Weather Control: 3D and 4D Phenomenon? Who's on first? What's the science?

Saw this posted on X a number of times from Helene in the Gulf of Mexico where a strange vortex is seen in or near the eye of the hurricane. It doesn't help matters that the mainstream for the most part ignores or ridicules people that identify and try to explain these things, and want an explanation from officialdom. This one, imo, was particularly strange... who knows maybe there is a rational and benign explanation for it. Or it could be indicative of a hell of a battle in 4D or something along those lines.

 
Saw this posted on X a number of times from Helene in the Gulf of Mexico where a strange vortex is seen in or near the eye of the hurricane. It doesn't help matters that the mainstream for the most part ignores or ridicules people that identify and try to explain these things, and want an explanation from officialdom. This one, imo, was particularly strange... who knows maybe there is a rational and benign explanation for it. Or it could be indicative of a hell of a battle in 4D or something along those lines.

FWIW, I saw a post claiming this was photoshopped. Has anyone found an original source of that clip to show one way or the other?
 
During various sessions, the C's have hinted that humans may have some degree of influence over the weather, while outright stating that severe weather is often a form of "battle" between 4D forces, amongst the natural Earth Changes taking place:

The image coming into focus here seems to be one of significant, localised 4D influence over natural processes, with humans having only the most rudimentary understanding of the physics and technologies behind such influences. Even 3D 'secret super-weapons' appear to lack the power to direct the forces of nature - only to tap them.

So, what IS the science behind all of this? Let's start the discussion with one example: cloud seeding. Here in Australia, cloud seeding has been experimented with quite a lot and from what I've read about the topic, it's an energy-intensive process that has delivered very modest results compared to the sorts of phenomena referred to above. From Australia's main government scientific organisation, the CSIRO, we find:


Bowen's interest in cometary and meteor particle streams and electrostatic effects influencing rainfall is worth noting. Maybe he was on to something?

For all this excellent research though, there's little evidence of any kind of applied technological outcome. It seems that if we want to understand the possibilities humans have of influencing the weather in any acute sense, we need to look less at chemical and material processes and more towards principles of physics that can transcend the boundary between densities. That looks to be where the real power to 'change the climate' resides.
Expanded/edited this post and put it up on the Cass Substack:

 
Back
Top Bottom