Hmm, I'm not sure whether I use "unthaw" or not. I think I usually say "thaw out", but I never realized unthaw was wrong.
Recently words have really been coming to life for me. I will say or think a word and suddenly want to know why that word means what it means. The
Online Etymology Dictionary by Douglas Harper has been very helpful for this. Learning the etymology of words really clarifies them and reveals things that definitions cannot, particularly connections to original meanings and to other words. So I've begun thinking of words in terms of root words, trying to notice when words are connected, and then checking etymology to see if I'm correct. Also, considering words in terms of their sounds is interesting; there are connections between the meanings of words and the consonants and vowels used in them, although they are very loose.
Some examples of my word-connection discoveries;
infer : transfer : defer : refer - all connected by the Latin "ferre", meaning 'to carry or bear'.
polite : politics - I was surprised to find that the dictionary didn't present any direct connection between these words. Polite comes from Latin "politus" meaning 'polished'. Politics comes from Latin "politicus", from Greek "politikos", both meaning 'of citizens or the state', from Greek "polites", 'citizen', from "polis", meaning 'city'. I still suspect a connection between the two words.
several : sever : separate - all connected by Latin "separare", 'to pull apart', which is from prefix "se-", meaning 'apart' (connected to the word "secret") and "parare", meaning "to make ready, to prepare" (root of the word pare as in "paring knife").
happy : happen - both from 14th century word "hap", meaning 'luck, chance'. Afterwards I realized that "haphazard" is also related, which the dictionary confirms. This last definition is perhaps the most interesting from an esoteric point of view, as it connects to Gurdjieff's teaching that man is a machine (and that mechanical action is chaotic) and everything "happens" through him rather than being done by him.
In Daniel Tammet's book,
Embracing The Wide Open Sky, he cites some research indicating that people have natural tendancies and instincts concerning the sounds that make up words, and that sound does relate to meaning. I'm finding the concept fun to explore a bit. The following are just my observations.
The sounds of 'i', 'e', 't', and 'k' seem to be often connected with smallness and pointedness, whereas 'o', 'u', 'b', and 'L' tend toward the large, round, and powerful. The letters 'a' seems to swings around a bit, but seems to often express length, rigidity, and squareness, and combines with letter 'L' a lot.
tiny, teeny, twinkle, sprinkles, sip, tip, pin, tine, tick, inch, kit, mite, tike, spike, stick, bit, spite, spit, needle, knit, trickle, chip, girl.
round, bounce, ball, huge, block, loud, rush, boulder, chunk, crowd, power, tumble, rumble, crumble, thunder, hour, tower, plow, bomb, spoon.
small, tall, mall, stall, large, barge, charge, all, wall, law, lasso, margin, saw, man, rail, tail, scale, sail, tape, late, massive, flat.
Anyway, it's sort of interesting to me, although learning etymology is the most useful, I think.