Perceval said:
This is just one of hundreds or thousands of such incidents that Iraqi civilians have experienced at the hands of US soldiers, military helicopters and jets. At a minimum, half of the 1.3 million dead in Iraq were killed directly by the US military, the other half were mostly killed by US-sponsored death squads as they attempted to create the "reality" of a civil war in Iraq as per the orders from the office of the Vice President. So just multiply this video by several thousand times, with much larger number of dead and you get an overall picture of the "Iraq war".
This is unfortunately "just" one of hundreds or thousands of such incidents. Taken with consideration for Vietnam as well and there is cause for shame, but there is also cause for awakening to just how effective the brainwashing of the Jewish media has been, and in that regard I think this WikiLeak demands close scrutiny.
Perceval said:
What we are talking about is US jets etc going in and bombing entire neighborhoods in Iraq and US soldiers and mercenaries "killing anything that moved". The American butchers in the US military and government knew from day one (in fact long before then) that the "Iraq war" was against the ordinary civilian population of Iraq because THAT was the resistance. NOTHING you have been told about Iraq by the mainstream media is true. NOTHING. If you want to begin to understand the horror of it all, and that is a big "if", then you first have to forget everything you think you know about what has gone on there over the past 7 years.
Right, everything we think we know has come through Zionist propaganda filters insulating American collective consciousness from the barbarity. Nothing we've been told is true, and we've been so conditioned to focus attention on warm humorous cartoon clowns that we're all primed for outrage at being exposed to such soul-less brutality of the gunship footage. Which makes the WikiLeaks disclosure that much more curious to me.
To me the WikiLeaks release of the gunship slaughterfest seems a purposeful imposition of a snuff-video. If we've opened our eyes to the realities of the snuff-video 9/11 provided, and we understand what Perceval points out about the gunship incident being one of thousands, then why does a 2007 incident warrant a major PR push by WikiLeaks now? I can imagine several COINTELPRO justifications if I were king.
1) Traumatize common sensibility
2) Provoke outrage at a past event distracting from current operations
3) Induce shame
4) Promote idea Fourth Estate is alive and well
5) Divert everyone exercising close scrutiny of emerging events
Reviewing the SOTT articles focusing on the WikiLeaks release I was struck by Julian Assange's interview with Russia Today in many ways. Partly I find his moralizing fascinating, but in particular his answer to the question about WikiLeaks becoming the flag-bearer of the Fourth Estate caught my ear wondering whether he really said what he said, and so I had to listen close.
WikiLeaks editor speaks out about Apache massacre video
[quote author=Julian Assange, WikiLeaks editor speaks out about Apache massacre video]
Reporters that don't have new information to some degree have nothing useful to say.
And what keeps people honest, and what keeps our management over civilization going is we understand how the world actually works. So the first step in the 4th estate is to get information out about the real world. And the second step is to comment on it and to think about it. That we need sources that can get restricted information out to the public.
Restricted information is very interesting economically. So when information is held back by a bank or the Pentagon, and extra attention is used to suppress it, in this particular case Reuters applied for this information through the Freedom of Information Act and spent the last two and a half years trying to get it and were not able to.
Usually that suppression is a result of fear, so in this particular case, seems that the Pentagon or the US military at some level was scared of this information coming out because of the reform effect of the information.
[/quote]
So trying to follow Assange here, the reason we needed this snuff-vid now is so that he can confront the fears of the Pentagon, and we need to trust him because he understand how the world actually works and that's what keeps his management over civilization going. And don't mind all the economic interests surrounding his restricted information. K, thanks got it.