Vaccinated persons emitting a code that can be captured by bluetooth

is this technically feasible?? credible..??

My opinion is that these claims are total nonsense. The idea that any manufacturing process currently in use can package and store highly infectious biologics within nano particles, to be released upon receipt of an EMF signal, at the scale required for mass rollout throughout the entire population, doesn’t jive with the reality of how poorly made so many of these “vaccine” injections are.

Particles can degrade over time due to a number of reasons. Some can break under severe heat stress, be subject to disruptive ultrasonic frequencies, become degraded through oxidation, or even be mechanically destroyed through consumption by our innate immune system.

If there were secret pathogens added, any number of the aforementioned processes would have already degraded the nano particles and unleashed the viruses at some point since the rollout in some people somewhere on the planet. We would have seen cases of Ebola, Marburg, or whatever else already pop up in heavily vaccinated countries. But there has been NOTHING. For all the bad batches with much higher mortality rates than normal, none of these have been linked to some kind of novel infectious outbreak. Instead we’ve seen RSV, Monkeypox, heart damage, and turbo cancers. The signal for the latter two are in line with what we’ve seen from the cardiovascular damage spike proteins cause and the immune system dysregulation caused by getting the body to produce spike proteins en masse. As for the former, does anyone want to argue the evil powers plan on waging democide with remote-controlled RSV or Monkeypox? 😂

Internet gonna internet.
 
Grapheme oxide is used in the manufacturing of biosensors. The tech exists and it does not seem a stretch to think that the Graphene oxide injected into people (and the self assembling nano tech some researchers found) could be responsive to a broadcast signal.

A graphite oxide-based field-effect transistor (GO-FET) was fabricated and functionalized with COVID-19 antibody for the purpose of real-time detection of COVID-19 spike protein antigen. Thermal evaporation process was used to deposit the gold electrodes on the surface of the sensor substrate. Graphite oxide channel was placed between the gold electrodes. Bimetallic nanoparticles of platinum and palladium were generated via an ultra-high vacuum (UHV) compatible system by sputtering and inert-gas condensation technique. The biosensor graphite oxide channel was immobilized with specific antibodies against the COVID-19 spike protein to achieve selectivity and specificity. This technique uses the attractive semiconductor characteristics of the graphite oxide-based materials resulting in highly specific and sensitive detection of COVID-19 spike protein. The GO-FET biosensor was decorated with bimetallic nanoparticles of platinum and palladium to investigate the improvement in the sensor sensitivity. The in-house developed biosensor limit of detection (LOD) is 1 fg/mL of COVID-19 spike antigen in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Moreover, magnetic labelled SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody were studied to investigate any enhancement in the sensor performance. The results indicate the successful fabrication of a promising field effect transistor biosensor for COVID-19 diagnosis.
 
Last edited:
My opinion is that these claims are total nonsense

I (better say all) hope you are right, but many people found various undetermined elements in the vaccines. And to add to the complexity of the subject, i assume it's different from one brand to another, but also, within the same brand, there are visibly differences between batches - this was demonstrated simply (and unfortunately) with high death rate for some specific batches/series.
All what you list could be seen as ... let's say collateral damages, but the main objective may be broader and still undiscovered.
But i want again to insist on the fact that, and C's often informed about, that there's a difference between what they (the PTB) want and what they finally get, i mean here their wishful thinking. What is sure and factual is that a good % of people on earth were injected unknown substances coupled with, as far as i understood, some technological stuff. Regarding health, short term effects are now known, middle term ones are starting to show up. For the long term ones we'll have to wait.

Coming back to the technological aspect, the subject of the thread, is the answer definitively known ? I mean, does the bluetooth codes emitted by someone, that you can pick up, are coming (or a consequence) from (of) the vaccines ?
A direct friend of mine is persuaded about. He's at the avant-guarde of the people fighting the authorities and helped to finance the material needed for a test of the bluetooth presence made in France for the known reportage (at least in the french community) named "Hold Out" (the second one, first was "Hold on"). They demonstrated it, with a bailiff who came to attest it (if i well remember it happened at least 3x in France that a bailiff attested such a demonstration, but this was already 2y before, some other countries also did it). But they observed/got unexpected results when they did it : some people not vaccinated also emitted a code (not a strong % among the unvaccinated but some anyway), which made him conclude that some technological stuff may also been inserted in some people by the mean of the tests/swabs - At least there's also the schedding sub-topic.

This subject came back to me today after reading this clip I posted and brought back all the questions for which i've no concrete answer so far - this remains and interresting topic to discuss together :)
 
I update this topic as there's something new about, or we could also say, there's nothing new, or even worst, a complete blackout of the topic itself, related to potential electronic componenents within the jabs.

In France, there are 2 carers (caregivers) who started to inform back in regard to the vaccines and what they discovered in them. They did a great (in fact enormous) work as they release 3 documentaries and also a book early this year. Their documentaries are well known, at least on the french side, they named them "Next dose"

They recently sent a publication, which is somewhat worrying if we consider what they wrote on it and most important, what they discovered, is true (or truths). There are 3 elements to summarize :
- even the re-information sphere does not much cover this sub-topic of nano-particules, graphene or technological stuff in the vaccines.
- the omerta and censorship on the topic looks like it's a top-priority topic to censor
- one of the 2 carers was visibly attacked and despite his young age, had a stroke and went 10 days in intensive care.

What i found strange is why this sub-topic of technological stuff in the vaccines would be more ... "hidded" than the lethality of these same vaccines, that this information looks like more protected ? Is this because this part of the (population reduction) job is handled by the army (i can't help to think about the otan who probably play a larger role in many topics here in europe) ? This would be logical, as they have the control of the whole EU press (just look at the anti-russian narravite broadcasted by all the EU medias), they can add this topic in their list of forbidden subjects. But it looks like they also put under pressure any legal move (read what they say about their lawyer who came to help and who retracted 3 days after) and the fact that i doubt that the stroke that one of the 2 got is an hazard.

I mean, all signs here point to a first (easy-to-make) conclusion : this looks like a big fish, a topic they do not want at all to be spread. Notice that this topic may be linked to the 5G and the possibility that 5G would be in measure to activate some things inserted in one's body, i do not know. (would be worth it to ask C's about, no ?)

Here's the link to the article in french :

And here's the auto-translated link to english

As this topic seems to be ... sensitive, i wonder if this would be a good idea to relay it on SOTT, i think about the french SOTT. I remember the advise of the C's early the covid crisis which was to keep a low profile. But on the other hand, looking at what these 2 guys did and how they seem attacked, relaying their work would help them, they need to be supported, helped, protected, and i think that relaying their work will help to protect them.
 
That link also goes to the page in French, but there is a button in the header to click on for both the English and the Spanish versions.
I investigated. The link is good, just tried it on 3 different browsers, if it doesn't work it's a local problem on your side. I tested it on a secured browser with javascript disabled and yes, it did not translate from french to english, so maybe you have a security limitation on your browser that does not allow JS (javascript) to do its job.
 
I investigated. The link is good, just tried it on 3 different browsers, if it doesn't work it's a local problem on your side. I tested it on a secured browser with javascript disabled and yes, it did not translate from french to english, so maybe you have a security limitation on your browser that does not allow JS (javascript) to do its job.
You're right. I use uMatrix and when it's disabled your link works fine. Sorry to have bothered you with my noise. :-[
 
This recent video is being copied many times on Odysee and was translated to french. It's from the well known Dr John Campbell who, now, officially mentions them (the technological things found in the vaccines). This could be posted in many threads but i selected this one in order to keep one single thread for the technological aspect & sub-topic of the vaccines, just that this thread's title could maybe be renamed.

Here's the clip, 15m, with french sub-titles, on Odysee :

For french people, same clip but with audio translation (not advised for english as you won't hear it well anymore) and a few more explanations at the begining + a reminder with Pr. Perrone at the end of the clip, here it's 19m

It looks as the start of a wider public awareness of this issue, John Campbell has 3+ millions of subscribers ! I wonder if this can be found on youtube, didn't search for it. If yes, any copy should normally be quickly deleted, isn't it ?
 
Due to the server crash, i repost what i posted yesterday, coming from a contact (friend) who manage a telegram account and who has a great knowledge and many contacts.
I can't link the TG post because it's a private channel.

First, here's the link to the PDF, PDF that i also attached to this post as it's not too big (6,5Mo)

Here's the translation of what he wrote :

All those vaccinated have been nanotested. There can no longer be any doubt.
That said, the detection of some is not 100% functional and some can only be connected as far as possible, with more or less variable transmission-reception rates that are sensitive to the various existing telecommunications services.
So what have we found in Pfizer injections for as long as we've been looking?
The answer is many things. Both organic and inorganic.
Here, we'll just focus on the work of Australian Doctor David Nixon, who has done some fantastic work on the analysis of inorganic nanoparticles.
Pfizer's Comirnaty in particular.
Based on the work of Pablo Campra, David dug deeper and found some very interesting things.
But what exactly?
Well, self-assembling nano-structures that prove that all vaccinated people have been nano-traced and that they all carry within them this unprecedented technological revolution in the history of humanity.
The era of transhumans in spite of themselves.
For those who want to know more after reading David Nixon's work, you will see that you can then easily make the connection with Microsoft's crypto mining and attribution patent. Patent WO2020060606.
Then, one thing leading to another, you will then be able to link all this to the CBDC of central banks and digital identity.
Below, please find the fruits of his labour in PDF and thank you in advance for sharing.
Herein lies the real tragedy: how have billions of people been injected and nano-traced without their knowledge?
Ukraine, Palestine, the Alliance, etc., it's all just a distraction.
The proof is that everyone has quietly moved on to other things.


There are many scientist, more in the domain of biology, who have access to professional microscopes who came to the same conclusions, or we could also say "puzzling observations". Also, as we all here +/- follow what is happening, it's a logical step for the elite's plans, they want their "internet of bodies".
 

Attachments

I've been sent a substack article from an Australian PhD who is on the topic of nano stuff since a long time.
First i searched if his substack or blog was at least one referenced in the forum and it is not, nor his website nor the substack.

I read the article, which is about analysis the collected mac addresses. It's a bit too technical for me to understand, thus i can't much comment about. What he summarized about is that these mac addresses are not random but are from a structured architecture.
Here's the link to the article, it was posted today and it's free access :


Anb here's the link to the main page of his substack :

All his researched looks like a good source of information about this specific topic.
For instance, another article, posted end of March, written by another scientist (Len Ber MD) who put under microscope one dental anesthetic (the Xylocaine) and found what looks like technology in it, just a quick text with a couple of pictures :

This topic of dental anesthetic was discussed in one other thread, here it's the first time i read someone who analysed one ... and found these nano craps in it.


I mainly wanted to post this to keep a trace here, a reference, as it directly refers to the subject of the thread. I don't know if this will be important or not to understand this topic in the future, or, for the ones who are the most skeptical, the very first step would be to accept that it's a true matter (ie not a fake one)
 
Dear all,

I heard about this subject mid September, when I was proposed to finance the buyout of specific material to scan bluetooth frequencies. FYI, some links to such type of material you can buy on amazon - link1 - link2 - link3 - link4 (could be useful if Scottie want to dig into the subject)
Tests were done during the first half of November, in the middle of french countryside, using some tight protocols. All was recorded and the results will be included in the new movie/documentary of Pierre Barnerias named "Primum non Noncere" (PNN) who released the famous "Hold up" documentary 1 year before.

* Side note about PNN: it should have been released the 11 November, but it hasn't yet at this date - I asked some people but none can answer the reasons. I checked P. Barnerias twitter, no news about .... more could be said about but it's not the point here, I just hope that PNN will be soon released, and I think that once it is, it's going to make a lot of noise, particularly in regard to this subject of codes emitted by vaccinated people.

I posted about in the Corona thread the 31/10 (link), there's a link to a document (which is part of a series of other documents, under PDF) which raises the topic and which already answers to many questions, here's back the link to this PDF :
(ill refer to this document as "the PDF" below)


Online video & first tests
There's one long trailer of 11m for PNN, but also a short one of 1m30s which is a kind of mini-trailer for just this subject of "bluetooth codes", here's one link to this trailer (it's in french)

I made a few researches 3 weeks before, mainly on odysee, and took note of some pertinent video. I just re-did it today and found one which is quite explicit and which answer (or partially answer) to some questions, it comes from Spain, a certain Dr Luis de Benito, and i found one with english sub-titles :

Other video are more amateur ones, just type "bluetooth" in odysee to find some, there are a lot of re-post of the same video, here are some i found :
French one, 4m52, they make a test in a forest, with 2 smartphones, scanning when a runner or biker come around :

1m video which simply shows what you see on your smartphone (if it can read them)

2m46, similar to previous one but with more context, spanish or portugese :

1m19, youtube one, video of the smartphone screen + comments (russian ?)
Link

Edit before posting : one more video, french, from well know lawyer Carlo Brusa, he made a speech visibly in a cofee the 6 November., got the link on Telegram and hopefully i found the clip on Odysee, but it's french (sorry, i lack time and energy to traduce it)

... we can find many other clips, sometimes short ones, like this one of 31s (on YTube), and i guess new ones will appear from time to time.

I did some tests on my side, but no serious ones. I had a friend entrepeneur who came here with his worker for my bathroom, he's vaccinated when his worker is not, I scanned before he arrived, once he was there, when he left, and clearly had at least one mac address found by my smartphone all the time he was present. I said at least one, because i sometimes pick up a signal that probably comes from my neighboors (I have 5 appartments surrounding mine)
I also did 2 tests outside (see my post in the covid thread linked above)
Some of my colleagues did also some tests, the most relevent was done in a germann coffe one friday evening during October, he recorded a 2m video when he scanned and spotted a lot of codes. He was with a friend and later went outside with nobody around, he scanned a few times again and spotted one code coming from his friend (none of my colleagues are jabbed)

I re-discussed about with my contact who had the results of the test done in France. He told me this was more complicated as just "vaccinated = you emit a code", some people were just PCR tested and also emitted one !? This render the topic quite more complex.
In fact, i was waiting to have the new french reportage "PNN" to be released to discuss more about this subject here on the forum, but as it wasn't (yet) released, I decided to spend this evening writing this post.

One test was made in Luxembourg, you can find it explained starting at page 51 in "the PDF"


Can all smartphone detect these codes ?
This is tricky and need to be investigated brand per brand.
With an iphone, it seems that it's not possible, or not "anymore" possible. From the discussion i had with my contact, he told me he was in measure to read them from his iphone during June, then not anymore in measure (but i have to confirm this information). I tried to figure out what would i do if i was Apple, and the answer was obvious : patch all iphone with a fix of the bluetooth drivers/software in order to avoid to display these "annoying" bluetooth codes.
For Android systems, it's more difficult to perform such a worlwide update, because it depends on the smartphone's brand. I wouldn't be surprised that some brands applied some updates with the same aim : hide this to the public.

Personnally, i rarely update my smartphone (it's on Android). It can detect these codes, but, i had to activate the developper options (which is a different operation/procedure to follow depending on the brand of the smartphone), and once in these options, there's one named (traduced from french) "Presentation of unnamed bluetooth devices" which has to be turned ON.

This means that depending on the brand of your smartphone you may have to search how to allow it to "see" these codes (or simply display them)

This lead to further questions. For instance, regarding the iphone, supposing Apple blocked this, is it then a complete blocking at the system level (drivers of the bluetooth chip), which would mean that even if you download a specialized application to scan the bluetooth it'll not detect any because at low system level it's hided/blocked !? Same question for Android systems.

If any here is an iphone guru, maybe search in the in-depth options of your iphone to check if it's possible to do something about ? Or some dedicated application would do the job ? To investigate.


About dedicated applications (on Android)
The best one is "Bluetooth scanner", once you found a code, you can use a realtime tracking function, if you come close to the source you'll have the signal strength which will raise quite visibly.

You can find screens of this application on page 49 & 50 of the PDF but also on page 85, 4 pictures, the 2nd one shows the "realtime scanning" screen, and at leat one last screen on page 98.

One funny fact about : when i downloaded it from the android "play store", one comment for this application was (traduced to english) : "impressive for locating the vaccinated" ^^


About codes
These codes are visibly mac addresses (McA). Link to wiki page about.
Normally, each manufacturer has its dedicated "starting" code, the 3 first elements of the total of 6 elements that compose the McA code can determine the name of the brand/constructor. I found 2 websites which allow to find the brand behind a mac adress found :

For instance, there's an "Android bluedroid" coming from one of my 2 neighboors on the left of my flat, its mac address starts by
9C:71:3A which refers to Huawei Technologies Co.,Ltd
One other neighboor on the right got a TV with code starting with 64:12:36 which refers to Technicolor CH USA Inc
Note : the application bluetooth scanner lists the manufacturer code

For all the unnamed codes i found and tested so far, none was linked to a manufacturer !?

The most important information is that the code emitted by someone changes ! From the video of Dr de Benito, he mentions 5 different codes, but i don't know if it's correct, this would require to conduct the same test with one known vaccinated person during a certain time and each time take note of the code he's emitting. I think it's more than 5, I even wonder if it's not always changing, maybe a kind of algorythm based on date & time or other variables, which would mean that you'll never see 2x the same code emitted by a vaccinated person once he "renewed". I also have no clue about the frequence of this "renewal" of McA code ...

One other thing i noticed, but it's just supposition to investigate : the possibility that it does not emit all the time. For instance, it seems that i do not pick up any more signal during the night !?

--------------------

There are probably other details i miss but this first post is already long.

I encourage anyone to conduct his own tests and post here, or investigate about, discuss, search.... dunno. To me it looks like a good "practical" networking exercice.

One last note/advise : if you make screen captures of your smartphone and want to post them here, for privacy reason, ensure that the MacAddress of your own smartphone is not visible on the screenshoot - I would have liked to share the small "clip" my colleague did in the german coffee, but we can see the McA of his smartphone, soI did not share it.
My interesante e informativo.
 
I found no reference to phd, please take into account that phd means nothing if your title is in philosophy but you attempt astrophysics
Indeed, Brave AI says that he has a PhD in architecture. The thing is, even amateurs can do valuable research on some topics that interest us or that we deem important, like many of us do here on this forum.

And I suppose that parts of his knowledge may apply to his research of what is in the vaccines, eg. proper scientific approach. Though the science of architecture does seem pretty far away from it.
 
Well, everybody can look into microscope but to correctly interpret what you see you need years of study, there are no shortcuts. Even guy himself states he is an amateur, it tells quite a lot about level of confidence we should maintain regarding his work.

We have inundation of self-appointed experts lately, maybe they even are doing it in goodwill, most probably they see what they wanna find and their study serves only to prove preconceived ideas.

Honestly BT in vax is straight ignorant
why use BT? there was no better tech, invisible to all mobile owners on the planet?
BT isn't an rfid that only returns code, it transmits and needs large amount of power to run, where does this power come from, graphene battery and charger?
What would that do, remotely control society? prone to hacking by any bored kiddo?
It just don't add up, this is level of thinking of paranoid person with narrow imagination and knowledge, if there is anything in vax it wont be BT
 
Back
Top Bottom