Bowen's interest in cometary and meteor particle streams and electrostatic effects influencing rainfall is worth noting. Maybe he was on to something?
For all this excellent research though, there's little evidence of any kind of applied technological outcome. It seems that if we want to understand the possibilities humans have of influencing the weather in any acute sense, we need to look less at chemical and material processes and more towards principles of physics that can transcend the boundary between densities. That looks to be where the real power to 'change the climate' resides.
This was a post today from Alex Krainers Substak.
Have they weaponized hurricanes?
No. At least not successfully. Here I condensed what we know about hurricanes and why they're beyond anybody's ability to control.
No. At least not successfully. Here I condensed what we know about hurricanes and why they're beyond anybody's ability to control.
alexkrainer.substack.com
After hurricane Helene wreaked havoc through Southeast of the United States,
hurricane Milton is about to make landfall on Florida’s Gulf coast, also with catastrophic potential. US Government’s inability or unwillingness to adequately respond to the resulting disasters has unleashed heated discussions on social media, including the speculation that they are somehow deliberately engineering these storms.
The conspiracy theories can’t be dismissed; our government agencies as well as certain oligarchs like
Bill Gates have been busy playing God with climate-engineering technologies like cloud-seeding, HAARP (High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program), AAI (atmospheric aerosol injections), carbon sequestration, sun dimming, and who knows what else. These technologies exist, and they can and do
influence the weather. Here’s the former CIA director
John Brennan talking about AAI in 2016:...Embeded in the text.
Clearly, they’re busy messing with the climate. At the same time however, I very much doubt that they are capable of controlling anything much. In fact, tropical storms and hurricanes vividly expose the limitations of science and technology at understanding and forecasting the behavior of complex systems. Hurricane forecasts have greatly improved over the last few decades and the 24 and 48 hour forecasts of their
trajectories tend to be fairly good.
Good however isn’t the same as
accurate. But our ability to predict a hurricane’s
intensity isn’t even good. If we can’t predict something, how would we even begin to control it?
He then goes on to state his case and hypothesis:
Below are the descriptive paragraph headings with graphics included in the text of the article to clarify
How Hurricanes
Modelling the storms
Building up the monitoring grid
The brick wall of complexity
And the conclusion:
“They”: cruel, sadistic and stupid juveniles
To suppose that anyone would actually be capable of controlling such systems and achieving desired outcomes is to credit them with omniscience and omnipotence that’s beyond the human grasp. It takes a particular mental disposition to venture and play God with our societies, economies, viruses, earthquakes or weather modification technologie
s.
Based on what we’ve seen so far, the people who are inclined to do so have much more in common with cruel, sadistic and stupid juveniles than they do with learned, mature and responsible scientists. They can set things on fire and destroy life, but they wouldn’t know how to create or control something if their degenerate lives depended on it. They are good at one thing only: failing.
So it would seem to me that 3D has a limited influence on weather manipulation, and as the C's have stated is more related to conflict with 4DSTS. IMO there must be on humongous battle going on that this time.
