G
gritzle70
Guest
Rosalee Grable" <webfairy@thewebfairy.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 23:11:00 -0500
Subject: Re: Every Mind Counts -- Scalar Pulses Are Now Showing Up on Waveforms
I have a whole directory of evidence of scalar (microwave) destruction
involved in the demoliton of the towers and Building 7.
http://thewebfairy.com/911/h-effect
there is no index file,, but poke around. Each of the .htm files shows a
flash cut from the History Channel DVD
Relics from the Rubble, showing such oddities as THE ONLY FILING CABINET
FOUND in the debris.
Considering these were two hundred story office towers, the absence of
filing cabinets seems suspicious, eh?
The one that's left is about the size of a basketball, with unburnt
shards of paper clinging to it.
http://thewebfairy.com/911/h-effect/filingcabinet.htm
and huge beam bent like a horseshoe
http://thewebfairy.com/911/h-effect/horseshoe.htm
Some substances microwaves hit instantaneously. Some substances are
ignored and stay cool. Some substances explode when exposed to microwave
radiation.
A kid produced a plasma ball in a microwave oven of Letterman.
http://www.apache.airnet.com.au/~fastinfo/microwave/letterman/
Conventional controlled demolition wouldn't result in nano-particles.
From PlaguePuppy, MIT trained Engineer and Family Physician
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Professor Thomas Cahill and the Poisonous post 9/11
atmosphere
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 20:49:42 -0800
From: Jeff <jeffrey.king2@comcast.net>
Dear Dave and All,
This very fine dust business opens up a whole host of interesting
questions, many of which Cahill himself raises, and the implications
tell us some very unlikely things about the physical processes going on
in the pile. If only there had been sampling of these very fine
particles during and just after the collapses I suspect we would find
even deeper oddities, but even three weeks later when Cahill started
monitoring there is plenty of strangeness.
The high prevalence of very small particles
(http://delta.ucdavis.edu/SizeDist.jpg) is immediately striking and
raises very forcefully the question of mechanism. During the collapses
we may imagine very forceful interactions of falling pieces that could
produce at least some amount of fine dust in what amounts to a grinding
or milling process. But after the buildings have been reduced to
smoldering piles of rubble, we should have only thermal and chemical
processes available to generate particles.
From Cahill's PowerPoint:
Proposed explanation of very fine aerosols size and composition
Problems:
?We see very fine aerosols typical of combustion temperatures far higher
than the WTC collapse piles
?We see some elements abundantly and others hardly at all, despite
similar abundances in the collapse dust
?We see organic species in the very fine mode that would not survive
high temperatures
Explanation
?The hot collapse piles are converting some species to gasses that can
escape to the surface of the piles and then form aerosols, a process
that yields very fine particles
I don't know if this really qualifies as an explanation, more just the
assertion that "somehow" the piles are converting various elements and
compounds into their vapor form, even though the temperatures within the
piles should have been much too cool for this to happen. But without
that crucial step of vaporization (followed by condensation) there is no
way to form such extremely small particles. And why are these metal
vapors not oxidizing when they reach the air?
Remember that liquid metal was found at least six weeks after the
collapses, but to generate vapor means heating the metals all the way to
their boiling points. And the energy to keep metal at even the melting
point for so long is quite substantial, and cannot be explained by
combustion. No matter how hot it may have been right after the collapse
(even mini-nuke hot), high gradients mean high heat flows and things
would have cooled off much faster than they did.
If there wasn't enough fuel to generate steel-melting temperatures when
the buildings were still standing, there is surely not enough to
generate these kinds of temperatures weeks later, and in a pit that
allowed very little air circulation. Such high temperatures anywhere in
the pit would create a high heat flux toward the surface, and would need
a continuing source of energy to maintain the gradient.
And what's with the strange distribution of elements? The abundances
don't correlate with any of the things they should: the abundances in
the WTC materials, the melting points, the chlorine-enhanced
volatility. (see pages 27 and on from Cahill's PowerPoint -
(http://delta.ucdavis.edu/WTC%20aersols%20ACS%202003.ppt ) When you add
the otherwise unexplained presence of Americium, the possibility must be
considered that there was actually some kind of nuclear chemistry, i.e.
transmutation of elements, going on during or after the collapses.
One other thought about the particles: whatever process was continuing
to produce these very fine particles by something resembling evaporation
and condensation was also continuing to produce much bigger (2.5 to 5
micron) particles that could not arise this way. Cahill notes that
these bigger particles would normally disappear after a rain, but
reappeared after rain in early and again in mid-October. This would
suggest that there was an ongoing disintegration process that was
releasing larger as well as smaller particles, something that could
weaken the bond energy of the various substances and allow them to
"smoulder" away into a kind of smoke at temperatures well below their
normal boiling points.
Best wishes,
Jeff king
>> The scalar variable was edited out of Maxwell's equations, along with
>> quanternion math which could represent vectors in scalar format.
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 23:11:00 -0500
Subject: Re: Every Mind Counts -- Scalar Pulses Are Now Showing Up on Waveforms
I have a whole directory of evidence of scalar (microwave) destruction
involved in the demoliton of the towers and Building 7.
http://thewebfairy.com/911/h-effect
there is no index file,, but poke around. Each of the .htm files shows a
flash cut from the History Channel DVD
Relics from the Rubble, showing such oddities as THE ONLY FILING CABINET
FOUND in the debris.
Considering these were two hundred story office towers, the absence of
filing cabinets seems suspicious, eh?
The one that's left is about the size of a basketball, with unburnt
shards of paper clinging to it.
http://thewebfairy.com/911/h-effect/filingcabinet.htm
and huge beam bent like a horseshoe
http://thewebfairy.com/911/h-effect/horseshoe.htm
Some substances microwaves hit instantaneously. Some substances are
ignored and stay cool. Some substances explode when exposed to microwave
radiation.
A kid produced a plasma ball in a microwave oven of Letterman.
http://www.apache.airnet.com.au/~fastinfo/microwave/letterman/
Conventional controlled demolition wouldn't result in nano-particles.
From PlaguePuppy, MIT trained Engineer and Family Physician
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Professor Thomas Cahill and the Poisonous post 9/11
atmosphere
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 20:49:42 -0800
From: Jeff <jeffrey.king2@comcast.net>
Dear Dave and All,
This very fine dust business opens up a whole host of interesting
questions, many of which Cahill himself raises, and the implications
tell us some very unlikely things about the physical processes going on
in the pile. If only there had been sampling of these very fine
particles during and just after the collapses I suspect we would find
even deeper oddities, but even three weeks later when Cahill started
monitoring there is plenty of strangeness.
The high prevalence of very small particles
(http://delta.ucdavis.edu/SizeDist.jpg) is immediately striking and
raises very forcefully the question of mechanism. During the collapses
we may imagine very forceful interactions of falling pieces that could
produce at least some amount of fine dust in what amounts to a grinding
or milling process. But after the buildings have been reduced to
smoldering piles of rubble, we should have only thermal and chemical
processes available to generate particles.
From Cahill's PowerPoint:
Proposed explanation of very fine aerosols size and composition
Problems:
?We see very fine aerosols typical of combustion temperatures far higher
than the WTC collapse piles
?We see some elements abundantly and others hardly at all, despite
similar abundances in the collapse dust
?We see organic species in the very fine mode that would not survive
high temperatures
Explanation
?The hot collapse piles are converting some species to gasses that can
escape to the surface of the piles and then form aerosols, a process
that yields very fine particles
I don't know if this really qualifies as an explanation, more just the
assertion that "somehow" the piles are converting various elements and
compounds into their vapor form, even though the temperatures within the
piles should have been much too cool for this to happen. But without
that crucial step of vaporization (followed by condensation) there is no
way to form such extremely small particles. And why are these metal
vapors not oxidizing when they reach the air?
Remember that liquid metal was found at least six weeks after the
collapses, but to generate vapor means heating the metals all the way to
their boiling points. And the energy to keep metal at even the melting
point for so long is quite substantial, and cannot be explained by
combustion. No matter how hot it may have been right after the collapse
(even mini-nuke hot), high gradients mean high heat flows and things
would have cooled off much faster than they did.
If there wasn't enough fuel to generate steel-melting temperatures when
the buildings were still standing, there is surely not enough to
generate these kinds of temperatures weeks later, and in a pit that
allowed very little air circulation. Such high temperatures anywhere in
the pit would create a high heat flux toward the surface, and would need
a continuing source of energy to maintain the gradient.
And what's with the strange distribution of elements? The abundances
don't correlate with any of the things they should: the abundances in
the WTC materials, the melting points, the chlorine-enhanced
volatility. (see pages 27 and on from Cahill's PowerPoint -
(http://delta.ucdavis.edu/WTC%20aersols%20ACS%202003.ppt ) When you add
the otherwise unexplained presence of Americium, the possibility must be
considered that there was actually some kind of nuclear chemistry, i.e.
transmutation of elements, going on during or after the collapses.
One other thought about the particles: whatever process was continuing
to produce these very fine particles by something resembling evaporation
and condensation was also continuing to produce much bigger (2.5 to 5
micron) particles that could not arise this way. Cahill notes that
these bigger particles would normally disappear after a rain, but
reappeared after rain in early and again in mid-October. This would
suggest that there was an ongoing disintegration process that was
releasing larger as well as smaller particles, something that could
weaken the bond energy of the various substances and allow them to
"smoulder" away into a kind of smoke at temperatures well below their
normal boiling points.
Best wishes,
Jeff king
>> The scalar variable was edited out of Maxwell's equations, along with
>> quanternion math which could represent vectors in scalar format.