A
atreides
Guest
You are not alone, many people get to this point early in their training, it's why I think something like only 1 in 7 adults who start martial arts classes continue beyond the first month.Marie said:Hi,
As some know I've taken up karate a few months ago, and now it's the end of their "session" and it's pretty clear to me that I don't really want to keep on with it, because it's just obvious that some of the stuff doesn't work.
There are no blocks in Kata or forms, anyone who says differently is either a) Intentionally concealing the truth, or b) more likely doesn't know. Everything is a strike, or a hold/lock/break. You just don't see because it is practiced alone, when you add in another person you start to see what is being taught. Also alot of movements in kata are an abstract language.Marie said:First of all, we learned more blocks than anything else, and I can see why they're useless - what the teacher says is that for a block to be effective you have to stop it before is bypasses the shoulder - and well, seems to me that it just doesn't work, plus most of the blocks are obviously intended to be used when the strike gets to you.
I am not 100% sure what movement you are discussing, as it's been many years since I actively studied karate. You could make a video of the movement if you want and I will see if I know it, maybe I can explain it maybe not. Also remember that there are at least three levels to every move and explanation, what you tell to kyus, what you tell to pre 4th dans, and then the truth.Marie said:Also I don't trust some of those forms they show us - like something they call "downward hammer", which is basically reacting to someone grabbing your wrist by making a block for an expected crochet from the other side - and leaving yourself completely open in the front. Seems to me those things only work if your opponent is doing a predictable routine. What if they choose to do something else - such as, say, punch you from the front?
It sounds like you have had a really bad teacher, weapons and empty hand movements are the same, for instance all of the locks and hand to hand techniques in Aikido are based on sword and counter sword maneuvers. Kali hand to hand is a better example, Arnis as well. Wing Tsun butterfly sword techniques are another example.Marie said:Anyways I've looked into some of the things that were mentioned here - I kinda dropped everything that was done with weapons because I figured that if /when I have to fight I'm unlikely to have a weapon . What looks real interesting to me is Wing Tsu and Wu Xing.
You mean Wing Tsun and Wing Chun, yes different transliterations, as far as I know.Marie said:While doing a pretty general search I found the following stuff, which I thought might be interesting regarding the original request - it's basically things that people said on a Chinese history forum:
Yun said:SCP, the most original statement of the Wu Xing school is the Hongfan (Great Norm) chapter of the Shangshu/Shujing. I think you can look for Legge's classic translation of the Shangshu. All elaborations and expansions on the Wu Xing philosophy by the Han Confucians (including Dong Zhongshu) used the Hongfan as a starting point.Not sure if this was what you were looking for Atreides, but I thought it might be relevant to martial arts and/or your project.Bao Pu said:Aihe Wang's book "Cosmology and Political Culture in Early China" (2000) discusses the development of Wuxing, including its precedent in the Shang Dynasty's "Sifang" system. She stresses that there were numerous Wuxing systems in existence, before it finally stabilized. Some of the sources she mentions are: Hongfan chapter of the Shangshu, The Lushi Chunqiu, The Zuo Zhuan, The Guanzi, the Huainanzi (chapters 3, 4, 5), The Mawangdui Xingde text, and the Shuihudi Rishu (Daybooks).
I figured that Wing Tsu and Wing Chu were the same thing; somebody please tell me if they're not. I really like that idea of using the attacker's own strength against them, because, well, the situations where knowing how to fight would have been useful in the past always involved a size disadvantage for me.
Now Wu Xing seems to be a science applied to all kinds of different ends - something like the idea of ch'i, like a theory of the way people and things work, and it's been mentioned that the one-inch punch is done using Wu Xing, and several of the websites that sell Wing Chu/Tsu courses mention (promise?) the one-inch punch - therefore Wing Tsu includes studying some Wu Xing? Or is it better to study Wu Xing separately?
That is not a bad idea, I am working on some home study training methods I will be posting on my www.weirding-way.com site, and maybe some vids on youtoube etc, but am waiting for some supplies to get here, and having the time to set stuff up. It is always best to find a good teacher, even if it's only to go to their seminars, I am in a similar situation here in france.Marie said:I decided I would teach myself from books seen as I'm geographically challenged (i.e. I live far from cities), and there's nowhere to find such courses. I have seen a lot of books for sale, but a lot of them look suspicious (like way too commercial), and well, would anyone have a suggestion of good books or writers on the subject(s)?