication with the outside world and use of the OS TOOK protocol​

4. Taking control of the human brain, the last bastion of bioterrorists?​

4.1 What is cybernetics?​

4.2 Explaining neuromodulation and remote control of the human brain​

Conclusion​

This is by no means a figment of the imagination, but a set of incriminating elements that can no longer leave the reader in doubt. In the days to come, we will publish a few extracts on selected topics in the form of articles. However, the coherence of this dossier confirms that the preparation of the vaccines was carried out before the epidemic and that the Sars-Cov 2 epidemic is neither natural nor accidental.​

This site is used to be known as "serious", the only problem is that the referred document is not freely distributed, which is a bit unusual, i suppose it'll be released freely sooner or later.

What i have in mind since I heard about this in June 2021 is that this topic is a time bomb, but strangely, by the fact that it can easily be verified by anyone (if at least you have a smartphone that allow it and if you know how to activate it which is sometimes tricky), this topic was not much followed or more discussed even in the re-information sphere. I think that with such articles and such kind of concrete files & researches, this topic was taking its time to come to the spotlight ? I hope so, it has a huge "anti-hypnotic" potential.

When people will understand that they get nanochipped and that many of them will be in measure to verify it with their smartphone, many jaws will fall or brains will bug out (and of course, some will answer "cool" ... )

Time will tell.

 

[Ina]

Maybe my vaxes were duds. I don’t emit signals, don’t catch wifi, didn’t get a Tshirt or even a doghnut.

 

[whitecoast]

Recently discovered this presentation on nanotechnology in the jabs, reported on this substack.

FANTASTIC MUST SEE Intra-Body Nano-Network Presentation by Mik Anderson

One of my substack subscribers sent me this presentation by Mik Anderson. It is excellent and explains the technicalities of how this network works. I do not know Mik Anderson, but want to thank him profoundly and my subscriber very much for this brilliant information. It is important that...

anamihalceamdphd.substack.com

MUST SEE Intra-Body Nano-Network Presentation by Mik Anderson

Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD

5-6 minutes

---

One of my substack subscribers sent me this presentation by Mik Anderson. It is excellent and explains the technicalities of how this network works. I do not know Mik Anderson, but want to thank him profoundly and my subscriber very much for this brilliant information. It is important that people understand in concise ways how the technology works and these images allow complex information to be understood. I have copied most of the the PDF below but the full presentation is available clicking on this link:
Intra- Body Nano Network, Mik Anderson
Diagram of the intra-body nano-network
The nano-network is a set of objects and elements with the ability to interact with each other through signals in the form of pulses, electromagnetic waves, and electric fields, being also able to operate in the molecular spectrum. These components may be already assembled or pending self-assembly when the conditions of temperature, magnetism, and environment are suitable. Within the nano-network, two types or strands can be distinguished: 1. The one that is fixed in the brain, 2. The one that is fixed in the rest of the body
Brain nano-network
It aims to form a neuronal interface to interact with the cognitive, physical, and electrical processes of brain activity for neuromodulation, neurostimulation, and neurocontrol. This requires the introduction of carbon nanotubes that serve to link neurons, shortening the natural distance of axons. This can also be achieved with graphene quantum dots and graphene nanosheets, although the literature makes explicit that single-walled carbon nanotubes SWCNT or multi-walled carbon nanotubes MWCNT are the key element. The carbon nanotubes together with the hydrogel in which they are coated act as electrodes, picking up the fluctuations of the electrical activity of the neurons, with sufficient sensitivity to determine the segregation of neurotransmitters. Electrical activity can be transmitted through the carbon nanotubes as signals triggered by the molecular activity of the surrounding brain tissue so that a map of the individual's brain activity can be obtained in real-time. Since the carbon nanotubes are tubular graphene structures, they can propagate the electrical signals to other components of the nano-network. These are the nearest nanorouter or nanocontrollers. The nanorouters are responsible for receiving the electrical signal, decoding it, configuring the data packets and the recipient of the information, providing MAC identification and a destination IP address. Additionally, this information can be encrypted to increase the security of the system and prevent bio-hacking. A nano-interface is required to transmit the signal outside the body, which could have several functions, on the one hand, the encryption of the data packets and, on the other hand, to increase the frequency, so that it can be propagated outside the body at an enough distance. As opposed to the brain nano-network, it doesn't require carbon nanotubes to operate and can be based entirely on the theory of electromagnetic communication. Note that the brain nano-network additionally works on molecular communication. This network employs all kinds of nano-devices and nano-nodes. In particular, graphene GQD quantum dots, but also nano-devices or nano-sensors made of hydrogel, carbon nanotubes, and graphene sheets (not necessarily pre-formed). All components, whether nano-sensors, nano-devices, or GQD graphene quantum dots, can transmit and repeat signals so that they act as nano-antennas, transmitters, and receivers, in target organs and tissues.
The possible data that can be obtained are vital signs, cardiac activity, respiratory activity, blood composition, degree of oxygenation, etc. The literature describes a multitude of nano-sensors based on graphene and carbon nanotubes, among other components. They are obtained thanks to graphene GQD quantum dots, which circulate through the bloodstream, arteries, capillaries... These components are electrically charged and can transport proteins due to their adsorptive capacity. When passing near a fixed/attached biosensor in the human body (e.g. a network of carbon nanotubes with graphene nanosheets forming a simple circuit or transistor), it generates a potential differential and thus a signal that can be interpreted and transmitted. Don't forget the ability of the nanomaterial to act as nano-antennas. The signals are transmitted to the nearest nanocontroller or nanorouter, reproducing the same signal propagation process, to the outside of the body through a component that acts as a nano-interface.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch...dcc4-3feb-48eb-8019-7599c6fb05a8_1273x716.png
Full presentation:

Intra-body nano-network - Brief summary by Mik Andersen.pdf

Intra-body nano-network Brief summary Mik Andersen. Translated by Orwell City https://www.orwell.city. Diagram of the intra-body nano-network. Diagram of the intra-body nano-network • The nano-network is a set of objects and elements with the ability to interact with each other through signals...

www.docdroid.net

From what I've read the body does have the ability to break down graphene via myeloperoxidase enzyme.

Graphene oxide biodegrades with help of human enzymes

Researchers show how graphene oxide suspended in water biodegrades in a reaction catalyzed by a human enzyme, with the effectiveness of the breakdown dependent on the colloidal stability of the suspension. The study should guide the development of graphene-based biomedical applications.

www.sciencedaily.com

After detailing the findings of their experiment, the researchers discuss the mechanism of graphene oxide degradation, beginning with a summary of the process by which myeloperoxidase acts against infection by microbes and other invasive materials that inflame biological tissues. During the inflammation process, neutrophils, a subtype of white blood cells, gather at the infection site and secrete myeloperoxidase, which catalyses a chemical reaction with chloride ions and hydrogen peroxide to produce strong oxidants such as hypochlorous acid. These oxidants have antimicrobial qualities, and are also known to degrade polyester-based implants, extracellular sugars and oxidised carbon nanotubes.

The study authors suggest that the high redox potentials of oxidants produced in the myeloperoxidase-catalysed reaction could in a similar way degrade graphene oxide held in suspension. Material breakdown likely starts at the level of carbon atoms connected with oxygen in the graphene lattice, and central to this is the hypochlorous acid produced in the reaction. Surface electric charge is also thought to contribute, as it does in the case of oxidised carbon nanotubes, since it favours the strong binding of graphene oxide with the enzyme, and subsequently triggers its degradation.

Seems like oxygen could be an important way to help oxidize and degrade those types of networks.

 

[dredger]

Here's a short clip/testimony that was posted on telegram, but i can't say if it's recent or old, at least the telegram post is from today, but the clip (?)
Here's the telegram link, the russian channel "NATISKA" :

NASTIKA

❗️Адвокат Тодда Каллендера, «вирус» (патогены в прививках от COVID) будет активирован тремя одноминутными импульсными волнами на частоте 18 ГГц от вышек 5G по всему миру. Правительства готовились уже много лет, а теперь просто «ждут», когда произойдет «катастрофа». Мы в Telegram: 👉...

t.me

Translation of the text :
Advocate Todd Callender, the "virus" (pathogens in COVID vaccines) will be activated by three one-minute pulse waves at 18 GHz from 5G towers around the world.
Governments have been preparing for years and now are just "waiting" for the "catastrophe" to happen.

What i wonder is of course if it's true ? If yes, as they do much wishful thinking, it may not work as well as they would explain, and instead of killing the lion the elites will just succeed to anger him & at the same time even more expose themselves. dunno, but still useful to share this information - sorry if already posted in another thread, hard to follow all

 

[heinrich]

Here's a short clip/testimony that was posted on telegram, but i can't say if it's recent or old, at least the telegram post is from today, but the clip (?)
Here's the telegram link, the russian channel "NATISKA" :

NASTIKA

❗️Адвокат Тодда Каллендера, «вирус» (патогены в прививках от COVID) будет активирован тремя одноминутными импульсными волнами на частоте 18 ГГц от вышек 5G по всему миру. Правительства готовились уже много лет, а теперь просто «ждут», когда произойдет «катастрофа». Мы в Telegram: 👉...

t.me

Translation of the text :
Advocate Todd Callender, the "virus" (pathogens in COVID vaccines) will be activated by three one-minute pulse waves at 18 GHz from 5G towers around the world.
Governments have been preparing for years and now are just "waiting" for the "catastrophe" to happen.

What i wonder is of course if it's true ? If yes, as they do much wishful thinking, it may not work as well as they would explain, and instead of killing the lion the elites will just succeed to anger him & at the same time even more expose themselves. dunno, but still useful to share this information - sorry if already posted in another thread, hard to follow all

is this technically feasible?? credible..??

 

[Ðekel]

is this technically feasible?? credible..??

Anything is technically feasible, especially if the tech is "futuristic". Credible: Who is to say ?

However, heinrich, we shouldn't underestimate the power of nature.

Nature tends to solve the correct things at the correct "time"