Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

axj said:
You are making claims about something you cannot possibly know. Yes, there is some evidence that Trump is not quite as bright, but there is also evidence that his heart is in the right place (including the C's saying the same).
Click to expand...
it depends how you define right place and where is your line between what is right and what is wrong
Just empty your mind from preconceived ideas and observe his actions, they speak volumes, and by his deeds you will know him
 
An article about why Reza Pahlavi won't be replacing the Ayatollah anytime soon.

The topic is the heir to the Iranian throne, why the Israelis are counting on him to replace Ayatollah Khamenei, and why it ain't gonna happen.
Click to expand...


www.sott.net

Shah-Mat

Dear Readers: My Readers being of the intellectual and cosmopolitan type, I don't need to explain the joke to them. About the Russian word "Shah-maty" (chess) deriving (well, ignore the French intermediary) ultimately from the Persian expression...
www.sott.net www.sott.net
 
Deneb said:
Just empty your mind from preconceived ideas and observe his actions, they speak volumes, and by his deeds you will know him
Click to expand...
What do you think we are doing here in these discussions?

When someone is making statements of fact about something he cannot possibly know for sure, it is a good idea for that person to look at one's own preconceived notions and beliefs.

Getting closer to the truth and more objective perception requires acknowledging what you do not know for sure.
 
So, the anonymous loser is correct in the assessment that US attack did not destroy what they said they destroyed, as we had been observing? But since he is a loser who has written false stories on CNN, does that mean that what they claimed was destroyed was actually destroyed? These political gymnastics are quite entertaining.

From RT Russian TC
The White House said the intelligence community's assessment of US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities "was classified, but was leaked to CNN by an anonymous loser anyway."

Earlier, the TV channel reported that, according to intelligence estimates, the US strikes did not result in the destruction of the main components of Tehran's nuclear program.
Click to expand...
 
iamthatis said:
Did you expect a Russian version of Top Gun? Putin has addressed this type of critique directly.



Aside from demilitarizing NATO for three years, I read this piece by Helmer and it suggests Russia has been involved in Iran specifically to some extent.

johnhelmer.net

“CONGRATULATIONS TO EVERYONE!” IN ROPE-A-DOPE STRATEGY, THE BELL ALSO SOUNDS FOR REST PERIODS

By John Helmer, Moscow @bears_with According to the Unified Rules of Boxing issued by the US Association of Boxing Commissions and Comb
johnhelmer.net
Click to expand...
I was expecting exactly what Russia did, and its nothing. Pakistan was threatening Israel, China sent some equipment, Trump, as we see now, seems to solved the situation, all that time Russia was shooting out Captain Obvious style statement such as "Its third world war, its bad for people...." and nothing else concrete.

We are expecting too much of Russia. Russia today is still not ready to be world power. That status means that you act on the maters of the whole world, which Russia still dont know how to do. Thats why I already wrote that Russia is "autistic empire", and it will be for some more time. That mean that they are big, but only look towards itself and see only problems and concerns that are only theirs, cant see anything else.

Russia can be spiritual power, leader of a change of the world (but they wont help you in your change, only if you use them as a exemplar and learn that way), but not military or economical power. For the whole role of Russia in the world we should wait for another 10 - 20 years. If it doesn't dissolve after Putin's death.

IMO, of course.
 
Russia only provides the S300/400 in Syria and Iran at locations where Russian scientists work. They are not there for the purpose of defending the countries in which they have those scientists working. That is of course subject to change, but would require a completely different arrangement.
 
Keit said:
Here's a comment by someone who supposedly has an inner knowledge regarding Middle East affairs (translated from Russian):



And this:
Click to expand...
I and others would strongly disagree with this sentiment on Netanyahu. It might be hard to see behind all the censorship in Israel, but I think the Israeli public got totally shell shocked with what happened. As Scott Ritter put it, the state of Israel fails when all those dual citizens go flying out of the country because they don't want to be subjected to this stuff and realize they are a target; when companies no longer want to relocate there because Iran can reach out and touch their headquarters. They had to keep their people from moving out for a reason and I bet people are already looking to get the hell out.

It is soon going to be apparent to everyone as negotiations start ramping up again and the state of the nuclear program get openly exposed (they did not do shit to it, and made it more likely they ARE COVERTLY PRODUCING A BOMB RIGHT NOW because the IAEA is no where to be seen), the danger is still there. That the war could restart any minute if Bibi does not like the way that negotiations are going and he sneak attacks again. And people will be thinking, what the fuck did we just do this for? Other than beating up Iran, while getting beat up themselves? And plus he clearly pissed Trump off. He was promised an easy regime change war and he now risks losing his base.

No, I think Netanyahu is the big loser, as well as Israel.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom