astrozombie
Jedi
I have two sisters and two brothers. We were each set up with a trust fund account that we could access when we turned 25 or graduated from college, whichever occurs first.
I am 34 and never graduated from college but due to my "need" to prove that I don't need my family's money, I have never really touched my trust fund. I have made some small withdrawals here and there, small in comparison to the money available in any case, but I have never relied on it for personal support.
Most of my siblings have blown through their funds and my withdrawals have been an attempt to mostly help them out. I'm sick of it. The money matters little to me but their inability to show any gratitude and their failure to make good use of my help in the past has caused some "friction" to put it mildly.
In preparation for some major changes that I am currently making in my life, I went to make a withdrawal. It has always been as easy going to the bank with identification and a wd slip. However, yesterday, I found out that there is a clause saying that I must also be of "sound mind" to have access. I got in touch with my attorney and as it turns out, my father is the only one that can invoke said clause and I must see a quack of his choosing. Does that sound like a loaded gun or what?
My attorney assured me that the trust is set up in a way that the money can never be "revoked" (I believe that is the word he used) but that I better get ready to jump through some hoops.
But why all this now? We have had our rifts but have always worked through them. I have made no mention of my "life changes" to anyone other than a dear friend (who is also a part of these changes). I trust her very much and never once suspected her.
After I calmed down my initial response was "to heck with them, I don't need their money anyway" but I can put it to some good use and that's what I'm going to do. But I still needed to get to the bottom of this "clause" issue.
As it turns out, my eldest brother has been monitoring my computer. I only had basic protection as I am not one to suspect that the world is against me but boy was I wrong.
Last year, my brother convinced me to run a program on my computer that in effect made it a proxy of his own. When my IT guy discovered the program, it even gave my "permission" for this to occur. If I sound like a total ass who doesn't know what he is talking about when it comes to computers, that's because I don't.
Well, this program works both ways and when my techy checked it out, the only thing we could access from my brother's computer was a link to the film "Donnie Darko". I think it is his way of calling me a wacko.
My question is, should I see this quack? I have respect for the field but when I have to see a psychiatrist of their choosing, I know the cards are stacked against me. Like I said, I don't need the money but I want to put it to good use.
BTW, I was advised that I do have legal recourse against my brother but if I see this quack and his analyses is as I suspect, his actions will be deemed justified.
I have never been to a mental Doc before but my plan is to see two reputable of my own and then submit myself to the dog show.
Thoughts, please.
I am 34 and never graduated from college but due to my "need" to prove that I don't need my family's money, I have never really touched my trust fund. I have made some small withdrawals here and there, small in comparison to the money available in any case, but I have never relied on it for personal support.
Most of my siblings have blown through their funds and my withdrawals have been an attempt to mostly help them out. I'm sick of it. The money matters little to me but their inability to show any gratitude and their failure to make good use of my help in the past has caused some "friction" to put it mildly.
In preparation for some major changes that I am currently making in my life, I went to make a withdrawal. It has always been as easy going to the bank with identification and a wd slip. However, yesterday, I found out that there is a clause saying that I must also be of "sound mind" to have access. I got in touch with my attorney and as it turns out, my father is the only one that can invoke said clause and I must see a quack of his choosing. Does that sound like a loaded gun or what?
My attorney assured me that the trust is set up in a way that the money can never be "revoked" (I believe that is the word he used) but that I better get ready to jump through some hoops.
But why all this now? We have had our rifts but have always worked through them. I have made no mention of my "life changes" to anyone other than a dear friend (who is also a part of these changes). I trust her very much and never once suspected her.
After I calmed down my initial response was "to heck with them, I don't need their money anyway" but I can put it to some good use and that's what I'm going to do. But I still needed to get to the bottom of this "clause" issue.
As it turns out, my eldest brother has been monitoring my computer. I only had basic protection as I am not one to suspect that the world is against me but boy was I wrong.
Last year, my brother convinced me to run a program on my computer that in effect made it a proxy of his own. When my IT guy discovered the program, it even gave my "permission" for this to occur. If I sound like a total ass who doesn't know what he is talking about when it comes to computers, that's because I don't.
Well, this program works both ways and when my techy checked it out, the only thing we could access from my brother's computer was a link to the film "Donnie Darko". I think it is his way of calling me a wacko.
My question is, should I see this quack? I have respect for the field but when I have to see a psychiatrist of their choosing, I know the cards are stacked against me. Like I said, I don't need the money but I want to put it to good use.
BTW, I was advised that I do have legal recourse against my brother but if I see this quack and his analyses is as I suspect, his actions will be deemed justified.
I have never been to a mental Doc before but my plan is to see two reputable of my own and then submit myself to the dog show.
Thoughts, please.