The presence of aliens near us was there in tv many many years ago. I remember a series that I loved very much (I was 10 years old) called The Invaders
Since New Jersey was apparently chosen for the 'testing of the will' due to a highly programmed (and vaxxed) population - and some kind of testing of sending signals to vaxxed people was also conducted - one interpretation is that the 'testing of the will' was primarily about how much the programmed and vaxxed people can be controlled or influenced.So if we read the recent session exerpt in light of the older one, then the (presumably) STS ufo's of the recent flap are also, perhaps, trying to gage if the public's natural protective instincts are kicking in, and if so, by how much.
So if we read the recent session exerpt in light of the older one, then the (presumably) STS ufo's of the recent flap are also, perhaps, trying to gage if the public's natural protective instincts are kicking in, and if so, by how much.
Corbell's upset at being 'cut out' of the congressional record regarding the 'Immaculate Constellation' UAP program:There's' a lot of commotion and hyping going on about the upcoming days. I like Coulthard, as he appears more trustworthy than e.g. Corbell, not to mention Greer. Corbell and Greer are acting "all mysterious" about a super-duper revelation that's going to "change everything". Corbell, acting "reluctant" and "very careful" tells in a hush-hush voice in a dramatic video how they're going to convince peple that a huge alien spaceship is approaching Earth and will be here in 2027.
Okay, so maybe the 'Nephilims' are finally coming, or maybe they're staging a 'beeg show' just like the C's have predicted? I just don't trust Corbell and Greer, so why are they hyping these things up now? Is it to take away the thunder of Coulthard's interview that shold be aired tonight? I could be wrong, but Corbell always felt like an attention seeker, so maybe he's just doing it for 'likes' and 'clicks'?
If they did deliberately exclude him, and it wasn't an innocent oversight, as being the one who submitted the documents, he doesn't give his opinion as to why. Anyone here able to guess why?
Interesting hypothesis. The C's have repeatedly referred to the attempted invasion process as "amalgamation". What better way to "amalgamate" a susceptible society than to make them think that the "amalgamation" is just the process of their own technological 'evolution' and not the deliberate plan of some external malevolent entities? If this is the case, then it probably behooves us to pay attention to which mainstream disclosure advocates are asking questions about who or what is doing all the cattle and human mutilations and abductions.Moreover, it's possible there won't be any "aliens" at all. "Space craft"? Maybe, but in an increasingly hi-tech world, including military tech, any such craft may be superficially indistinguishable from human tech craft, and therefore much more acceptable.
Excellent interview. Pines is clearly very well-read on a wide range of topics.An some insightful commentary and response from Matthew Pines, who understands the workings of the intel world:
Maybe Corbell's line of inquiry is a little too "truthy" for some?Anyone here able to guess why?
What a gem he is!Ian Carroll gives a good round up of the recent spate of crazy events, and urges everyone to sit back and enjoy the show (watch to the end).

There was the 2016 Denis Villeneuve film, Arrival, that I have seen a couple of times:Something I've mentioned on the NJ drones thread, but bears repeating here I think; the only reference most people have for "aliens" and particularly "alien invasion", is Hollywood movies. In the large majority of those movies, the aliens are decidedly evil, with the plots being, more or less, humans fighting against and defeating the "aliens". I'm leaving out movies like ET etc. that present an alien as cuddly, since they don't involve invasions.
Two questions this brought up for me were:
1) why have so many alien invasion movies depicted the aliens as evil? Maybe it's just that the archetypal idea of being "invaded" has always been a negative one for human beings. Another possible answer is the in the second question.
2) Assuming it's possible for "thor's pantheum" types to influence human creative endeavors like movies (as suggested by the Cs), why have the script writers for most modern day alien invasion movies not been "influenced" to make the aliens a lot more friendly, and thus prepare the ground for widespread acceptance at some point in the future? Maybe it would involve some kind of crossing the line vis a vis free will. On the same idea, perhaps script writers of these movies have been influenced, but in a more protective/positive direction, to avoid widespread acceptance of any possible planned mass invasion.
Anyway, presuming any "aliens" are planning some kind of disclosure in the near future, and presuming they want to create a good impression on humanity when they do it (or in the process leading up to it), they would be well-advised to not present themselves in a way that even remotely resembles any themes from Hollywood movies about aliens.
Assuming these premises are true, then the process of reasoning above necessarily produces a conclusion that allows me to assert with 78.24% certainty that any future disclosure will not be along the lines of alien invasion themes as presented in Hollywood movies.
Moreover, it's possible there won't be any "aliens" at all. "Space craft"? Maybe, but in an increasingly hi-tech world, including military tech, any such craft may be superficially indistinguishable from human tech craft, and therefore much more acceptable.
I wonder if this is what they're gearing up to 'breathe into' the population when the time is right: 'love-bombing' them into surrendering (what's left of) their will and undergoing the final stage(s) of 'mind-amalgamation'.
The C's have repeatedly referred to the attempted invasion process as "amalgamation". What better way to "amalgamate" a susceptible society than to make them think that the "amalgamation" is just the process of their own technological 'evolution' and not the deliberate plan of some external malevolent entities?
Barber's wide-eyed description of being 'love-bombed', followed by his 'radiation sickness', are consistent with UFO encounters/abductions. Joe pointed out to me that those effects can also be induced by human tech, although for that to be the case you have to suppose an elaborate ruse to cause 'paranormal effects' in him so that his story makes for a more credible 'fake alien encounter'. I almost don't care about his mission that day, or whatever the 'egg' was. His description of the unusual change in his mental state during it is the interesting part. I wonder if this is what they're gearing up to 'breathe into' the population when the time is right: 'love-bombing' them into surrendering (what's left of) their will and undergoing the final stage(s) of 'mind-amalgamation'.