What's new in Channel Watching? Maybe nothing means something.

[Avi]

Here is a bit more info, though it is noteworthy that this site seems to promote a Pole Shift as imminent. The questions were asked back in March 2008 (paraphrased) on a scale of 1 to 10 how close are we to a pole shift? The answer, 22 March 2008.
(interesting date, BTW, as this relates to the Georgia Guidestones)

"If you consider that you are perhaps between a 2 and a 3, it could be considered to rise to a 6 by the end of the year. 10 being the pole shift, of course. This is taking into consideration all Earth changes, such as weather, winds, floods, earthquakes and stretch zone accidents, and political and economic upheaval."

That is why the link below says 7 out of 10. According to this info, since the Japan tsunami we are now at 8 out of 10, but AGAIN, in relation to a POLE SHIFT, something that is not in any way a clear cut deal.

_http://zetatalk.com/7of10/7of10.htm


The size of the quakes and tsunami that will strike Japan was addressed with UFO warnings for North America as they will also experience quakes and a tsunami. Vancouver and Hawaii were also detailed.

The New Madrid earthquake follows the big quakes in Japan and will continue to adjust up until the pole shift after one big jolt which also causes the St Lawrence Seaway to split and how there will be no doubt it has occurred. The west coast reacts to the large quake which will tear communication cables but no volcanic activity is expected in the Eastern US. The Zetas were also asked about Florida, Chicago and how it would compare to the pole shift.

Just hours afterwards, the North Atlantic Rift tears sending a tsunami racing towards Europe, propelled by the gulf stream. The Zetas describe how it hits the Bristol Channel, the Irish Sea and passes through the English Channel to hit the east coast of Britain, devastate Denmark and what the residents of Denmark can expect. Sweden and France will be hit (among others) but Iceland and the Arctic Circle will be unaffected. Advice is given on how to warn people and how far inland to be although water will wash inland along rivers. There will be repeat tsunami but smaller and how the different countries will react is mentioned.

I am posting this real quick but need to read up on Nancy and the Zetas per the forum, then I might come back and modify the post, or it might be worthwhile to keep it up.

 

[Avi]

Oh, I see, having read up on this thread:

http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=5622.0



Well, this sums it up for me:

Good one, mark :)

It isn't so much that Nancy's stuff sounds too nutty to believe -- there's plenty of real nutty stuff out there -- it's that she cites the Zetas only (who've been dreadfully wrong so many times), and presents no research.

So if she's been wrong (and dreadfully so!) so many times yet seems to like to make predictions then perhaps the recent "hit" on Japan is a mere matter of statistics. As in, throw enough darts at the dartboard and one of em is bound to stick. Gonna keep the previous post as is but if a moderator feels it should be changed I am happy to do so.

 

[PopHistorian]

It could be a coincidence or it could be many other things. One argument in favor of coincidence is that the popularity of this "source" seemed to drop to near zero after Planet X didn't show up on the predicted date, and I can't think of a reason for a rehabilitation of Nancy, who may be continuing only because she doesn't know how to do anything else. She said she learned about the "sequence of 10" by attending a presentation given by a green, bug-eyed, water-dwelling hominoid in a dress who communicated to her audience via telepathy, but, according to this video of hers: _http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDf9UHyFORg, which I can barely follow, it seems that #7 hasn't exactly happened.

Wow, it seems like about eighteen months ago that I noticed Nancy was back and had started producing these videos, but it's actually been closer to four years! Time seems to be speeding. I'm not really interested in monitoring Nancy's predictions. The "success" of this particular one, given second-hand in simplified form by someone on a forum, is not swaying me to start. :)