Is There an Ideal Way of Acting and Being in Male-Female Relationships?

Your lack of respect for Sandra is in no way representative of the members of this forum. 2 of Sandra's books are on the recommended reading list, and I've read them and agree that they are must reads. I ask you to leave this thread and post in other threads, because this thread is about Sandra's book and I find that it is an honor to have Sandra interacting with the rest of us who treat her with respect.
I agree. I am ashamed that Sandra read what you wrote in a thread specifically concerned to discussions about her books about dangerous men.

It was disrespectful and could perhaps even put her off any further interactions with this forum. That would be our loss! Badly done.
 
The decision we make depends on the consciousness we have...and being with someone allowing them to know you and vice versa entails a decision on both sides.
Let's suppose that our antenna attracts in concecuence certain frequencies or people but we should evaluate how we are, is everything ok? There is not a continuous flow of moods, factors that intervene and the responses get out of whack. So maybe it is better to decide when there is some progress of balance in our lives because we are more open to make better informed decisions to be with someone.
 
I am not following any ideologies and I am not looking for any rewards.

The way you wrote your essay, you might as well have copied it straight out of a textbook on pickup-artistry, and that’s the give-away. The way that it reads shows that it’s all internalised from books or videos on the topic. It’s all just theory. It’s a low-resolution framework that maps onto reality just enough to boost weak men’s confidence and get them laid by a certain percentage of women. It’s an ideology, and you, in the words of Jordan Peterson, are now ideologically possessed.

As for the idea that you aren’t looking for any rewards, you said that you’d arranged three dates in quick succession. I suppose you’re going on these dates for the benefit of these one-dimensional women you know so much about?

I am far from seeing it black and white but showing some not so nice facts of reality.

What facts? The only fact you’ve really stated is that a woman would prefer to be in a relationship with a man who isn’t useless. This fact is then spun as some sort of secret, inside-knowledge that is hard for snowflakes to swallow.

And hiding behind a justification of, “I’m just saying the truth, as hard as it is for some to accept” is itself one of the subtle brainwashing, manipulative techniques of pick-up artistry, whether you believe it’s meant for picking up women or not.

It comes from a place of self-assured ‘righteousness’, demonstrating the artist’s lack of fear of being rejected, and it has the effect on the naive or weak-minded of making them question their assumptions. It’s hypnosis 101: once you can make a vulnerable person question their assumptions and beliefs, you can then vector their thinking in the direction you want it to go in. Ironically, this is exactly what happened to you when you were exposed to this material.
 
Suppose you want to be with a girl you like would you like a relationship with her? Very but keep in mind your intention will it be for a spiritual or carnal progress of both of you? do you share in common spurituality? Suppose she is a jehovah witness and you are a scientific atheist.
Because based on your desires you will probably get more of the same from that which reflects on yourself your fears, your desires, in short (your FRV) that is your antenna and if the antenna is not cleaned from time to time the weather can affect it and the waves would not be quite right to attract someone with the characteristics of consciousness if you are selective about the work for example Mouravieff and (the way of love).
Well then you say that girl I like is all you want but if your antenna signal is of lack for example (you carry within you shadows of old painful relationships, etc.) you will be attracting like minded women with similar problems that reflect you that represent your reflection of your projections of unresolved issues.
Jesus said ask and it will be given to you...but first SEEK THE KINGDOM OF GOD AND HIS RIGHTEOUSNESS AND THEN EVERYTHING WILL COME TO YOU BY ADDITION i.e. who you are is the kingdom of God your conscience and if your conscience is not quite right the righteousness will be very wrong then the related addition will be a bad harvest and every tree without fruit (unconscious actions).
Tip: don't put a chain of guilt around your neck but rather become aware of your mistakes and learn to decide (the law of accident) or the (general law).
Your actions determine the flow of energy that consequently no one lifts a stone without planets rising.
Everybody here has a dog's face nobody is clean wheat everything represents a mirror the tiger has spots don't forget it become aware.
 
I believe that the theme of soul mates is the true Holy Grail is to search for something true that is not to prove yourself if you are the best knight in the world or if you are worthy to save humanity it is simply to find the truth in yourself because both man and woman represent that integration and understanding.
Why would I want power over others? Or power to change the world? It is not necessary life itself is perfect
 
Your lack of respect for Sandra is in no way representative of the members of this forum. 2 of Sandra's books are on the recommended reading list, and I've read them and agree that they are must reads. I ask you to leave this thread and post in other threads, because this thread is about Sandra's book and I find that it is an honor to have Sandra interacting with the rest of us who treat her with respect.
If I disagree about some things, and I agree with a lot of said, it is not disrespect and I was not having conversation with her in the first place.
It sounds like women for you is not about relationships but about sex and about satisfying a hunger that you have at times just like hunger for food. In that way you are using women for sex just like some women will choose to do. In the above the entre was good and now you have already ordered the main course and the desert, hoping both to be satisfactory, while you cancelled the petit fours with the coffee.
So you can read my mind? I do not think so and some should work on their assumptions. I do not date for sex(and I know many man and women do today) because to me it is too shallow and I look for something serious and if someone dates more then one people it is maybe because that every person you date is not right match for you. I do not see women in a degrading way as sex objects and I do not mastrubate, watch porn and control my urges so to use that energy in positive way.
The way you wrote your essay, you might as well have copied it straight out of a textbook on pickup-artistry, and that’s the give-away. The way that it reads shows that it’s all internalised from books or videos on the topic. It’s all just theory. It’s a low-resolution framework that maps onto reality just enough to boost weak men’s confidence and get them laid by a certain percentage of women. It’s an ideology, and you, in the words of Jordan Peterson, are now ideologically possessed.
I talk from experience and not just theory. There are bad man and women and there are good man and women, and I know it is not white and black and I do not generalize, but most are selfish in their nature core and thanks to programming and brainwashing this is domminating in all spheres of life people are guided by shallow principles and today it is in extreme, especially among younger generations that are lost, and while those romantic novels are the thing how it should function based on deeper understanding and love, that is far from this reality and is more of a fiction for most part in this world with few exceptions. You in the west are those who are most possesed by ideologies that you need someone like Peterson to teach you about common sense and that says all about your ideologies.
What facts? The only fact you’ve really stated is that a woman would prefer to be in a relationship with a man who isn’t useless. This fact is then spun as some sort of secret, inside-knowledge that is hard for snowflakes to swallow.
It is not about that.
It comes from a place of self-assured ‘righteousness’, demonstrating the artist’s lack of fear of being rejected, and it has the effect on the naive or weak-minded of making them question their assumptions. It’s hypnosis 101: once you can make a vulnerable person question their assumptions and beliefs, you can then vector their thinking in the direction you want it to go in. Ironically, this is exactly what happened to you when you were exposed to this material.
You have many assumptions but we can agree to disagree at least.
 
Last edited:
You sound to me like a guy who has idealized women in the past, was disappointed [something that is necessary in breaking illusion] and now, because of the fear of a new disappointment, you think badly of ALL women.
With your bad attitude, assumptions and limitations, you are creating future bad situations with women.
Also, I agree that there's a lot of "bad" [people without knowledge] but there also people craving for the knowledge and Love [which is the same].
You could choose to be ignorant and be the part of the world that's ignorant too, but you could also choose to be the one that want to know, experience with open eyes and mind and than maybe you will find someone who will help you to heal your wounds and change your perspective.
 
If I disagree about some things, and I agree with a lot of said, it is not disrespect and I was not having conversation with her in the first place.
Hi Corvus,

If you don't believe that there was anything wrong with that interaction then you're wrong. I think it would be a good idea to ponder on the feedback you've received and review the situation as it actually happened. Then compare that to what you thought was happening.

As TC pointed out, it's a red flag when you're wrong about common sense reality in the service to some ideology. That would be a sign to me that I need to make some changes in my thinking and the information I'm consuming. Because where people are hypnotized/spellbound by an ideology you can probably bet there is a spellbinder involved. FWIW
 
If I disagree about some things, and I agree with a lot of said, it is not disrespect and I was not having conversation with her in the first place.

So you can read my mind? I do not think so and some should work on their assumptions. I do not date for sex(and I know many man and women do today) because to me it is too shallow and I look for something serious and if someone dates more then one people it is maybe because that every person you date is not right match for you. I do not see women in a degrading way as sex objects and I do not mastrubate, watch porn and control my urges so to use that energy in positive way.

I talk from experience and not just theory. There are bad man and women and there are good man and women, and I know it is not white and black and I do not generalize, but most are selfish in their nature core and thanks to programming and brainwashing this is domminating in all spheres of life people are guided by shallow principles and today it is in extreme, especially among younger generations that are lost, and while those romantic novels are the thing how it should function based on deeper understanding and love, that is far from this reality and is more of a fiction for most part in this world with few exceptions. You in the west are those who are most possesed by ideologies that you need someone like Peterson to teach you about common sense and that says all about your ideologies.

It is not about that.

You have many assumptions but we can agree to disagree at least.
Starting from the courtship the softness the touch the glances, the romance there is also joy smiles and the sky takes on a new brightness who has not seen those beautiful turquoise eyes of a woman and that curly hair her bright smile and has not been amazed as if the stars did not have to be dimmed? But you also have to see the other side of a person...she has positives and negatives...what do we expect? I remember when I was a kid I gave a fantasy ring to a girl and she crushed it she got mad and (....) then the ray of hope fades the birds stop singing and little red riding hood becomes a real predator...but it is a meaningless judgment it usually happens .... I fell in love many times and a couple of times more my heart broke but that does not mean that one does not rediscover love and that light that shines from the resurrected heart with the sound of bells!...who did not go through a spiritual bankruptcy? Present me yes, who has not lost? Present I have and that is why I believe in love I have never given up and even when defeated I would continue to believe because in a certain way we are love! a miracle something inexplicable! We are in the fight, look at the illuminati panorama, negative extraterrestrials, etc...Even so, that is what it is about to turn the result around...and I am not afraid to face all the elite and do you know why? Because I have not lost the love so there is no such thing as defeat.
 
I do not see women in a degrading way as sex objects and I do not mastrubate, watch porn and control my urges so to use that energy in positive way.

Using your sex energy in the right way is a great achievement.

But as you say "statistics don't lie," and more often than not people who practice abstinence only end up using that energy to fuel imagination and useless work in their other centers.

"Is complete sexual abstinence necessary for transmutation and is sexual abstinence, in general, useful for work on oneself?" we asked him.

"Here there is not one but a number of questions," said G. "In the first place sexual abstinence is necessary for transmutation only in certain cases, that is, for certain types of people. For others it is not at all necessary. And with yet others it comes by itself when transmutation begins.

"I will explain this more clearly. For certain types a long and complete sexual abstinence is necessary for transmutation to begin; this means in other words that without a long and complete sexual abstinence transmutation will not begin. But once it has begun abstinence is no longer necessary. In other cases, that is, with other types, transmutation can begin in a normal sexual life - and on the contrary, can begin sooner and proceed better with a very great outward expenditure of sex energy. In the third case the beginning of transmutation does not require abstinence, but, having begun, transmutation takes the whole of sexual energy and puts an end to normal sexual life or the outward expenditure of sex energy.

"Then the other question - 'Is sexual abstinence useful for the work or not?'

"It is useful if there is abstinence in all centers. If there is abstinence in one center and full liberty of imagination in the others, then there could be nothing worse. And still more, abstinence can be useful if a man knows what to do with the energy which he saves in this way. If he does not know what to do with it, nothing whatever can be gained by abstinence."

"Speaking in general, what is the most correct form of life in this connection from the point of view of the work?"

"It is impossible to say. I repeat that while a man does not know, it is better for him not to attempt anything. Until he has new and exact knowledge it will be quite enough if his life is guided by the usual rules and principles. If a man begins to theorize and invent in this sphere, it will lead to nothing except psychopathy.

"But it must again be remembered that only a person who is completely normal as regards sex has any chance in the work. Any kind of 'originality,' strange tastes, strange desires, or, on the other hand, fears, constantly working 'buffers,' must be destroyed from the very beginning. Modem education and modem life create an enormous number of sexual psychopaths. They have no chance at all in the work.

"Speaking in general, there are only two correct ways of expending sexual energy: normal sexual life and transmutation. All inventions in this sphere are very dangerous.

"People have tried abstinence from times beyond memory. Sometimes, very rarely, it has led to something but in most cases what is called abstinence is simply exchanging normal sensations for abnormal, because the abnormal are more easily hidden.

"But it is not about this that I wish to speak. You must understand where lies the chief evil and what makes for slavery. It is not in sex itself but in the abuse of sex. But what the abuse of sex means is again misunderstood. People usually take this to be either excess or perversion. But these are comparatively innocent forms of abuse of sex. And it is necessary to know the human machine very well in order to grasp what abuse of sex in the real meaning of these words is. It means the wrong work of centers in relation to sex, that is, the action of the sex center through other centers, and the action of other centers through the sex center; or, to be still more precise, the functioning of the sex center with energy borrowed from other centers and the functioning of other centers with energy borrowed from the sex center."

"Can sex be regarded as an independent center?" asked one of those present.

"It can," said G. "At the same time if all the lower story is taken as one whole, then sex can be regarded as the neutralizing part of the moving center."

"With what 'hydrogen' does the sex center work?" asked another.

This question had interested us for a long time but we had not previously been able to answer it. And G., when he had been asked before, had never given a direct reply.

"The sex center works with 'hydrogen' 12," he said on this occasion, "that is to say, it ought to work with it. This is si 12. But the fact is that it very rarely works with its proper hydrogen. Abnormalities in the working of the sex center require special study.

"In the first place it must be noted that normally in the sex center as well as in the higher emotional and the higher thinking centers, there is no negative side. In all the other centers except the higher ones, in the thinking, in the emotional, in the moving, in the instinctive, in all of them there are, so to speak, two halves—the positive and the negative; affirmation and negation, or 'yes' and 'no,' in the thinking center, pleasant and unpleasant sensations in the moving and instinctive centers. There is no such division in the sex center. There are no positive and negative sides in it. There are no unpleasant sensations or unpleasant feelings in it; there is either a pleasant sensation, a pleasant feeling, or there is nothing, an absence of any sensation, complete indifference.

"But in consequence of the wrong work of centers it often happens that the sex center unites with the negative part of the emotional center or with the negative part of the instinctive center. And then, stimulation of a certain kind of the sex center, or even any stimulation at all of the sex center, calls forth unpleasant feelings and unpleasant sensations. People who experience unpleasant feelings and sensations which have been evoked in them through ideas and imagination connected with sex are inclined to regard them as a great virtue or as something original; in actual fact it is simply disease. Everything connected with sex should be either pleasant or indifferent. Unpleasant feelings and sensations all come from the emotional center or the instinctive center.

"This is the 'abuse of sex.'

It is necessary, further, to remember that the sex center works with 'hydrogen' 12. This means that it is stronger and quicker than all other centers. Sex, in fact, governs all other centers. The only thing in ordinary circumstances -- that is, when man has neither consciousness nor will -- that holds the sex center in submission is buffers. 'Buffers' can entirely bring it to nought, that is, they can stop its normal manifestation. But they cannot destroy its energy. The energy remains and passes over to other centers, finding expression for itself through them; in other words, the other centers rob the sex center of the energy which it does not use itself.

"The energy of the sex center in the work of the thinking, emotional, and moving centers can be recognized by a particular 'taste,' by a particular fervor, by a vehemence which the nature of the affair concerned does not call for. The thinking center writes books, but in making use of the energy of the sex center it does not simply occupy itself with philosophy, science, or politics -- it is always fighting something, disputing, criticizing, creating new subjective theories.

"The emotional center preaches Christianity, abstinence, asceticism, or the fear and horror of sin, hell, the torment of sinners, eternal fire, all this with the energy of the sex center. ... Or on the other hand it works up revolutions, robs, burns, kills, again with the same energy. The moving center occupies itself with sport, creates various records, climbs mountains, jumps, fences, wrestles, fights, and so on.

"In all these instances, that is, in the work of the thinking center as well as in the work of the emotional and the moving centers, when they work with the energy of the sex center, there is always one general characteristic and this is a certain particular vehemence and, together with it, the uselessness of the work in question. Neither the thinking nor the emotional nor the moving centers can ever create anything useful with the energy of the sex center. This is an example of the 'abuse of sex.'

"But this is only one aspect of it. Another aspect consists in the fact that, when the energy of the sex center is plundered by the other centers and spent on useless work, it has nothing left for itself and has to steal the energy of other centers which is much lower and coarser than its own.

"And yet the sex center is very important for the general activity, and particularly for the inner growth of the organism, because, working with 'hydrogen' 12, it can receive a very fine food of impressions, such as none of the ordinary centers can receive. The fine food of impressions is very important for the manufacture of the higher 'hydrogens.' But when the sex center works with energy that is not its own, that is, with the comparatively low 'hydrogens' 48 and 24, its impressions become much coarser and it ceases to play the role in the organism which it could play.

"At the same time union with, and the use of its energy by, the thinking center creates far too great an imagination on the subject of sex, and in addition a tendency to be satisfied with this imagination. Union with the emotional center creates sentimentality or, on the contrary, jealousy, cruelty. This is again a picture of the 'abuse of sex.'"

"What must be done to struggle against the 'abuse of sex'?" asked somebody present.

G. laughed.

"I was just waiting for that question," he said. "But you already ought to understand that it is just as impossible to explain to a man who has not yet begun to work on himself and does not know the structure of the machine what the 'abuse of sex' means, as it is to say what must be done to avoid these abuses.

"Right work on oneself begins with the creation of a permanent center of gravity. When a permanent center of gravity has been created everything else begins to be disposed and distributed in subordination to it. The question comes to this: From what and how can a permanent center of gravity be created? And to this may be replied that only a man's attitude to the work, to school, his valuation of the work, and his realization of the mechanicalness and aimlessness of everything else can create in him a permanent center of gravity.

"The role of the sex center in creating a general equilibrium and a permanent center of gravity can be very big. According to its energy, that is to say, if it uses its own energy, the sex center stands on a level with the higher emotional center. And all the other centers are subordinate to it. Therefore it would be a great thing if it worked with its own energy. This alone would indicate a comparatively very high level of being. And in this case, that is, if the sex center worked with its own energy and in its own place, all other centers could work correctly in their places and with their own energies."
 
Corvus I believe is a cop. In his line of work he is taught to be decisive and a leader, otherwise lives get lost. He may be employing this mentality here where he doesn't doubt or question himself.

I personally think what he said was too black and white, not enough grey. He painted a very broad brush, missed the finer details and nuances. @Corvus are you surprised people are reacting the way they are? You literally insulted all women. 🤷

As someone not invested on whether you change your mind or not, the only advice I can give is you were too black / white in your assessment and you also sounded kind of angry too.

Also, your interaction with the author of that book was kind of tyrannical - how does it feel to be a tyrant? You were very rude and disrespectful that it was like 🤯. She was a guest here and you know what people think of her, including Laura and you came right in and did a big 💩. 🤦‍♂️
 
I was reading a little more carefully this post and it seems that the disclaimer you have made is a sign that writing is a therapy where you can release what you clench between your fists and teeth, ie you know what can be generated by throwing bricks so you did not give up the idea to try to justify it, then what is the problem? I mean we all live influenced by "the world" and if you have seen that in the women where you have been it seems that you carry a lot of pain and resentment and the need to feel loved and pampered by a woman otherwise what sense does it make to express so much anger who has not felt alone? I suggest corvus that you swallow your breath and apologize to the women of the forum and also remember what the C's said to avoid entering into negative spirals (we are in end times) and it is time to throw away this false programming, note that here is a woman who is appreciated in the forum Sandra B and for something they speak well of her, she seems to have a lot of study and knows a lot.
I still want you to apologize.
Hypothetically
I would accept the apology if someone was sincere that it was not right to accuse me (that he did not care) is the least of it because if it were so he would not bother to throw me to the lions.
But many times pride wins over status....
But it's easy to say (I'm sorry) and I will take conscience.
 
I agree. I am ashamed that Sandra read what you wrote in a thread specifically concerned to discussions about her books about dangerous men.

It was disrespectful and could perhaps even put her off any further interactions with this forum. That would be our loss! Badly done.
You could almost place a bet that a 'Corvus' of some description would show up. Sandra begins contributing highly meaningful dialogue to this forum and up pops Corvus with his repulsive, stereotypical pick-up artistry views on women. Despite his complete failure to read the room and the initial responses he gets, he doubles down thinking he's going to provide some sort of balance to the "lefty" perspectives, adding to the noise which is on some level intended to smother the signal of informative discussion. General Law in action.

Of course Corvus, totally lacking in insight and unable to view the larger context, sees none of this and is really just acting as a puppet for forces of which he has the barest theoretical knowledge.

So you can read my mind? I do not think so and some should work on their assumptions.
It might be an assumption of yours that Aeneas cannot read your mind.
 
Starting from the courtship the softness the touch the glances, the romance there is also joy smiles and the sky takes on a new brightness who has not seen those beautiful turquoise eyes of a woman and that curly hair her bright smile and has not been amazed as if the stars did not have to be dimmed? But you also have to see the other side of a person...she has positives and negatives...what do we expect? I remember when I was a kid I gave a fantasy ring to a girl and she crushed it she got mad and (....) then the ray of hope fades the birds stop singing and little red riding hood becomes a real predator...but it is a meaningless judgment it usually happens .... I fell in love many times and a couple of times more my heart broke but that does not mean that one does not rediscover love and that light that shines from the resurrected heart with the sound of bells!...who did not go through a spiritual bankruptcy? Present me yes, who has not lost? Present I have and that is why I believe in love I have never given up and even when defeated I would continue to believe because in a certain way we are love! a miracle something inexplicable! We are in the fight, look at the illuminati panorama, negative extraterrestrials, etc...Even so, that is what it is about to turn the result around...and I am not afraid to face all the elite and do you know why? Because I have not lost the love so there is no such thing as defeat.
@Jimmy Ssaz, what are you talking about and why are you talking about it in this thread?

@Corvus, it is obvious to anyone who reads what you write that you are angry at women. If you want to truly look at that and see where it comes from and what you can do about it, let's continue this conversation. If you don't want to, that's fine, but we are not interested in reading your fallacious men/women/relationships perspectives. And keep in mind that no matter how shallow you paint the women you date, I am pretty sure they will also see - like we do - your own shallowness and bitterness sooner than later. It's so noticeable and so unattractive!

Also, your interaction with the author of that book was kind of tyrannical - how does it feel to be a tyrant? You were very rude and disrespectful that it was like 🤯. She was a guest here and you know what people think of her, including Laura and you came right in and did a big 💩. 🤦‍♂️

Yeap, and what sottreader says.
 
Back
Top Bottom