The meaning of these protests eludes analysts outside the country, because these are the first such protests in Europe, the protests of Generation Z (perhaps the second in the world, because student protests of this type were recorded in Bangladesh recently). This is not a colored revolution, because it is characterized by two things:
1) the desire to change those in power - for the opposition to become the government, and the government to be driven into the opposition - there is no such thing here, because the students do not want a change of government by another government that was previously replaced in the elections - among them are leftists and rightists, those from the center, and atheists and believers etc.
2) the desire to change the foreign policy course of the country - there is no such thing either, because there are also Europhiles and Russophiles and everyone else here. All these things are left to be dealt with afterwards. Even Dugin misses the point, everyone has a cognitive bias, but they can't understand such young people.
Rebellion is anti-system. The system of the Third Republic, from 2000 to today, forced partocracy, corruption, the rule of the fit and ignorant, and the taking of "corruption rent" that was constantly increasing, with the dying of institutions. The idea is to reduce or abolish everything described, and introduce a new system. Corruption rent is not 0% even in Finland, but here it has taken the forms seen in African countries. The rule of the incompetent is endemic, and if someone wonders why someone would sacrifice a year at the university: here's why - because why get a degree in electrical engineering if Grcic can be the director of EPS and the like?
Therefore, it does not matter whether this or that party will be dominant in the parliament and who will be the president, if the system works. But, if the system works, then there won't be so much desire for power because it doesn't allow the rule of the worst, criminal irresponsibility and enrichment through corruption rents. The current president can remain in office, if he sticks to the constitutional framework, the heir to the throne can be appointed as a figure of unification, a monarchy can be declared or a republic can remain, it is irrelevant. There is no difference between the republics of Iceland and Finland on the one hand, and the monarchies of Sweden, Norway and Denmark on the other - all 5 work so that the system works (the same).
), but I think its the Fourth. There was that stint called "Serbia and Montenegro" between the two Republics.
