To me it seems impossible that I would have begun to think without having suffered. And I am just meaning the curiosity I began to have, not necessarily this idea of self-development that I found here. But also I wonder--if I was completely happy (which I'm definitely not) would "the Work" still appeal to me. The answer I think, is that I still would value it, but my attitude might be different. Right now I kind of look on it as the only solution for myself. the only option or thing to hold onto.
So I have to reiterate that, curiosity for what is beyond life, and the idea and concepts of self development is different. though to an extent it does go together--like with Ouspensky fascinated with his idea of eternal recurrence, but also him seeing the Work as valuable. So maybe these two things don't need to be distinguished so much.
That is my preface, what I want to share is the quote from Thomas de Hartmann's book on meeting Gurdjieff.
Then I thought: You have to speak ...
I made a great effort and forced myself to say to him that I wished to be admitted to his Work.
Mr Gurdjieff asked the reason for my request. Perhaps I was not happy in life? Or was there some other special reason? I answered that I was perfectly happy, happily married, that I had enough money to live on without having to earn my living, and that I had my music, which was the centre of my life. But, I added, all this was not enough. 'Without inner growth,' I said, 'there is no life at all for me; both my wife and I are searching for a way to develop.
It's kind of confounding to me, that he is perfectly happy but also is looking for something. And I think at this point he did not know much of the content of Gurdjieffs lectures, or much about the Work. just to note that. At first I kind of denied this could be possible. But in my current mindset I see that it might be. of course this idea of happiness is kind of strange... but I asked someone I know who professes to be completely happy, I said 'you are happy, but still looking for something?'. and she said yes...so that is my evidence, not very good. But she has a very destructive lifestyle (drugs etc) so I got to thinking she is happy but she is also 'killing herself' and maybe there is this underlying search for something more.
I imagine Thomas de Hartmann is perhaps similar to some of the forum members that express from a very young age feeling something was wrong with the world-or looking for something.
For me I don't think it was like this. I feel I was very oblivious to this idea truth and lies. or that I never once saw my insignificance. I was actually dissociated my whole childhood i like to think. videogames and fiction books and imaginary games with my brother. some 'positive' some maybe 'negative'. but it was directly because of a period of suffering I began to think a little differently. I felt I had to face reality of my life and it wasn't sustaining to not do this. And I suppose it might come down to experiencing unfairness or misrepresentation, or something like that, which is a commonality it seems. but if I did as a child none of it struck me profoundly that I have a certain memory.
I do remember a few times in childhood I would consider 'what is life', what is movement, thoughts, this earth, so on... but it was a certain state of mind not just the questions themselves, and I could not just bring it on. And it was almost like I would loose my grip on reality. it would be staggering. but then I would come back to my normal awareness. It also had to do with imagining the vastness of space and 'seeing' a picture of the stars and space. It's a weird phenomenon. kind of subtle, so maybe I am over dramatizing.
For the fun of it, what woke me up this morning? :P The end of my dream and then my restless mind telling me I better get up and do stuff. Definitely not that interesting lol.